Analyze Diet
Veterinary ophthalmology2018; 22(3); 265-275; doi: 10.1111/vop.12587

Identification of bacteria and fungi sampled from the conjunctival surface of normal horses in South-East Queensland, Australia.

Abstract: To identify bacteria and fungi found on the conjunctival surface of normal horse eyes; to investigate potential risk factors for these microflora; and to determine their susceptibility to common topical ophthalmic antimicrobials. Methods: A total of 95 client-owned horses were studied. Methods: Horses within sub-tropical Australia (South-East Queensland) were sampled once between April 2012 and March 2013. A conjunctival swab was taken from each eye and cultured for aerobic bacteria and fungi. Organisms were identified by colony morphology and phenotype. Antimicrobial disk diffusion susceptibility testing for commonly used antimicrobials was performed. Results: Positive bacterial cultures were returned from 187/190 (98.4%) eyes from 94/95 (98.9%) horses. The most common species included Staphylococcus spp. (25.2% of total bacterial isolates), Bacillus cereus (17.4%), Bacillus spp. (14.1%), and Corynebacterium spp. (8.9%). Most bacterial isolates were susceptible to neomycin and fluoroquinolones. Positive fungal cultures were returned from 111/190 (58.4%) eyes from 73 (76.8%) horses. The most common species identified included: Penicillium spp. (16.7% of fungal isolates), Aspergillus spp. (15.4%), and Scopulariopsis spp. (10.3%). Most (≥90%) molds were susceptible to ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, and miconazole. Yeasts were most susceptible to ketoconazole. There was no significant effect of breed, age, sex, purpose, or housing of the horse or climatic conditions on bacterial or fungal culture status. Conclusions: Bacteria and fungi were commonly isolated from the eyes of healthy horses. The antibiotic and antifungal susceptibilities identified can be used as a guide for empirical therapy after cytology in the treatment of corneal ulceration in horses.
Publication Date: 2018-07-02 PubMed ID: 29963751DOI: 10.1111/vop.12587Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research examines the types of bacteria and fungi existing on the surface of healthy horse eyes, investigates potential risk factors for these microorganisms, and assesses their response to certain antimicrobial medicines. The study involved 95 horses within South-East Queensland, Australia.

Methodology

The researchers carried out the study on 95 client-owned horses in subtropical Australia. The sampling period ran from April 2012 to March 2013. They collected conjunctival swabs from each horse’s eye and cultured the samples to identify aerobic bacteria and fungi, determined by their colony morphology and phenotype. They then subjected the organisms to antimicrobial disk diffusion susceptibility testing, a laboratory method used to determine microbial resistance to antibiotics.

Results

From the study, 98.4% of the sampled eyes returned positive bacterial cultures, with the majority of the bacteria being Staphylococcus spp., Bacillus cereus, Bacillus spp., and Corynebacterium spp. These bacteria were predominantly susceptible to neomycin and fluoroquinolones, types of antibiotics.

Meanwhile, 58.4% of the eyes sampled returned positive fungal cultures, with the most common species being Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp., and Scopulariopsis spp. Most of these molds showed susceptibility to fungal treatments like ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, and miconazole. Yeasts were particularly sensitive to ketoconazole.

The research found no significant connection between the breed, age, sex, purpose, or housing of the horse or climatic conditions and the bacterial or fungal culture status.

Conclusion

The researchers concluded that both bacteria and fungi are commonly found on the eyes of healthy horses. The susceptibility of the identified microorganisms can help guide empirical therapy (treatment based on observation and experience) following cytology (the study of cells under a microscope) in addressing corneal ulceration in horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Hampson ECGM, Gibson JS, Barot M, Shapter FM, Greer RM. (2018). Identification of bacteria and fungi sampled from the conjunctival surface of normal horses in South-East Queensland, Australia. Vet Ophthalmol, 22(3), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12587

Publication

ISSN: 1463-5224
NlmUniqueID: 100887377
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 3
Pages: 265-275

Researcher Affiliations

Hampson, Edith C G M
  • School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
  • WestVETS Equine Hospital, Anstead, QLD, Australia.
Gibson, Justine S
  • School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
Barot, Mayank
  • School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
Shapter, Frances M
  • School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.
Greer, Ristan M
  • School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Antifungal Agents / pharmacology
  • Antifungal Agents / therapeutic use
  • Bacteria / drug effects
  • Bacteria / isolation & purification
  • Conjunctiva / microbiology
  • Eye Infections, Bacterial / drug therapy
  • Eye Infections, Bacterial / veterinary
  • Eye Infections, Fungal / drug therapy
  • Eye Infections, Fungal / veterinary
  • Female
  • Fungi / drug effects
  • Fungi / isolation & purification
  • Horses / microbiology
  • Male
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
  • Queensland
  • Reference Values

