Analyze Diet
The Australian journal of experimental biology and medical science1979; 57(6); 583-585; doi: 10.1038/icb.1979.61

Gel electrophoresis of rotavirus RNA derived from six different animal species.

Abstract: Rotavirus RNA prepared from calf, pig, mouse, deer, foal and dog-adapted human isolates was compared using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Reproducible differences in the RNA migration patterns were found between all isolates. There were 11 clearly resolved segments in the pig, mouse and foal samples. The calf rotavirus RNA and deer rotavirus RNA separated into 9 bands and 10 bands, respectively. The dog-adapted human virus migrated in 12 bands, and this probably results from the complex passage history of the original human rotavirus isolate.
Publication Date: 1979-12-01 PubMed ID: 232982DOI: 10.1038/icb.1979.61Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates how RNA from rotaviruses of various animal species behaves in gel electrophoresis. The researchers found notable differences between the RNA migration patterns of each species.

Study Design and Methods

  • The study involved comparing rotavirus RNA derived from six different animal species: calf, pig, mouse, deer, foal, and dog.
  • This RNA was prepared and put through a process called polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis which separates proteins, nucleic acids, and small molecules in a gel matrix, based on their size.

Results and Observations

  • The tests yielded reproducible and distinguishable differences in the RNA migration patterns among all species-specific isolates. This implies that the specific animal host of the virus may impact the structure or behavior of the virus’ RNA.
  • In the pig, mouse, and foal samples, there were 11 clearly resolved segments, suggesting that these animal species’ rotavirus RNA are composed of 11 segments.
  • Conversely, calf rotavirus RNA separated into nine segments, and deer rotavirus RNA into ten. This differentiation likely reflects slight differences in the genetic makeup of the rotavirus seen in different animal species.

Special Case – Dog-Adapted Human Virus

  • The dog-adapted human virus migrated in 12 bands, which was more than any of the other samples tested.
  • Researchers theorized that it might be due to the complex history of passage – how the virus was transmitted – of the original human rotavirus isolate. This suggests the host shift (going from affecting humans to dogs) may have induced changes in the virus’ RNA.

Conclusion

  • This research indicates that animal species host could impact the structure of rotavirus RNA, which in turn can influence how they migrate during gel electrophoresis. These distinctions may prove essential in further studies on the genetic makeup and behavior of rotaviruses in different animal hosts.

Cite This Article

APA
Smith M, Tzipori S. (1979). Gel electrophoresis of rotavirus RNA derived from six different animal species. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci, 57(6), 583-585. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.1979.61

Publication

ISSN: 0004-945X
NlmUniqueID: 0416662
Country: Australia
Language: English
Volume: 57
Issue: 6
Pages: 583-585

Researcher Affiliations

Smith, M
    Tzipori, S

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Cattle
      • Deer
      • Dogs
      • Electrophoresis
      • Horses
      • Humans
      • Mice
      • RNA Viruses / isolation & purification
      • RNA, Viral / analysis
      • Rotavirus / classification
      • Rotavirus / isolation & purification
      • Species Specificity
      • Swine

      Citations

      This article has been cited 10 times.
      1. Gulati BR, Deepa R, Singh BK, Rao CD. Diversity in Indian equine rotaviruses: identification of genotype G10,P6[1] and G1 strains and a new VP7 genotype (G16) strain in specimens from diarrheic foals in India.. J Clin Microbiol 2007 Mar;45(3):972-8.
        doi: 10.1128/JCM.01696-06pubmed: 17135436google scholar: lookup
      2. Imagawa H, Tanaka T, Sekiguchi K, Fukunaga Y, Anzai T, Minamoto N, Kamada M. Electropherotypes, serotypes, and subgroups of equine rotaviruses isolated in Japan.. Arch Virol 1993;131(1-2):169-76.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01379088pubmed: 8392320google scholar: lookup
      3. Dimitrov DH, Graham DY, Lopez J, Muchinik G, Velasco G, Stenback WA, Estes MK. RNA electropherotypes of human rotaviruses from North and South America.. Bull World Health Organ 1984;62(2):321-9.
        pubmed: 6329538
      4. Hoshino Y, Wyatt RG, Greenberg HB, Kalica AR, Flores J, Kapikian AZ. Isolation and characterization of an equine rotavirus.. J Clin Microbiol 1983 Sep;18(3):585-91.
        doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.3.585-591.1983pubmed: 6313746google scholar: lookup
      5. Albert MJ, Unicomb LE, Tzipori SR, Bishop RF. Isolation and serotyping of animal rotaviruses and antigenic comparison with human rotaviruses. Brief report.. Arch Virol 1987;93(1-2):123-30.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01313898pubmed: 3028338google scholar: lookup
      6. Greenberg HB, Vo PT, Jones R. Cultivation and characterization of three strains of murine rotavirus.. J Virol 1986 Feb;57(2):585-90.
        doi: 10.1128/JVI.57.2.585-590.1986pubmed: 3003390google scholar: lookup
      7. Dolan KT, Twist EM, Horton-Slight P, Forrer C, Bell LM Jr, Plotkin SA, Clark HF. Epidemiology of rotavirus electropherotypes determined by a simplified diagnostic technique with RNA analysis.. J Clin Microbiol 1985 May;21(5):753-8.
        doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.753-758.1985pubmed: 2987300google scholar: lookup
      8. Theil KW, McCloskey CM. Partial characterization of a bovine group A rotavirus with a short genome electropherotype.. J Clin Microbiol 1988 Jun;26(6):1094-9.
      9. Nagesha HS, Holmes IH. New porcine rotavirus serotype antigenically related to human rotavirus serotype 3.. J Clin Microbiol 1988 Feb;26(2):171-4.
        doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.2.171-174.1988pubmed: 2830302google scholar: lookup
      10. Tzipori S, Unicomb L, Bishop R, Montenaro J, Vaelioja LM. Studies on attenuation of rotavirus. A comparison in piglets between virulent virus and its attenuated derivative.. Arch Virol 1989;109(3-4):197-205.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01311081pubmed: 2558635google scholar: lookup