Analyze Diet
Applied and environmental microbiology1999; 65(8); 3738-3741; doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.8.3738-3741.1999

Identification of Ruminococcus flavefaciens as the predominant cellulolytic bacterial species of the equine cecum.

Abstract: Detection and quantification of cellulolytic bacteria with oligonucleotide probes showed that Ruminococcus flavefaciens was the predominant species in the pony and donkey cecum. Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus albus were present at low levels. Four isolates, morphologically resembling R. flavefaciens, differed from ruminal strains by their carbohydrate utilization and their end products of cellobiose fermentation.
Publication Date: 1999-07-31 PubMed ID: 10427077PubMed Central: PMC91562DOI: 10.1128/AEM.65.8.3738-3741.1999Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study reveals that Ruminococcus flavefaciens is the most abundant cellulolytic bacterial species in the cecum of ponies and donkeys, according to detection and quantification by oligonucleotide probing. Other species, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus albus, were also found but at lower quantities. Furthermore, four isolates that morphologically resembled R. flavefaciens had unique carbohydrate utilization and cellobiose fermentation end products compared to ruminal strains.

Research Background

  • The objective of this study was to identify and quantify different species of cellulolytic bacteria present in the cecum of ponies and donkeys. The cecum, part of the digestive tract, is a key site for the breaking down of cellulose – the largest component of plant-based diets in these animals. The process is facilitated by various species of bacteria with cellulolytic properties.
  • The study sought to determine which bacteria species was predominant and any variations in their properties.

Methods and Findings

  • Researchers used a method of detection and quantification known as oligonucleotide probing. This involves the use of short DNA or RNA strands complimentary to a specific sequence in the genomes of the bacteria in question.
  • The results revealed that Ruminococcus flavefaciens was the most common species of cellulolytic bacteria in the cecum of both ponies and donkeys. Other cellulolytic bacterial species such as Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus albus were also present, though in lower proportions.

Additional Findings

  • The research further delves into the properties of four isolated strains morphologically similar to Ruminococcus flavefaciens.
  • These isolates displayed variations in carbohydrate utilization and showed unique end products of cellobiose fermentation, a component of cellulose breakdown. This suggests these strains of Ruminococcus flavefaciens could potentially have unique functionalities in the cecum beyond those standardly known within the species.

Research Impact

  • The findings from this study provide valuable insights into the bacterial composition in the cecum of ponies and donkeys and how different cellulose breakdown processes may take place.
  • The discovery of these unique Ruminococcus flavefaciens strains could lead to further research into their specific functionalities and impacts on equine health and nutrition. This in turn could influence feeding strategies and veterinary practices in the future.

Cite This Article

APA
Julliand V, de Vaux A, Millet L, Fonty G. (1999). Identification of Ruminococcus flavefaciens as the predominant cellulolytic bacterial species of the equine cecum. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65(8), 3738-3741. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.65.8.3738-3741.1999

Publication

ISSN: 0099-2240
NlmUniqueID: 7605801
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 65
Issue: 8
Pages: 3738-3741

Researcher Affiliations

Julliand, V
  • Laboratoire associé de Recherches Zootechniques INRA-ENESAD, 21036 Dijon Cedex, France. v.julliand@enesad.fr
de Vaux, A
    Millet, L
      Fonty, G

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Bacillaceae / genetics
        • Bacillaceae / isolation & purification
        • Bacillaceae / metabolism
        • Cecum / microbiology
        • Cellobiose / metabolism
        • Equidae / microbiology
        • Fermentation
        • Horses / microbiology
        • Oligonucleotide Probes

