Analyze Diet
Animal genetics2006; 37(1); 33-39; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01376.x

Genetic diversity among horse populations with a special focus on the Franches-Montagnes breed.

Abstract: Genetic characterization helps to assure breed integrity and to assign individuals to defined populations. The objective of this study was to characterize genetic diversity in six horse breeds and to analyse the population structure of the Franches-Montagnes breed, especially with regard to the degree of introgression with Warmblood. A total of 402 alleles from 50 microsatellite loci were used. The average number of alleles per locus was significantly lower in Thoroughbreds and Arabians. Average heterozygosities between breeds ranged from 0.61 to 0.72. The overall average of the coefficient of gene differentiation because of breed differences was 0.100, with a range of 0.036-0.263. No significant correlation was found between this parameter and the number of alleles per locus. An increase in the number of homozygous loci with increasing inbreeding could not be shown for the Franches-Montagnes horses. The proportion of shared alleles, combined with the neighbour-joining method, defined clusters for Icelandic Horse, Comtois, Arabians and Franches-Montagnes. A more disparate clustering could be seen for European Warmbloods and Thoroughbreds, presumably from frequent grading-up of Warmbloods with Thoroughbreds. Grading-up effects were also observed when Bayesian and Monte Carlo resampling approaches were used for individual assignment to a given population. Individual breed assignments to defined reference populations will be very difficult when introgression has occurred. The Bayesian approach within the Franches-Montagnes breed differentiated individuals with varied proportions of Warmblood.
Publication Date: 2006-01-31 PubMed ID: 16441293DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01376.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research sought to identify the levels of genetic diversity among six horse breeds, with a particular focus on the Franches-Montagnes breed, using analysis of 402 alleles from 50 microsatellite loci.

Understanding Genetic Diversity in Horse Breeds

  • The study focused on understanding the genetic make-up and diversity of six distinct horse breeds.
  • Researchers collected 402 alleles from 50 different genetic markers, known as microsatellite loci, from the horses.
  • Importantly, the average number of alleles per genetic marker was notably lower in Thoroughbred and Arabian horses compared to other breeds examined.

differences among horse breeds

  • Differentiation among the horse breeds was evaluated, with average heterozygosity (genetic variation) found to vary between 0.61 to 0.72 across the breeds.
  • The overall coefficient of gene differentiation due to breed differences was 0.100, with a range from 0.036 to 0.263.
  • No significant correlation was observed between the degree of gene differentiation and the number of alleles per microsatellite.

Breed Specific Findings: Franches-Montagnes Horses

  • For the Franches-Montagnes breed, researchers could not establish any increase in the number of homozygous (identical) genetic markers with increasing inbreeding.
  • Moreover, the research also aimed to explore the degree of interbreeding between Franches-Montagnes and Warmblood horses.

Cluster Analysis and Introgression

  • The investigation established clusters for the Icelandic Horse, Comtois, Arabians, and Franches-Montagnes breeds based on shared alleles and the neighbor-joining method.
  • However, European Warmbloods and Thoroughbreds demonstrated more disparate clustering, presumably due to frequent interbreeding or “grading-up” of Warmbloods with Thoroughbreds.
  • Grading-up effects were also observed using Bayesian and Monte Carlo resampling approaches for individual assignment to a population.
  • Whenever an introgression (transfer of genetic information from one species to another) occurred, it posed a challenge in assigning individual breeds to defined reference populations.

Breed Specific Findings: Warmblood Proportions within Franches-Montagnes

  • Using a Bayesian approach, the study differentiated individuals within the Franches-Montagnes breed based on their varied proportions of Warmblood lineage.
  • This highlights the influence and presence of Warmblood genetics within the Franches-Montagnes breed.

Cite This Article

APA
Glowatzki-Mullis ML, Muntwyler J, Pfister W, Marti E, Rieder S, Poncet PA, Gaillard C. (2006). Genetic diversity among horse populations with a special focus on the Franches-Montagnes breed. Anim Genet, 37(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01376.x

Publication

ISSN: 0268-9146
NlmUniqueID: 8605704
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 37
Issue: 1
Pages: 33-39

Researcher Affiliations

Glowatzki-Mullis, M L
  • Institute of Animal Genetics, Nutrition and Housing, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Berne, CH-3001 Berne, Switzerland. marie-louise.glowatzki@itz.unibe.ch
Muntwyler, J
    Pfister, W
      Marti, E
        Rieder, S
          Poncet, P A
            Gaillard, C

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Bayes Theorem
              • Cluster Analysis
              • Gene Frequency
              • Genetic Variation
              • Genetics, Population
              • Heterozygote
              • Horses / genetics
              • Microsatellite Repeats / genetics
              • Species Specificity

