Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2023; 10; 1135452; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1135452

Flow-controlled expiration reduces positive end-expiratory pressure requirement in dorsally recumbent, anesthetized horses.

Abstract: Equine peri-anesthetic mortality is higher than that for other commonly anesthetized veterinary species. Unique equine pulmonary pathophysiologic aspects are believed to contribute to this mortality due to impairment of gas exchange and subsequent hypoxemia. No consistently reliable solution for the treatment of peri-anesthetic gas exchange impairment is available. Flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) is a ventilatory mode that linearizes gas flow throughout the expiratory phase, reducing the rate of lung emptying and alveolar collapse. FLEX has been shown to improve gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics in anesthetized horses. This study further evaluated FLEX ventilation in anesthetized horses positioned in dorsal recumbency, hypothesizing that after alveolar recruitment, horses ventilated using FLEX would require a lower positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent alveolar closure than horses conventionally ventilated. Unassigned: Twelve adult horses were used in this prospective, randomized study. Horses were assigned either to conventional volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or to FLEX. Following induction of general anesthesia, horses were placed in dorsal recumbency mechanically ventilated for a total of approximately 6.5 hours. Thirty-minutes after starting ventilation with VCV or FLEX, a PEEP-titration alveolar recruitment maneuver was performed at the end of which the PEEP was reduced in decrements of 3 cmH2O until the alveolar closure pressure was determined. The PEEP was then increased to the previous level and maintained for additional three hours. During this time, the mean arterial blood pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, central venous blood pressure, cardiac output (CO), dynamic respiratory system compliance and arterial blood gas values were measured. Unassigned: The alveolar closure pressure was significantly lower (6.5 ± 1.2 vs 11.0 ± 1.5 cmH2O) and significantly less PEEP was required to prevent alveolar closure (9.5 ± 1.2 vs 14.0 ± 1.5 cmH2O) for horses ventilated using FLEX compared with VCV. The CO was significantly higher in the horses ventilated with FLEX (37.5 ± 4 vs 30 ± 6 l/min). Unassigned: We concluded that FLEX ventilation was associated with a lower PEEP requirement due to a more homogenous distribution of ventilation in the lungs during expiration. This lower PEEP requirement led to more stable and improved cardiovascular conditions in horses ventilated with FLEX.
Publication Date: 2023-04-14 PubMed ID: 37124564PubMed Central: PMC10140341DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1135452Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated the effects of a ventilation method, called Flow-controlled Expiration (FLEX), on anesthetized horses placed in a dorsal position. It found that FLEX improved gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics, thus requiring less positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent alveolar closure and proved more favourable for the horses’ cardiovascular conditions when compared to traditional volume-controlled ventilation (VCV).

Methodology

  • The researchers conducted a prospective, randomized study that involved twelve adult horses.
  • Each horse was assigned randomly to either conventional volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or FLEX.
  • Upon administering general anesthesia, the horses were positioned dorsally and mechanically ventilated for a total duration of approximately 6.5 hours.
  • Thirty minutes into the ventilation with either VCV or FLEX, a PEEP-titration alveolar recruitment maneuver was performed. After this maneuver, the PEEP was reduced in decrements of 3 cmHO until the alveolar closure pressure was determined.
  • The PEEP was then raised back to the previous level and maintained for an additional three hours. During this period, various measurements were taken, including mean arterial blood pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, central venous blood pressure, cardiac output (CO), dynamic respiratory system compliance and arterial blood gas values.

Findings

  • The study found that the alveolar closure pressure was notably lower for horses ventilated using FLEX when compared to horses ventilated with VCV.
  • Additionally, less PEEP was required to prevent alveolar closure in horses ventilated using FLEX as compared to VCV.
  • The cardiac output (the quantity of blood being pumped by the heart per minute) was also significantly higher in the horses ventilated using the FLEX modality. This indicates a more robust cardiovascular condition in the horses ventilated with FLEX.

Conclusion

  • Based on the results, the researchers concluded that FLEX ventilation provides a lower PEEP requirement due to a more homogenous distribution of ventilation in the lungs during expiration.
  • The lower PEEP requirement implies better lung function and gas exchange in anesthetized horses under FLEX ventilation.
  • The improvement in cardiac output also suggested that the FLEX method has added benefits of maintaining a better cardiovascular condition in the horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Brandly JE, Midon M, Douglas HF, Hopster K. (2023). Flow-controlled expiration reduces positive end-expiratory pressure requirement in dorsally recumbent, anesthetized horses. Front Vet Sci, 10, 1135452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1135452

