Analyze Diet
The Journal of general virology1987; 68 ( Pt 5); 1441-1447; doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-68-5-1441

Genomic heterogeneity of equine betaherpesviruses.

Abstract: The genomes of 51 isolates of slowly cytopathic equine herpesviruses were examined by digestion with restriction endonucleases. Forty-seven of the isolates showed considerable fragment pattern heterogeneity although common fragments were evident, especially when any two isolates were compared or when they were digested with SalI. Fifteen of the 47 viruses, selected for their diverse fragment patterns, showed a high degree of homology in Southern blot hybridization. In contrast, four viruses, representing three epidemiologically distinct isolations, shared few, if any, comigrating fragments with the 47 equine herpesvirus 2 (EHV-2) isolates, although they shared comigrating fragments with each other. These four viruses showed reduced homology to a representative EHV-2 isolate by Southern blot hybridization under stringent conditions. Although not sharply delineated from EHV-2, these four viruses grew very slowly and had low yields in vitro, and preliminary data suggested they had a significantly smaller genome than EHV-2 (148 +/- 12 kb compared to 190 kb). These four viruses may be prototypic of a novel equine betaherpesvirus.
Publication Date: 1987-05-01 PubMed ID: 2883251DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-68-5-1441Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study delves into the genetic diversity seen in 51 isolations of equine herpesvirus and considers the potential presence of a new strain that exhibits distinct characteristics in comparison with others.

Research Background

  • The Lexington study was devised to understand the genetic diversity in equine herpesviruses, which were seen to have ‘slow cytopathic’ effects, which means that they slowly damage or kill the cells they infect.
  • The study specifically delved into Equine herpesvirus 2 (EHV-2) and attempted to highlight their intrinsic genetic differences.
  • Equine herpesviruses are a common cause of disease in horses, and understanding their genetic diversity is key to developing effective treatments.

Methodology

  • The study examined the genomes of 51 isolated strains of equine herpesviruses by a method called digestion with restriction endonucleases.
  • This method involves breaking down the DNA of a virus into smaller pieces, revealing a pattern of DNA fragments which can be used to compare different viruses.
  • In specific cases, viruses were compared after digestion with a restriction endonuclease called SalI, which helps to reveal common DNA fragments.
  • Furthermore, 15 of the 47 viruses exhibiting diverse fragment patterns were put through a process called Southern blot hybridization, where DNA sequences are transferred to a material like nylon or nitrocellulose paper for better observation and study.

Findings

  • Out of the 51 viruses, 47 showed significant variability in their DNA fragment patterns, indicating a high degree of genetic diversity among them.
  • However, there were still common DNA fragments observed, especially when two isolates were compared, or when they underwent SalI digestion.
  • Four viruses, out of the remaining, intrigued the researchers as they differed significantly from the rest. They represented three epidemiologically distinct isolations and didn’t share the common DNA fragments with the 47 EHV-2 isolates.
  • These four viruses also showed reduced correspondence to a typical EHV-2 isolate under stringent conditions in the Southern blot hybridization.

Implications

  • These four particular viruses proved to be the outliers as they grew very slowly and had low amounts when cultivated under lab conditions. Also, the preliminary data pointed out that they had a considerably smaller genome compared to EHV-2 (148 +/- 12 kilobase pairs [kb] compared to 190 kb).
  • The researchers suggest that these four viruses may be representative of a new type of equine betaherpesvirus.
  • No clear demarcation was found that separated these suspected new strains from the previously known EHV-2 strains.

Conclusion

  • The discovery of this potentially new equine betaherpesvirus has implications for how researchers understand and treat equine herpesvirus infections.
  • The significant variations in the genomes of different equine herpesvirus strains reinforce the importance of comprehensive genomic investigations.

Cite This Article

APA
Browning GF, Studdert MJ. (1987). Genomic heterogeneity of equine betaherpesviruses. J Gen Virol, 68 ( Pt 5), 1441-1447. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-68-5-1441

Publication

ISSN: 0022-1317
NlmUniqueID: 0077340
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 68 ( Pt 5)
Pages: 1441-1447

Researcher Affiliations

Browning, G F
    Studdert, M J

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • DNA, Viral / genetics
      • Genes, Viral
      • Genetic Variation
      • Herpesviridae / classification
      • Herpesviridae / genetics
      • Herpesviridae / isolation & purification
      • Horses / microbiology
      • Nucleic Acid Hybridization
      • Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
      • Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid

