Analyze Diet
Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation2018; 70(4); 495-509; doi: 10.3233/CH-189316

Human and equine endothelial cells in a live cell imaging scratch assay in vitro.

Abstract: Human and equine patients are known to frequently develop vascular complications, particularly thrombosis both in veins and arteries as well as in the microvasculature. Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate and compare the angiogenic response of human and equine endothelial cells to lesions in an in vitro scratch assay. Methods: Endothelial cells from human umbilical vein (HUVEC), abdominal aorta (HAAEC) and dermal microvasculature (HDMEC) as well as equine carotid artery (EACEC) and jugular vein (EVJEC) were cultured and an elongated defect was created (scratch or "wound"). Cultures were monitored over a period of 90 hours in a live cell imaging microscope. Results: In the human endothelial cell cultures, there was a uniform and continuous migration of the cells from the scratch fringe into the denuded area, which was closed after 17 (HUVEC), 15 (HAAEC) and 26 (HDMEC) hours. In the equine endothelial cell cultures, a complete closure of the induced defect occurred after 17 (EVJEC) and 35 (EACEC) hours. Conclusions: In the equine arterial cells, the delay in closure of the denuded area seems to be the results of a disoriented and uncoordinated migration of endothelial tip cells resulting in slow re-endothelialization.
Publication Date: 2018-11-08 PubMed ID: 30400082DOI: 10.3233/CH-189316Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper investigates and compares the way human and equine (horse) endothelial cells respond to vascular damage. The researchers used a live cell imaging method to monitor the healing process of these cells in an in vitro environment.

Objective

  • The main aim of this study was to compare how human and equine endothelial cells react to injuries, specifically focusing on their angiogenic response – the formation of new blood vessels – in vitro.

Methods

  • Endothelial cells from varying sources were used including human umbilical vein (HUVEC), human abdominal aorta (HAAEC), human dermal microvasculature (HDMEC), equine carotid artery (EACEC), and equine jugular vein (EVJEC).
  • These cells were cultured and then an elongated defect or “wound” was created to emulate vascular injury.
  • The scratch assay was monitored for a total of 90 hours in a live cell imaging microscope to observe how the cells responded to the injury and tracked the time it took to heal the wound.

Results

  • In the human endothelial cells, they observed a uniform and progressive migration of cells from the edges of the scratch towards the empty area. This area was fully healed after 17, 15, and 26 hours for HUVEC, HAAEC, and HDMEC, respectively.
  • Meanwhile, in the equine endothelial cells, full closure of the injury was achieved after 17 and 35 hours for EVJEC and EACEC, respectively.

Conclusions

  • The study found that the equine arterial cells exhibited slower wound healing compared to the human endothelial cells and equine venous cells. This delay is believed to be due to the disoriented and uncoordinated migration of the endothelial tip cells which consequently slows down the re-endothelialization process, or the repair of the endothelial layer on the inner surface of blood vessels.

Cite This Article

APA
Rieger J, Hopperdietzel C, Kaessmeyer S, Slosarek I, Diecke S, Richardson K, Plendl J. (2018). Human and equine endothelial cells in a live cell imaging scratch assay in vitro. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 70(4), 495-509. https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-189316

Publication

ISSN: 1875-8622
NlmUniqueID: 9709206
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 70
Issue: 4
Pages: 495-509

Researcher Affiliations

Rieger, Juliane
  • Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Veterinary Anatomy, Germany.
Hopperdietzel, Carsten
  • Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Veterinary Anatomy, Germany.
Kaessmeyer, Sabine
  • Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Veterinary Anatomy, Germany.
Slosarek, Ilka
  • Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Veterinary Anatomy, Germany.
Diecke, Sebastian
  • Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Germany.
Richardson, Ken
  • Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Plendl, Johanna
  • Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Veterinary Anatomy, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Assay / methods
  • Cells, Cultured / cytology
  • Cells, Cultured / metabolism
  • Endothelial Cells / cytology
  • Endothelial Cells / metabolism
  • Horses
  • Humans