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Pages: 1135452

Researcher Affiliations

Brandly, Jerrianne E
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA, United States.
Midon, Monica
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA, United States.
Douglas, Hope F
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA, United States.
Hopster, Klaus
  • Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA, United States.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 54 references
  1. Dugdale AH, Taylor PM. Equine anaesthesia-associated mortality: where are we now?. Vet Anaesth Analg (2016) 43:242–55.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12372pubmed: 26970940google scholar: lookup
  2. Johnston G, Eastment J, Wood J, Taylor P. The confidential enquiry into perioperative equine fatalities (CEPEF): mortality results of phases 1 and 2. Vet Anaesth and Analg (2002) 29:159–70.
  3. Costa-Farré C, Prades M, Ribera T, Valero O, Taurà P. Does intraoperative low arterial partial pressure of oxygen increase the risk of surgical site infection following emergency exploratory laparotomy in horses?. Vet J (1997) 2014) 200:175–80.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.01.029pubmed: 24582131google scholar: lookup
  4. Ruegg M, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Hartnack S, Junge HK, Theiss F, Ringer SK. Comparison of non-assisted versus head and tail rope-assisted recovery after emergency abdominal surgery in horses. Pferdeheilkunde (2016) 32:469–78.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20160508google scholar: lookup
  5. Nyman G, Funkquist B, Kvart C, Frostell C, Tokics L, Strandberg Å. Atelectasis causes gas exchange impairment in the anaesthetised horse. Equine Vet J (1990) 22:317–24.
  6. Sorenson PR, Robinson NE. Postural effects on lung volumes and asynchronous ventilation in anesthetized horses. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol (1980) 48:97–103.
    doi: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.1.97pubmed: 7353982google scholar: lookup
  7. Stack A, Derksen F, Williams K, Robinson E, Jackson W. Lung region and racing affect mechanical properties of equine pulmonary microvasculature. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol (2014) 117:370–6.
  8. Nyman G, Hedenstierna G. Ventilation-perfusion relationships in the anaesthetised horse. Equine Vet. J. (1989) 21:274–81.
  9. Shander A, Fleisher LA, Barie PS, Bigatello LM, Sladen RN, Watson CB. Clinical and economic burden of postoperative pulmonary complications: patient safety summit on definition, risk-reducing interventions, and preventive strategies*. Crit. Care Med. (2011) 39:2163–72.
    doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821f0522pubmed: 21572323google scholar: lookup
  10. Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, Kor DJ, Subramaniam B, Martinez Ruiz R. Postoperative pulmonary complications, early mortality, and hospital stay following noncardiothoracic surgery: a multicenter study by the perioperative research network investigators. JAMA Surg. (2017) 152:157–66.
    doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065pmc: PMC5334462pubmed: 27829093google scholar: lookup
  11. Raphel CF, Beech J. Pleuritis secondary to pneumonia or lung abscessation in 90 horses. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. (1982) 181:808–10.
    pubmed: 7141978
  12. Estell KE, Young A, Kozikowski T, Swain EA, Byrne BA, Reilly CM. Pneumonia caused by Klebsiella spp. in 46 horses. J. Vet. Intern. Med. (2015) 30:314–21.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.13653pmc: PMC4913652pubmed: 26492860google scholar: lookup
  13. Laurenza C, Ansart L, Portier K. Risk factors of anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity in one equine hospital: a retrospective study on 1, 161 cases undergoing elective or emergency surgeries. Front Vet Sci (2020) 6:6.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00514pmc: PMC6990105pubmed: 32039253google scholar: lookup
  14. Wettstein D, Moens Y, Jaeggin-Schmucker N, Bohn SH, Ulrich Rothen H, Mosing M. Effects of an alveolar recruitment maneuver on cardiovascular and respiratory parameters during total intravenous anesthesia in ponies. Am. J. Vet. Res. (2006) 67:152–9.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.67.1.152pubmed: 16426225google scholar: lookup
  15. Hopster K, Kästner SB, Rohn K, Ohnesorge B. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation with constant positive end-expiratory pressure and alveolar recruitment manoeuvre during inhalation anaesthesia in horses undergoing surgery for colic, and its influence on the early recovery period. Vet Anaesth and Analg (2011) 38:169–77.
  16. Hopster K, Rohn K, Ohnesorge B, Kästner SBR. Controlled mechanical ventilation with constant positive end-expiratory pressure and alveolar recruitment manoeuvres during anaesthesia in laterally or dorsally recumbent horses. Vet Anaesth and Analg (2017) 44:121–6.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12390pubmed: 27251105google scholar: lookup
