Analyze Diet
Animal reproduction science2020; 219; 106509; doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106509

High-throughput sperm assay using label-free microscopy: morphometric comparison between different sperm structures of boar and stallion spermatozoa.

Abstract: The capacity for microscopic evaluation of sperm is useful for assisted reproductive technologies (ART), because this can allow for specific selection of sperm cells for in vitro fertilization (IVF). The objective of this study was to analyze the same sperm samples using two high-resolution methods: spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to determine if with one method there was more timely and different information obtained than the other. To address this objective, there was evaluation of sperm populations from boars and stallions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported comparison when using AFM and high-sensitivity interferometric microscopy (such as SLIM) to evaluate spermatozoa. Results indicate that with the use of SLIM microscopy there is similar nanoscale sensitivity as with use of AFM while there is approximately 1,000 times greater throughput with use of SLIM. With SLIM, there is also allowace for the measurement of the dry mass (non-aqueous content) of spermatozoa, which may be a new label-free marker for sperm viability. In the second part of this study, there was analysis of two sperm populations. There were interesting correlations between the different compartments of the sperm and the dry mass in both boars and stallions. Furthermore, there was a correlation between the dry mass of the sperm head and the length and width of the acrosome in both boars and stallions. This correlation is positive in boars while it is negative in stallions.
Publication Date: 2020-05-23 PubMed ID: 32828395PubMed Central: PMC8842552DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106509Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Validation Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on using high-resolution microscopy methods, namely spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), for sperm evaluation in boars and stallions. Results revealed that SLIM provided similar data to AFM but with a significantly faster data collection rate and a new potential measure for sperm viability.

Methods in Focus: SLIM and AFM

  • The two main methodologies used in this study were spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM).
  • SLIM is a type of interferometric microscopy that provides high-resolution, label-free imaging. It involves the use of light to measure the difference in optical path length in a sample.
  • AFM, on the other hand, is a type of scanning probe microscopy that can provide a three-dimensional profile of a sample. Its high-resolution imaging capabilities make AFM suitable for investigations at the nanoscale level.

Objective and Procedure

  • The study aimed to compare results obtained from SLIM and AFM when used for sperm evaluation.
  • Samples were sourced from boars and stallions, and the same sample sets were analyzed using both microscopy technologies.
  • The main objective was to find out if one method could deliver quicker and different information than the other.

Findings and Implications

  • Results indicated that while both technologies were capable of nanoscale sensitivity, SLIM was significantly faster, offering a throughput approximately 1,000 times greater than AFM.
  • Beyond its efficiency, SLIM also allowed the measurement of the dry mass (non-aqueous content) of spermatozoa. This could serve as a new indicator of sperm viability, a measurement that would be useful in assisted reproductive technologies (ART).
  • In the study’s second part, an analysis of two different sperm populations revealed correlations between the various compartments of the spermatozoa and the dry mass in both species.
  • In both boars and stallions, a correlation was observed between the dry mass of the sperm head and the size (length and width) of the acrosome, a part of the sperm cell that contains enzymes to help the sperm penetrate the egg. Interestingly, this correlation was positive in boars and negative in stallions, suggesting species-specific variations in sperm cell properties.

Significance

  • This research provides valuable information for advancements in ART, in particular for selecting sperm cells for in vitro fertilization (IVF).
  • Furthermore, the indication that SLIM can be a quicker, equally sensitive alternative to AFM for sperm evaluation opens up new possibilities for faster, more efficient sperm sample analyses in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
Rubessa M, Feugang JM, Kandel ME, Schreiber S, Hessee J, Salerno F, Meyers S, Chu I, Popescu G, Wheeler MB. (2020). High-throughput sperm assay using label-free microscopy: morphometric comparison between different sperm structures of boar and stallion spermatozoa. Anim Reprod Sci, 219, 106509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106509

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2232
NlmUniqueID: 7807205
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 219
Pages: 106509