      Citations

      This article has been cited 16 times.
      1. Onasanya AE, El-Hage C, Diaz-Méndez A, Vaz PK, Legione AR, Browning GF, Devlin JM, Hartley CA. Whole genome sequence analysis of equid gammaherpesvirus -2 field isolates reveals high levels of genomic diversity and recombination.. BMC Genomics 2022 Aug 30;23(1):622.
        doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08789-xpubmed: 36042397google scholar: lookup
      2. Stasiak K, Dunowska M, Rola J. Kinetics of the Equid Herpesvirus 2 and 5 Infections among Mares and Foals from Three Polish National Studs.. Viruses 2022 Mar 29;14(4).
        doi: 10.3390/v14040713pubmed: 35458443google scholar: lookup
      3. El-Hage C, Mekuria Z, Dynon K, Hartley C, McBride K, Gilkerson J. Association of Equine Herpesvirus 5 with Mild Respiratory Disease in a Survey of EHV1, -2, -4 and -5 in 407 Australian Horses.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Nov 30;11(12).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11123418pubmed: 34944194google scholar: lookup
      4. Muscat KE, Padalino B, Hartley CA, Ficorilli N, Celi P, Knight P, Raidal S, Gilkerson JR, Muscatello G. Equine Transport and Changes in Equid Herpesvirus' Status.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:224.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00224pubmed: 30320126google scholar: lookup
      5. Marenzoni ML, Stefanetti V, Danzetta ML, Timoney PJ. Gammaherpesvirus infections in equids: a review.. Vet Med (Auckl) 2015;6:91-101.
        doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S39473pubmed: 30155436google scholar: lookup
      6. Stasiak K, Dunowska M, Rola J. Prevalence and sequence analysis of equid herpesviruses from the respiratory tract of Polish horses.. Virol J 2018 Jul 11;15(1):106.
        doi: 10.1186/s12985-018-1018-3pubmed: 29996858google scholar: lookup
      7. Thorsteinsdóttir L, Torsteinsdóttir S, Svansson V. Establishment and characterization of fetal equine kidney and lung cells with extended lifespan. Susceptibility to equine gammaherpesvirus infection and transfection efficiency.. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2016 Sep;52(8):872-7.
        doi: 10.1007/s11626-016-0046-9pubmed: 27173610google scholar: lookup
      8. Wilkie GS, Kerr K, Stewart JP, Studdert MJ, Davison AJ. Genome sequences of equid herpesviruses 2 and 5.. Genome Announc 2015 Mar 12;3(2).
        doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00119-15pubmed: 25767243google scholar: lookup
      9. Andoh K, Kai K, Matsumura T, Maeda K. Further Development of an Equine Cell Line that can be Propagated over 100 Times.. J Equine Sci 2009;20(2):11-4.
        doi: 10.1294/jes.20.11pubmed: 24833964google scholar: lookup
      10. Marenzoni ML, Coppola G, Maranesi M, Passamonti F, Cappelli K, Capomaccio S, Verini Supplizi A, Thiry E, Coletti M. Age-dependent prevalence of equid herpesvirus 5 infection.. Vet Res Commun 2010 Dec;34(8):703-8.
        doi: 10.1007/s11259-010-9443-9pubmed: 20842426google scholar: lookup
      11. Reubel GH, Crabb BS, Studdert MJ. Diagnosis of equine gammaherpesvirus 2 and 5 infections by polymerase chain reaction.. Arch Virol 1995;140(6):1049-60.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01315414pubmed: 7611877google scholar: lookup
      12. Browning GF, Studdert MJ. Physical mapping of a genome of equine herpesvirus 2 (equine cytomegalovirus).. Arch Virol 1989;104(1-2):77-86.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01313809pubmed: 2923549google scholar: lookup
      13. Browning GF, Ficorilli N, Studdert MJ. Asinine herpesvirus genomes: comparison with those of the equine herpesviruses.. Arch Virol 1988;101(3-4):183-90.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01310999pubmed: 2845891google scholar: lookup
      14. Browning GF, Studdert MJ. Physical mapping of the genomic heterogeneity of isolates of equine herpesvirus 2 (equine cytomegalovirus).. Arch Virol 1989;104(1-2):87-94.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01313810pubmed: 2564271google scholar: lookup
      15. Staczek J. Animal cytomegaloviruses.. Microbiol Rev 1990 Sep;54(3):247-65.
        doi: 10.1128/mr.54.3.247-265.1990pubmed: 2170830google scholar: lookup
      16. Roizmann B, Desrosiers RC, Fleckenstein B, Lopez C, Minson AC, Studdert MJ. The family Herpesviridae: an update. The Herpesvirus Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses.. Arch Virol 1992;123(3-4):425-49.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01317276pubmed: 1562239google scholar: lookup