FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Horse Housing on Prince Edward Island, Canada: Attitudes and...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2023; 13(2); 275; doi: 10.3390/ani13020275

Horse Housing on Prince Edward Island, Canada: Attitudes and Experiences Related to Keeping Horses Outdoors and in Groups.

Abstract: Limited research has assessed the "human dimension" of horse care. The aims of this study were to (1) understand horse owner attitudes toward horse welfare when kept outdoors versus indoors and in groups versus individually, (2) compare horse owner attitudes toward horse welfare with the ways in which they house their horses, and (3) explore horse owner reasons for and challenges with their horses' housing. Seventy-six horse owners in Prince Edward Island, Canada completed a questionnaire. Non-parametric tests and quantitative content analysis were used for data analysis. Consistent with the way horses were kept, most (82-96%) owners agreed that horses' physical health, mental well-being, and natural living were better when kept outdoors and in groups. Fewer (64-68%) participants agreed that the horses' standard of care was better when kept outdoors or in groups. Results show associations between owners whose attitudes suggest indoor and/or individual housing is better for horse welfare and keeping their horses indoors part-time and/or individually. Two overarching themes were developed from owners' responses regarding their reasons and challenges related to the ways in which horses were housed: horse-centered and owner-centered care. The results indicate that horse owners' choices about their horses' housing correspond to beliefs about improved horse welfare.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2023-01-13 PubMed ID: 36670815PubMed Central: PMC9855179DOI: 10.3390/ani13020275Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper investigates the attitudes and practices of horse owners in Prince Edward Island, Canada concerning horse welfare in different housing scenarios – outdoors versus indoors and group versus individual housing. The study combines a questionnaire-based survey and data analysis, revealing that most owner attitudes lean towards outdoor and group housing as beneficial for horses’ physical health, mental well-being, and natural living.

Research Objectives

  • The researchers set out to delve into the human dimension of horse care, focusing on horse owner attitudes towards two main comparative aspects of horse housing: outdoor versus indoor, and group versus individual.
  • They seek to establish if these attitudes align with the actual housing preferences and choices exercised by the horse owners.
  • They explore the reasons and challenges that horse owners articulate about their housing choices for horses.

Research Methodology

  • They used a questionnaire to collect relevant data, completed by a sample size of 76 horse owners in Prince Edward Island, Canada.
  • They employed non-parametric tests and quantitative content analysis processes to analyse the data sharp-out from the questionnaire.

Research Findings

  • The findings revealed that a significant majority of horse owners (between 82%-96%) agreed that outdoor and group housing is better for the physical health, mental well-being and natural living conditions of horses.
  • Fewer participants (64%-68%) saw outdoor or group housing as positively impacting the standard of care for horses.
  • Findings also indicate a positive association between the attitudes of horse owners towards indoor and/or individual housing and their actual housing practices.
  • Assessing the reasons behind their housing choices, two key themes were developed: horse-centered care (prioritizing the horses’ welfare) and owner-centered care (prioritizing the convenience of the horse-keepers).

Conclusion

  • The key insight from this research is that a horse owner’s beliefs about horse welfare significantly influence their actual housing practices.

Cite This Article

APA
Ross M, Proudfoot K, Merkies K, Elsohaby I, Mills M, Macmillan K, Mckenna S, Ritter C. (2023). Horse Housing on Prince Edward Island, Canada: Attitudes and Experiences Related to Keeping Horses Outdoors and in Groups. Animals (Basel), 13(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020275

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 2
PII: 275

Researcher Affiliations

Ross, Megan
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Proudfoot, Kathryn
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Merkies, Katrina
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
  • Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Elsohaby, Ibrahim
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
  • Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China.
Mills, Molly
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Macmillan, Kathleen
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Mckenna, Shawn
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.
Ritter, Caroline
  • Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada.