Researcher Affiliations

Rubessa, Marcello
  • Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA; Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Feugang, Jean M
  • Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Kandel, Mikhail E
  • Quantitative Light Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Beckman Institute of Advanced Science and Technology, USA.
Schreiber, Sierra
  • Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
Hessee, Jade
  • Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
Salerno, Francesca
  • Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
Meyers, Sascha
  • Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA.
Chu, Iwei
  • Institute for Imaging & Analytical Technologies, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Popescu, Gabriel
  • Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA; Quantitative Light Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Beckman Institute of Advanced Science and Technology, USA.
Wheeler, Matthew B
  • Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, USA; Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA. Electronic address: mbwheele@illinois.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cell Shape
  • Fertilization in Vitro / veterinary
  • High-Throughput Screening Assays / methods
  • High-Throughput Screening Assays / veterinary
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Microscopy / methods
  • Microscopy / veterinary
  • Semen Analysis / methods
  • Semen Analysis / veterinary
  • Species Specificity
  • Sperm Head / ultrastructure
  • Spermatozoa / cytology
  • Spermatozoa / ultrastructure
  • Staining and Labeling / methods
  • Staining and Labeling / veterinary
  • Swine

Grant Funding

  • R01 GM129709 / NIGMS NIH HHS

References

This article includes 30 references
  1. Allen MJ, Bradbury EM, Bathom R. The natural subcellular surface structure of the bovine sperm cell.. J. Struct. Biol 114, 197–208.
    pubmed: 7662487
  2. Banaszewska D, Andraszek K, Czubaszek M, Biesiada-Drzazga B. The effect of selected staining techniques on bull sperm morphometry.. Anim Reprod Sd 159, 17–24.
    pubmed: 26149220
  3. Burger D, Dolivo G, Wedekind C. Ejaculate Characteristics Depend on Social Environment in the Horse (Equus caballus).. PLOS ONE 10, e0143185.
    pmc: PMC4658062pubmed: 26599821
  4. Caprio G, Ferrara MA, Micdo L, Merola F, Memmolo P, Ferraro P, Coppola G. Holographic imaging of unlabdled sperm cdls for semen analysis: a review.. Journal of biophotonics 8, 779–789.
    pubmed: 25491593
  5. Carvalho JO, Silva LP, Sartori R, Dode MA. Nanoscale differences in the shape and size of X and Y chromosome-bearing bovine sperm heads assessed by atomic force microscopy.. PloS one 8, e59387.
    pmc: PMC3602057pubmed: 23527178
  6. Casey PJ, Gravance CG, Davis RO, Chabot DD, Liu IKM. Morphometric differences in sperm head dimensions of fertile and subfertile stallions.. Theriogenology 47, 575–582.
    pubmed: 16728009
  7. Cummins JM, Woodall PF. On mammalian sperm dimensions.. Journal of reproduction and fertility 75, 153–175.
    pubmed: 4032369
  8. Ellis DJ, Shadan S, James PS, Henderson RM, Edwardson JM, Hutchings A, Jones R. Post-testicular development of a novel membrane substructure within the equatorial segment of ram, bull, boar, and goat spermatozoa as viewed by atomic force microscopy.. Journal of structural biology 138, 187–198.
    pubmed: 12217657
  9. Ferrara MA, Di Caprio G, Manago S, De Angelis A, Sirleto L, Coppola G, De Luca AC. Label-free imaging and biochemical characterization of bovine sperm cells.. Biosensors 5, 141–157.
    pmc: PMC4493542pubmed: 25836358
  10. Feugang JM, Greene JM, Willard ST, Ryan PL. In vitro effects of relaxin on gene expression in porcine cumulus-oocyte complexes and developing embryos.. Reproductive biology and endocrinology: RB&E 9, 15.
    pmc: PMC3045296pubmed: 21272344
