FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Anat Sci Educ / Impact of the educational setting on the teaching and learni...
Anatomical sciences education2024; doi: 10.1002/ase.2475

Impact of the educational setting on the teaching and learning of the equine distal limb ultrasonography.

Abstract: The use of immersive methodologies is a trend in the educational environment, but their outcomes in the teaching-learning process need to be better understood. This study aimed to assess the impact of the educational environment on learning equine distal limb ultrasonography, comparing immersive classroom, traditional classroom, and virtual classroom. A total of 153 veterinary medicine students from the first to the third semester participated in this study. The students were divided into four groups: traditional (n = 22), immersive (n = 100), online (n = 31), and traditional-immersive (n = 15). The students completed a questionnaire before and immediately after the class. The online group had a lower average gain in correct answers compared to the others (p < 0.01). Regarding student perception, it was observed that the virtual group had the lowest satisfaction score (p < 0.001), and students in the immersive and online environments were more satisfied with the resources used compared to the traditional classroom (p = 0.01). Concluding, in the present study students showed a greater interest in environments associated with technology, and that in-person modalities resulted in significantly superior learning outcomes compared to online ones.
© 2024 American Association for Anatomy.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-06-18 PubMed ID: 38887863DOI: 10.1002/ase.2475Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper investigates how different educational environments (traditional, immersive, and virtual classrooms) affect the teaching and learning of equine distal limb ultrasonography, a crucial veterinary medical procedure. The study found that students had greater interest in and satisfaction with technology-assisted learning environments, but significantly better learning outcomes were observed with in-person modalities.

Study Design and Participants

  • The study included a total of 153 veterinary medicine students from the first to third semesters.
  • These students were divided into four groups: traditional classroom (22 students), immersive classroom (100 students), online classroom (31 students), and a combination of traditional and immersive classrooms (15 students).

Methodology

  • Each student completed a questionnaire before and immediately after their class in their given environment.
  • The purpose of the questionnaire was to assess changes in their understanding of equine distal limb ultrasonography and their perception of the learning environment.

Findings

  • The results showed that the classroom setting had an impact on the learning outcomes.
  • The students in the online teaching environment had the lowest average gain in terms of correct answers.
  • In terms of perception, students in the virtual class had the lowest satisfaction score.
  • Interestingly, the students in the immersive and online environments were more satisfied with the resources used for teaching, compared to those in the traditional classroom.

Conclusion

  • The research concludes that while students show a greater interest in environments that utilise technology, in-person teaching led to significantly superior learning outcomes.
  • This suggests that while modern technology can provide engaging learning environments, traditional methods are still vital for effective learning – at least in the specific context of veterinary medicine and ultrasonography of the equine distal limb.

Cite This Article

APA
Romeiro PS, Weber SH, Justino EJ, Michelotto PV. (2024). Impact of the educational setting on the teaching and learning of the equine distal limb ultrasonography. Anat Sci Educ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2475

Publication

Anatomical sciences education
ISSN: 1935-9780
NlmUniqueID: 101392205
Country: United States
Language: English

Researcher Affiliations

Romeiro, Pollyanna Stremel
  • Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Weber, Saulo Henrique
  • Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Justino, Edson José
  • Graduate Program in Computer Sciences, Polytechnic School, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Michelotto, Pedro Vicente
  • Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

Grant Funding

  • 001 / Coordenau00e7u00e3o de Aperfeiu00e7oamento de Pessoal de Nu00edvel Superior