Grant Funding

  • 000 / Canadian Agricultural Partnership
  • 000 / Sir James Dunn Animal Welfare Center
  • 000 / Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
  • 000 / Canada Research Chairs
  • 000 / Canada Foundation for Innovation

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

This article includes 66 references
  1. Hemsworth LM, Jongman E, Coleman GJ. Recreational Horse Welfare: The Relationships between Recreational Horse Owner Attributes and Recreational Horse Welfare.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2015;165:1–16.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.019google scholar: lookup
  2. Ikinger C, Spiller A, Kayser M. Factors Influencing the Attitude of Equestrians towards Sport Horse Welfare.. Anim. Welf. 2016;25:411–422.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.25.4.411google scholar: lookup
  3. Visser EK, van Wijk-Jansen EEC. Diversity in Horse Enthusiasts with Respect to Horse Welfare: An Explorative Study.. J. Vet. Behav. 2012;7:295–304.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2011.10.007google scholar: lookup
  4. Popescu S, Diugan EA, Spinu M. The interrelations of good welfare indicators assessed in working horses and their relationships with the type of work.. Res Vet Sci 2014 Apr;96(2):406-14.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.12.014pubmed: 24461957google scholar: lookup
  5. Lesimple C, Reverchon-Billot L, Galloux P, Stomp M, Boichot L, Coste C, Henry S, Hausberger M. Free Movement: A Key for Welfare Improvement in Sport Horses?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2020;225:104972.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104972google scholar: lookup
  6. Kelemen Z, Grimm H, Vogl C, Long M, Cavalleri JMV, Auer U, Jenner F. Equine Activity Time Budgets: The Effect of Housing and Management Conditions on Geriatric Horses and Horses with Chronic Orthopaedic Disease.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 23;11(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11071867pmc: PMC8300227pubmed: 34201584google scholar: lookup
  7. Kwiatkowska-Stenzel A, Sowińska J, Mituniewicz T. The Comparison of Horses Management Conditions in the Box Stable and the Horse-Barn.. Pol. J. Nat. Sci. 2011;26:27–36.
  8. Leme DP, Parsekian ABH, Kanaan V, Hötzel MJ. Management, Health, and Abnormal Behaviors of Horses: A Survey in Small Equestrian Centers in Brazil.. J. Vet. Behav. 2014;9:114–118.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2014.01.004google scholar: lookup
  9. Lesimple C, Poissonnet A, Hausberger M. How to Keep Your Horse Safe? An Epidemiological Study about Management Practices.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;181:105–114.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.04.015google scholar: lookup
  10. Lesimple C, Gautier E, Benhajali H, Rochais C, Lunel C, Bensaïd S, Khalloufi A, Henry S, Hausberger M. Stall Architecture Influences Horses’ Behaviour and the Prevalence and Type of Stereotypies.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2019;219:104833.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104833google scholar: lookup
  11. Connysson M, Rhodin M, Jansson A. Effects of Horse Housing System on Energy Balance during Post-Exercise Recovery.. Animals (Basel) 2019 Nov 14;9(11).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9110976pmc: PMC6912715pubmed: 31739646google scholar: lookup
  12. Connysson M, Rhodin M, Bergh A, Jansson A. Effects of Horse Housing on Musculoskeletal System Post-Exercise Recovery.. Comp. Exerc. Physiol. 2021;17:421–428.
    doi: 10.3920/CEP200088google scholar: lookup
  13. Pessoa GO, Trigo P, Mesquita Neto FD, Lacreta Junior ACC, Sousa TM, Muniz JA, Moura RS. Comparative Well-Being of Horses Kept under Total or Partial Confinement Prior to Employment for Mounted Patrols.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016;184:51–58.
    doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.08.014google scholar: lookup
  14. Fraser D, Weary DM, Pajor EA, Milligan BN. A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare That Reflects Ethical Concerns.. Anim. Welf. 1997;6:187–205.
    doi: 10.1017/S0962728600019795google scholar: lookup
  15. Weary DM, Robbins JA. Understanding the Multiple Conceptions of Animal Welfare.. Anim. Welf. 2019;28:33–40.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.28.1.033google scholar: lookup
  16. Horseman SV, Buller H, Mullan S, Knowles TG, Barr AR, Whay HR. Equine Welfare in England and Wales: Exploration of Stakeholders' Understanding.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2017 Jan-Mar;20(1):9-23.
