Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1993; 25(4); 309-313; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb02969.x

In-vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs of bacterial isolates from horses in The Netherlands.

Abstract: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 30 antimicrobial agents (including the hitherto unreported antimicrobial agents doxycycline, minocycline, vanomycin, 3 quinolones and 3 combinations of antimicrobial agents) for isolates of Salmonella spp. (20), Escherichia coli (17), Klebsiella spp. (8), Proteus spp. (7), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7), Actinobacillus equuli (5), Rhodococcus equi (4), Streptococcus zooepidemicus (23), Streptococcus equisimilis (6), Streptococcus equi (4), coagulase-positive Staphylococcus spp. (20) and Taylorella equigenitalis (19) were determined using the agar dilution method. All isolates were of equine origin. MICs were compared with recommended MIC breakpoints. The results indicate that, for some of the pathogenic bacteria evaluated, susceptibility testing of isolates from the individual patient is essential to determine an appropriate antimicrobial treatment.
Publication Date: 1993-07-01 PubMed ID: 8354217DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb02969.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focuses on testing the effectiveness of various antimicrobial drugs on different types of bacteria collected from horses in The Netherlands. It emphasizes the need for individualized treatment plans in fighting bacterial infections based on each bacteria’s unique susceptibility to different drugs.

Study Details

  • This study examined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 30 antimicrobial agents on several bacterial isolates. The MIC is the smallest concentration of an antimicrobial drug that can prevent bacterial growth.
  • The antimicrobial agents tested included doxycycline, minocycline, vanomycin, three quinolones, and three combinations of antimicrobial agents. Some of these agents had not been reported in prior research.
  • The bacterial isolates tested were all of equine origin and included species of Salmonella, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Actinobacillus equuli, Rhodococcus equi, several species of Streptococcus, coagulase-positive Staphylococcus, and Taylorella equigenitalis.
  • The method used for testing was ‘agar dilution,’ a common laboratory procedure where the bacterial isolates are cultivated in agar plates containing varied concentrations of the antimicrobial drugs.

Results and Implications

  • After determining the MICs for all antimicrobial agents and bacterial isolates, researchers compared them to accepted standard values.
  • The results highlighted variability in drug effectiveness among the different types of bacteria. Certain bacterial species were more resistant to specific antimicrobial drugs, with their MICs exceeding the recommended thresholds.
  • This implies that susceptibility testing is crucial when determining the most effective treatment for bacterial infections in horses. A ‘one size fits all’ approach may not be effective, and treatment should be personalized to the specific bacterial infection.
  • Ultimately, this study underlines the importance of veterinary pharmacological research in optimizing antimicrobial treatment strategies. It adds valuable information to existing knowledge about bacterial resistance to drugs, crucial in efforts to counter antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine.

Cite This Article

APA
Ensink JM, van Klingeren B, Houwers DJ, Klein WR, Vulto AG. (1993). In-vitro susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs of bacterial isolates from horses in The Netherlands. Equine Vet J, 25(4), 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb02969.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 25
Issue: 4
Pages: 309-313

Researcher Affiliations

Ensink, J M
  • Department of General and Large Animal Surgery, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
van Klingeren, B
    Houwers, D J
      Klein, W R
        Vulto, A G

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
          • Bacteria / drug effects
          • Drug Resistance, Microbial
          • Horses / microbiology
          • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
          • Netherlands
          • Staphylococcus / drug effects

          Citations

          This article has been cited 11 times.
          1. Kinoshita Y, Niwa H, Ueno T. Minimal disruption of equine gut microbiota by intravenous cephalothin treatment. J Vet Med Sci 2025 Jun 1;87(6):690-696.
            doi: 10.1292/jvms.25-0105pubmed: 40254462google scholar: lookup
          2. Yang B, Liu S, Cheng J, Qu H, Guo Y, Ji C, Wang Y, Zhao S, Huang S, Zhao L, Ma Q. Pharmacokinetics of Enrofloxacin in Plasma, Urine, and Feces of Donkey (Equus asinus) after a Single Intragastric Administration. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024 Apr 12;13(4).
            doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13040355pubmed: 38667031google scholar: lookup
          3. Vereecke N, Vandekerckhove A, Theuns S, Haesebrouck F, Boyen F. Whole genome sequencing to study antimicrobial resistance and RTX virulence genes in equine Actinobacillus isolates. Vet Res 2023 Apr 5;54(1):33.
            doi: 10.1186/s13567-023-01160-2pubmed: 37020296google scholar: lookup
          4. Chapuis RJJ, Smith JS, French HM, Toka FN, Peterson EW, Little EL. Nonlinear Mixed-Effect Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Distribution of Doxycycline in Healthy Female Donkeys after Multiple Intragastric Dosing-Preliminary Investigation. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jul 9;11(7).
            doi: 10.3390/ani11072047pubmed: 34359175google scholar: lookup
          5. Kuroda T, Minamijima Y, Niwa H, Tamura N, Mita H, Fukuda K, Kaimachi M, Suzuki Y, Enoki Y, Taguchi K, Matsumoto K, Toutain PL, Bousquet-Melou A, Kasashima Y. Rational dosage regimens for cephalothin and cefazolin using pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics analysis in healthy horses. Equine Vet J 2021 Nov;53(6):1239-1249.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.13406pubmed: 33341979google scholar: lookup
          6. Durham AE. An evaluation of serum gentamicin concentrations and bacterial susceptibility to gentamicin in equine practice. J Vet Intern Med 2018 May;32(3):1194-1201.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.15078pubmed: 29575239google scholar: lookup
          7. Alexander K, Drost WT, Mattoon JS, Kowalski JJ, Funk JA, Crabtree AC. Binding of ciprofloxacin labelled with technetium Tc 99m versus 99mTc-pertechnetate to a live and killed equine isolate of Escherichia coil. Can J Vet Res 2005 Oct;69(4):272-7.
            pubmed: 16479725
          8. Jacks SS, Giguère S, Nguyen A. In vitro susceptibilities of Rhodococcus equi and other common equine pathogens to azithromycin, clarithromycin, and 20 other antimicrobials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003 May;47(5):1742-5.
          9. Haines GR, Brown MP, Gronwall RR, Merritt KA. Serum concentrations and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin after intravenous and intragastric administration to mares. Can J Vet Res 2000 Jul;64(3):171-7.
            pubmed: 10935883
          10. Bowersock TL, Salmon SA, Portis ES, Prescott JF, Robison DA, Ford CW, Watts JL. MICs of oxazolidinones for Rhodococcus equi strains isolated from humans and animals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000 May;44(5):1367-9.
          11. Bleumink-Pluym NM, ter Laak EA, Houwers DJ, van der Zeijst BA. Differences between Taylorella equigenitalis strains in their invasion of and replication in cultured cells. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1996 Jan;3(1):47-50.
            doi: 10.1128/cdli.3.1.47-50.1996pubmed: 8770503google scholar: lookup