Analyze Diet

Identification and differentiation of Taylorella equigenitalis and Taylorella asinigenitalis by lipopolysaccharide O-antigen serology using monoclonal antibodies.

Abstract: Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) from Taylorella equigenitalis, the causative agent of contagious equine metritis, and T. asinigenitalis were compared by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Lipopolysaccharide profiles of 11 T. equigenitalis strains were similar, but different from the profiles of 3 T. asinigenitalis strains, and the profiles of 2 T. asinigenitalis strains were similar to each other. The serological specificities of the LPSs from these 14 strains were examined by immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to the LPSs of the T. equigenitalis and T. asinigenitalis type strains and T. asinigenitalis strain 2329-98. A MAb to T. equigenitalis LPS O-polysaccharide (O-PS) (M2560) reacted with LPSs from all T. equigenitalis strains but did not react with LPSs from the 3 T. asinigenitalis strains or with 43 non-Taylorella bacteria. Three MAbs to the T. asinigenitalis type strain LPS O-PS or core epitopes (M2974, M2982, M3000) reacted with the homologous strain and T. asinigenitalis strain Bd 3751/05, but not with any of the other bacteria. Five MAbs to T. asinigenitalis 2329-98 LPS O-PS or core epitopes (M2904, M2907, M2910, M2923, M2929) reacted only with this strain. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of the O-PSs of the type strains of T. equigenitalis and T. asinigenitalis provided fingerprint identification and differentiation of these 2 organisms. The serological results were consistent with our previous finding that the O-antigen of the type strain of T. equigenitalis, being a linear polymer of disaccharide repeating [-->4)-alpha-L-GulpNAc3NAcA-(1-->4)-beta-D-ManpNAc3NAcA-(1-->] units, differs from that of the T. asinigenitalis O-antigen polymer that is composed of repeating [-->3)-beta-D-QuipNAc4NAc-(1-->3)-beta-D-GlcpNAmA-(1-->] units. Lipopolysaccharide O-PS could be a specific marker for identification and differentiation of T. equigenitalis and T. asinigenitalis, and provide the basis for the development of specific detection assays for T. equigenitalis. Les lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) provenant de Taylorella equigenitalis, l’agent étiologique de la métrite contagieuse équine, et T. asinigenitalis ont été comparés par électrophorèse sur gel de polyacrylamide avec du sulfate de dodécyl sodique (SDS-PAGE). Les profils de LPSs de 11 souches de T. equigenitalis étaitent similaires, mais différaient des profils de 3 souches de T. asinigenitalis, et les profils de 2 souches de T. asinigenitalis étaient similaires entre eux. Les spécificités sérologiques des LPSs de ces 14 souches ont été examinées par immunobuvardage et immunoessais avec des anticorps monoclonaux (Mabs) contre les LPSs des souches types de T. equigenitalis et T. asinigenitalis et la souche 2329–98 de T. asinigenitalis. Un MAb contre le polysaccharide O (O-PS) du LPS de M. equigenitalis (M2560) a réagit avec les LPSs de toutes les souches de T. equigenitalis mais n’a pas réagit avec les LPSs des 3 souches de T. asinigenitalis ou des 43 bactéries différentes de Taylorella. Trois MAbs dirigés contre le O-PS LPS ou les épitopes du core de la souche type de T. asinigenitalis (M2974, M2982, M3000) ont réagit avec la souche homologue et avec la souche Bd 3751/05 de T. asinigenitalis, mais avec aucune autre bactérie. Cinq MAbs dirigés contre le O-PS du LPS ou les épitopes du core de T. asinigenitalis 2329–98 (M2904, M2907, M2910, M2923, M2929) n’ont réagit qu’avec cette souche. Le spectre des O-PSs des souches types de T. equigenitalis et T. asinigenitalis obtenu par résonnance magnétique nucléaire protonique a fourni des empreintes pour l’identification et la différenciation de ces 2 organismes. Les résultats sérologiques étaient compatibles avec nos résultats précédents qui indiquaient que l’antigène O de la souche type de T. equigenitalis, qui est un polymère linéaire d’unités répétées du disaccharide [→4)-α -L-GulpNAc3NAcA-(1→4)- β-D-ManpNAc3NAcA-(1→], diffère du polymère de l’antigène O de T. asinigenitalis qui est composé d’unités répétées de [3→)- β-D-QuipNAc4NAc-(1→3)- β-D-GlcpNAmA-(1→]. Le O-PS du LPS pourrait être un marqueur spécifique pour l’identification et la différenciation de T. equigenitalis et T. asinigenitalis, et il fournit les éléments de base pour le développement d’épreuves spécifiques de détection de T. equigenitalis. (Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier)
Publication Date: 2010-04-02 PubMed ID: 20357953PubMed Central: PMC2801306
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper discusses the identification and distinction of two bacteria strains, Taylorella equigenitalis and Taylorella asinigenitalis, by analyzing their Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) structures using serology methods with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs).

Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) Comparison

  • The research used sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) to compare the LPSs from Taylorella equigenitalis and T. asinigenitalis.
  • The LPS profile findings, which represents the composition and structure of the bacterial cell wall, showed that 11 strains of T. equigenitalis were similar to each other but different from 3 strains of T. asinigenitalis, which were also similar to each other.