    doi: 10.1080/10888705.2016.1197776pubmed: 27414640google scholar: lookup
  17. Fletcher K, Cameron L, Freeman M. Contemplating the Five Domains Model of Animal Welfare Assessment: UK Horse Owner Perceptions of Equine Well-Being.. Anim. Welf. 2021;30:259–268.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.30.3.003google scholar: lookup
  18. Viksten SM, Visser EK, Blokhuis HJ. A Comparative Study of the Application of Two Horse Welfare Assessment Protocols.. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 2016;66:56–65.
    doi: 10.1080/09064702.2016.1186726google scholar: lookup
  19. Sirovica LV, Ritter C, Hendricks J, Weary DM, Gulati S, von Keyserlingk MAG. Public attitude toward and perceptions of dairy cattle welfare in cow-calf management systems differing in type of social and maternal contact.. J Dairy Sci 2022 Apr;105(4):3248-3268.
    doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21344pubmed: 35094864google scholar: lookup
  20. Luna D, Tadich TA. Why Should Human-Animal Interactions Be Included in Research of Working Equids' Welfare?. Animals (Basel) 2019 Jan 30;9(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani9020042pmc: PMC6406816pubmed: 30704022google scholar: lookup
  21. Lanas R, Luna D, Tadich T. The Relationship between Working Horse Welfare and Their Owners’ Socio-Economic Status.. Anim. Welf. 2018;27:47–54.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.27.1.047google scholar: lookup
  22. Luna D, Vásquez RA, Rojas M, Tadich TA. Welfare Status of Working Horses and Owners' Perceptions of Their Animals.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Aug 1;7(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani7080056pmc: PMC5575568pubmed: 28788109google scholar: lookup
  23. Luna D, Vásquez R, Yáñez J, Tadich T. The Relationship between Working Horse Welfare State and Their Owners’ Empathy Level and Perception of Equine Pain.. Anim. Welf. 2018;27:115–123.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.27.2.115google scholar: lookup
  24. Christie JL, Hewson CJ, Riley CB, McNiven MA, Dohoo IR, Bate LA. Management factors affecting stereotypies and body condition score in nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island.. Can Vet J 2006 Feb;47(2):136-43.
    pmc: PMC1345728pubmed: 16579039
  25. Christie JL, Hewson CJ, Riley CB, Mcniven MA, Dohoo IR, Bate LA. Demographics, management, and welfare of nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island.. Can Vet J 2004 Dec;45(12):1004-11.
    pmc: PMC554751pubmed: 15646847
  26. DuBois C, Hambly-Odame H, Haley DB, Merkies K. An Exploration of Industry Expert Perception of Equine Welfare Using Vignettes.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Dec 20;7(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani7120102pmc: PMC5742796pubmed: 29261119google scholar: lookup
  27. DuBois C, Hambly Odame H, Haley DB, Merkies K. An exploration of industry expert perception of Canadian equine welfare using a modified Delphi technique.. PLoS One 2018;13(7):e0201363.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201363pmc: PMC6066239pubmed: 30059509google scholar: lookup
  28. Huxley K, Atkinson P, Delamont S, Cernat A, Sakshaug JW, Williams RA. Content Analysis, Quantitative.. .
  29. Downe-Wamboldt B. Content analysis: method, applications, and issues.. Health Care Women Int 1992 Jul-Sep;13(3):313-21.
    doi: 10.1080/07399339209516006pubmed: 1399871google scholar: lookup
  30. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.. Fam Med 2005 May;37(5):360-3.
    pubmed: 15883903
  31. Derisoud E, Nakonechny L, Merkies K. An Industry View of Perception and Practice of Equine Management in Canada.. J. Vet. Behav. 2016;15:94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2016.08.066google scholar: lookup
  32. Hartmann E, Bøe KE, Christensen JW, Hyyppä S, Jansson H, Jørgensen GH, Ladewig J, Mejdell CM, Norling Y, Rundgren M, Särkijärvi S, Søndergaard E, Keeling LJ. A Nordic survey of management practices and owners' attitudes towards keeping horses in groups.. J Anim Sci 2015 Sep;93(9):4564-74.
    doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9233pubmed: 26440355google scholar: lookup
  33. Rogers S, White J, Busby D. Introducing Human Behavior Change for Animals: A New Approach to Sustainable Change for Horses.. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:152.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.06.021google scholar: lookup
  34. Reilly AC, Bryk-Lucy JA. 143 Incidence of Soft Tissue Injury and Hours of Daily Paddock Turnout in Non-Elite Performance Horses.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2021;100:103606.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103606google scholar: lookup
