FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animal cognition2009; 12(5); 693-704; doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0229-9

Horse (Equus caballus) whinnies: a source of social information.

Abstract: Many animal species that rely mainly on calls to communicate produce individual acoustic structures, but we wondered whether individuals of species better known as visual communicants, with small vocal repertoires, would also exhibit individual distinctiveness in calls. Moreover, theoretical advances concerning the evolution of social intelligence are usually based on primate species data, but relatively little is known about the social cognitive capacities of non-primate mammals. However, some non-primate species demonstrate auditory recognition of social categories and possess mental representation of their social network. Horses (Equus caballus) form stable social networks and although they display a large range of visual signals, they also use long-distance whinny calls to maintain contact. Here, we investigated the potential existence of individual acoustic signatures in whinny calls and the ability of horses to discriminate by ear individuals varying in their degree of familiarity. Our analysis of the acoustic structure of whinnies of 30 adult domestic horses (ten stallions, ten geldings, ten mares) revealed that some of the frequency and temporal parameters carried reliable information about the caller's sex, body size and identity. However, no correlations with age were found. Playback experiments evaluated the behavioural significance of this variability. Twelve horses heard either control white noise or whinnies emitted by group members, familiar neighbours or unfamiliar horses. While control sounds did not induce any particular response, horses discriminated the social category of the callers and reacted with a sound-specific behaviour (vigilance and attraction varied with familiarity). Our results support the existence of social knowledge in horses and suggest a process of vocal coding/decoding of information.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2009-05-18 PubMed ID: 19449192DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0229-9Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the whinny calls of horses, exploring if they carry individual characteristics and if horses can distinguish familiar from unfamiliar whinnies. The findings show that horses do have distinct whinny calls, conveying information such as sex and size, and horses can identify the social category of the caller, responding differently based on familiarity.

Uniqueness of Horse Whinny Calls

  • The researchers studied the whinny calls of 30 adult domestic horses, consisting of an equal number of stallions, geldings, and mares. They found that these calls provide reliable information about the caller’s unique characteristics. This argues against the previous notion that the species, being primarily visual communicators, wouldn’t bear individual distinctiveness in their calls.
  • Analysis of the acoustic structure of the calls demonstrated that these sounds carried information relating to the horse’s sex and body size. This refutes the previous assumption of species with small vocal repertoires having less individual distinctiveness in calls.
  • Contrary to expectation, no correlations between the calls and the horses’ ages were found, indicating that age-related changes might not be reflected in their vocalizations.

Horse’s Ability to Recognize Whinny Calls

  • Via a series of playback experiments with twelve horses, the researchers assessed the behavioural significance of the acoustic variability in whinny calls. The horses listened to control sounds (white noise) or calls from group members, familiar neighbours, or unfamiliar horses.
  • The response from horses indicated that they have the ability to discriminate between the social categories of different callers. Unlike the control sounds which did not trigger any response, the horses reacted specifically to the whinnies based on their familiarity with the caller.
  • Responses ranged from increased vigilance to attraction, varying with the degree of familiarity with the caller. This supports the notion that horses possess a level of social cognition, contrary to the limited composite knowledge on the social cognitive capacities of non-primate mammals.

Implications and Conclusions

  • This research provides evidence for a process of vocal coding/decoding of information in horses, which confirms the existence of social knowledge in this species.
  • The study also contributes to the wider understanding of social intelligence evolution, especially for species that are not primates. It showcases the capability for auditory recognition of social categories within some non-primate species, expanding the boundaries of our understanding of animal communication and social cognition.

Cite This Article

APA
Lemasson A, Boutin A, Boivin S, Blois-Heulin C, Hausberger M. (2009). Horse (Equus caballus) whinnies: a source of social information. Anim Cogn, 12(5), 693-704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-009-0229-9

Publication

Animal cognition
ISSN: 1435-9456
NlmUniqueID: 9814573
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 5
Pages: 693-704

Researcher Affiliations

Lemasson, Alban
  • Université de Rennes 1, EthoS Ethologie animale et humaine, UMR 6552, C.N.R.S., Station Biologique de Paimpont, 35380 Paimpont, France. alban.lemasson@univ-rennes1.fr
Boutin, Anaïs
    Boivin, Sarah
      Blois-Heulin, Catherine
        Hausberger, Martine

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Female
          • Horses / psychology
          • Male
          • Social Behavior
          • Vocalization, Animal

