Analyze Diet
Australian veterinary journal2001; 79(8); 563-569; doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10751.x

Identification of equine herpesviruses 1 and 4 by polymerase chain reaction.

Abstract: To develop and validate specific, sensitive and rapid (< 8 hour) diagnostic tests using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the diagnosis of abortion and respiratory disease caused by equine herpesvirus 1 (EHV1; equine abortion virus) and EHV4 (equine rhinopneumonitis virus). Methods: Primer sets based on nucleotide sequences encoding glycoprotein H (gH) of EHV1 and gB of EHV4 were designed and used in single round and second round (seminested) PCRs, and in a multiplex PCR for the diagnosis of EHV1 and EHV4 infections. Methods: Oligonucleotide primers were designed for each virus, PCR conditions were defined and the specificity and sensitivity of the assays were determined. The tests were applied to tissue samples from aborted equine foetuses and to nasopharyngeal swabs from horses with acute febrile respiratory disease. Results: Individual single round and a second round (seminested) EHV1 and EHV4 PCRs were specific in that EHV1 primers amplified all (n = 30) EHV1 isolates and did not amplify EHV4. Similarly EHV4 primers amplified all (n = 6) EHV4 isolates and did not amplify EHV1. Both PCRs were sensitive in that the first round EHV1 PCR detected 1220 molecules of EHV1 plasmid DNA and the first round EHV4 PCR detected 7280 molecules of EHV4 plasmid DNA. The EHV1 second round PCR was 100 times more sensitive in that it detected 12 molecules of EHV1 DNA and the EHV4 second round PCR was 1000 times more sensitive in that it detected 8 molecules of EHV4 DNA. There was a high correlation between detection of EHV1 by virus isolation and PCR when tissue samples from 71 aborted foetuses were examined; all samples positive by virus isolation were positive by PCR. Similarly the EHV4 PCR was at least as sensitive as virus isolation when applied to nasaopharyngeal swabs from horses with respiratory disease in that all samples positive by virus isolation were also positive by PCR. Conclusions: Individual single round and second round (seminested) PCRs and a seminested multiplex PCR were developed that enabled reliable, rapid detection of EHV1 and EHV4 in aborted foetal tissues and nasopharyngeal swab samples.
Publication Date: 2001-10-16 PubMed ID: 11599819DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10751.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research worked on creating specific, fast and sensitive diagnostic tests using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for diagnosing diseases caused by equine herpesvirus 1 and 4 in horses. These new PCR-based diagnostic tools were able to accurately detect the viruses in samples from horses and aborting fetuses.

Methodology

  • PCR tests were developed based on the nucleotide sequences that encode glycoprotein H (gH) of EHV1 and gB of EHV4. These are proteins found in the virus that can distinguish them from other viruses.
  • The researchers designed sets of primers, short pieces of RNA or DNA that can specifically bind to these sequences, for each virus.
  • The characteristics of the PCR conditions, such as temperature and timing, were defined to ensure accurate and efficient amplification.
  • The specificity and sensitivity of the tests were determined, meaning how well the tests could correctly identify the viruses and the minimum amount of virus needed for detection.
  • These tests were applied to swabs from horses with acute febrile respiratory disease and tissue samples taken from aborted equine fetuses, conditions commonly associated with these viruses.

Results

  • The PCRs were successful in only amplifying the intended virus, demonstrating their specificity.
  • These tests were capable of detecting very small amounts of the virus, showing their high sensitivity.
  • A second, more refined PCR (seminested) was able to detect even fewer molecules than the first round, thereby increasing the sensitivity of the test.
  • There was a strong correlation between the results of the PCRs and conventional virus isolation methods.
  • All samples that were positive for the virus based on traditional virus isolation methods were also positive according to the PCR tests.

Conclusion

  • The development of the new PCR diagnostics is significant as it allows for the reliable and rapid detection of EHV1 and EHV4.
  • This adds an invaluable tool for the veterinary field, allowing for quicker and more accurate diagnosis of diseases caused by these viruses and leading to prompter treatments.
  • Additionally, these tools can aid in research studies on these viruses, possibly leading to a better understanding of their biology and the diseases they cause. This could potentially pave the way for the development of preventative measures such as vaccines.