  35. Graham-Thiers PM, Bowen LK. Improved Ability to Maintain Fitness in Horses During Large Pasture Turnout.. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013;33:581–585.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.09.001google scholar: lookup
  36. Luke KL, Rawluk A, McAdie T. A New Approach to Horse Welfare Based on Systems Thinking.. Anim. Welf. 2022;31:37–49.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.31.1.004google scholar: lookup
  37. Yarnell K, Hall C, Royle C, Walker SL. Domesticated horses differ in their behavioural and physiological responses to isolated and group housing.. Physiol Behav 2015 May 1;143:51-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.02.040pubmed: 25725117google scholar: lookup
  38. Schmucker S, Preisler V, Marr I, Krüger K, Stefanski V. Single housing but not changes in group composition causes stress-related immunomodulations in horses.. PLoS One 2022;17(8):e0272445.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272445pmc: PMC9385002pubmed: 35976860google scholar: lookup
  39. Henderson AJ. Don't fence me in: managing psychological well being for elite performance horses.. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2007;10(4):309-29.
    doi: 10.1080/10888700701555576pubmed: 17970632google scholar: lookup
  40. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. The Day-to-Day Management of UK Leisure Horses and the Prevalence of Owner-Reported Stable-Related and Handling Behaviour Problems.. Anim. Welf. 2015;24:29–36.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.1.029google scholar: lookup
  41. Smith R, Pinchbeck G, McGowan C, Ireland J, Perkins E. Caring for the Older Horse: A Conceptual Model of Owner Decision Making.. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 2;11(5).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11051309pmc: PMC8147395pubmed: 34063176google scholar: lookup
  42. McGowan TW, Pinchbeck G, Phillips CJ, Perkins N, Hodgson DR, McGowan CM. A survey of aged horses in Queensland, Australia. Part 2: Clinical signs and owners' perceptions of health and welfare.. Aust Vet J 2010 Dec;88(12):465-71.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2010.00638.xpubmed: 21091457google scholar: lookup
  43. Ireland J, Clegg P, McGowan C, Duncan J, McCall S, Platt L, Pinchbeck G. Owners’ Perceptions of Quality of Life in Geriatric Horses: A Cross-Sectional Study.. Anim. Welf. 2011;20:483–495.
    doi: 10.1017/S0962728600003122google scholar: lookup
  44. Hemsworth LM, Jongman EC, Coleman GJ. The Human-Horse Relationship: Identifying the Antecedents of Horse Owner Attitudes towards Horse Husbandry and Management Behaviour.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 22;11(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11020278pmc: PMC7911803pubmed: 33499202google scholar: lookup
  45. Heleski CR, Mertig AG, Zanella AJ. Stakeholder Attitudes toward Farm Animal Welfare.. Anthrozoos. 2006;19:290–307.
    doi: 10.2752/089279306785415439google scholar: lookup
  46. DeBoer ML, Jaqueth AL, Tuszka A, Martinson KL. Winter blanketing practices: An online survey of North American horse owners.. J Equine Vet Sci 2022 Jun;113:103911.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.103911pubmed: 35202780google scholar: lookup
  47. Butterfield ME, Hill SE, Lord CG. Mangy Mutt or Furry Friend? Anthropomorphism Promotes Animal Welfare.. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2012;48:957–960.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.010google scholar: lookup
  48. Serpell JA. How Happy Is Your Pet? The Problem of Subjectivity in the Assessment of Companion Animal Welfare.. Anim. Welf. 2019;28:57–66.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.28.1.057google scholar: lookup
  49. Bradshaw J, Casey RA. Anthropomorphism and Anthropocentrism as Influences in the Quality of Life of Companion Animals.. Anim. Welf. 2007;16:149–154.
    doi: 10.1017/S0962728600031869google scholar: lookup
  50. Mellor DJ. Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2017 Aug 9;7(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani7080060pmc: PMC5575572pubmed: 28792485google scholar: lookup
  51. Webster J. Assessment of Animal Welfare: The Five Freedoms.. .
  52. Mellor DJ. Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" by Updating the "Five Provisions" and Introducing Aligned "Animal Welfare Aims".. Animals (Basel) 2016 Sep 23;6(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani6100059pmc: PMC5082305pubmed: 27669313google scholar: lookup
