Analyze Diet

Immunologic relationships between equine herpesvirus type 1 (equine abortion virus) and type 4 (equine rhinopneumonitis virus).

Abstract: The specificity of selected immune responses to equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) and type 4 (EHV-4) was examined in 3 colostrum-deprived specific-pathogen-free foals. Single foals were vaccinated with inactivated EHV-1, inactivated EHV-4, or control cell lysate plus adjuvant followed by successive intranasal challenge exposures with EHV-1 and EHV-4 or with EHV-4 and EHV-1. Vaccination with inactivated virus preparations elicited cellular immune responses and antibody which were augmented by subsequent challenge exposures. Cellular immune responses, as measured by in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis, were cross-reactive after foals were given either EHV-1 or EHV-4. Serum virus-neutralizing antibody responses were type-specific for foals given EHV-1, but were cross-reactive after EHV-4 administrations. It was concluded that diseases caused by EHV-1 and EHV-4 may be more effectively controlled with a bivalent vaccine containing both EHV-1 and EHV-4 than with the presently used monovalent vaccines based on EHV-1 alone.
Publication Date: 1984-10-01 PubMed ID: 6208822
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research aims to examine the immune responses in foals to equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) and type 4 (EHV-4). They concluded that a bivalent vaccine, containing both EHV-1 and EHV-4, may be more efficient for disease control than the currently used EHV-1 alone.

Experiment Design and Methodology

  • The study involved three colostrum-deprived specific-pathogen-free foals. This means they were free of any specific pathogens prior to the vaccine. The foals were deprived of colostrum to prevent interference from any maternal antibodies that could skew the results.
  • One foal was vaccinated with inactivated EHV-1, another with inactivated EHV-4, while the third one was given a control cell lysate plus an adjuvant. An adjuvant is a substance that boosts the body’s immune response to the vaccine.
  • This was followed by exposure to EHV-1 and EHV-4 via intranasal challenge exposure techniques to test the response of the immune system.

Findings

  • Vaccination with the inactivated virus preparations induced a cellular immune response as well as the production of antibodies. The challenge exposures further increased this response.
  • Cellular immune responses, as measured by in vitro lymphocyte blastogenesis (a process that measures the ability of lymphocytes to replicate), were cross-reactive regardless of the strain of EHV administered. This means that the foals’ immune systems responded similarly to both EHV-1 and EHV-4.
  • However, virus-neutralizing antibodies in the serum were type-specific in foals given EHV-1 but were cross-reactive after EHV-4 administration. This means that the antibodies produced in response to EHV-1 were specific to the virus and did not react with EHV-4, but the antibodies produced in response to EHV-4 were capable of neutralizing both viruses.

Conclusion

  • These findings led the researchers to suggest that a combined or “bivalent” vaccine containing both EHV-1 and EHV-4 would potentially be a more effective method of controlling diseases caused by the equine herpesvirus than the existing vaccines that contain only EHV-1.

Cite This Article

APA
Fitzpatrick DR, Studdert MJ. (1984). Immunologic relationships between equine herpesvirus type 1 (equine abortion virus) and type 4 (equine rhinopneumonitis virus). Am J Vet Res, 45(10), 1947-1952.

Publication

ISSN: 0002-9645
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 45
Issue: 10
Pages: 1947-1952

Researcher Affiliations

Fitzpatrick, D R
    Studdert, M J

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Antibodies, Viral / biosynthesis
      • Antigens, Viral / immunology
      • Epitopes
      • Herpesviridae / immunology
      • Herpesviridae Infections / immunology
      • Herpesviridae Infections / veterinary
      • Herpesvirus 1, Equid / classification
      • Herpesvirus 1, Equid / immunology
      • Horse Diseases / immunology
      • Horses
      • Lymphocyte Activation
      • Neutralization Tests
      • Vaccines, Attenuated / immunology
      • Viral Vaccines / immunology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 10 times.
      1. Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar C, Herskin M, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Roberts HC, Padalino B, Pasquali P, Spoolder H, Ståhl K, Calvo AV, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Carvelli A, Paillot R, Broglia A, Kohnle L, Baldinelli F, Van der Stede Y. Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): infection with Equine Herpesvirus-1. EFSA J 2022 Jan;20(1):e07036.
        doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7036pubmed: 35035581google scholar: lookup
      2. Knox A, Beddoe T. Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Technologies for the Detection of Equine Viral Pathogens. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 20;11(7).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11072150pubmed: 34359278google scholar: lookup
      3. Tewari D, Gibson JS, Slater JD, O'Neill T, Hannant D, Allen GP, Field HJ. Modulation of the serological response of specific pathogen-free (EHV-free) foals to EHV-1 by previous infection with EHV-4 or a TK-deletion mutant of EHV-1. Arch Virol 1993;132(1-2):101-20.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01309846pubmed: 8394686google scholar: lookup
      4. Crabb BS, MacPherson CM, Reubel GH, Browning GF, Studdert MJ, Drummer HE. A type-specific serological test to distinguish antibodies to equine herpesviruses 4 and 1. Arch Virol 1995;140(2):245-58.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01309860pubmed: 7710353google scholar: lookup
      5. Crabb BS, Studdert MJ. Epitopes of glycoprotein G of equine herpesviruses 4 and 1 located near the C termini elicit type-specific antibody responses in the natural host. J Virol 1993 Oct;67(10):6332-8.
      6. Studdert MJ, Fitzpatrick DR, Browning GF, Cullinane AA, Whalley JM. Equine herpesvirus genomes: heterogeneity of naturally occurring type 4 isolates and of a type 1 isolate after heterologous cell passage. Arch Virol 1986;91(3-4):375-81.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01314296pubmed: 3022687google scholar: lookup
      7. Bridges CG, Ledger N, Edington N. The characterization of equine herpes virus-1-infected cell polypeptides recognized by equine lymphocytes. Immunology 1988 Feb;63(2):193-8.
        pubmed: 2832309
      8. Bridges CG, Edington N. Genetic restriction of cytolysis during equid herpesvirus 1 subtype 2 infection. Clin Exp Immunol 1987 Nov;70(2):276-82.
        pubmed: 2827921
      9. Gibson JS, Slater JD, Awan AR, Field HJ. Pathogenesis of equine herpesvirus-1 in specific pathogen-free foals: primary and secondary infections and reactivation. Arch Virol 1992;123(3-4):351-66.
        doi: 10.1007/BF01317269pubmed: 1314051google scholar: lookup
      10. Kambayashi Y, Bannai H, Nemoto M, Kawanishi N, Niwa H, Tsujimura K. Comparative analysis of 3 qPCR primer-probe sets for the detection of equid alphaherpesvirus 1. J Vet Diagn Invest 2026 Jan;38(1):77-83.
        doi: 10.1177/10406387251379857pubmed: 41055561google scholar: lookup