Abstract: Equine peri-anesthetic mortality is higher than that for other commonly anesthetized veterinary species. Unique equine pulmonary pathophysiologic aspects are believed to contribute to this mortality due to impairment of gas exchange and subsequent hypoxemia. No consistently reliable solution for the treatment of peri-anesthetic gas exchange impairment is available. Flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) is a ventilatory mode that linearizes gas flow throughout the expiratory phase, reducing the rate of lung emptying and alveolar collapse. FLEX has been shown to improve gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics in anesthetized horses. This study further evaluated FLEX ventilation in anesthetized horses positioned in dorsal recumbency, hypothesizing that after alveolar recruitment, horses ventilated using FLEX would require a lower positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent alveolar closure than horses conventionally ventilated. Unassigned: Twelve adult horses were used in this prospective, randomized study. Horses were assigned either to conventional volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or to FLEX. Following induction of general anesthesia, horses were placed in dorsal recumbency mechanically ventilated for a total of approximately 6.5 hours. Thirty-minutes after starting ventilation with VCV or FLEX, a PEEP-titration alveolar recruitment maneuver was performed at the end of which the PEEP was reduced in decrements of 3 cmH2O until the alveolar closure pressure was determined. The PEEP was then increased to the previous level and maintained for additional three hours. During this time, the mean arterial blood pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, central venous blood pressure, cardiac output (CO), dynamic respiratory system compliance and arterial blood gas values were measured. Unassigned: The alveolar closure pressure was significantly lower (6.5 ± 1.2 vs 11.0 ± 1.5 cmH2O) and significantly less PEEP was required to prevent alveolar closure (9.5 ± 1.2 vs 14.0 ± 1.5 cmH2O) for horses ventilated using FLEX compared with VCV. The CO was significantly higher in the horses ventilated with FLEX (37.5 ± 4 vs 30 ± 6 l/min). Unassigned: We concluded that FLEX ventilation was associated with a lower PEEP requirement due to a more homogenous distribution of ventilation in the lungs during expiration. This lower PEEP requirement led to more stable and improved cardiovascular conditions in horses ventilated with FLEX.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research investigated the effects of a ventilation method, called Flow-controlled Expiration (FLEX), on anesthetized horses placed in a dorsal position. It found that FLEX improved gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics, thus requiring less positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent alveolar closure and proved more favourable for the horses’ cardiovascular conditions when compared to traditional volume-controlled ventilation (VCV).
Methodology
The researchers conducted a prospective, randomized study that involved twelve adult horses.
Each horse was assigned randomly to either conventional volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or FLEX.
Upon administering general anesthesia, the horses were positioned dorsally and mechanically ventilated for a total duration of approximately 6.5 hours.
Thirty minutes into the ventilation with either VCV or FLEX, a PEEP-titration alveolar recruitment maneuver was performed. After this maneuver, the PEEP was reduced in decrements of 3 cmHO until the alveolar closure pressure was determined.
The PEEP was then raised back to the previous level and maintained for an additional three hours. During this period, various measurements were taken, including mean arterial blood pressure, pulmonary arterial pressure, central venous blood pressure, cardiac output (CO), dynamic respiratory system compliance and arterial blood gas values.
Findings
The study found that the alveolar closure pressure was notably lower for horses ventilated using FLEX when compared to horses ventilated with VCV.
Additionally, less PEEP was required to prevent alveolar closure in horses ventilated using FLEX as compared to VCV.
The cardiac output (the quantity of blood being pumped by the heart per minute) was also significantly higher in the horses ventilated using the FLEX modality. This indicates a more robust cardiovascular condition in the horses ventilated with FLEX.
Conclusion
Based on the results, the researchers concluded that FLEX ventilation provides a lower PEEP requirement due to a more homogenous distribution of ventilation in the lungs during expiration.
The lower PEEP requirement implies better lung function and gas exchange in anesthetized horses under FLEX ventilation.
The improvement in cardiac output also suggested that the FLEX method has added benefits of maintaining a better cardiovascular condition in the horses.
Cite This Article
APA
Brandly JE, Midon M, Douglas HF, Hopster K.
(2023).
Flow-controlled expiration reduces positive end-expiratory pressure requirement in dorsally recumbent, anesthetized horses.
Front Vet Sci, 10, 1135452.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1135452
Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA, United States.
Midon, Monica
Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA, United States.
Douglas, Hope F
Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA, United States.
