Analyze Diet
Veterinary microbiology2024; 295; 110167; doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110167

Foals of mares vaccinated for Hendra virus have a suboptimal response to HeV vaccination.

Abstract: Hendra virus (HeV) is lethal to horses and a zoonotic threat to humans in Australia, causing severe neurological and/or respiratory disease with high mortality. An equine vaccine has been available since 2012. Foals acquire antibodies from their dams by ingesting colostrum after parturition, therefore it is assumed that foals of mares vaccinated against HeV will have passive HeV antibodies circulating during the first several months of life until they are actively vaccinated. However, no studies have yet examined passive or active immunity against HeV in foals. Here, we investigated anti-HeV antibody levels in vaccinated mares and their foals. Testing for HeV neutralising antibodies is cumbersome due to the requirement for Biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) containment to conduct virus neutralisation tests (VNT). For this study, a subset of samples was tested for HeV G-specific antibodies by both an authentic VNT with infectious HeV and a microsphere-based immunoassay (MIA), revealing a strong correlation. An indicative neutralising level was then applied to the results of a larger sample set tested using the MIA. Mares had high levels of HeV-specific neutralising antibodies at the time of parturition. Foals acquired high levels of maternal antibodies which then waned to below predictive protective levels in most foals by 6 months old when vaccination commenced. Foals showed a suboptimal response to vaccination, suggesting maternal antibodies may interfere with active vaccination. The correlation analysis between the authentic HeV VNT and HeV MIA will enable further high throughput serological studies to inform optimal vaccination protocols for both broodmares and foals.
Publication Date: 2024-06-27 PubMed ID: 38954881DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110167Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study examined how baby horses (foals) born to mares vaccinated against Hendra virus (HeV) respond to their own HeV vaccinations.
  • It found that foals initially receive protective antibodies from their mothers but respond poorly to their own vaccinations, likely due to interference from maternal antibodies.

Background on Hendra Virus and Vaccination

  • Hendra virus (HeV) is a highly lethal virus affecting horses and can be transmitted to humans, causing serious neurological and respiratory illness with high death rates in Australia.
  • An equine vaccine against HeV has been available since 2012 to protect horses from infection.
  • Foals receive maternal antibodies by ingesting colostrum (first milk) shortly after birth, providing early passive immunity during the first months of life.
  • It was assumed foals of vaccinated mares have sufficient circulating antibodies to protect them until they can be actively vaccinated.
  • Prior to this study, no research had been conducted on passive immunity (maternal antibody levels) or active immunity (foals’ own response) against HeV in foals.

Objectives and Methods of the Study

  • The study aimed to investigate anti-HeV antibody levels both in vaccinated mares at parturition and in their foals over the first six months of life.
  • Testing for HeV neutralising antibodies usually requires Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) facilities due to the infectious virus used in virus neutralisation tests (VNT), which are complex and high containment.
  • The researchers used two methods to measure HeV antibodies:
    • Authentic Virus Neutralisation Test (VNT) using infectious HeV at BSL-4.
    • Microsphere-Based Immunoassay (MIA) detecting antibodies against the HeV glycoprotein (G protein), which is safer and easier to perform.
  • A subset of samples was tested using both methods to validate the MIA by demonstrating a strong correlation with VNT results.
  • This correlation allowed researchers to use MIA results as an indicator of neutralising antibody levels in a larger sample set.

Key Findings

  • Mares at the time of parturition had high levels of neutralising antibodies against HeV due to vaccination.
  • Foals acquired high levels of maternal antibodies shortly after birth through colostrum.
  • These maternal antibodies declined over time, dropping below the levels predictive of protection in most foals by the age of 6 months, which is when foal vaccination typically begins.
  • Foals demonstrated a suboptimal immune response to their own HeV vaccinations.
  • This reduced response is likely because maternal antibodies interfere with the foals’ ability to mount an effective active immunity when vaccinated.

Implications of the Study

  • The interference by maternal antibodies with foal vaccination suggests current vaccination protocols may not induce sufficient protection in young foals.
  • The validated microsphere-based immunoassay (MIA) provides a reliable, high-throughput method to assess HeV antibody levels without requiring BSL-4 containment.
  • This MIA tool can facilitate further serological studies on larger populations of horses to optimize timing and strategies for vaccinating both pregnant mares and their foals.
  • Optimizing vaccine protocols could improve passive and active immunity, potentially reducing risk of HeV infection in foals and breaking a window of vulnerability.

Cite This Article

APA
Carey KJ, Smith I, Barr J, Caruso S, Au GG, Hartley CA, Bailey KE, Perriam W, Broder CC, Gilkerson JR. (2024). Foals of mares vaccinated for Hendra virus have a suboptimal response to HeV vaccination. Vet Microbiol, 295, 110167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110167

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2542
NlmUniqueID: 7705469
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 295
Pages: 110167
PII: S0378-1135(24)00189-5

Researcher Affiliations

Carey, Kimberley J
  • Centre for Equine Infectious Disease, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Corner Park Drive and Flemington Road, Building 400, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Smith, Ina
  • CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Black Mountain Laboratories, Clunies Ross Street,Black Mountain, ACT 2601, Australia.
Barr, Jennifer
  • CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP), 5 Portarlington Road, East Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Caruso, Sarah
  • CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP), 5 Portarlington Road, East Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Au, Gough G
  • CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP), 5 Portarlington Road, East Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Hartley, Carol A
  • Centre for Equine Infectious Disease, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Corner Park Drive and Flemington Road, Building 400, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Bailey, Kirsten E
  • Centre for Equine Infectious Disease, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Corner Park Drive and Flemington Road, Building 400, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Perriam, Wendy
  • Gundy Veterinary Services, 898 Gundy Road, Scone, NSW 2337, Australia.
Broder, Christopher C
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States.
Gilkerson, James R
  • Centre for Equine Infectious Disease, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Corner Park Drive and Flemington Road, Building 400, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia. Electronic address: jrgilk@unimelb.edu.au.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Hendra Virus / immunology
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Horse Diseases / immunology
  • Antibodies, Viral / blood
  • Henipavirus Infections / prevention & control
  • Henipavirus Infections / veterinary
  • Henipavirus Infections / immunology
  • Henipavirus Infections / virology
  • Female
  • Vaccination / veterinary
  • Viral Vaccines / immunology
  • Viral Vaccines / administration & dosage
  • Antibodies, Neutralizing / blood
  • Immunity, Maternally-Acquired
  • Animals, Newborn / immunology
  • Pregnancy
  • Neutralization Tests / veterinary
  • Australia
  • Colostrum / immunology

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. McNabb L, McMahon A, Woube EG, Agnihotri K, Colling A, Broder CC, Kucinskaite-Kodze I, Petraityte-Burneikiene R, Bowden TR, Halpin K. Development and Validation of a Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals (DIVA) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Strategy for Distinguishing Between Hendra-Infected and Vaccinated Horses.. Viruses 2025 Feb 28;17(3).
    doi: 10.3390/v17030354pubmed: 40143282google scholar: lookup