Use of Monoclonal Antibodies in Identification

  • The specificities of the LPSs were examined through immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay utilizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), which are identical antibodies made by identical immune cells that were cloned from a unique parent cell.
  • When these monoclonal antibodies were exposed to T. equigenitalis, they reacted with the LPS from all T. equigenitalis strains but not with the LPSs from the 3 T. asinigenitalis strains or any other non-Taylorella bacteria.
  • Contrarily, three MAbs reacting with T. asinigenitalis only positively identified the same strain and one other, but none of the other bacteria.

Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectra

  • This method was used to provide a ‘fingerprint’ identification by distinguishing between the type strains of T. equigenitalis and T. asinigenitalis.
  • The NMR spectra of the O-Polysaccharides (O-PS) of both types of bacteria were fundamentally different, hence aiding in their identification.

Implication of Findings

  • The consistency of the serological results with the previously known O-antigen structure of T. equigenitalis bacteria, as well as the distinct structure of T. asinigenitalis, lends support to their findings.
  • The research concludes that the LPS O-PS could potentially serve as a specific marker for the identification and differentiation of the two studied Taylorella strains.
  • This study could set the stage for the development of precise detection assays for T. equigenitalis, important for controlling and preventing the spread of infections caused by these bacteria.

Cite This Article

APA
Brooks BW, Lutze-Wallace CL, Maclean LL, Vinogradov E, Perry MB. (2010). Identification and differentiation of Taylorella equigenitalis and Taylorella asinigenitalis by lipopolysaccharide O-antigen serology using monoclonal antibodies. Can J Vet Res, 74(1), 18-24.

Publication

ISSN: 1928-9022
NlmUniqueID: 8607793
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 74
Issue: 1
Pages: 18-24

Researcher Affiliations

Brooks, Brian W
  • Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa Laboratory (Fallowfield), Ottawa, Ontario. brian.brooks@inspection.gc.ca
Lutze-Wallace, Cheryl L
    Maclean, Leann L
      Vinogradov, Evgeny
        Perry, Malcolm B

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Antibodies, Bacterial / immunology
          • Antibodies, Monoclonal / immunology
          • Biomarkers
          • Carbohydrate Sequence
          • Epitopes
          • Mice
          • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular
          • O Antigens / chemistry
          • O Antigens / immunology
          • Serotyping
          • Taylorella / classification
          • Taylorella equigenitalis / classification

