Analyze Diet
Acta veterinaria Scandinavica2019; 61(1); 18; doi: 10.1186/s13028-019-0456-2

Idiopathic peritonitis in horses: a retrospective study of 130 cases in Sweden (2002-2017).

Abstract: Peritonitis in horses is historically associated with prolonged treatment regimens of broad-spectrum antimicrobials and a guarded prognosis for survival. The condition is most often seen as a secondary complication to traumatic injuries involving the abdominal cavity, rupture of bowel or abdominal surgery. However, cases of idiopathic peritonitis with no such underlying cause have been described. In Sweden idiopathic peritonitis is commonly identified and, in contrast to peritonitis secondary to traumatic incidents, affected horses appear to respond well to medical treatment. The objectives of this study were to describe clinical signs, laboratory findings, bacterial culture results, treatment regimens and survival rates for horses diagnosed with idiopathic peritonitis. Results: Medical records were obtained from horses diagnosed with peritonitis without identifiable cause. Diagnosis was based on macroscopically abnormal peritoneal fluid, with an elevated nucleated cell count (> 10 × 109 cells/L) or total protein (> 25 g/L). A total of 130 horses were included, presenting with pyrexia (83%), lethargy (80%), anorexia (68%) and abdominal pain (51%). Microbial cultures were performed in 84% of the cases of which 41% were positive. The most commonly recovered bacteria were Actinobacillus spp., cultured from 21% of the submitted samples. All horses received antimicrobial therapy and many responded to treatment with penicillin alone. Survival until discharge was 94%. Conclusions: Idiopathic peritonitis is a disease that should be considered in horses presented with fever, signs of colic and lethargy. Medical treatment of idiopathic peritonitis is often successful and in Sweden most cases appear to respond well to treatment with penicillin as the sole antimicrobial.
Publication Date: 2019-04-25 PubMed ID: 31023351PubMed Central: PMC6485108DOI: 10.1186/s13028-019-0456-2Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examines idiopathic peritonitis, an inflammation of the peritoneum in horses that happens with no obvious medical cause, using data from cases in Sweden over a 15-year period. The study aims to better understand this condition and its successful treatment with penicillin.

Objective of the Study

The aim of the analysis was to understand better the signs, lab results, culture results, treatment methods, and survival rates associated with idiopathic peritonitis. The study relied on medical records from horses diagnosed with this condition who exhibited no identifiable underlying cause.

Methodology

  • The diagnosis of idiopathic peritonitis was based on abnormalities in peritoneal fluid, specifically noticeable in an elevated count of nucleated cells and total protein.
  • The study covered a total of 130 horses that had been diagnosed with this condition.
  • Symptoms that led to the diagnosis included an elevated body temperature (83% of cases), lethargy (80%), loss of appetite (68%), and abdominal pain (51%).
  • A microbial culture was performed in 84% of the cases, with positive results in 41% instances.
  • The bacteria Actinobacillus spp. was the most common finding, seen in 21% of the samples tested.

Results

  • All horses were treated with antimicrobial therapy. Many of the horses responded well to treatment with just penicillin.
  • The survival rate was high, with 94% of horses surviving until discharge.

Conclusion

In conclusion, idiopathic peritonitis is a significant consideration in dealing with horses that present symptoms like fever, signs of colic, and lethargy. With medical treatment, most cases of idiopathic peritonitis can be managed successfully, especially with the use of penicillin as the primary antimicrobial treatment in Sweden. These findings hint at the possibility of successful management of the disease with the use of penicillin, even in the absence of an identifiable cause.

Cite This Article

APA
Odelros E, Kendall A, Hedberg-Alm Y, Pringle J. (2019). Idiopathic peritonitis in horses: a retrospective study of 130 cases in Sweden (2002-2017). Acta Vet Scand, 61(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-019-0456-2

Publication

ISSN: 1751-0147
NlmUniqueID: 0370400
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 61
Issue: 1
Pages: 18

Researcher Affiliations

Odelros, Emma
  • Mälaren Equine Clinic, Hälgesta 1, 193 91, Sigtuna, Sweden. emmao@hastklinik.se.
Kendall, Anna
  • Mälaren Equine Clinic, Hälgesta 1, 193 91, Sigtuna, Sweden.
Hedberg-Alm, Ylva
  • University Equine Hospital, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7040, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Pringle, John
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7040, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Bacterial Infections / epidemiology
  • Bacterial Infections / veterinary
  • Female
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / etiology
  • Horse Diseases / pathology
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Peritonitis / complications
  • Peritonitis / epidemiology
  • Peritonitis / veterinary
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sweden / epidemiology