        References

        This article includes 28 references
        1. Amann RI, Binder BJ, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW, Devereux R, Stahl DA. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations.. Appl Environ Microbiol 1990 Jun;56(6):1919-25.
        2. Argenzio RA. Functions of the equine large intestine and their interrelationship in disease.. Cornell Vet 1975 Jul;65(3):303-30.
          pubmed: 237739
        3. Bernalier A. Thèse de doctorat. Clermont-Ferrand, France: Université d’Auvergne; 1991.
        4. Bonhomme A. Attachment of horse cecal bacteria to forage cell walls.. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi 1986 Apr;48(2):313-22.
          pubmed: 3712892doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.48.313google scholar: lookup
        5. Bryant M P, Burkey L A. Cultural methods and some characteristics of some of the more numerous groups of bacteria in the bovine rumen. J Dairy Sci 1953;36:205–217.
        6. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.. Anal Biochem 1987 Apr;162(1):156-9.
          pubmed: 2440339doi: 10.1006/abio.1987.9999google scholar: lookup
        7. Davies E M. Cellulolytic bacteria isolated from the large intestine of the horse. J Appl Bacteriol 1964;27:373–378.
        8. de Vaux A. Ph.D. thesis. Dijón, France: Université de Bourgogne; 1998.
        9. Fonty G, Gouet P, Jouany J P, Senaud J P. Establishment of the microflora and anaerobic fungi in the rumen of lambs. J Gen Microbiol 1987;123:1835–1843.
        10. Fonty G, Jouany J-P, Forano E, Gouet P. L’écosystème microbien du réticulo-rumen. In: Jarrige Y R R, Demarquilly C, Farce M H, Journet M, editors. Nutrition des ruminants domestiques. Paris, France: INRA; 1995. pp. 299–347.
        11. Goodson J, Tyznik WJ, Cline JH, Dehority BA. Effects of an abrupt diet change from hay to concentrate on microbial numbers and physical environment in the cecum of the pony.. Appl Environ Microbiol 1988 Aug;54(8):1946-50.
        12. HALLIWELL G, BRYANT MP. THE CELLULOLYTIC ACTIVITY OF PURE STRAINS OF BACTERIA FROM THE RUMEN OF CATTLE.. J Gen Microbiol 1963 Sep;32:441-8.
          pubmed: 14058994doi: 10.1099/00221287-32-3-441google scholar: lookup
        13. Hungate R E. A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. Methods Microbiol 1969;3:117–132.
        14. Hungate R E. The rumen and its microbes. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press; 1966.
        15. Julliand V. Thèse de Doctorat. Dijon, France: Université de Bourgogne; 1996.
        16. Julliand V, Riondet C, de Vaux A, Alcaraz G, Fonty G. Comparison of metabolic activities between Piromyces citronii, an equine fungal species, and Piromyces communis, a ruminal species. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1998;70:161–168.
        17. Kern DL, Slyter LL, Leffel EC, Weaver JM, Oltjen RR. Ponies vs. steers: microbial and chemical characteristics of intestinal ingesta.. J Anim Sci 1974 Mar;38(3):559-64.
          pubmed: 4856481doi: 10.2527/jas1974.383559xgoogle scholar: lookup
        18. Kern DL, Slyter LL, Weaver JM, Leffel EC, Samuelson G. Pony cecum vs. steer rumen: the effect of oats and hay on the microbial ecosystem.. J Anim Sci 1973 Aug;37(2):463-9.
          pubmed: 4201259doi: 10.2527/jas1973.372463xgoogle scholar: lookup
        19. Leedle JA, Hespell RB. Differential carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating techniques in delineating carbohydrate-utilizing subgroups in rumen bacterial populations.. Appl Environ Microbiol 1980 Apr;39(4):709-19.
          pmc: PMC291408pubmed: 6769390doi: 10.1128/aem.39.4.709-719.1980google scholar: lookup
        20. Lin C, Stahl DA. Taxon-specific probes for the cellulolytic genus Fibrobacter reveal abundant and novel equine-associated populations.. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995 Apr;61(4):1348-51.
        21. Lowe S E, Theodorou M K, Trinci A P J, Hespell R B. Growth of anaerobic rumen fungi on defined and semi-defined media lacking rumen fluid. J Gen Microbiol 1985;131:2225–2229.
        22. Maidak BL, Olsen GJ, Larsen N, Overbeek R, McCaughey MJ, Woese CR. The RDP (Ribosomal Database Project).. Nucleic Acids Res 1997 Jan 1;25(1):109-11.
          pmc: PMC146422pubmed: 9016515doi: 10.1093/nar/25.1.109google scholar: lookup
        23. Martin-Rosset W, Vermorel M, Doreau M, Tisserand J L, Andrieu J. The French horse feed evaluation systems and recommended allowances for energy and protein. Livestock Prod Sci 1994;40:37–56.
        24. Moore BE, Dehority BA. Effects of diet and hindgut defaunation on diet digestibility and microbial concentrations in the cecum and colon of the horse.. J Anim Sci 1993 Dec;71(12):3350-8.
          pubmed: 8294287doi: 10.2527/1993.71123350xgoogle scholar: lookup
        25. Odenyo AA, Mackie RI, Stahl DA, White BA. The use of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes to study competition between ruminal fibrolytic bacteria: pure-culture studies with cellulose and alkaline peroxide-treated wheat straw.. Appl Environ Microbiol 1994 Oct;60(10):3697-703.
        26. Schleifer K-H. Section 12. Gram-positive cocci. In: Sneath P H A, Mair N S, Sharpe M E, Holt J G, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Vol. 2. Baltimore, Md: The Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1986. pp. 999–1103.
        27. Stahl D A, Amman R I. Development and application of nucleic acid probes. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematic. New York, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1991. pp. 205–248.
        28. Stewart C S, Flint H J, Bryant M P. The rumen bacteria. In: Hobson P N, Stewart C S, editors. The rumen microbial ecosystem. London, United Kingdom: Blackie Academic and Professional; 1997. pp. 10–72.

