Analyze Diet
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2020; 10(2); doi: 10.3390/ani10020221

Horses Failed to Learn from Humans by Observation.

Abstract: Animals can acquire new behavior through both individual and social learning. Several studies have investigated horses' ability to utilize inter-species (human demonstrator) social learning with conflicting results. In this study, we repeat a previous study, which found that horses had the ability to learn from observing humans performing an instrumental task, but we include a control for stimulus enhancement. One human demonstrator and thirty horses were included, and the horses were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: (A) full human demonstration, (B) partial human demonstration, and (C) no human demonstration. The task was for the horses to touch an object situated 1 m away from a feed box, to open this feed box, and thereby obtain a food reward. The success of each horse, the behavior directed towards the apparatus and the human, and behaviors indicative of frustration were observed. The results showed that horses observing a full and partial human demonstration were not more successful in solving the instrumental task than horses not observing any demonstration. Horses that did not solve the task expressed more box- and human-oriented behavior compared to successful horses, which may be an indication of motivation to solve the task and/or frustration from being unable to solve the task.
Publication Date: 2020-01-29 PubMed ID: 32013218PubMed Central: PMC7070367DOI: 10.3390/ani10020221Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study investigates the ability of horses to learn from humans through observation but found that horses were no more successful in performing a task when observing a human’s demonstration compared to not observing a demonstration.

Research Methodology

  • The research involved thirty horses and one human demonstrator. The horses were randomly assigned to one of three groups with different treatments:
    • A) Full human demonstration,
    • B) Partial human demonstration,
    • C) No human demonstration.
  • The task assigned for the horses was to touch an object located 1 meter away from a feed box that would open the box and provide a food reward.
  • The researchers observed and recorded the horses’ behavior towards the apparatus and the human, and whether they showed signs of frustration.

Research Findings

  • The key finding from the study was that horses observing a full or partial human demonstration were not more successful in solving the task than horses not observing any demonstration. This suggests that inter-species (i.e., from human to animal) social learning may not be as effective in horses may not be as effective in horses as previously thought.
  • Horses that were unsuccessful at the task displayed more box- and human-oriented behavior, suggesting they may have experienced motivation to complete the task or frustration from being unable to do so.

Interpretation and Implications

  • The findings suggest that horses’ capability for social learning from humans through observation is questionable, contradicting some previous studies.
  • The visible frustration in unsuccessful horses indicates a drive to solve the task, which can potentially be employed in different instructional methods.
  • In further research, a different methodology or different tasks might be required to accurately assess and support the ability of horses to learn from human demonstrators.

Cite This Article

APA
Rørvang MV, Nielsen TB, Christensen JW. (2020). Horses Failed to Learn from Humans by Observation. Animals (Basel), 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020221