References

This article includes 38 references
  1. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem‐based learning medical course? Perceptions of first‐ and second‐year students.. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29(2):173–180.
  2. Khalil MK, Abdel MEM, Elkhider IA. Teaching of anatomical sciences: a blended learning approach.. Clin Anat 2018;31(3):323–329.
  3. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization.. Anat Sci Educ 2010;3(2):83–93.
  4. Gasmalla HEE, Mossa AH, Taha MH, Wadi MM, Shehzad K, Abdalla ME. Promoting more future‐ready anatomy education after the COVID‐19 pandemic: a scoping review.. Anat Sci Educ 2022;15:1120–1137.
  5. López‐Úbeda R, García‐Vázquez FA. Self‐directed learning using computer simulations to study veterinary physiology: comparing individual and collaborative learning approaches.. Vet Rec 2022;191(8):1732–1743.
  6. Mahdy MAA, Sayed RKA. Evaluation of the online learning of veterinary anatomy education during the COVID‐19 pandemic lockdown in Egypt: Students' perceptions.. Anat. Sci Educ 2022;15(1):67–82.
  7. Routh J, Paramasivam SJ, Cockcroft P, Nadarajah VD, Jeevaratnam K. Veterinary education during COVID‐19 and beyond—challenges and mitigating approaches.. Animals (Basel) 2021;11(6):1818.
  8. Sadeghinezhad J. Online veterinary anatomy education during COVID‐19 pandemic in Iran: challenges and opportunities.. Vet Med Sci 2023;9(4):1869–1880.
  9. Muca E, Cavallini D, Raspa F, Bordin C, Bergero D, Valle E. Integrating new learning methods into equine nutrition classrooms: the importance of students' perceptions.. J Equine Vet 2023;126:104537.
  10. Machado LC, Santos SIP, Mariano CG Jr, Coutinho MP, Guaraná JB, Fantinato‐Neto P. Delivery anatomy kits help to keep practical veterinary classes during the COVID‐19 pandemic.. Anat Histol Embryol 2023;52(1):31–35.
  11. Attardi SM, Harmon DJ, Barremkala M, Bentley DC, Brown KM, Dennis JF. An analysis of anatomy education before and during COVID‐19: August‐December 2020.. Anat Sci Educ 2022;15(1):5–26.
  12. Gomez E, Azadi J, Magid D. Innovation born in isolation: rapid transformation of an in‐person medical student radiology elective to a remote learning experience during the COVID‐19 pandemic.. Acad Radiol 2020;32(20):35–44.
  13. Korf HW, Wicht H, Snipes RL, Timmermans JP, Paulsen F, Rune G. The dissection course—necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students.. Ann Anat 2008;190(1):16–22.
  14. Kruse MHL. Anatomia: A ordem do corpo.. Rev Bras Enferm 2004;57(1):79–84.
  15. Queiroz CDAF. The use of human cadavers as an instrument in the construction of knowledge from a bioethical perspective.. Universidade Católica de Goiás. Master's Degree in Environmental Sciences and Health Dissertation. 2005. p. 129.
  16. Photopoulos P, Tsonos C, Stavrakas I, Triantis D. Remote and in‐person learning: utility versus social experience.. SN Comput Sci 2023;4(2):116.
  17. Moore DL, Ding L, Sadhasivam S. Novel real‐time feedback and integrated simulation model for teaching and evaluating ultrasound‐guided regional anesthesia skills in pediatric anesthesia trainees.. Paediatr Anaesth 2012;22(9):847–853.
  18. Wichtel J. Investigation of ultrasound simulation technology amongst veterinary students.. Thesis. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph; 2021.
  19. Solis CN, Gilmour LJ, Coleman MC, Watts AE, Bevevino KE, Glass KG. Perspectives in veterinary education: effectiveness of a digital interactive multimedia tutorial for preparing veterinary students to perform ultrasonography in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2021;258(2):165–169.
  20. Bell FE, Neuffer FH, Haddad TR, Epps JC, Kozik ME, Warren BC. Active learning the floor of mouth anatomy with ultrasound.. Anat Sci Educ 2019;12(3):310–316.
  21. Zwicker MRGS. Neuroscience, innovation and new higher education: contributions for public relations professors in the transformation society.. Organicom 2020;17(32):131–140.
  22. Hiroshi S, Daisuke F, Yukari T, Eiko S, Yuki D, Hideaki H. Characteristics of bone fractures and usefulness of micro–computed tomography for fracture detection in rabbits: 210 cases (2007–2013).. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2015;246(12):1339–1344.
  23. Mayer RE. The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning.. Educ Psychol Rev 2024;36(8):2–25.
  24. Mayer RE, Heiser J, Lonn S. Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: when presenting more material results in less understanding.. J Educ Psychol 2001;93(1):187–198.
  25. Mayer RE. Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning.. Learn Instr 2014;29:171–173.
  26. Ryan GV, Callaghan S, Rafferty A, Higgins MF. Learning outcomes of immersive technologies in health care student education: systematic review of the literature.. J Med Internet Res 2022;24(2):e30082.
  27. De Back TT, Tinga AM, Louwerse MM. CAVE‐based immersive learning in undergraduate courses: examining the effect of group size and time of application.. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 2021;18:56.
  28. Wood AKW, Lublin JR, Hoffmann KL, Dadd MJ. Alternatives for improving veterinary medical student's learning of clinical sonography.. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000;41(5):433–436.
  29. Debue N, van de Leemput C. What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory.. Front Psychol 2014;1(5):1099.
  30. Kester L, Kirschner PA. Cognitive tasks and learning.. In: Seel NM, editor. Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer, New York, NY: Springer; 2012. p. 619–622.
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_225google scholar: lookup
  31. Baddeley AD, Hitch GJ. Working memory.. In: Bower GA, editor. Recent advances in learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press; 2021. Vol. 8. p. 47–89.
  32. Young T, Rohwer A, Volmink J, Clarke M. What are the effects of teaching evidence‐based health care (EBHC)? Overview of systematic reviews.. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e86706.
  33. Hutchinson L. ABC of learning and teaching—educational environment.. BMJ 2003;12(326):810–812.
  34. Soemantri D, Herrera C, Riquelme A. Measuring the educational environment in health professios studies: a systematic review.. Med Teach 2010;32(12):947–952.
  35. Borges ML, Silva AG. Implications of a multigenerational scenario in the workplace: differences, challenges and learning.. Brasília, DF: IV People Management and Labor Relations Meeting; 2013.
  36. Prensky M. Nativos Digitais Imigrantes Digitais.. On the Horizon Bradford, UK: NCB University Press; 2001. 9(5).
  37. Smart KL, Cappel JJ. Students' perceptions of online learning: a comparative study.. J Inf Technol Educ Res 2006;5(1):201–219.
  38. Orlandi TRC, Duque CG, Mori AM, Orlandi MTAL. Gamification: a new multimodal approach to education.. Books (online) 2018;70:17–30.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,030 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.