Analyze Diet
Veterinary ophthalmology2009; 12(5); 318-324; doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2009.00721.x

In vitro susceptibility patterns of Aspergillus and Fusarium species isolated from equine ulcerative keratomycosis cases in the midwestern and southern United States with inclusion of the new antifungal agent voriconazole.

Abstract: To evaluate and compare the in vitro susceptibility of Aspergillus and Fusarium spp. isolated from horses with ulcerative keratomycosis, address regional differences in equine keratomycosis isolates, and provide susceptibility data to update prior studies. Methods: Fourteen horses with ulcerative keratomycosis. Methods: Banked fungal isolates from equine corneal ulcers (eight Aspergillus spp. and six Fusarium spp.) were identified at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. In vitro minimum inhibitory concentration and susceptibility to natamycin, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, and miconazole were determined for each isolate. Results: Fungi were significantly more susceptible to voriconazole than to natamycin, itraconazole, fluconazole, and ketoconazole, but miconazole susceptibility did not differ significantly from voriconazole. Aspergillus spp. were most susceptible to voriconazole, miconazole, and itraconazole, which were significantly better to fluconazole and ketoconazole. Fusarium spp. susceptibility was greatest to natamycin and voriconazole and lowest to itraconazole and ketoconazole. Fusarium spp. were significantly less susceptible to itraconazole and ketoconazole compared to natamycin. No significant differences in susceptibility were found when isolates from Florida were compared with isolates from other states. Conclusions: Based on in vitro evidence, voriconazole appears to be the most effective antifungal for initial treatment of equine keratomycosis in the midwestern and southern United States. Results are comparable with previous studies in that isolated fungi from equine keratomycosis cases showed consistently poor susceptibility to fluconazole. Organisms isolated in different geographic locations of the midwestern and southern United States appeared to have similar patterns of antifungal susceptibility.
Publication Date: 2009-09-16 PubMed ID: 19751493DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2009.00721.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research aimed to determine the effectiveness of various antifungal treatments on Aspergillus and Fusarium species – the causative organisms of equine ulcerative keratomycosis. The study found that voriconazole was the most effective antifungal agent against these organisms in the midwestern and southern United States, outperforming natamycin, itraconazole, fluconazole, and ketoconazole in terms of susceptibility. The geographical location did not affect the patterns of antifungal susceptibility.

Procedure and Methodology

  • The research used banked fungal isolates from equine corneal ulcers. These included eight Aspergillus species and six Fusarium species which were identified at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
  • The minimum inhibitory concentration was determined for each isolate. This is the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that will inhibit the visible growth of a microorganism after overnight incubation.
  • The susceptibility to natamycin, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, ketoconazole, and miconazole were also tested for each fungal isolate.

Results and Findings

  • The study found that the fungi were significantly more susceptible to voriconazole than to natamycin, itraconazole, fluconazole, and ketoconazole. Miconazole susceptibility did not significantly differ from that of voriconazole.
  • Aspergillus species showed the highest susceptibility to voriconazole, miconazole, and itraconazole, which was significantly better than fluconazole and ketoconazole.
  • Fusarium species showed the greatest susceptibility to natamycin and voriconazole, but were least susceptible to itraconazole and ketoconazole.
  • The study also compared the susceptibility of the isolates from different states and found no significant differences.

Conclusion

  • The research concluded that voriconazole appears to be the most effective antifungal agent for the initial treatment of equine keratomycosis in the midwestern and southern United States.
  • The study’s results are comparable with previous ones as they both show that fungi isolated from equine keratomycosis cases consistently show poor susceptibility to fluconazole.
  • The geographical location of the isolates within the midwestern and southern United States did not show significant differences in the patterns of antifungal susceptibility.