  53. Mellor DJ, Beausoleil NJ, Littlewood KE, McLean AN, McGreevy PD, Jones B, Wilkins C. The 2020 Five Domains Model: Including Human-Animal Interactions in Assessments of Animal Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 14;10(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101870pmc: PMC7602120pubmed: 33066335google scholar: lookup
  54. McGreevy P, Berger J, de Brauwere N, Doherty O, Harrison A, Fiedler J, Jones C, McDonnell S, McLean A, Nakonechny L, Nicol C, Preshaw L, Thomson P, Tzioumis V, Webster J, Wolfensohn S, Yeates J, Jones B. Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare.. Animals (Basel) 2018 Mar 18;8(3).
    doi: 10.3390/ani8030041pmc: PMC5867529pubmed: 29562654google scholar: lookup
  55. Heleski CR, Shelle AC, Nielsen BD, Zanella AJ. Influence of Housing on Weanling Horse Behavior and Subsequent Welfare.. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;78:291–302.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00108-9google scholar: lookup
  56. McLean JG. Equine paralytic myoglobinuria ("azoturia"): a review.. Aust Vet J 1973 Jan;49(1):41-3.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1973.tb14679.xpubmed: 4570243google scholar: lookup
  57. van René Weeren P, Firth EC, Brama PAJ. To Move or to Perish: The Importance of Exercise during Musculoskeletal Development in the Horse.. Pferdeheilkunde 2010;26:581–587.
    doi: 10.21836/pem20100413google scholar: lookup
  58. Suagee-Bedore JK, Linden DR, Bennett-Wimbush K. Effect of Pen Size on Stress Responses of Stall-Housed Horses Receiving One Hour of Daily Turnout.. J Equine Vet Sci 2021 Mar;98:103366.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103366pubmed: 33663718google scholar: lookup
  59. Hoffmann G, Wagels E, Kräft S, Goossens L, Ammon C, Georg H, Feige K. Comparative Study of Horses in Tie Stalls, Individual Housing in Boxes and Group Housing.. Pferdeheilkunde Equine Med. 2012;28:702–709.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20120608google scholar: lookup
  60. Dalla Costa E, Dai F, Lebelt D, Scholz P, Barbieri S, Canali E, Zanella AJ, Minero M. Welfare Assessment of Horses: The AWIN Approach.. Anim. Welf. 2016;25:481–488.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.25.4.481google scholar: lookup
  61. Dalla Costa E, Murray L, Dai F, Canali E, Minero M. Equine On-Farm Welfare Assessment: A Review of Animal-Based Indicators.. Anim. Welf. 2014;23:323–341.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.3.323google scholar: lookup
  62. Hötzel MJ, Vieira MC, Leme DP. Exploring Horse Owners’ and Caretakers’ Perceptions of Emotions and Associated Behaviors in Horses.. J. Vet. Behav. 2019;29:18–24.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2018.10.002google scholar: lookup
  63. Wires C, Hoffman R, Talbert A, Brady C, O’Haire M, Croney C. 111 Ability to Interpret and Apply Animal Behavior and Welfare Terminology by Adults within the Horse Industry.. J Equine Vet Sci. 2021;100:103574.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103574google scholar: lookup
  64. Viksten SM, Visser EK, Nyman S, Blokhuis HJ. Developing a Horse Welfare Assessment Protocol.. Animal Welfare 2017;26:59–65.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.26.1.059google scholar: lookup
  65. DuBois C, de Vries TJ, Haley DB, Lawlis P, Merkies K. Farm Manager Involvement in an Equine On-Farm Welfare Assessment: Opportunities for Education and Improvement.. Animal Welfare 2019;28:173–181.
    doi: 10.7120/09627286.28.2.173google scholar: lookup
  66. . Canadian Horse Industry Profile Survey.. 2010.

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Brauns M, Ali A, Berger J, McLean A. Physiological and Behavioral Responses of Stabled Horses (Equus caballus) to Three Types of Environmental Enrichment. Animals (Basel) 2025 Sep 23;15(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15192779pubmed: 41096375google scholar: lookup
  2. Phelipon R, Hennes N, Ruet A, Bret-Morel A, Górecka-Bruzda A, Lansade L. Forage, freedom of movement, and social interactions remain essential fundamentals for the welfare of high-level sport horses. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1504116.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1504116pubmed: 39634765google scholar: lookup
  3. Ross M, Proudfoot K, Campbell Nishimura E, Morabito E, Merkies K, Mitchell J, Ritter C. 'It's more emotionally based': Prince Edward Island horse owner perspectives of horse weight management. Anim Welf 2024;33:e14.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.9pubmed: 38510426google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.