  17. Hopster K, Wogatzki A, Geburek F, Conze P, Kästner SBR. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure titration on intestinal oxygenation and perfusion in isoflurane anaesthetised horses. Equine Vet. J. (2016) 49:250–6.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12555pubmed: 26729233google scholar: lookup
  18. Tremblay LN, Slutsky AS. Ventilator-induced lung injury: from the bench to the bedside. Intensive Care Med. (2006) 32:24–33.
    doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2817-8pubmed: 16231069google scholar: lookup
  19. Maeda Y, Fujino Y, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Nishimura M. Effects of peak inspiratory flow on development of ventilator-induced lung injury in rabbits. Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) (2004) 101:722–8.
  20. Wilson DV, Soma LR. Cardiopulmonary effects of positive end-expiratory pressure in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated ponies. Am. J. Vet. Res. (1990) 51:734–9.
    pubmed: 2186677
  21. Lenfant C, Howell BJ. Cardiovascular adjustments in dogs during continuous pressure breathing. J. Appl. Physiol. (1960) 15:425–8.
    doi: 10.1152/jappl.1960.15.3.425pubmed: 14415661google scholar: lookup
  22. Lessard MR, Guérot E, Lorino H, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Effects of pressure-controlled with different I:E ratios versus volume-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamics in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology (1994) 80:983–91.
  23. Campbell RS, Davis BR. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation: does it matter?. Respir. Care. (2002) 47:416–6.
    pubmed: 11929615
  24. Schumann S, Goebel U, Haberstroh J, Vimlati L, Schneider M, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M. Determination of respiratory system mechanics during inspiration and expiration by FLow-controlled EXpiration (FLEX): a pilot study in anesthetized pigs. Minerva Anesthesiol. (2014) 80:19–28.
    pubmed: 24193175
  25. Goebel U, Haberstroh J, Foerster K, Dassow C, Priebe H, Guttmann J. Flow-controlled expiration: a novel ventilation mode to attenuate experimental porcine lung injury. Br. J. Anaesth. (2014) 113:474–83.
    doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu058pubmed: 24694683google scholar: lookup
  26. Borgmann S, Schmidt J, Goebel U, Haberstroh J, Guttmann J, Schumann S. Dorsal recruitment with flow-controlled expiration (FLEX): an experimental study in mechanically ventilated lung-healthy and lung-injured pigs. Crit. Care. (2018) 22:245.
    doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2168-9pmc: PMC6162883pubmed: 30268138google scholar: lookup
  27. Wirth S, Springer S, Spaeth J, Borgmann S, Goebel U, Schumann S. Application of the novel ventilation mode FLow-controlled EXpiration (FLEX): a crossover proof-of-principle study in lung-healthy patients. Anesth. Analg. (2017) 125:1246–52.
    doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001991pubmed: 28368939google scholar: lookup
  28. Fry DL, Hyatt RE. Pulmonary mechanics. A unified analysis of the relationship between pressure, volume and gas flow in the lungs of normal and diseased human subjects. Am. J. Med. (1960) 29:672–89.
    doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(60)90100-5pubmed: 13702319google scholar: lookup
  29. Nucci G, Suki B, Lutchen K. Modeling airflow-related shear stress during heterogeneous constriction and mechanical ventilation. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2003) 95:348–56.
  30. dos Santos CC, Slutsky AS. The contribution of biophysical lung injury to the development of biotrauma. Annu. Rev. Physiol. (2006) 68:585–618.
  31. Weber J, Straka L, Borgmann S, Schmidt J, Wirth S, Schumann S. Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) improves regional ventilation in obese patients – a randomized controlled crossover trial. BMC Anesthesiol. (2020) 20:24.
    doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-0944-ypmc: PMC6986135pubmed: 31992213google scholar: lookup
  32. Hopster K, Hurcombe SD, Simpson K, VanderBroek AR, Driessen B. Flow-controlled expiration improves respiratory mechanics, ventilation, and gas exchange in anesthetized horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. (2022) 83:393–8.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.21.10.0158pubmed: 35175934google scholar: lookup
  33. Hopster K, D○ LR, Hopster-Iversen CCS, Driessen B. Efficacy of an alveolar recruitment maneuver for improving gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics in anesthetized horses ventilated with oxygen or a helium-oxygen mixture. Am. J. Vet. Res. (2018) 79:1021–7.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.79.10.1021pubmed: 30256141google scholar: lookup
  34. Steffey EP, Eisele JH, Baggot JD. Interactions of morphine and isoflurane in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. (2003) 64:166–75.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.166pubmed: 12602585google scholar: lookup
