Analyze Diet
Veterinary parasitology2020; 281; 109094; doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109094

Horses are susceptible to natural, but resistant to experimental, infection with the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica.

Abstract: Fasciola hepatica is a common parasite of livestock in Ireland, causing significant economic losses and affecting animal welfare. A previous abattoir study of 200 horses led to an estimated 9.5 % prevalence of infection in horses slaughtered in Ireland. However, the epidemiology and pathogenic significance of this infection in this species is not well-described. The objectives of this study were to determine the susceptibility of horses to oral challenge infection with F. hepatica metacercariae, and to document the course of the infection along with serological and biochemical response. We attempted an experimental infection of horses (n = 10; 9 geldings and 1 mare) with F. hepatica. Four were given 1000 metacercariae, four 500 metacercariae and two were sham-infected. Blood and faecal samples were taken at intervals up to 18 weeks post-infection (wpi). ELISA assays were used to assess sero-conversion in the experimental horses and also in a panel of sera from horses of known fluke status. No flukes were recovered from any of the livers, and neither were any lesions that could be attributed to F. hepatica infection observed. Coproantigen ELISA was negative throughout for all horses. Three antibody detection ELISAs, useful in diagnosing fasciolosis in other species, had limitations as diagnostic aids as determined using a panel of sera from horses of known F. hepatica infection status. This study is limited by the relatively small number of animals included, and the relatively short duration of the study period. Failure to establish infection after oral challenge raises fundamental questions on the pathophysiology and epidemiology of equine fasciolosis.
Publication Date: 2020-04-02 PubMed ID: 32344146DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109094Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on how horses react to infection by Fasciola hepatica, a parasite that is common in the livestock of Ireland. This was done via experimental infection and the monitoring of blood and fecal samples.

Study Objectives

  • The researchers wanted to understand the susceptibility of horses to the Fasciola hepatica parasite when it’s introduced orally.
  • They also aimed to trace the progression of the infection, as well as the biological and serological responses it induces in horses.

Methodology

  • The team conducted an experimental infection on 10 horses (9 geldings and 1 mare) using metacercariae of Fasciola hepatica.
  • Some of the horses were given higher dosage (1000 metacercariae) while others were given a lesser amount (500 metacercariae). Two horses were sham-infected, serving as the control group.
  • Blood and faecal samples were collected at intervals up to 18 weeks after the infection. The samples were analysed using the ELISA method.

Findings

  • No flukes were found in any of the horse’s livers and no lesions that could be connected to the Fasciola hepatica infection were observed.
  • All Coproantigen ELISA results were negative for all horses, indicating the absence of parasite antigens in the faecal samples of horses.
  • Three antibody detection ELISAs that are used for diagnosing the parasite infection in other species proved to be flawed on equine sera samples.

Limitations and Implications

  • The study’s limitations include the relatively low number of animals used in the experiment and the short duration of the study period. The results may have been different with a larger sample size or longer study period.
  • An important implication of this study is that it brings up questions on the pathophysiology and epidemiology of equine fasciolosis, as the infection did not establish after the horses were orally challenged with the parasite.

Cite This Article

APA
Quigley A, Sekiya M, Garcia-Campos A, Paz-Silva A, Howell A, Williams DJL, Mulcahy G. (2020). Horses are susceptible to natural, but resistant to experimental, infection with the liver fluke, Fasciola hepatica. Vet Parasitol, 281, 109094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109094

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2550
NlmUniqueID: 7602745
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 281
Pages: 109094
PII: S0304-4017(20)30074-1

Researcher Affiliations

Quigley, A
  • UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Sekiya, M
  • UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Garcia-Campos, A
  • UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Paz-Silva, A
  • Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Howell, A
  • Veterinary Parasitology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, UK.
Williams, D J L
  • Veterinary Parasitology, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, UK.
Mulcahy, G
  • UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: grace.mulcahy@ucd.ie.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Disease Susceptibility / parasitology
  • Disease Susceptibility / veterinary
  • Fasciola hepatica / physiology
  • Fascioliasis / parasitology
  • Fascioliasis / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horses

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Villa-Mancera A, Reynoso-Palomar A. The prevalence and risk factors of liver fluke infection in Mexican horses, donkeys and mules in tropical and temperate regions.. Parasitol Res 2020 Nov;119(11):3699-3703.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06910-1pubmed: 33006039google scholar: lookup