Cite This Article

APA
Pearce JW, Giuliano EA, Moore CP. (2009). In vitro susceptibility patterns of Aspergillus and Fusarium species isolated from equine ulcerative keratomycosis cases in the midwestern and southern United States with inclusion of the new antifungal agent voriconazole. Vet Ophthalmol, 12(5), 318-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-5224.2009.00721.x

Publication

ISSN: 1463-5224
NlmUniqueID: 100887377
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 12
Issue: 5
Pages: 318-324

Researcher Affiliations

Pearce, Jacqueline W
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. pearcej@missouri.edu
Giuliano, Elizabeth A
    Moore, Cecil P

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Antifungal Agents / pharmacology
      • Antifungal Agents / therapeutic use
      • Aspergillus / drug effects
      • Corneal Ulcer / drug therapy
      • Corneal Ulcer / microbiology
      • Corneal Ulcer / veterinary
      • Eye Infections, Fungal / drug therapy
      • Eye Infections, Fungal / veterinary
      • Fusarium / drug effects
      • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
      • Horse Diseases / microbiology
      • Horses
      • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
      • Pyrimidines / pharmacology
      • Triazoles / pharmacology
      • Voriconazole

      Citations

      This article has been cited 12 times.
      1. Mo PM, Picard J, Gummow B. The conjunctival fungal microflora of horses in a North Queensland tropical environment and their in vitro susceptibilities to antifungal agents. Vet Res Commun 2023 Sep;47(3):1641-1651.
        doi: 10.1007/s11259-023-10119-9pubmed: 37022654google scholar: lookup
      2. Jadi PK, Sharma P, Bhogapurapu B, Roy S. Alternative Therapeutic Interventions: Antimicrobial Peptides and Small Molecules to Treat Microbial Keratitis. Front Chem 2021;9:694998.
        doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.694998pubmed: 34458234google scholar: lookup
      3. Foote BC, Smith JS, Bowden AC, Allbaugh RA, Sebbag L. Case Report: Successful Management of Refractory Keratomycosis in an Alpaca Using Penetrating Keratoplasty and Combination Antifungal Therapy (Caspofungin 0.5% and Terbinafine 1%). Front Vet Sci 2021;8:644074.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.644074pubmed: 33791355google scholar: lookup
      4. Walsh ML, Meason-Smith C, Arnold C, Suchodolski JS, Scott EM. Evaluation of the ocular surface mycobiota in clinically normal horses. PLoS One 2021;16(2):e0246537.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246537pubmed: 33539431google scholar: lookup
      5. Mora-Pereira M, Abarca EM, Duran S, Ravis W, McMullen RJ Jr, Fischer BM, Lee YP, Wooldridge AA. Sustained-release voriconazole-thermogel for subconjunctival injection in horses: ocular toxicity and in-vivo studies. BMC Vet Res 2020 Apr 16;16(1):115.
        doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02331-5pubmed: 32295599google scholar: lookup
      6. Mustikka MP, Grönthal TSC, Pietilä EM. Equine infectious keratitis in Finland: Associated microbial isolates and susceptibility profiles. Vet Ophthalmol 2020 Jan;23(1):148-159.
        doi: 10.1111/vop.12701pubmed: 31364808google scholar: lookup
      7. Cullen M, Jacob ME, Cornish V, VanderSchel IQ, Cotter HVT, Cubeta MA, Carbone I, Gilger BC. Multi-locus DNA sequence analysis, antifungal agent susceptibility, and fungal keratitis outcome in horses from Southeastern United States. PLoS One 2019;14(3):e0214214.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214214pubmed: 30921394google scholar: lookup
      8. Galera PD, Brooks DE. Optimal management of equine keratomycosis. Vet Med (Auckl) 2012;3:7-17.
        doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S25013pubmed: 30155429google scholar: lookup
      9. Marlo TL, Giuliano EA, Tripathi R, Sharma A, Mohan RR. Altering equine corneal fibroblast differentiation through Smad gene transfer. Vet Ophthalmol 2018 Mar;21(2):132-139.
        doi: 10.1111/vop.12485pubmed: 28685927google scholar: lookup
      10. Marlo TL, Giuliano EA, Sharma A, Mohan RR. Development of a novel ex vivo equine corneal model. Vet Ophthalmol 2017 Jul;20(4):288-293.
        doi: 10.1111/vop.12415pubmed: 27471196google scholar: lookup
      11. Sandmeyer LS, Bauer BS, Robinson K, Grahn BH. Diagnostic ophthalmology. Can Vet J 2014 Mar;55(3):281-3.
        pubmed: 24587514
      12. Reed Z, Thomasy SM, Good KL, Maggs DJ, Magdesian KG, Pusterla N, Hollingsworth SR. Equine keratomycoses in California from 1987 to 2010 (47 cases). Equine Vet J 2013 May;45(3):361-6.