  35. Steffey EP, Pascoe PJ, Woliner MJ, Berryman ER. Effects of xylazine hydrochloride during isoflurane-induced anesthesia in horses. Am. J. Vet. Res. (2000) 61:1225–31.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.1225pubmed: 11039552google scholar: lookup
  36. Kerr CL, McDonell WN. Oxygen Supplementation and Ventilatory Support. Equine Anesthesia StLouis. Netherland: Elsevier; (2009). p. 332–352.
  37. Moens YPS, Gootjes P, Ionita J, Heinonen E, Schatzmann U. In vitro validation of a pitot-based flow meter for the measurement of respiratory volume and flow in large animal anaesthesia. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. (2009) 36:209–19.
  38. Ambrisko TD, Schramel J, Hopster K, Kästner S, Moens Y. Assessment of distribution of ventilation and regional lung compliance by electrical impedance tomography in anaesthetized horses undergoing alveolar recruitment manoeuvres. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. (2017) 44:264–72.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.03.001pubmed: 28237681google scholar: lookup
  39. Suarez-Sipmann F, Böhm SH, Tusman G, Pesch T, Thamm O, Reissmann H. Use of dynamic compliance for open lung positive end-expiratory pressure titration in an experimental study. Crit. Care Med. (2007) 35:214–21.
  40. Boehme S, Bentley AH, Hartmann EK, Chang S, Erdoes G, Prinzing A. Influence of inspiration to expiration ratio on cyclic recruitment and derecruitment of atelectasis in a saline lavage model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care Med. (2015) 43:e65–74.
    doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000788pubmed: 25513783google scholar: lookup
  41. Lachmann B. Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Med. (1992) 18:319–21.
    doi: 10.1007/BF01694358pubmed: 1469157google scholar: lookup
  42. Richardson P, Jarriel S, Hansen TN. Mechanics of the respiratory system during passive exhalation in preterm lambs. Pediatr. Res. (1989) 26:425–8.
  43. Wenzel C, Frey C, Schmidt J, Lozano-Zahonero S, Urban G, Schumann S. A linearized expiration flow homogenizes the compartmental pressure distribution in a physical model of the inhomogeneous respiratory system. Physiol. Meas. (2020) 41:1–7.
    doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab83e6pubmed: 32213677google scholar: lookup
  44. Cournand A, Motley HL. Physiological studies of the effects of intermittent positive pressure breathing on cardiac output in man. Am. J. Phys. (1948) 152:162–74.
  45. Krismer AC, Wenzel V, Lindner KH, Haslinger CW, Oroszy S, Stadlbauer KH. Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation on survival during severe hemorrhagic shock. Ann. Emerg. Med. (2005) 46:337–42.
  46. Dancker C, Hopster K, Rohn K, Kästner SB. Effects of dobutamine, dopamine, phenylephrine and noradrenaline on systemic haemodynamics and intestinal perfusion in isoflurane anaesthetised horses. Equine Vet. J. (2018) 50:104–10.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12721pubmed: 28710899google scholar: lookup
  47. Mead J, Takishima T, Leith D. Stress distribution in lungs: a model of pulmonary elasticity. J. Appl. Physiol. (1970) 28:596–608.
    doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.28.5.596pubmed: 5442255google scholar: lookup
  48. Retamal J, Bergamini BC, Carvalho AR, Bozza FA, Borzone G, Borges JB. Non-lobar atelectasis generates inflammation and structural alveolar injury in the surrounding healthy tissue during mechanical ventilation. Crit. Care. (2014) 18:505–1.
    doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0505-1pmc: PMC4172813pubmed: 25200702google scholar: lookup
  49. Hess DR. Recruitment maneuvers and PEEP titration. Respir. Care. (2015) 60:1688–704.
    doi: 10.4187/respcare.04409pubmed: 26493593google scholar: lookup
  50. Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GFJ, Caramez MPR, Arantes PR, Barros F. Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. (2006) 174:268–78.
    doi: 10.1164/rccm.200506-976OCpubmed: 16690982google scholar: lookup
  51. Wolf SJ, Reske AP, Hammermüller S, Costa ELV, Spieth PM, Hepp P. Correlation of lung collapse and gas exchange - a computer tomographic study in sheep and pigs with atelectasis in otherwise normal lungs. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0135272.
  52. Tusman G, Böhm SH, Warner DO, Sprung J. Atelectasis and perioperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. (2012) 25:1–10.
    doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834dd1ebpubmed: 22113182google scholar: lookup
  53. Gernoth C, Wagner G, Pelosi P, Luecke T. Respiratory and haemodynamic changes during decremental open lung positive end-expiratory pressure titration in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care. (2009) 13:R59.
    doi: 10.1186/cc7786pmc: PMC2689506pubmed: 19374751google scholar: lookup
  54. Floriano D, Hopster K, Driessen B. Accuracy of tidal volume delivery by five different models of large-animal ventilators. Am. J. Vet. Res. (2020) 81:857–64.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.81.11.857pubmed: 33107749google scholar: lookup