          References

          This article includes 34 references
          1. Timoney PJ. Contagious equine metritis. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 1996;19:199–204.
            pubmed: 8800545
          2. Crowhurst RC. Genital infection in mares. Vet Rec 1977;100:476.
            pubmed: 878259
          3. Timoney PJ, Ward J, Kelly P. A contagious genital infection of mares. Vet Rec 1977;101:103.
            pubmed: 906223
          4. Timoney PJ, Powell DG. Contagious equine metritis— epidemiology and control. J Equine Vet Sci 1988;8:42–46.
          5. Anonymous. OIE Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Paris: Office international des épizooties; 2005.
            pubmed: 0
          6. Croxton-Smith P, Benson JA, Dawson FLM, Powell DG. A complement fixation test for antibody to the contagious equine metritis organism. Vet Rec 1978;103:275–278.
            pubmed: 716183
          7. Bleumink-Pluym NM, Werdler ME, Houwers DJ, Parlevliet JM, Colenbrander B, van der Zeijst BA. Development and evaluation of PCR test for detection of Taylorella equigenitalis. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:893–896.
            pmc: PMC263158pubmed: 8027339
          8. Anzai T, Eguchi M, Sekizaki T, Kamada M, Yamamoto K, Okuda T. Development of a PCR test for rapid diagnosis of contagious equine metritis. J Vet Med Sci 1999;61:1287–1292.
            pubmed: 10651048
          9. Duquesne F, Pronost S, Laugier C, Petry S. Identification of Taylorella equigenitalis responsible for contagious equine metritis in equine genital swabs by direct polymerase chain reaction. Res Vet Sci 2007;82:47–49.
            pubmed: 16806331
          10. Rossau R, Kersters K, Falsen E. Oligella, a new genus including Oligella urethralis comb. nov. (formerly Moraxella urethralis) and Oligella ureolytica sp. nov. (formerly CDC Group IVe): Relationship to Taylorella equigenitalis and related taxa. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987;37:198–210.
          11. Bleumink-Pluym NM, van Dijk L, van Vliet AH, van der Giessen JW, van der Zeijst BA. Phylogenetic position of Taylorella equigenitalis determined by analysis of amplified 16S ribosomal DNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993;43:618–621.
            pubmed: 8347520
          12. Katz JB, Evans LE, Hutto DL. Clinical, bacteriologic, serologic, and pathologic features of infections with atypical Taylorella equigenitalis in mares. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000;216:1945–1948.
            pubmed: 10863594
          13. Jang SJ, Donahue JM, Arata AB. Taylorella asinigenitalis sp.nov., a bacterium isolated from the genital tract of male donkeys (Equus asinus). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001;51:971–976.
            pubmed: 11411723
          14. Båverud V, Nyström C, Johansson KE. Isolation and identification of Taylorella asinigenitalis from the genital tract of a stallion, first case of a natural infection. Vet Microbiol 2006;116:294–300.
            pubmed: 16793226
          15. Raetz CRH. Biochemistry of bacterial endotoxins. Annu Rev Biochem 1990;59:129–170.
            pubmed: 1695830
          16. Reeves PR, Hobbs M, Valvano MA. Bacterial polysaccharide synthesis and gene nomenclature. Trends Microbiol 1996;4:495–503.
            pubmed: 9004408
          17. Whitfield C, Kaniuk N, Frirdich E. Molecular insights into the assembly and diversity of the outer core oligosaccharide in lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli and Salmonella. J Endotoxin Res 2003;9:244–249.
            pubmed: 12935355
          18. Perry MB, MacLean LL. Structural characterization of the O-polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide produced by Salmonella milwaukee O:43 (group U) which possesses human blood group B activity. Biochem Cell Biol 1992;70:49–55.
            pubmed: 1374616
          19. Perry MB, MacLean LL. Structure of the polysaccharide O-antigen of Salmonella riogrande O:40 (group R) related to blood group A activity. Carbohydr Res 1992;232:143–150.
            pubmed: 1384971
          20. Vinogradov E, Peppler MS, Perry MB. The structure of the nonreducing terminal groups in the O-specific polysaccharides from two strains of Bordetella bronchiseptica. Eur J Biochem 2000;267:7230–7237.
            pubmed: 11106436
          21. Vinogradov E, MacLean LL, Brooks BW, Lutze-Wallace C, Perry MB. The structure of the polysaccharide antigen of the lipopolysaccharide produced by Taylorella (formerly Haemophilus) equigenitalis type strain (ATCC 35865). Carbohydrate Res 2008;343:3079–3084.
            pubmed: 18950750
          22. Vinogradov E, MacLean LL, Brooks BW, Lutze-Wallace C, Perry MB. Structure of the O-polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide produced by Taylorella asinigenitalis type strain (ATCC 700933). Biochem Cell Biol 2008;86:278–284.
            pubmed: 18523489
          23. Brooks BW, Robertson RH, Lutze-Wallace CL, Pfahler W. Monoclonal antibodies specific for Campylobacter fetus lipopolysaccharides. Vet Microbiol 2002;87:37–49.
            pubmed: 12079745
          24. Brooks BW, Garcia MM, Robertson RH, Lior H. Electrophoretic and immunoblot analysis of Campylobacter fetus lipopolysaccharides. Vet Microbiol 1996;51:105–114.
            pubmed: 8828127
          25. Hitchcock PJ, Brown TM. Morphological heterogeneity among Salmonella lipopolysaccharide chemotypes in silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. J Bacteriol 1983;154:269–277.
            pmc: PMC217456pubmed: 6187729
          26. Tsai CM, Frasch CE. A sensitive silver stain for detecting lipopolysaccharides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 1982;119:115–119.
            pubmed: 6176137
          27. Johnson KG, Perry MB. Improved techniques for the preparation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Can J Microbiol 1976;22:29–34.
            pubmed: 814982
          28. MacLean LL, Perry MB. Structural studies on the O-polysaccharide of the lipopolysaccharide produced by Citrobacter rodentium (ATCC 51459). Eur J Biochem 2001;268:5740–5746.
            pubmed: 11722558
          29. Brisson JR, Crawford E, Uhrin D. The core oligosaccharide component from Mannheimia (Pasteurella) haemolytica serotype A1 lipopolysaccharide contains L-glycero-D-manno- and D-glycero-D-mannoheptoses: Analysis of the structure and conformation by high-resolution NMR spectroscopy. Can J Chem 2002;80:949–963.
          30. Gradinaru DA, Helmer JM, Klein F. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against Taylorella equigenitalis. Vet Res 1997;28:65–76.
            pubmed: 9172842
          31. Szymanski CM, Michael FS, Jarrell HC. Detection of conserved N-linked glycans and phase variable lipooligosaccharides and capsules from campylobacter cells by mass spectrometry and high resolution magic angle spinning spectroscopy. J Biol Chem 2003;278:24509–24520.
            pubmed: 12716884
          32. Luk JMC, Kongmuang U, Reeves PR, Lindberg AA. Selective amplification of abequose and paratose synthase genes (rfb) by polymerase chain reaction for identification of Salmonella major serogroups (A, B, C2, and D). J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2118–2123.
            pmc: PMC265708pubmed: 8370740
          33. Feng L, Senchenkova SN, Tao J. Structural and genetic characterization of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O145 O antigen and development of an O145 serogroup-specific PCR assay. J Bacteriol 2005;187:758–764.
            pmc: PMC543545pubmed: 15629947
          34. Feng L, Tao J, Guo H. Structure of the Shigella dysenteriae 7 O antigen gene cluster and identification of its antigen specific genes. Microb Pathog 2004;36:109–115.
            pubmed: 14687563