Analyze Diet
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2025; 106394; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106394

Haemoglobin concentration measurement agreement obtained from three different devices in anaesthetised horses.

Abstract: Accurate measurement of haemoglobin concentration is crucial for monitoring the oxygen-carrying capacity in anaesthetised horses. This prospective study aimed to determine the agreement in haemoglobin concentration in anaesthetised horses using the SpHb pulse co-oximeter, an Epoc® blood gas analyser, and values derived from packed cell volume (PCV), which served as the reference method in this study. The study included 34 horses undergoing elective surgeries. Blood samples were collected from each horse and divided for analysis using the microhaematocrit method to estimate haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]PCV_est) and the Epoc®. Haemoglobin concentrations were compared to SpHb readings using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman analysis, with a predefined acceptable clinical limit of agreement set at a 7% variance from the reference. The mean [Hb]PCV_est was 14.6 ±1.8g/dL, the Epoc® [Hb] was 11.0 ±1.8g/dL, and the SpHb® [Hb] was 9.6 ±1.5g/dL. Analysis revealed poor agreement between the SpHb and Epoc® devices compared to [Hb]PCV_est. Both SpHb and Epoc® methods underestimated haemoglobin concentrations by an average of 4.96g/dL and 3.6g/dL, respectively. Lin's CCC indicated weak concordance (0.08 for SpHb and 0.14 for Epoc®). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated significant biases, exceeding the acceptable 7% threshold, with wide limits of agreement. In conclusion, both the SpHb pulse co-oximeter and the Epoc® showed poor agreement with the [Hb]PCV_est method, underestimating haemoglobin levels in anaesthetised horses. Further research with larger sample sizes and species-specific device calibration is necessary to establish the true accuracy and clinical utility of the SpHb Radical-7® device in horses.
Publication Date: 2025-06-25 PubMed ID: 40578423DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106394Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research compared the accuracy of three methods for measuring haemoglobin concentration in anaesthetised horses. The results suggested that two commonly used tools, the SpHb pulse co-oximeter and the Epoc blood gas analyser, often underestimate haemoglobin levels when compared with the packed cell volume (PCV) method.

Study Design

  • The aim of the study was to determine how closely the results from the SpHb pulse co-oximeter and the Epoc® blood gas analyser matched the values derived from the packed cell volume (PCV) method.
  • This research was prospective in nature and involved 34 horses undergoing elective surgeries.
  • Blood samples were collected from each horse and analysed using the PCV method (which was used as the reference method) and the Epoc® device.

Comparative Analysis

  • The researchers compared the haemoglobin concentration results from the SpHb and Epoc® devices to those obtained from the PCV method.
  • They utilized Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the agreement between the results.
  • An acceptable clinical limit of agreement was pre-set at 7% variance from the reference.

Results

  • The average haemoglobin concentration derived from the PCV method was 14.6 ±1.8g/dL. But the SpHb and Epoc® devices measured considerably lower levels: 9.6 ±1.5g/dL and 11.0 ±1.8g/dL, respectively.
  • The SpHb and Epoc® devices underestimated the haemoglobin concentrations by an average of 4.96g/dL and 3.6g/dL, correspondingly.
  • The concordance measured using Lin’s CCC indicated weak agreement, with values of 0.08 for the SpHb and 0.14 for the Epoc®.
  • Bland-Altman analysis also showed significant biases and wide limits of agreement, exceeding the acceptable threshold of 7%.

Conclusions and Future Research

  • The study concluded that both the SpHb pulse co-oximeter and the Epoc® blood gas analyser poorly agreed with the PCV method, consistently underestimating haemoglobin levels in anaesthetised horses.
  • The researchers suggest that further study with larger sample sizes and species-specific device calibration is needed in order to establish the true accuracy and clinical utility of these devices for measuring haemoglobin in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Santos L, Werfel K, Ferlini-Agne G. (2025). Haemoglobin concentration measurement agreement obtained from three different devices in anaesthetised horses. Vet J, 106394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106394

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Pages: 106394
PII: S1090-0233(25)00098-X

Researcher Affiliations

Santos, Lcp
  • School of Biodiversity, One Health & Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow. Electronic address: luiz.santos@glasgow.ac.uk.
Werfel, K
  • The School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide.
Ferlini-Agne, G
  • The School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Adelaide.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest We confirm that this manuscript has not been published previously and is not currently under consideration by any other journal. Additionally, we declare no conflicts of interest related to this study. Thank you for considering our work. We look forward to your favourable review and the opportunity to contribute to your esteemed journal.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.