        Citations

        This article has been cited 36 times.
        1. Wunderlich G, Bull M, Ross T, Rose M, Chapman B. Understanding the microbial fibre degrading communities & processes in the equine gut.. Anim Microbiome 2023 Jan 12;5(1):3.
          doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00224-6pubmed: 36635784google scholar: lookup
        2. Perricone V, Sandrini S, Irshad N, Comi M, Lecchi C, Savoini G, Agazzi A. The Role of Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Supporting Gut Health in Horses: An Updated Review on Its Effects on Digestibility and Intestinal and Fecal Microbiota.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Dec 9;12(24).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12243475pubmed: 36552396google scholar: lookup
        3. Kang M, Chhetri G, Kim I, So Y, Seo T. Comparative genomic analyses of four novel Ramlibacter species and the cellulose-degrading properties of Ramlibacter cellulosilyticus sp. nov.. Sci Rep 2022 Dec 8;12(1):21233.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25718-wpubmed: 36482214google scholar: lookup
        4. Żak-Bochenek A, Bajzert J, Sambor D, Siwińska N, Szponar B, Łaczmański Ł, Żebrowska P, Czajkowska A, Karczewski M, Chełmońska-Soyta A. Homeostasis of the Intestinal Mucosa in Healthy Horses-Correlation between the Fecal Microbiome, Secretory Immunoglobulin A and Fecal Egg Count.. Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 10;12(22).
          doi: 10.3390/ani12223094pubmed: 36428322google scholar: lookup
        5. Froidurot A, Jacotot E, Julliand V. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Annotation of Fibrobacter succinogenes HC4, Isolated from the Horse Cecum.. Microbiol Resour Announc 2022 Nov 17;11(11):e0044022.
          doi: 10.1128/mra.00440-22pubmed: 36227092google scholar: lookup
        6. Froidurot A, Julliand V. Cellulolytic bacteria in the large intestine of mammals.. Gut Microbes 2022 Jan-Dec;14(1):2031694.
          doi: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2031694pubmed: 35184689google scholar: lookup
        7. Fujimori S. Humans have intestinal bacteria that degrade the plant cell walls in herbivores.. World J Gastroenterol 2021 Dec 7;27(45):7784-7791.
          doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7784pubmed: 34963741google scholar: lookup
        8. Muhonen S, Sadet-Bourgeteau S, Julliand V. Effects of Differences in Fibre Composition and Maturity of Forage-Based Diets on the Microbial Ecosystem and Its Activity in Equine Caecum and Colon Digesta and Faeces.. Animals (Basel) 2021 Aug 8;11(8).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11082337pubmed: 34438794google scholar: lookup
        9. Kumawat PK, Sahoo A, Sarkar S, Kumar S. Isolation and characterization of anaerobic bacteria with fiber degradation potential from faeces of Boselaphus tragocamelus grazing on semi arid Indian conditions.. Arch Microbiol 2021 Oct;203(8):5105-5116.
          doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02477-2pubmed: 34304303google scholar: lookup
        10. Mach N, Lansade L, Bars-Cortina D, Dhorne-Pollet S, Foury A, Moisan MP, Ruet A. Gut microbiota resilience in horse athletes following holidays out to pasture.. Sci Rep 2021 Mar 3;11(1):5007.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84497-ypubmed: 33658551google scholar: lookup
        11. Jiang H, Fang S, Yang H, Chen C. Identification of the relationship between the gut microbiome and feed efficiency in a commercial pig cohort.. J Anim Sci 2021 Mar 1;99(3).
          doi: 10.1093/jas/skab045pubmed: 33570553google scholar: lookup
        12. Sorensen RJ, Drouillard JS, Douthit TL, Ran Q, Marthaler DG, Kang Q, Vahl CI, Lattimer JM. Effect of hay type on cecal and fecal microbiome and fermentation parameters in horses.. J Anim Sci 2021 Jan 1;99(1).
          doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa407pubmed: 33515482google scholar: lookup
        13. Kauter A, Epping L, Semmler T, Antao EM, Kannapin D, Stoeckle SD, Gehlen H, Lübke-Becker A, Günther S, Wieler LH, Walther B. The gut microbiome of horses: current research on equine enteral microbiota and future perspectives.. Anim Microbiome 2019 Nov 13;1(1):14.