Grant Funding

  • Jurox Pty Ltd, Rutherford, NSW 2320, Australia

Citations

This article has been cited 12 times.
  1. Hardefeldt L, Thomas K, Page S, Norris J, Browning G, El Hage C, Stewart A, Gilkerson J, Muscatello G, Verwilghen D, van Galen G, Bauquier J, Cuming R, Reynolds B, Whittaker C, Wilkes E, Clulow J, Burden C, Begg L. Antimicrobial prescribing guidelines for horses in Australia. Aust Vet J 2025 Dec;103(12):781-889.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.70003pubmed: 40903020google scholar: lookup
  2. Heun F, Meißner J, Schieder AK, Ohnesorge B, Busse C. Pantoea agglomerans in Equine Ulcerative Keratitis: Prevalence and Comparative Efficacy of Four Topical Antiseptics. Vet Ophthalmol 2026 Jan;29(1):e70044.
    doi: 10.1111/vop.70044pubmed: 40557447google scholar: lookup
  3. Dieste-Pérez L, Holstege MMC, de Jong JE, Heuvelink AE. Azole resistance in Aspergillus isolates from animals or their direct environment (2013-2023): a systematic review. Front Vet Sci 2025;12:1507997.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1507997pubmed: 40182641google scholar: lookup
  4. Julien ME, Shih JB, Correa Lopes B, Vallone LV, Suchodolski JS, Pilla R, Scott EM. Alterations of the bacterial ocular surface microbiome are found in both eyes of horses with unilateral ulcerative keratitis. PLoS One 2023;18(9):e0291028.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291028pubmed: 37682941google scholar: lookup
  5. Torres LEC, Florez CO, Oliveira JG, Vieira GD, Ribeiro IS, Keller KM, Leme FOP, Fantini P, Maranhão RPA. Antimicrobial Activity of Plasma Rich in Platelets (PRP) on the Ocular Microbiota of Healthy Horses from Minas Gerais: In Vitro Study. Vet Med Int 2023;2023:2407768.
    doi: 10.1155/2023/2407768pubmed: 37622165google scholar: lookup
  6. Mo PM, Picard J, Gummow B. The conjunctival fungal microflora of horses in a North Queensland tropical environment and their in vitro susceptibilities to antifungal agents. Vet Res Commun 2023 Sep;47(3):1641-1651.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10119-9pubmed: 37022654google scholar: lookup
  7. Fernández-Garayzábal JF, LaFrentz S, Casamayor A, Abarca E, Mohammed HH, Cuming RS, Arias CR, Domínguez L, Vela AI. Corynebacterium conjunctivae: A New Corynebacterium Species Isolated from the Ocular Surface of Healthy Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Jul 18;12(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12141827pubmed: 35883374google scholar: lookup
  8. Ricard RM, St-Jean G, Duizer G, Atwal H, Wobeser BK. A 13-year retrospective study of equine abortions in Canada. Can Vet J 2022 Jul;63(7):715-721.
    pubmed: 35784776
  9. Santibáñez R, Lara F, Barros TM, Mardones E, Cuadra F, Thomson P. Ocular Microbiome in a Group of Clinically Healthy Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 7;12(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12080943pubmed: 35454190google scholar: lookup
  10. Walsh ML, Meason-Smith C, Arnold C, Suchodolski JS, Scott EM. Evaluation of the ocular surface mycobiota in clinically normal horses. PLoS One 2021;16(2):e0246537.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246537pubmed: 33539431google scholar: lookup
  11. Mustikka MP, Grönthal TSC, Pietilä EM. Equine infectious keratitis in Finland: Associated microbial isolates and susceptibility profiles. Vet Ophthalmol 2020 Jan;23(1):148-159.
    doi: 10.1111/vop.12701pubmed: 31364808google scholar: lookup
  12. Scott EM, Arnold C, Dowell S, Suchodolski JS. Evaluation of the bacterial ocular surface microbiome in clinically normal horses before and after treatment with topical neomycin-polymyxin-bacitracin. PLoS One 2019;14(4):e0214877.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214877pubmed: 30943258google scholar: lookup