Cite This Article

APA
Varrasso A, Dynon K, Ficorilli N, Hartley CA, Studdert MJ, Drummer HE. (2001). Identification of equine herpesviruses 1 and 4 by polymerase chain reaction. Aust Vet J, 79(8), 563-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2001.tb10751.x

Publication

ISSN: 0005-0423
NlmUniqueID: 0370616
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 79
Issue: 8
Pages: 563-569

Researcher Affiliations

Varrasso, A
  • Centre for Equine Virology, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria.
Dynon, K
    Ficorilli, N
      Hartley, C A
        Studdert, M J
          Drummer, H E

            MeSH Terms

            • Abortion, Veterinary / etiology
            • Animals
            • Blotting, Southern / veterinary
            • DNA Primers
            • DNA, Viral / isolation & purification
            • Female
            • Fetus / virology
            • Herpesviridae Infections / complications
            • Herpesviridae Infections / diagnosis
            • Herpesviridae Infections / veterinary
            • Herpesvirus 1, Equid / isolation & purification
            • Herpesvirus 4, Equid / isolation & purification
            • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
            • Horse Diseases / virology
            • Horses
            • Nasopharynx / virology
            • Polymerase Chain Reaction / standards
            • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
            • Pregnancy
            • Respiratory Tract Infections / complications
            • Respiratory Tract Infections / diagnosis
            • Respiratory Tract Infections / veterinary
            • Sensitivity and Specificity

            Citations

            This article has been cited 7 times.
            1. Wang T, Hu L, Wang Y, Liu W, Liu G, Zhu M, Zhang W, Wang C, Ren H, Li L. Identification of equine herpesvirus 8 in donkey abortion: a case report.. Virol J 2022 Jan 6;19(1):10.
              doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01738-2pubmed: 34991640google scholar: lookup
            2. Knox A, Beddoe T. Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Technologies for the Detection of Equine Viral Pathogens.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 20;11(7).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11072150pubmed: 34359278google scholar: lookup
            3. Vaz PK, Horsington J, Hartley CA, Browning GF, Ficorilli NP, Studdert MJ, Gilkerson JR, Devlin JM. Evidence of widespread natural recombination among field isolates of equine herpesvirus 4 but not among field isolates of equine herpesvirus 1.. J Gen Virol 2016 Mar;97(3):747-755.
              doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000378pubmed: 26691326google scholar: lookup
            4. Mori E, Lara Mdo C, Cunha EM, Villalobos EM, Mori CM, Soares RM, Brandão PE, Fernandes WR, Richtzenhain LJ. Molecular characterization of Brazilian equid herpesvirus type 1 strains based on neuropathogenicity markers.. Braz J Microbiol 2015 Jun;46(2):565-70.
              doi: 10.1590/S1517-838246220140096pubmed: 26273275google scholar: lookup
            5. Marenzoni ML, Bietta A, Lepri E, Casagrande Proietti P, Cordioli P, Canelli E, Stefanetti V, Coletti M, Timoney PJ, Passamonti F. Role of equine herpesviruses as co-infecting agents in cases of abortion, placental disease and neonatal foal mortality.. Vet Res Commun 2013 Dec;37(4):311-7.
              doi: 10.1007/s11259-013-9578-6pubmed: 24052369google scholar: lookup
            6. Costa EA, Bomfim MR, da Fonseca FG, Drumond BP, Coelho FM, Vasconcelos AC, Furtini R, Paixão TA, Tsolis RM, Santos RL, Resende M. Ovine herpesvirus 2 infection in Foal, Brazil.. Emerg Infect Dis 2009 May;15(5):844-5.
              doi: 10.3201/eid1505.081664pubmed: 19402994google scholar: lookup
            7. Veronesi F, Diaferia M, Mandara MT, Marenzoni ML, Cittadini F, Piergili Fioretti D. Neospora spp. infection associated with equine abortion and/or stillbirth rate.. Vet Res Commun 2008 Sep;32 Suppl 1:S223-6.
              doi: 10.1007/s11259-008-9155-6pubmed: 18696243google scholar: lookup