Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record1998; 142(3); 66-67; doi: 10.1136/vr.142.3.66

Incidence of recurrent seasonal pruritus (‘sweet itch’) in British and German shire horses.

Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 1998-03-03 PubMed ID: 9481844DOI: 10.1136/vr.142.3.66Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper explores the prevalence of a type of seasonal pruritus, commonly known as ‘sweet itch’, in British and German shire horses.

Background Information

  • In both the British and German context, there was a common belief that the incidence of ‘sweet itch’ was high among shire horses.
  • Prior to this study, there was a lack of published data that supported these claims, particularly for British horses.
  • The researchers highlighted a previous survey by the British Equine Veterinary Association (BEVA) in 1965, which suggested that around 1.5% of heavy horses experience skin conditions, with 0.23% specifically identified as ‘sweet itch’.
  • This study aimed at providing a more accurate approximation of ‘sweet itch’ prevalence in British and German shire horses.

Data Collection

  • Data was gathered through questionnaires sent out to members of the British Shire Horse Society and the German Shire Horse Society.
  • The questionnaire sought information about the number of horses owned by respondents, the number of horses affected by ‘sweet itch’, the age of onset of the disease, and whether any related animals were known to be affected.
  • Responses were received from 184 British owners of 1088 shire and shire crosses and 43 German members with information about 77 horses.

Findings

  • The study found that the number of horses suffering from ‘sweet itch’ in the surveyed populations was 126 in Britain and 29 in Germany, representing a prevalence of 11.6% and 37.7% respectively.
  • The difference in the prevalence of ‘sweet itch’ in the two countries was determined to be statistically significant.
  • The peak age of onset for ‘sweet itch’ was two years for British horses and one year for German horses.
  • A familial incidence was reported by 36.8% of British owners and 34.5% of German horses were known to have affected relatives.

Conclusions and Limitations

  • The study validates the belief of a high incidence of ‘sweet itch’ in German shire horses, with a rate three times higher than that of British shire horses.
  • However, the researchers question the accuracy of these results due to a low response rate from British horse owners which could lead to potential bias.
  • The prevalence of ‘sweet itch’ in British shire horses, as derived from the study, is a considerable increase from the figures reported in the previous BEVA survey.

Cite This Article

APA
Littlewood JD. (1998). Incidence of recurrent seasonal pruritus (‘sweet itch’) in British and German shire horses. Vet Rec, 142(3), 66-67. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.142.3.66

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 142
Issue: 3
Pages: 66-67

Researcher Affiliations

Littlewood, J D
  • Animal Health Trust, Newmarket, Suffolk.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Germany / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horses
  • Incidence
  • Pruritus / epidemiology
  • Pruritus / veterinary
  • Seasons
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • United Kingdom / epidemiology

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Simonin EM, Wagner B. IgE-binding monocytes upregulate the coagulation cascade in allergic horses. Genes Immun 2023 Jun;24(3):130-138.
    doi: 10.1038/s41435-023-00207-wpubmed: 37193769google scholar: lookup
  2. Larson EM, Babasyan S, Wagner B. IgE-Binding Monocytes Have an Enhanced Ability to Produce IL-8 (CXCL8) in Animals with Naturally Occurring Allergy. J Immunol 2021 May 15;206(10):2312-2321.
    doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001354pubmed: 33952617google scholar: lookup
  3. Larson EM, Babasyan S, Wagner B. Phenotype and function of IgE-binding monocytes in equine Culicoides hypersensitivity. PLoS One 2020;15(5):e0233537.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233537pubmed: 32442209google scholar: lookup
  4. Baker T, Carpenter S, Gubbins S, Newton R, Lo Iacono G, Wood J, Harrup LE. Can insecticide-treated netting provide protection for Equids from Culicoides biting midges in the United Kingdom?. Parasit Vectors 2015 Nov 25;8:604.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1182-xpubmed: 26607993google scholar: lookup
  5. Langner KF, Jarvis DL, Nimtz M, Heselhaus JE, McHolland LE, Leibold W, Drolet BS. Identification, expression and characterisation of a major salivary allergen (Cul s 1) of the biting midge Culicoides sonorensis relevant for summer eczema in horses. Int J Parasitol 2009 Jan;39(2):243-50.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.06.008pubmed: 18708061google scholar: lookup
  6. Björnsdóttir S, Sigvaldadóttir J, Broström H, Langvad B, Sigurdsson A. Summer eczema in exported Icelandic horses: influence of environmental and genetic factors. Acta Vet Scand 2006 May 26;48(1):3.
    doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-48-3pubmed: 16987399google scholar: lookup
  7. Graner A, Mueller RS, Geisler J, Bogenstätter D, White SJ, Jonsdottir S, Marti E. Allergen immunotherapy using recombinant Culicoides allergens improves clinical signs of equine insect bite hypersensitivity. Front Allergy 2024;5:1467245.
    doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1467245pubmed: 39403119google scholar: lookup