Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(5); 784; doi: 10.3390/ani14050784

Forced Handling Decreases Emotionality but Does Not Improve Young Horses’ Responses toward Humans and their Adaptability to Stress.

Abstract: Horses are often still exposed to stressful or inadequate conditions and difficult relationships with humans, despite growing concerns about animal welfare. In the present study, we investigated the impact of different approaches of short-term handling sessions on young Lusitanian horses raised on a high-breed farm, specifically on their later adaptability to humans and stressful environments. Thirty-one foals (3 months old ± 15 days), from both sexes, were separated into three groups, one submitted to 3 consecutive days of handling sessions (Int-H), another to one handling session each month for 3 months (Month-H), and one left undisturbed (control). At 8 months old ± 15 days, all foals were evaluated during behavioral tests (restraint in a stock and forced-person test). Evaluations were based on behavioral observations and physiological assessments. The handled foals (Int-H and Month-H) reacted less to being isolated and restrained and better tolerated human contact and veterinary procedures than the control ones. The handled foals displayed less evasive and negative behaviors toward human approach, but also sought less human contact and did not interact, regardless of the handling timeframe. All animals displayed signs of stress when restrained in the stock, with increased neutrophil counts and CHCM levels in the blood, and no differences in metabolic (CK and LDH) and other hematological parameters. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was significantly higher ( < 0.05) in handled foals than in control ones, suggesting low standards of welfare. Our data suggest that early forced handling decreases fearfulness in new environments; however, it does not improve the horses' relationship with humans, and it decreases welfare.
Publication Date: 2024-03-02 PubMed ID: 38473169DOI: 10.3390/ani14050784Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper explores the impact of different handling methods on young Lusitanian horses’ response to humans and stress. The study indicates that while early forceful handling reduces fear, it does not improve the horses’ relationship with humans and adversely affects their welfare.

Background and Methodology

  • The researchers expressed concern for the horse’s welfare against the backdrop of stressful or unsuitable circumstances, and unfavourable interactions with humans.
  • The study’s subject consisted of young Lusitanian horses raised on a high-breed farm.
  • A total of thirty-one foals, aged 3 months old ± 15 days, were divided into one of three groups: one that underwent handling sessions over three consecutive days (Int-H), another that received monthly handling sessions for three months (Month-H), and a control group that was left untouched.
  • The foals’ behaviours and physiological tendencies were assessed when they were 8 months old ± 15 days during a series of behavioural tests including restraint in a stock and forced-person test.

Findings and Interpretation

  • The study deduced that the foals that underwent handling sessions (both Int-H and Month-H) reacted less when isolated and restrained. They also better tolerated human interaction and veterinary procedures when compared to the control group.
  • Nevertheless, despite displaying less evasive and negative behaviour towards human approach, the handled foals showed less interest in human contact and did not interact, regardless of the duration of handling.
  • All animals indicated stress markers when restrained in the stock through blood analysis. There was an increase in neutrophil counts and corpuscular haemoglobin concentration mean (CHCM) levels, but no differences in the metabolic parameters such as creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), or other hematological parameters.
  • The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in the handled foals was significantly higher than in the control ones, hinting towards poor welfare standards.
  • The findings led researchers to imply that although early forced handling lessens the fearfulness in new environments, it fails to enhance the horses’ interaction with humans and in fact, brings down their welfare standards.

Cite This Article

APA
Pereira-Figueiredo I, Rosa I, Sancho Sanchez C. (2024). Forced Handling Decreases Emotionality but Does Not Improve Young Horses’ Responses toward Humans and their Adaptability to Stress. Animals (Basel), 14(5), 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050784

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 5
PII: 784

Researcher Affiliations

Pereira-Figueiredo, Inês
  • Neuroscience Institute of Castilla y León, University of Salamanca, C. Pintor Fernando Gallego, 1, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
  • Thekidsfellows-Research Group in Anthrozoology, 6060-309 Idanha-a-Nova, Portugal.
Rosa, Ilda
  • Thekidsfellows-Research Group in Anthrozoology, 6060-309 Idanha-a-Nova, Portugal.
  • Animal Behaviour and Welfare Laboratory, Center of Interdisciplinary Investigation in Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lisbon, 1300-477 Lisbon, Portugal.
Sancho Sanchez, Consuelo
  • Neuroscience Institute of Castilla y León, University of Salamanca, C. Pintor Fernando Gallego, 1, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
  • Thekidsfellows-Research Group in Anthrozoology, 6060-309 Idanha-a-Nova, Portugal.
  • Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.

Grant Funding

  • 2010, Nu00ba GG/GGP/ME611-0166/05. / POCI

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.