Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal. Supplement2011; (38); 676-682; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00254.x

Goniometry: is it a reliable tool to monitor passive joint range of motion in horses?

Abstract: Simple objective assessment tools are essential to monitor the clinical efficacy of therapeutic interventions used in equine orthopaedics and rehabilitation. In human medicine, goniometry is a validated tool to quantify restrictions in joint range of motion (ROM); however, the technique is not validated in horses. Objective: To validate 2 different goniometry techniques for the measurement of passive flexion of the fetlock, carpus and hock by examining; 1) the intra- and inter-tester reliability; 2) the differences between 2 goniometry techniques and 3) differences between standing and anaesthetised horses. Methods: The study is composed of three parts: 1) the intra- and inter-tester reliability was examined on 10 horses, where each horse was assessed by 5 pairs of testers measuring ROM with a universal goniometer; 2) the differences between 2 goniometry techniques were examined on 14 horses, each assessed by 2 investigators (either working in pairs with one investigator holding the limb and the other measuring the joint angle, or working individually at the same time holding and measuring); 3) on 6 horses, the differences between standing and anaesthetised horses were assessed by 2 investigators with the same techniques as described above. Nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon sign-rank) and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analysis (P < 0.05). Results: 1) The intra-tester reliability was high to excellent (ICC 0.8-1) and the inter-tester reliability low to average (ICC 0.1-0.5); 2) significant differences in joint ROM were registered in carpus and hock when measuring in pairs compared to singly and 3) significant differences in joint ROM were registered measuring anaesthetised compared to standing horses. Conclusions: As shown in human studies, goniometry is a promising tool in documenting passive flexion of fetlock, carpus and hock, if used by the same investigator. However, additional studies are needed for further validation.
Publication Date: 2011-05-27 PubMed ID: 21059080DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00254.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aims to validate the use of goniometry, a tool used to measure joint range of motion in humans, in equine orthopedics and rehabilitation, given its current non-validated status in the field. The study examines aspects such as reliability between testers, difference in goniometry techniques, and differences between standing and anesthetized horses.

Research Methodology

In the course of the study, three main areas were tested and scrutinized:

  • The reliability between different test administrators (both intra- and inter-tester) was assessed using 10 horses, each measured by five sets of testers with a universal goniometer.
  • The study also examined the effectiveness of two different goniometry techniques on 14 horses. In one technique, two investigators worked in pairs with one holding the limb while the other measured the joint angle. In the other technique, investigators worked individually, simultaneously holding the limb and measuring the joint angle.
  • Differences in measurements between standing and anesthetized horses were assessed by investigators using the same techniques as earlier mentioned on six different horses.

For statistical analysis, nonparametric tests including Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon sign-rank, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were used.

Research Findings

The research findings were split into the specific areas of study:

  • The intra-tester reliability (same person testing) was found to be high to excellent (with an ICC of 0.8 to 1) while the inter-tester reliability (different people testing) was on the low to average scale (with an ICC of 0.1 to 0.5).
  • Significant differences in joint ROM measurements were recorded in carpus and hock when the measurement was done in pairs as opposed to individually.
  • Significant differences in joint ROM measurements were noted when assessing anesthetized horses as compared to those standing.

Conclusion

The research concluded that, as shown in human studies, goniometry is a promising tool for documenting passive joint motion in the fetlock, carpus, and hock in horses, but only if the tester remains consistent. However, despite these promising findings, the study indicates that more research is needed for further validation of goniometry in equine medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Liljebrink Y, Bergh A. (2011). Goniometry: is it a reliable tool to monitor passive joint range of motion in horses? Equine Vet J Suppl(38), 676-682. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00254.x

Publication

NlmUniqueID: 9614088
Country: United States
Language: English
Issue: 38
Pages: 676-682

Researcher Affiliations

Liljebrink, Y
  • Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. yvonne.liljebrink@bredband2.com
Bergh, A

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Forelimb / physiology
    • Hindlimb
    • Horses / physiology
    • Joints / physiology
    • Range of Motion, Articular / physiology
    • Reproducibility of Results

    Citations

    This article has been cited 9 times.
    1. Haussler KK, Hesbach AL, Romano L, Goff L, Bergh A. A Systematic Review of Musculoskeletal Mobilization and Manipulation Techniques Used in Veterinary Medicine. Animals (Basel) 2021 Sep 24;11(10).
      doi: 10.3390/ani11102787pubmed: 34679808google scholar: lookup
    2. Pinna S, Lanzi F, Tassani C. The Effect of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Rupture on Range of Motion in Dogs. Vet Sci 2021 Jun 24;8(7).
      doi: 10.3390/vetsci8070119pubmed: 34202476google scholar: lookup
    3. Bergh A, Lauridsen NG, Hesbach AL. Concurrent Validity of Equine Joint Range of Motion Measurement: A Novel Digital Goniometer versus Universal Goniometer. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 19;10(12).
      doi: 10.3390/ani10122436pubmed: 33352686google scholar: lookup
    4. Shakeshaft A, Tabor G. The Effect of a Physiotherapy Intervention on Thoracolumbar Posture in Horses. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 28;10(11).
      doi: 10.3390/ani10111977pubmed: 33126478google scholar: lookup
    5. Tabor G, Nankervis K, Fernandes J, Williams J. Generation of Domains for the Equine Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Outcome Score: Development by Expert Consensus. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jan 25;10(2).
      doi: 10.3390/ani10020203pubmed: 31991716google scholar: lookup
    6. Chong TE, Davies HMS. Investigating canine elbow joint stabilisation through mechanical constraints of the deep fascia and other soft tissues. J Anat 2018 Mar;232(3):407-421.
      doi: 10.1111/joa.12763pubmed: 29239479google scholar: lookup
    7. Duesterdieck-Zellmer KF, Moneta L, Ott JF, Larson MK, Gorman EM, Hunter B, Löhr CV, Payton ME, Morré JT, Maier CS. Effects of low and high dose intraarticular tiludronate on synovial fluid and clinical variables in healthy horses-a preliminary investigation. PeerJ 2014;2:e534.
      doi: 10.7717/peerj.534pubmed: 25237596google scholar: lookup
    8. Birdwhistell KE, Miscioscia E, Montalbano C, Repac J. The hamstring stretch angle: a screening and monitoring tool for canine fibrotic myopathy. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1600602.
      doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1600602pubmed: 40400667google scholar: lookup
    9. Jacklin BD, Hanousek K, Gillespie S, Liedtke A, Tucker R, Fiske-Jackson A, Smith RK. Validation of a novel clinical tool for monitoring distal limb stiffness. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1271036.
      doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1271036pubmed: 38249548google scholar: lookup