  11. Garcia-Vazquez F, Gadea J, Matas C, Holt W. Importance of sperm morphology during sperm transport and fertilization in mammals.. Asian Journal of Andrology 18, 844–850.
    pmc: PMC5109874pubmed: 27624988
  12. Gravance CG, Liu IK, Davis RO, Hughes JP, Casey PJ. Quantification of normal head morphometry of stallion spermatozoa.. J Reprod Fertil 108, 41–46.
    pubmed: 8958826
  13. Hirai M, Boersma A, Hoeflich A, Wolf E, FÖU J, AumÜLler R, Braun J. Objectively Measured Sperm Motility and Sperm Head Morphometry in Boars (Sus scrofa): Relation to Fertility and Seminal Plasma Growth Factors.. Journal of Andrology 22, 104–110.
    pubmed: 11191073
  14. Kandel ME, Teng KW, Selvin PR, Popescu G. Label-Free Imaging of Single Microtubule Dynamics Using Spatial Light Interference Microscopy.. ACS Nano 11, 647–655.
    pubmed: 27997798
  15. Kim T, Zhou RJ, Mir M, Babacan SD, Carney PS, Goddard LL, Popescu G. White-light diffraction tomography of unlabeled live cells.. Nature Photonics 8, 256–263.
  16. Komiya A, Watanabe A, Kato T, Kawauchi Y, Fuse H. Observation of spermatozoa by a high-magnification microscope.. Reproductive medicine and biology 13, 21–28.
    pmc: PMC5892975pubmed: 29662368
  17. Kondracki S, Wysokinska A, Kania M, Gorski K. Application of Two Staining Methods for Sperm Morphometric Evaluation in Domestic Pigs.. J Vet Res 61, 345–349.
    pmc: PMC5894426pubmed: 29978093
  18. Kumar S, Chaudhury K, Sen P, Guha SK. Atomic force microscopy: a powerful tool for high-resolution imaging of spermatozoa.. Journal of nanobio-technology 3, 9.
    pmc: PMC1253532pubmed: 16188038
  19. Kumar S, Chaudhury K, Sen P, Guha SK. Atomic force microscopy: A powerful tool for high-resolution imaging of spermatozoa.. J. Nanobiotechnol 3, 3–9.
    pmc: PMC1253532pubmed: 16188038
  20. Kumar S, Chaudhury K, Sen P, Guha SK. Topological alterations in human spermatozoa associated with the polyelectrolytic effect of RISUG®.. Micron 37, 526–532.
    pubmed: 16504524
  21. Liu L, Kandel ME, Rubessa M, Schreiber S, Wheeler MB, Popescu G. Topography and refractometry of sperm cells using spatial light interference microscopy.. Journal of biomedical optics 23, 1–6.
    pubmed: 29488366
  22. Ma Y, Xie N, Li Y, Zhang B, Xie D, Zhang W, Li Q, Yu H, Zhang Q, Ni Y, Xie X. Teratozoospermia with amorphous sperm head associate with abnormal chromatin condensation in a Chinese family.. Syst Biol Reprod Med 65, 61–70.
    pubmed: 30452285
  23. Majeed H, Ma L, Lee YJ, Kandel M, Min E, Jung W, Best-Popescu C, Popescu G. Magnified Image Spatial Spectrum (MISS) microscopy for nanometer and millisecond scale label-free imaging.. Optics express 26, 5423–5440.
    pubmed: 29529745
  24. Maree L, du Plessis SS, Menkveld R, van der Horst G. Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used.. Hum Reprod 25, 1369–1382.
    pubmed: 20400771
  25. Micdo L, Finizio A, Memmolo P, Paturzo M, Merola F, Coppola G, Di Caprio G, Gioffre M, Puglisi R, Balduzzi D, Galli A, Ferraro P. Detection and visualization improvement of Spermatozoa cells by Digital Holography.. Proc Spie 8089.
  26. Park Y, Depeursinge C, Popescu G. Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine.. Nature Photonics 12, 578.
  27. Popescu G. Quantitative phase imaging of cells and tissues.. McGraw-Hill, New York .
  28. Saeki K, Sumitomo N, Nagata Y, Kato N, Hosoi Y, Matsumoto K, Iritani A. Fine surface structure of bovine acrosome-intact and reacted spermatozoa observed by atomic force microscopy.. The Journal of reproduction and development 51, 293–298.
    pubmed: 15599111
  29. Shaked NT. Label-Free Quantitative Imaging of Sperm for In-Vitro Fertilization Using Interferometric Phase MicroscopylVF, IMSI, ICSI, IPM, Holography, Imaging, Sperm.. Journal of Fertilization: In Vitro - IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Stem Cell Biology 4.
  30. Wang Z, Millet L, Mir M, Ding H, Unarunotai S, Rogers J, Gillette MU, Popescu G. Spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM).. Optics express 19, 1016–1026.
    pmc: PMC3482902pubmed: 21263640