          Citations

          This article has been cited 37 times.
          1. Hole C, Murray R, Marlin D, Freeman P. Equine Behavioural and Physiological Responses to Auditory Stimuli in the Presence and Absence of Noise-Damping Ear Covers. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 8;13(9).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13091574pubmed: 37174609google scholar: lookup
          2. Torres Borda L, Auer U, Jenner F. Equine Social Behaviour: Love, War and Tolerance. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 26;13(9).
            doi: 10.3390/ani13091473pubmed: 37174510google scholar: lookup
          3. Fuchs E, Beeck VC, Baotic A, Stoeger AS. Acoustic structure and information content of trumpets in female Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). PLoS One 2021;16(11):e0260284.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260284pubmed: 34813615google scholar: lookup
          4. Pougnault L, Cousillas H, Heyraud C, Huber L, Hausberger M, Henry L. Experimental Tests for Measuring Individual Attentional Characteristics in Songbirds. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 29;11(8).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11082233pubmed: 34438691google scholar: lookup
          5. Merkies K, Franzin O. Enhanced Understanding of Horse-Human Interactions to Optimize Welfare. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 9;11(5).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11051347pubmed: 34065156google scholar: lookup
          6. Janczarek I, Wiśniewska A, Chruszczewski MH, Tkaczyk E, Górecka-Bruzda A. Social Behaviour of Horses in Response to Vocalisations of Predators. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 8;10(12).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10122331pubmed: 33302443google scholar: lookup
          7. Cousillas H, Henry L, George I, Marchesseau S, Hausberger M. Lateralization of social signal brain processing correlates with the degree of social integration in a songbird. Sci Rep 2020 Aug 24;10(1):14093.
            doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70946-7pubmed: 32839465google scholar: lookup
          8. Quaranta A, d'Ingeo S, Amoruso R, Siniscalchi M. Emotion Recognition in Cats. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jun 28;10(7).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10071107pubmed: 32605256google scholar: lookup
          9. Pougnault L, Levréro F, Mulot B, Lemasson A. Breaking conversational rules matters to captive gorillas: A playback experiment. Sci Rep 2020 Apr 24;10(1):6947.
            doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63923-7pubmed: 32332855google scholar: lookup
          10. Lesimple C. Indicators of Horse Welfare: State-of-the-Art. Animals (Basel) 2020 Feb 13;10(2).
            doi: 10.3390/ani10020294pubmed: 32069888google scholar: lookup
          11. Merkies K, Ready C, Farkas L, Hodder A. Eye Blink Rates and Eyelid Twitches as a Non-Invasive Measure of Stress in the Domestic Horse. Animals (Basel) 2019 Aug 15;9(8).
            doi: 10.3390/ani9080562pubmed: 31443315google scholar: lookup
          12. Nawroth C, Langbein J, Coulon M, Gabor V, Oesterwind S, Benz-Schwarzburg J, von Borell E. Farm Animal Cognition-Linking Behavior, Welfare and Ethics. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:24.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00024pubmed: 30838218google scholar: lookup
          13. Sigurjónsdóttir H, Haraldsson H. Significance of Group Composition for the Welfare of Pastured Horses. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jan 5;9(1).
            doi: 10.3390/ani9010014pubmed: 30621272google scholar: lookup
          14. Leroux M, Hetem RS, Hausberger M, Lemasson A. Cheetahs discriminate familiar and unfamiliar human voices. Sci Rep 2018 Oct 19;8(1):15516.
            doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33971-1pubmed: 30341369google scholar: lookup
          15. Liévin-Bazin A, Pineaux M, Clerc O, Gahr M, von Bayern AMP, Bovet D. Emotional responses to conspecific distress calls are modulated by affiliation in cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus). PLoS One 2018;13(10):e0205314.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205314pubmed: 30300404google scholar: lookup
          16. Rochais C, Sébilleau M, Menoret M, Oger M, Henry S, Hausberger M, Cousillas H. Attentional state and brain processes: state-dependent lateralization of EEG profiles in horses. Sci Rep 2018 Jul 5;8(1):10153.
            doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28334-9pubmed: 29976936google scholar: lookup
          17. Rochais C, Henry S, Hausberger M. Spontaneous attention-capture by auditory distractors as predictor of distractibility: a study of domestic horses (Equus caballus). Sci Rep 2017 Nov 10;7(1):15283.
            doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15654-5pubmed: 29127367google scholar: lookup
          18. Rochais C, Sébilleau M, Houdebine M, Bec P, Hausberger M, Henry S. A novel test for evaluating horses' spontaneous visual attention is predictive of attention in operant learning tasks. Naturwissenschaften 2017 Aug;104(7-8):61.
            doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1480-6pubmed: 28681089google scholar: lookup
          19. Briefer EF, Mandel R, Maigrot AL, Briefer Freymond S, Bachmann I, Hillmann E. Perception of emotional valence in horse whinnies. Front Zool 2017;14:8.
