Analyze Diet

How do GTR and GBR Differ? A Periodontitis Case Treated Using an Equine-derived, Enzyme-deantigenic, Collagenpreserving Bone Graft, and Collagen Membranes.

Abstract: The present case illustrates how a tooth, which had a highly questionable prognosis, was preserved by carrying out a periodontal regeneration surgery. Background: Treatment of periodontitis involves a careful consideration of all the factors that may allow the achievement of a favorable outcome; among those, the skillful use of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membranes is of paramount importance. Methods: A 39-year-old patient presented with a mobile central upper incisor due to severe periodontitis and was treated according to GTR principles using a collagen membrane. A collagen-preserving bone graft was also used, as a scaffold for clot formation and cellular infiltration, which was covered with a second collagen membrane. The patient was contacted for follow-up assessment at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery. Follow-up radiographs showed that bone regeneration occurred around the involved tooth and very little tooth mobility was observed. The patient's masticatory function, appearance, and comfort were favorable. Conclusions: The use of two equine collagen membranes with the purpose of creating the best conditions to carry out periodontal regeneration according to GTR principles, in association with an equine, collagen-preserving, enzyme-deantigenic bone graft, allowed sufficient bone regeneration to salvage a tooth that was deemed otherwise lost because of periodontitis. Conclusions: In cases of teeth that are severely compromised by periodontitis, the use of collagen membranes according to GTR principles can allow the regeneration of the periodontal tissues; the association with a bone substitute having well-known performance rates, covered with a collagen membrane (guided bone regeneration, GBR) can, in some cases, improve bone regeneration at the defect site.
Publication Date: 2019-05-01 PubMed ID: 31316031
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research primarily focuses on showcasing how a severely infected tooth with high chances of loss could remarkably be saved through a guided tissue regeneration (GTR) surgery technique. The technique was amplified by the use of two equine collagen membranes and an equine-derived, enzyme-deantigenic, collagen-preserving bone graft, which combinedly facilitated sufficient bone regeneration.

Overview of GTR and GBR Methods

  • Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is a periodontal treatment method where a membrane is utilized to guide the growth of new gum and bone at sites where there is bone deficiency or erosion due to periodontitis.
  • Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a similar type of technique employed for bone regeneration, specifically targeting critical bone defects. This method is frequently used in conjunction with membranes covered with a bone substitute to facilitate growth at the defect site.

Case Details and Treatment Approach

  • The patient under treatment was a 39-year-old with a mobile central upper incisor, caused due to severe periodontitis.
  • The tooth, initially with a questionable prognosis, was treated based on the principles of GTR using a collagen membrane. Additionally, a collagen-preserving bone graft was employed as a scaffold for clot formation and cell infiltration, which was subsequently covered by a second collagen membrane.

Follow-Up Assessment and Outcomes

  • Post-surgery, assessments were done at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months to monitor the patient’s progress.
  • Follow-up radiographs suggested that bone regeneration had occurred around the diseased tooth with only minimal tooth mobility observed.
  • The patient reported improvements in masticatory function, comfort, and physical appearance, suggesting a favorable outcome.

Concluding Insights

  • The use of double equine collagen membranes to conduct periodontal regeneration according to GTR principles, coupled with an equine, collagen-preserving, enzyme-deantigenic bone graft, proved effective in salvaging a tooth initially considered lost due to periodontitis.
  • For cases where teeth are severely affected by periodontitis, the application of collagen membranes under GTR practices can enable the regeneration of periodontal tissues. Moreover, GTR coupled with a bone substitute with proven effectiveness, covered with a collagen membrane (GBR approach), can further enhance bone regeneration at the defect site in some cases.

Cite This Article

APA
Tizzoni R, Tizzoni M. (2019). How do GTR and GBR Differ? A Periodontitis Case Treated Using an Equine-derived, Enzyme-deantigenic, Collagenpreserving Bone Graft, and Collagen Membranes. J Contemp Dent Pract, 20(5), 639-644.

Publication

ISSN: 1526-3711
NlmUniqueID: 101090552
Country: India
Language: English
Volume: 20
Issue: 5
Pages: 639-644

Researcher Affiliations

Tizzoni, Riccardo
  • Private practice in Milan, Italy, Via San Barnaba 30, Milan, Italy, Phone: +39-025453560, e-mail: dottori.tizzoni@gmail.com.
Tizzoni, Marta
  • Private practice in Milan, Italy.

MeSH Terms

  • Adult
  • Alveolar Bone Loss
  • Animals
  • Bone Regeneration
  • Bone Transplantation
  • Collagen
  • Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal
  • Horses
  • Humans
  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Periodontitis

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Wang H. A Review of the Effects of Collagen Treatment in Clinical Studies. Polymers (Basel) 2021 Nov 9;13(22).
    doi: 10.3390/polym13223868pubmed: 34833168google scholar: lookup
  2. Gallo N, Natali ML, Sannino A, Salvatore L. An Overview of the Use of Equine Collagen as Emerging Material for Biomedical Applications. J Funct Biomater 2020 Nov 1;11(4).
    doi: 10.3390/jfb11040079pubmed: 33139660google scholar: lookup