              Citations

              This article has been cited 20 times.
              1. Nguyen AT, Kövér G, Tóth P, Curik I, Bokor Á, Nagy I. Population Subdivision and Migration Assessment of Mangalica Pig Breeds Based on Pedigree Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2024 Feb 19;14(4).
                doi: 10.3390/ani14040653pubmed: 38396621google scholar: lookup
              2. Lindsay-McGee V, Sanchez-Molano E, Banos G, Clark EL, Piercy RJ, Psifidi A. Genetic characterisation of the Connemara pony and the Warmblood horse using a within-breed clustering approach. Genet Sel Evol 2023 Aug 17;55(1):60.
                doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00827-wpubmed: 37592264google scholar: lookup
              3. Winton CL, McMahon R, Hegarty MJ, McEwan NR, Davies-Morel MCG, Morgan C, Nash DM. Genetic diversity within and between British and Irish breeds: The maternal and paternal history of native ponies. Ecol Evol 2020 Feb;10(3):1352-1367.
                doi: 10.1002/ece3.5989pubmed: 32076519google scholar: lookup
              4. Jaworska J, Ropka-Molik K, Wocławek-Potocka I, Siemieniuch M. Inter- and intrabreed diversity of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in primitive and draft horse breeds. PLoS One 2020;15(2):e0228658.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228658pubmed: 32012208google scholar: lookup
              5. Dorji J, Tamang S, Tshewang T, Dorji T, Dorji TY. Genetic diversity and population structure of three traditional horse breeds of Bhutan based on 29 DNA microsatellite markers. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0199376.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199376pubmed: 29949614google scholar: lookup
              6. Duruz S, Flury C, Matasci G, Joerin F, Widmer I, Joost S. A WebGIS platform for the monitoring of Farm Animal Genetic Resources (GENMON). PLoS One 2017;12(4):e0176362.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176362pubmed: 28453561google scholar: lookup
              7. François L, Wijnrocx K, Colinet FG, Gengler N, Hulsegge B, Windig JJ, Buys N, Janssens S. Genomics of a revived breed: Case study of the Belgian campine cattle. PLoS One 2017;12(4):e0175916.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175916pubmed: 28426822google scholar: lookup
              8. Sziszkosz N, Mihók S, Jávor A, Kusza S. Genetic diversity of the Hungarian Gidran horse in two mitochondrial DNA markers. PeerJ 2016;4:e1894.
                doi: 10.7717/peerj.1894pubmed: 27168959google scholar: lookup
              9. Frischknecht M, Neuditschko M, Jagannathan V, Drögemüller C, Tetens J, Thaller G, Leeb T, Rieder S. Imputation of sequence level genotypes in the Franches-Montagnes horse breed. Genet Sel Evol 2014 Oct 1;46(1):63.
                doi: 10.1186/s12711-014-0063-7pubmed: 25927638google scholar: lookup
              10. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Cleary KD, McCue ME. The American Quarter Horse: population structure and relationship to the thoroughbred. J Hered 2014 Mar-Apr;105(2):148-62.
                doi: 10.1093/jhered/est079pubmed: 24293614google scholar: lookup
              11. Gupta AK, Chauhan M, Bhardwaj A. Genetic diversity and bottleneck studies in endangered Bhutia and Manipuri pony breeds. Mol Biol Rep 2013 Dec;40(12):6935-43.
                doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2813-ypubmed: 24150726google scholar: lookup
              12. Janova E, Futas J, Klumplerova M, Putnova L, Vrtkova I, Vyskocil M, Frolkova P, Horin P. Genetic diversity and conservation in a small endangered horse population. J Appl Genet 2013 Aug;54(3):285-92.
                doi: 10.1007/s13353-013-0151-3pubmed: 23649723google scholar: lookup
              13. Petersen JL, Mickelson JR, Cothran EG, Andersson LS, Axelsson J, Bailey E, Bannasch D, Binns MM, Borges AS, Brama P, da Câmara Machado A, Distl O, Felicetti M, Fox-Clipsham L, Graves KT, Guérin G, Haase B, Hasegawa T, Hemmann K, Hill EW, Leeb T, Lindgren G, Lohi H, Lopes MS, McGivney BA, Mikko S, Orr N, Penedo MC, Piercy RJ, Raekallio M, Rieder S, Røed KH, Silvestrelli M, Swinburne J, Tozaki T, Vaudin M, M Wade C, McCue ME. Genetic diversity in the modern horse illustrated from genome-wide SNP data. PLoS One 2013;8(1):e54997.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054997pubmed: 23383025google scholar: lookup
              14. Bordonaro S, Guastella AM, Criscione A, Zuccaro A, Marletta D. Genetic diversity and variability in endangered Pantesco and two other Sicilian donkey breeds assessed by microsatellite markers. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012:648427.
                doi: 10.1100/2012/648427pubmed: 22649301google scholar: lookup
              15. Persoons D, Bollaerts K, Smet A, Herman L, Heyndrickx M, Martel A, Butaye P, Catry B, Haesebrouck F, Dewulf J. The importance of sample size in the determination of a flock-level antimicrobial resistance profile for Escherichia coli in broilers. Microb Drug Resist 2011 Dec;17(4):513-9.
                doi: 10.1089/mdr.2011.0048pubmed: 21875337google scholar: lookup
              16. Bömcke E, Gengler N, Cothran EG. Genetic variability in the Skyros pony and its relationship with other Greek and foreign horse breeds. Genet Mol Biol 2011 Jan;34(1):68-76.
              17. Warmuth V, Eriksson A, Bower MA, Cañon J, Cothran G, Distl O, Glowatzki-Mullis ML, Hunt H, Luís C, do Mar Oom M, Yupanqui IT, Ząbek T, Manica A. European domestic horses originated in two holocene refugia. PLoS One 2011 Mar 30;6(3):e18194.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018194pubmed: 21479181google scholar: lookup
              18. Chauhan M, Gupta AK, Dhillon S. Genetic diversity and population structure of three Indian horse breeds. Mol Biol Rep 2011 Jun;38(5):3505-11.
                doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0461-zpubmed: 21104137google scholar: lookup
              19. Burocziova M, Riha J. Horse breed discrimination using machine learning methods. J Appl Genet 2009;50(4):375-7.
                doi: 10.1007/BF03195696pubmed: 19875888google scholar: lookup
              20. Behl R, Behl J, Gupta N, Gupta SC, Ahlawat SP, Ragnekar M, Ahmed Z. Genetic characterization of Zanskari breed of horse. J Genet 2006 Dec;85(3):199-203.
                doi: 10.1007/BF02935331pubmed: 17406094google scholar: lookup