          doi: 10.1186/s42523-019-0013-3pubmed: 33499951google scholar: lookup
        14. Edwards JE, Schennink A, Burden F, Long S, van Doorn DA, Pellikaan WF, Dijkstra J, Saccenti E, Smidt H. Domesticated equine species and their derived hybrids differ in their fecal microbiota.. Anim Microbiome 2020 Mar 16;2(1):8.
          doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00027-7pubmed: 33499942google scholar: lookup
        15. Glasgow EM, Kemna EI, Bingman CA, Ing N, Deng K, Bianchetti CM, Takasuka TE, Northen TR, Fox BG. A structural and kinetic survey of GH5_4 endoglucanases reveals determinants of broad substrate specificity and opportunities for biomass hydrolysis.. J Biol Chem 2020 Dec 18;295(51):17752-17769.
          doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015328pubmed: 33454012google scholar: lookup
        16. Panpetch W, Sawaswong V, Chanchaem P, Ondee T, Dang CP, Payungporn S, Leelahavanichkul A. Candida Administration Worsens Cecal Ligation and Puncture-Induced Sepsis in Obese Mice Through Gut Dysbiosis Enhanced Systemic Inflammation, Impact of Pathogen-Associated Molecules From Gut Translocation and Saturated Fatty Acid.. Front Immunol 2020;11:561652.
          doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.561652pubmed: 33101279google scholar: lookup
        17. Xue Y, Hu F, Guo C, Mei S, Xie F, Zeng H, Mao S. Undernutrition shifted colonic fermentation and digest-associated bacterial communities in pregnant ewes.. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2020 Jul;104(13):5973-5984.
          doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10662-4pubmed: 32415319google scholar: lookup
        18. Liu G, Bou G, Su S, Xing J, Qu H, Zhang X, Wang X, Zhao Y, Dugarjaviin M. Microbial diversity within the digestive tract contents of Dezhou donkeys.. PLoS One 2019;14(12):e0226186.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226186pubmed: 31834903google scholar: lookup
        19. Lindenberg F, Krych L, Fielden J, Kot W, Frøkiær H, van Galen G, Nielsen DS, Hansen AK. Expression of immune regulatory genes correlate with the abundance of specific Clostridiales and Verrucomicrobia species in the equine ileum and cecum.. Sci Rep 2019 Sep 3;9(1):12674.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49081-5pubmed: 31481726google scholar: lookup
        20. Clark A, Sallé G, Ballan V, Reigner F, Meynadier A, Cortet J, Koch C, Riou M, Blanchard A, Mach N. Strongyle Infection and Gut Microbiota: Profiling of Resistant and Susceptible Horses Over a Grazing Season.. Front Physiol 2018;9:272.
          doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00272pubmed: 29618989google scholar: lookup
        21. Curtis JT, Assefa S, Francis A, Köhler GA. Fecal microbiota in the female prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster).. PLoS One 2018;13(3):e0190648.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190648pubmed: 29579049google scholar: lookup
        22. La Reau AJ, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Suen G. Sequence-based analysis of the genus Ruminococcus resolves its phylogeny and reveals strong host association.. Microb Genom 2016 Dec;2(12):e000099.
          doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000099pubmed: 28348838google scholar: lookup
        23. Sun J, Zeng B, Chen Z, Yan S, Huang W, Sun B, He Q, Chen X, Chen T, Jiang Q, Xi Q, Zhang Y. Characterization of faecal microbial communities of dairy cows fed diets containing ensiled Moringa oleifera fodder.. Sci Rep 2017 Jan 30;7:41403.
          doi: 10.1038/srep41403pubmed: 28134261google scholar: lookup
        24. Vlčková K, Gomez A, Petrželková KJ, Whittier CA, Todd AF, Yeoman CJ, Nelson KE, Wilson BA, Stumpf RM, Modrý D, White BA, Leigh SR. Effect of Antibiotic Treatment on the Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Free-Ranging Western Lowland Gorillas (Gorilla g. gorilla).. Microb Ecol 2016 Nov;72(4):943-954.
          doi: 10.1007/s00248-016-0745-5pubmed: 26984253google scholar: lookup
