Analyze Diet
Andrologia2016; 48(9); 900-906; doi: 10.1111/and.12530

Freeze-dried stallion spermatozoa: evaluation of two chelating agents and comparative analysis of three sperm DNA damage assays.

Abstract: During the freeze-drying procedure, sperm DNA might become damaged by both freezing and drying stresses. Sperm DNA status can be detected using well-established assays; however, most techniques are expensive and involve elaborate protocols and equipment. Indirect assessments can provide alternative strategies. The objective of this study was to compare a simple test of DNA status using Diff-Quik (DQ) with two established procedures: acridine orange test (AOT) and sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) on freeze-dried (FD) stallion spermatozoa. Ejaculated spermatozoa from three stallions were freeze-dried in basic medium supplemented with two different chelating agents: EGTA or EDTA. After rehydration, the spermatozoa were subjected to DNA damage detection using a SCDt, AOT and DQ stain simultaneously. The results showed that the DNA damage levels in the EGTA group were significantly lower than those in the EDTA group. AOT detected a significantly higher proportion of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA than DQ and SCD. The results of the SCD test and DQ stain exhibited a significant positive correlation for DNA fragmentation (r = 0.528), whereas a negative correlation was observed between SCD, DQ and AOT (r = -0.134 and r = -0.332 respectively). The present study shows that both the SCD test and DQ assay are effective methods for detecting FD stallion sperm DNA fragmentation, whereas using of AOT is questionable.
Publication Date: 2016-01-24 PubMed ID: 26804066DOI: 10.1111/and.12530Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research involves an examination of two chelating agents and three sperm DNA damage assays of frozen-dried stallion spermatozoa. The study revealed both the SCD test and DQ assay are effective methods for detecting DNA fragmentation in the cells, and it was noted that the use of AOT for this purpose could be questionable.

Investigating Stallion Spermatozoa and Chelating Agents

  • The study began with freeze-drying ejaculated spermatozoa from three stallions. This procedure involves both freezing and drying the cell, which can lead to sperm DNA damage, a commonly observed problem.
  • The spermatozoa were freeze-dried using a basic medium with either EGTA or EDTA, two different chelating agents. Chelating agents are substances which can seek out and bind with certain metal ions, creating a complex that can be more easily excreted from the body. They can play a crucial role in protecting cells from damage during processes like freeze-drying.
  • The freeze-dried spermatozoa were then rehydrated. The objective was to identify a simple and cost-effective DNA status test as compared to the existing expensive and complicated ones.

Comparison of Three Sperm DNA Damage Detection Assays

  • After rehydration, the spermatozoa were subjected to DNA damage detection using three different assays simultaneously – SCD (Sperm Chromatin Dispersion), AOT (Acridine Orange Test), and the DQ (Diff-Quik) stain.
  • The levels of DNA damage were then assessed and the results showed that the stallion spermatozoa freeze-dried with EGTA contained significantly less DNA damage than those freeze-dried with EDTA.
  • Each of the tests provided a different level of detail about the DNA damage. AOT detected a higher proportion of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA than the DQ and SCD tests.

Interpreting the Results of the Study

  • The study successfully proved that both the SCD test and DQ assay are effective methods in detecting DNA fragmentation in freeze-dried stallion sperm.
  • The researchers noted, however, that the results from AOT were significantly different from those obtained through the SCD and DQ processes, pointing towards a questionable efficacy of AOT in assessing DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa.
  • Although this was a specific study examining stallion spermatozoa, the findings might have implications for broader contexts, particularly the fertility of other species and possibly the safety and effectiveness of freeze-drying procedures.

Cite This Article

APA
Olaciregui M, Luño V, Martí JI, Aramayona J, Gil L. (2016). Freeze-dried stallion spermatozoa: evaluation of two chelating agents and comparative analysis of three sperm DNA damage assays. Andrologia, 48(9), 900-906. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12530

Publication

ISSN: 1439-0272
NlmUniqueID: 0423506
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 9
Pages: 900-906

Researcher Affiliations

Olaciregui, M
  • Reproduction and Obstetric Area, Departamento de Patología Animal, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. maiteor88@gmail.com.
Luño, V
  • Reproduction and Obstetric Area, Departamento de Patología Animal, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Martí, J I
  • Reproduction and Obstetric Area, Departamento de Patología Animal, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Aramayona, J
  • Pharmacology and Physiology Area, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Gil, L
  • Reproduction and Obstetric Area, Departamento de Patología Animal, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

MeSH Terms

  • Acridine Orange
  • Animals
  • Chelating Agents
  • Coloring Agents
  • DNA Damage
  • Edetic Acid
  • Egtazic Acid
  • Fluorescent Dyes
  • Freeze Drying / methods
  • Freeze Drying / veterinary
  • Horses
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Male
  • Semen Preservation / adverse effects
  • Semen Preservation / methods
  • Semen Preservation / veterinary
  • Spermatozoa / metabolism

Citations

This article has been cited 5 times.
  1. Palazzese L, Anzalone DA, Turri F, Faieta M, Donnadio A, Pizzi F, Pittia P, Matsukawa K, Loi P. Whole genome integrity and enhanced developmental potential in ram freeze-dried spermatozoa at mild sub-zero temperature. Sci Rep 2020 Nov 2;10(1):18873.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76061-xpubmed: 33139842google scholar: lookup
  2. Keskintepe L, Eroglu A. Preservation of Mammalian Sperm by Freeze-Drying. Methods Mol Biol 2021;2180:721-730.
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0783-1_39pubmed: 32797445google scholar: lookup
  3. Palazzese L, Gosálvez J, Anzalone DA, Loi P, Saragusty J. DNA fragmentation in epididymal freeze-dried ram spermatozoa impairs embryo development. J Reprod Dev 2018 Oct 12;64(5):393-400.
    doi: 10.1262/jrd.2018-033pubmed: 29973438google scholar: lookup
  4. Olaciregui M, Luño V, Domingo P, González N, Gil L. In vitro developmental ability of ovine oocytes following intracytoplasmic injection with freeze-dried spermatozoa. Sci Rep 2017 Apr 24;7(1):1096.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00583-0pubmed: 28439073google scholar: lookup
  5. Al-Kass Z, Morrell JM. Freezing Stallion Semen-What Do We Need to Focus on for the Future?. Vet Sci 2024 Feb 2;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci11020065pubmed: 38393083google scholar: lookup