            doi: 10.1186/s12983-017-0193-1pubmed: 28203263google scholar: lookup
          20. Dunlop RA. Changes in vocal parameters with social context in humpback whales: considering the effect of bystanders. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2016;70:857-870.
            doi: 10.1007/s00265-016-2108-0pubmed: 27217614google scholar: lookup
          21. Koene P, Ipema B. Social Networks and Welfare in Future Animal Management. Animals (Basel) 2014 Mar 17;4(1):93-118.
            doi: 10.3390/ani4010093pubmed: 26479886google scholar: lookup
          22. Briefer EF, Maigrot AL, Mandel R, Freymond SB, Bachmann I, Hillmann E. Segregation of information about emotional arousal and valence in horse whinnies. Sci Rep 2015 Apr 21;4:9989.
            doi: 10.1038/srep09989pubmed: 25897781google scholar: lookup
          23. Lemasson A, Remeuf K, Trabalon M, Cuir F, Hausberger M. Mares prefer the voices of highly fertile stallions. PLoS One 2015;10(2):e0118468.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118468pubmed: 25714814google scholar: lookup
          24. Cinková I, Policht R. Contact calls of the northern and southern white rhinoceros allow for individual and species identification. PLoS One 2014;9(6):e98475.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098475pubmed: 24901244google scholar: lookup
          25. Chojnacki RM, Vas J, Andersen IL. The effects of prenatal stocking densities on the fear responses and sociality of goat (Capra hircus) kids. PLoS One 2014;9(4):e94253.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094253pubmed: 24710177google scholar: lookup
          26. Rochais C, Henry S, Sankey C, Nassur F, Góracka-Bruzda A, Hausberger M. Visual attention, an indicator of human-animal relationships? A study of domestic horses (Equus caballus). Front Psychol 2014;5:108.
            doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00108pubmed: 24592244google scholar: lookup
          27. Lemasson A, Mikus MA, Blois-Heulin C, Lodé T. Social partner discrimination based on sounds and scents in Asian small-clawed otters (Aonyx cinereus). Naturwissenschaften 2013 Mar;100(3):275-9.
            doi: 10.1007/s00114-013-1022-9pubmed: 23397263google scholar: lookup
          28. Briefer Freymond S, Briefer EF, Von Niederhäusern R, Bachmann I. Pattern of social interactions after group integration: a possibility to keep stallions in group. PLoS One 2013;8(1):e54688.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054688pubmed: 23382940google scholar: lookup
          29. Scheumann M, Roser AE, Konerding W, Bleich E, Hedrich HJ, Zimmermann E. Vocal correlates of sender-identity and arousal in the isolation calls of domestic kitten (Felis silvestris catus). Front Zool 2012 Dec 21;9(1):36.
            doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-9-36pubmed: 23259698google scholar: lookup
          30. Durier V, Henry S, Sankey C, Sizun J, Hausberger M. Locomotor Inhibition in Adult Horses Faced to Stressors: A Single Postpartum Experience May be Enough!. Front Psychol 2012;3:442.
            doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00442pubmed: 23112783google scholar: lookup
          31. Knörnschild M, Jung K, Nagy M, Metz M, Kalko E. Bat echolocation calls facilitate social communication. Proc Biol Sci 2012 Dec 7;279(1748):4827-35.
            doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1995pubmed: 23034703google scholar: lookup
          32. George I, Richard JP, Cousillas H, Hausberger M. No need to Talk, I Know You: Familiarity Influences Early Multisensory Integration in a Songbird's Brain. Front Behav Neurosci 2011;4:193.
            doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00193pubmed: 21283531google scholar: lookup
          33. Briefer E, Vannoni E, McElligott AG. Quality prevails over identity in the sexually selected vocalisations of an ageing mammal. BMC Biol 2010 Apr 9;8:35.
            doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-35pubmed: 20380690google scholar: lookup
          34. Górski K, Kondracki S, Kępka-Borkowska K. The Complexity of Communication in Mammals: From Social and Emotional Mechanisms to Human Influence and Multimodal Applications. Animals (Basel) 2026 Jan 15;16(2).
            doi: 10.3390/ani16020265pubmed: 41594455google scholar: lookup
          35. Lefèvre RA, Amichaud O, Özcan D, Briefer EF. Biphonation in animal vocalizations: insights into communicative functions and production mechanisms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2025 Apr 3;380(1923):20240011.
            doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0011pubmed: 40176517google scholar: lookup
          36. Torres Borda L, Roth P, Lumetzberger J, Auer U, Jenner F. Proximity tracking using ultra-wideband technology for equine social behaviour research. Sci Rep 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9971.
            doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60805-0pubmed: 38693325google scholar: lookup
          37. Torres Borda L, Kelemen Z, Auer U, Jenner F. Video Ethogram of Equine Social Behaviour. Animals (Basel) 2024 Apr 14;14(8).
            doi: 10.3390/ani14081179pubmed: 38672327google scholar: lookup
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,824 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.