        25. Shepherd ML, Ponder MA, Burk AO, Milton SC, Swecker WS Jr. Fibre digestibility, abundance of faecal bacteria and plasma acetate concentrations in overweight adult mares.. J Nutr Sci 2014;3:e10.
          doi: 10.1017/jns.2014.8pubmed: 25191602google scholar: lookup
        26. Voronov-Goldman M, Levy-Assaraf M, Yaniv O, Wisserman G, Jindou S, Borovok I, Bayer EA, Lamed R, Shimon LJ, Frolow F. Structural characterization of a novel autonomous cohesin from Ruminococcus flavefaciens.. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun 2014 Apr;70(Pt 4):450-6.
          doi: 10.1107/S2053230X14004051pubmed: 24699736google scholar: lookup
        27. Lwin KO, Matsui H. Comparative analysis of the methanogen diversity in horse and pony by using mcrA gene and archaeal 16s rRNA gene clone libraries.. Archaea 2014;2014:483574.
          doi: 10.1155/2014/483574pubmed: 24678264google scholar: lookup
        28. Salama-Alber O, Jobby MK, Chitayat S, Smith SP, White BA, Shimon LJW, Lamed R, Frolow F, Bayer EA. Atypical cohesin-dockerin complex responsible for cell surface attachment of cellulosomal components: binding fidelity, promiscuity, and structural buttresses.. J Biol Chem 2013 Jun 7;288(23):16827-16838.
          doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.466672pubmed: 23580648google scholar: lookup
        29. Levy-Assaraf M, Voronov-Goldman M, Rozman Grinberg I, Weiserman G, Shimon LJ, Jindou S, Borovok I, White BA, Bayer EA, Lamed R, Frolow F. Crystal structure of an uncommon cellulosome-related protein module from Ruminococcus flavefaciens that resembles papain-like cysteine peptidases.. PLoS One 2013;8(2):e56138.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056138pubmed: 23457513google scholar: lookup
        30. Steelman SM, Chowdhary BP, Dowd S, Suchodolski J, Janečka JE. Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes in fecal samples reveals high diversity of hindgut microflora in horses and potential links to chronic laminitis.. BMC Vet Res 2012 Nov 27;8:231.
          doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-231pubmed: 23186268google scholar: lookup
        31. Salama-Alber O, Gat Y, Lamed R, Shimon LJ, Bayer EA, Frolow F. Crystallization and preliminary X-ray characterization of a type III cohesin-dockerin complex from the cellulosome system of Ruminococcus flavefaciens.. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2012 Sep 1;68(Pt 9):1116-9.
          doi: 10.1107/S1744309112033088pubmed: 22949209google scholar: lookup
        32. Ransom-Jones E, Jones DL, McCarthy AJ, McDonald JE. The Fibrobacteres: an important phylum of cellulose-degrading bacteria.. Microb Ecol 2012 Feb;63(2):267-81.
          doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9998-1pubmed: 22213055google scholar: lookup
        33. Pieper R, Bindelle J, Rossnagel B, Van Kessel A, Leterme P. Effect of carbohydrate composition in barley and oat cultivars on microbial ecophysiology and proliferation of Salmonella enterica in an in vitro model of the porcine gastrointestinal tract.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009 Nov;75(22):7006-16.
          doi: 10.1128/AEM.01343-09pubmed: 19783749google scholar: lookup
        34. Alber O, Noach I, Lamed R, Shimon LJ, Bayer EA, Frolow F. Preliminary X-ray characterization of a novel type of anchoring cohesin from the cellulosome of Ruminococcus flavefaciens.. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2008 Feb 1;64(Pt 2):77-80.
          doi: 10.1107/S1744309107067437pubmed: 18259053google scholar: lookup
        35. Rincon MT, Cepeljnik T, Martin JC, Barak Y, Lamed R, Bayer EA, Flint HJ. A novel cell surface-anchored cellulose-binding protein encoded by the sca gene cluster of Ruminococcus flavefaciens.. J Bacteriol 2007 Jul;189(13):4774-83.
          doi: 10.1128/JB.00143-07pubmed: 17468247google scholar: lookup
        36. Bailey SR, Baillon ML, Rycroft AN, Harris PA, Elliott J. Identification of equine cecal bacteria producing amines in an in vitro model of carbohydrate overload.. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003 Apr;69(4):2087-93.