Publication

ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 2

Researcher Affiliations

Rørvang, Maria Vilain
  • Department Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 23053 Alnarp, Sweden.
Nielsen, Tina Bach
  • Department Animal Science, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Christensen, Janne Winther
  • Department Animal Science, Aarhus University, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Thorpe W.H.. Learning and Instinct in Animals. 1963 p. 55.
  2. Heyes C.. What’s social about social learning?. J. Comp. Psychol. 2012;126:193.
    doi: 10.1037/a0025180pubmed: 21895355google scholar: lookup
  3. Galef B.G.. Imitation and local enhancement: Detrimental effects of consensus definitions on analyses of social learning in animals. Behav. Processes 2013;100:123–130.
    doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.026pubmed: 23954830google scholar: lookup
  4. Rørvang M.V., Christensen J.W., Ladewig J., McLean A.. Social Learning in Horses—Fact or Fiction?. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:212.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00212pmc: PMC6135911pubmed: 30238009google scholar: lookup
  5. Boesch C., Tomasello M.. Chimpanzee and Human Cultures. Curr. Anthropol. 1998;39:591–614.
    doi: 10.1086/204785google scholar: lookup
  6. Morgan C.L.. Other minds than ours. 1903 p. 59.
  7. Avarguès-Weber A., Dawson E.H., Chittka L.. Mechanisms of social learning across species boundaries. J. Zool. 2013;290:1–11.
    doi: 10.1111/jzo.12015google scholar: lookup
  8. Burla J.B., Siegwart J., Nawroth C.. Human demonstration does not facilitate the performance of horses (Equus caballus) in a spatial problem-solving task. Animals 2018;8:96.
    doi: 10.3390/ani8060096pmc: PMC6025305pubmed: 29899296google scholar: lookup
  9. Henriksson J., Sauveroche M., Roth L.S.V.. Effects of size and personality on social learning and human-directed behaviour in horses (Equus caballus). Anim. Cogn. 2019;22:1001–1011.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01291-0pmc: PMC6834737pubmed: 31312981google scholar: lookup
  10. Schuetz A., Farmer K., Krueger K.. Social learning across species: Horses (Equus caballus) learn from humans by observation. Anim. Cogn. 2017;20:567–573.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1060-8pubmed: 27866286google scholar: lookup
  11. Bernauer K., Kollross H., Schuetz A., Farmer K., Krueger K.. How do horses (Equus caballus) learn from observing human action?. Anim. Cogn. 2019;23:1–9.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01310-0pubmed: 31531748google scholar: lookup
  12. McGreevy P., Christensen J.W., Von Borstel U.K., McLean A.. Equitation Science. 2nd ed. 2018.
  13. Rochais C., Henry S., Hausberger M.. “Hay-bags” and “Slow feeders”: Testing their impact on horse behaviour and welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2018;198:52–59.
  14. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing R Core Team. [(accessed on 9 May 2019)];2019 Available online: https://www.r-project.org/
  15. Wickham H.. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. 2009.
  16. SJVFS Saknr L 150: Statens jordbruksverkets föreskrifter och allmänna råd om försöksdjur; Jönkjöping, Sweden. [(accessed on 10 July 2019)];2019 Available online: http://www.jordbruksverket.se/download/18.7c1e1fce169bee5214fad877/1553851490782/2019-009.pdf.
  17. Kilkenny C., Browne W.J., Cuthill I.C., Emerson M., Altman D.G.. Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000412.
  18. Duncan I., Hagan K., Jose Hotzel M., Lay D., Olsson A., Sherwin C., Whittaker A., Martin F.. Ethical Treatment of Animals in Applied Animal Behaviour Research: Ethical Stand-Point & Decision Models. Int. Soc. Appl. Ethol. 2013.
  19. Lindberg A.C., Kelland A., Nicol C.J.. Effects of observational learning on acquisition of an operant response in horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999;61:187–199.
  20. Ahrendt L.P., Christensen J.W., Ladewig J.. The ability of horses to learn an instrumental task through social observation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;139:105–113.
  21. Sankey C., Henry S., André N., Richard-Yris M.A., Hausberger M.. Do horses have a concept of person?. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e18331.
  22. Lesimple C., Sankey C., Richard M.A., Hausberger M.. Do horses expect humans to solve their problems?. Front. Psychol. 2012;3:306.
    doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00306pmc: PMC3426792pubmed: 22936923google scholar: lookup
  23. Proops L., McComb K.. Attributing attention: The use of human-given cues by domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim. Cogn. 2010;13:197–205.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0257-5pubmed: 19588176google scholar: lookup
  24. Krueger K., Flauger B., Farmer K., Maros K.. Horses (Equus caballus) use human local enhancement cues and adjust to human attention. Anim. Cogn. 2011;14:187–201.
    doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0352-7pubmed: 20845052google scholar: lookup
  25. Proops L., Walton M., McComb K.. The use of human-given cues by domestic horses, Equus caballus, during an object choice task. Anim. Behav. 2010;79:1205–1209.
    doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.015pubmed: 19588176google scholar: lookup