Hopster, Klaus
Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA, United States.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Ruegg M, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Hartnack S, Junge HK, Theiss F, Ringer SK. Comparison of non-assisted versus head and tail rope-assisted recovery after emergency abdominal surgery in horses. Pferdeheilkunde (2016) 32:469–78.
Fernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, Kor DJ, Subramaniam B, Martinez Ruiz R. Postoperative pulmonary complications, early mortality, and hospital stay following noncardiothoracic surgery: a multicenter study by the perioperative research network investigators. JAMA Surg. (2017) 152:157–66.
Laurenza C, Ansart L, Portier K. Risk factors of anesthesia-related mortality and morbidity in one equine hospital: a retrospective study on 1, 161 cases undergoing elective or emergency surgeries. Front Vet Sci (2020) 6:6.
Maeda Y, Fujino Y, Uchiyama A, Matsuura N, Mashimo T, Nishimura M. Effects of peak inspiratory flow on development of ventilator-induced lung injury in rabbits. Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) (2004) 101:722–8.
Lessard MR, Guérot E, Lorino H, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Effects of pressure-controlled with different I:E ratios versus volume-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamics in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology (1994) 80:983–91.
Schumann S, Goebel U, Haberstroh J, Vimlati L, Schneider M, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M. Determination of respiratory system mechanics during inspiration and expiration by FLow-controlled EXpiration (FLEX): a pilot study in anesthetized pigs. Minerva Anesthesiol. (2014) 80:19–28.
Borgmann S, Schmidt J, Goebel U, Haberstroh J, Guttmann J, Schumann S. Dorsal recruitment with flow-controlled expiration (FLEX): an experimental study in mechanically ventilated lung-healthy and lung-injured pigs. Crit. Care. (2018) 22:245.
Wirth S, Springer S, Spaeth J, Borgmann S, Goebel U, Schumann S. Application of the novel ventilation mode FLow-controlled EXpiration (FLEX): a crossover proof-of-principle study in lung-healthy patients. Anesth. Analg. (2017) 125:1246–52.
Fry DL, Hyatt RE. Pulmonary mechanics. A unified analysis of the relationship between pressure, volume and gas flow in the lungs of normal and diseased human subjects. Am. J. Med. (1960) 29:672–89.
Kerr CL, McDonell WN. Oxygen Supplementation and Ventilatory Support. Equine Anesthesia StLouis. Netherland: Elsevier; (2009). p. 332–352.
Moens YPS, Gootjes P, Ionita J, Heinonen E, Schatzmann U. In vitro validation of a pitot-based flow meter for the measurement of respiratory volume and flow in large animal anaesthesia. Vet. Anaesth. Analg. (2009) 36:209–19.
Suarez-Sipmann F, Böhm SH, Tusman G, Pesch T, Thamm O, Reissmann H. Use of dynamic compliance for open lung positive end-expiratory pressure titration in an experimental study. Crit. Care Med. (2007) 35:214–21.
Boehme S, Bentley AH, Hartmann EK, Chang S, Erdoes G, Prinzing A. Influence of inspiration to expiration ratio on cyclic recruitment and derecruitment of atelectasis in a saline lavage model of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care Med. (2015) 43:e65–74.
Wenzel C, Frey C, Schmidt J, Lozano-Zahonero S, Urban G, Schumann S. A linearized expiration flow homogenizes the compartmental pressure distribution in a physical model of the inhomogeneous respiratory system. Physiol. Meas. (2020) 41:1–7.
Cournand A, Motley HL. Physiological studies of the effects of intermittent positive pressure breathing on cardiac output in man. Am. J. Phys. (1948) 152:162–74.
Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GFJ, Caramez MPR, Arantes PR, Barros F. Reversibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. (2006) 174:268–78.
Wolf SJ, Reske AP, Hammermüller S, Costa ELV, Spieth PM, Hepp P. Correlation of lung collapse and gas exchange - a computer tomographic study in sheep and pigs with atelectasis in otherwise normal lungs. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0135272.
Floriano D, Hopster K, Driessen B. Accuracy of tidal volume delivery by five different models of large-animal ventilators. Am. J. Vet. Res. (2020) 81:857–64.
Tan J, Bao CM, Chen XY. Lung ultrasound score evaluation of the effect of pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed on patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024 Jun 27;16(6):1717-1725.
Bukoski A, Downs J, Hodgson DS, Le-Bert CR, Thomen R, Flors L, Thombs L, Bailey J. Cardiopulmonary effects of apneustic anesthesia ventilation in anesthetized pigs: a new mode of ventilation for anesthetized veterinary species. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1378617.