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 29 references
  1. Mair TS, Hillyer MH, Taylor FG. Peritonitis in adult horses: a review of 21 cases.. Vet Rec 1990;126:567–570.
    pubmed: 2368303
  2. Henderson ISF, Mair TS, Keen JA, Shaw DJ, McGorum BC. Study of the short- and long-term outcomes of 65 horses with peritonitis.. Vet Rec 2008;163:293–297.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.163.10.293pubmed: 18776174google scholar: lookup
  3. Dyson S. Review of 30 cases of peritonitis in the horse.. Equine Vet J 1983;15:15–20.
    pubmed: 6825646
  4. Hawkins JF, Bowman KF, Roberts MC, Cowen P. Peritonitis in horses: 67 cases (1985–1990). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:284–288.
    pubmed: 8407492
  5. Nógrádi N, Tóth B, Macgillivray K. Peritonitis in horses: 55 cases (2004–2007). Acta Vet Hung 2011;59:181–193.
    doi: 10.1556/AVet.2011.011pubmed: 21665572google scholar: lookup
  6. Gay CC, Lording PM. Peritonitis in horses associated with Actinobacillus equuli.. Aust Vet J 1980;56:296–300.
  7. Matthews S, Dart AJ, Dowling BA, Hodgson JL, Hodgson DR. Peritonitis associated with Actinobacillus equuli in horses: 51 cases.. Aust Vet J 2001;79:536–539.
  8. Golland LC, Hodgson DR, Hodgson JL, Brownlow MA, Hutchins DR, Rawlinson RJ. Peritonitis associated with Actinobacillus equuli in horses: 15 cases (1982–1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994;205:340–343.
    pubmed: 7928617
  9. Watts AE, Johnson AL, Felippe MJ, Divers TJ. Recurrent Actinobacillus peritonitis in an otherwise healthy Thoroughbred horse.. Aust Vet J 2011;89:143–146.
  10. Patterson-Kane JC, Donahue JM, Harrison LR. Septicemia and peritonitis due to Actinobacillus equuli infection in an adult horse.. Vet Pathol 2001;38:230–232.
    doi: 10.1354/vp.38-2-230pubmed: 11280382google scholar: lookup
  11. Pihl TH, Nielsen MK, Olsen SN, Leifsson PS, Jacobsen S. Nonstrangulating intestinal infarctions associated with Strongylus vulgaris: clinical presentation and treatment outcomes of 30 horses (2008–2016). Equine Vet J 2018;50:474–480.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12779pubmed: 29112788google scholar: lookup
  12. Southwood LL, Russell G. The use of clinical findings in the identification of equine peritonitis cases that respond favorably to medical therapy.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2007;18:382–390.
  13. Brownlow MA, Hutchins DR, Johnston KG. Reference values for equine peritoneal fluid.. Equine Vet J 1981;13:127–130.
  14. Shuster R, Traub-Dargatz J, Baxter G. Survey of diplomates of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine and the American College of Veterinary Surgeons regarding clinical aspects and treatment of endotoxemia in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997;210:87–92.
    pubmed: 8977655
  15. Lye WC, Wong PL, Leong SO, Lee EJ. Isolation of organisms in CAPD peritonitis: a comparison of two techniques.. Adv Perit Dial 1994;10:166–168.
    pubmed: 7999819
  16. Dumoulin M, Pille F, Van den Abeele AM, Haesebrouck F, Oosterlinck M, Gasthuys F. Evaluation of an automated blood culture system for the isolation of bacteria from equine synovial fluid.. Vet J 2010;184:83–87.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.01.006pubmed: 19230729google scholar: lookup
  17. Ovesen AL, Riihimäki M, Båverud V, Pringle M. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides spp. from clinical samples from horses.. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;45:46–52.
  18. . Consumption of antibiotics and occurrence of resistance in Sweden.. Swedres-Svarm 2016.
  19. Belgrave RL, Dickey MM, Arheart KL, Cray C. Assesment of serum amyloid A testing of horses and its clinical impaction in a specialized equine practice.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013;243:113–119.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.243.1.113pubmed: 23786199google scholar: lookup
  20. Jacobsen S, Andersen PH. The acute phase protein serum amyloid A (SAA) as a marker of inflammation in horses.. Equine Vet Educ 2007;19:38–46.
  21. Sternberg S, Greko S, Olsson-Liljequist B. Antimicrobial susceptibility of equine isolates of Actinobacillus spp. and identification of β-lactamases in some strains.. Microb Drug Resist 1999;5:289–293.
    doi: 10.1089/mdr.1999.5.289pubmed: 10647087google scholar: lookup
  22. Schwartz D, Pusterla N, Jacobsen S, Christopher MM. Analytical validation of a new point-of-care assay for serum amyloid A in horses.. Equine Vet J 2018;50:678–683.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12807pubmed: 29344980google scholar: lookup
  23. van der Linden MA, Laffont CM, van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM. Prognosis in equine medical and surgical colic.. J Vet Intern Med 2003;17:343–348.
  24. Huang BF, Kropinski AM, Bujold AR, Macinnes JI. Complete genome sequence of Actinobacillus equuli subspecies equuli ATCC 19392T.. Stand in Genomic Sci 2015;10:32.
    doi: 10.1186/s40793-015-0009-xpmc: PMC4511653pubmed: 26203343google scholar: lookup
  25. Daly K, Shirazi-Beechey SP. Design and evaluation of group-specific oligonucleotide probes for quantitative analysis of intestinal ecosystems: their application to assessment of equine colonic microflora.. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2003;44:243–252.
    doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00032-1pubmed: 19719641google scholar: lookup
  26. Dimock WW, Edwards PR, Bruner DW. Infections observed in equine fetuses and foals.. Cornell Vet 1947;37:89–99.
    pubmed: 20243963
  27. Nielsen MK, Vidyashankar AN, Olsen SN, Monrad J, Thamsborg SM. Strongylus vulgaris associated with usage of selective therapy on Danish horse farms—is it reemerging?. Vet Parasitol 2012;109:260–266.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.04.039pubmed: 22703964google scholar: lookup
  28. Collins NM, Pirie RS. Case series: diagnostic investigation and treatment of peritonitis in six horses.. Aust Equine Vet 2012;30:47–52.
  29. Andersen U, Howe D, Dangoudoubiyam S, Toft N, Reinemeyer C, Lyons E. ScSXP: a Strongylus vulgaris antigen with potential for prepatent diagnosis.. Parasit Vectors 2013;6:84–96.
    doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-84pmc: PMC3623896pubmed: 23557195google scholar: lookup