Analyze Diet
The Journal of animal ecology2013; 83(1); 147-156; doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12115

Increasing density leads to generalization in both coarse-grained habitat selection and fine-grained resource selection in a large mammal.

Abstract: Density is a fundamental driver of many ecological processes including habitat selection. Theory on density-dependent habitat selection predicts that animals should be distributed relative to profitability of habitat, resulting in reduced specialization in selection (i.e. generalization) as density increases and competition intensifies. Despite mounting empirical support for density-dependent habitat selection using isodars to describe coarse-grained (interhabitat) animal movements, we know little of how density affects fine-grained resource selection of animals within habitats [e.g. using resource selection functions (RSFs)]. Using isodars and RSFs, we tested whether density simultaneously modified habitat selection and within-habitat resource selection in a rapidly growing population of feral horses (Equus ferus caballus Linnaeus; Sable Island, Nova Scotia, Canada; 42% increase in population size from 2008 to 2012). Among three heterogeneous habitat zones on Sable Island describing population clusters distributed along a west-east resource gradient (west-central-east), isodars revealed that horses used available habitat in a density-dependent manner. Intercepts and slopes of isodars demonstrated a pattern of habitat selection that first favoured the west, which generalized to include central and east habitats with increasing population size consistent with our understanding of habitat quality on Sable Island. Resource selection functions revealed that horses selected for vegetation associations similarly at two scales of extent (total island and within-habitat zone). When densities were locally low, horses were able to select for sites of the most productive forage (grasslands) relative to those of poorer quality. However, as local carrying capacity was approached, selection for the best of available forage types weakened while selection for lower-quality vegetation increased (and eventually exceeded that of grasslands). Isodars can effectively describe coarse-grained habitat selection in large mammals. Our study also shows that the main predictions of density-dependent habitat selection are highly relevant to our interpretation of RSFs in space and time. At low but not necessarily high population size, density will be a leading indicator of habitat quality. Fitness maximization from specialist vs. generalist strategies of habitat and resource selection may well be apparent at multiple spatial extents and grains of resolution.
Publication Date: 2013-08-09 PubMed ID: 23931034DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12115Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study suggests that as population density increases in large mammals, their selection behavior tends to generalize from specific preferences to more broad-based selection. The study was carried out using the rapidly growing population of feral horses on Sable Island, Canada, and puts the spotlight on the fundamental role of population density in ecological processes like habitat selection.

Understanding the Study

  • The research is based on the theory of density-dependent habitat selection. It posits that as the population density of a species increases, the animals diversify their habitat preferences due to increased competition.
  • They use isodars, a tool that measures how animals distribute themselves based on habitat profitability, and resource selection functions (RSFs) that help understand how animals choose resources within a certain habitat.
  • The case study for this research is the population of feral horses on Sable Island, Nova Scotia, the population of which grew by a hefty 42% from 2008 to 2012.

Habitat Zones and Selection

  • Sable Island for this study was divided into three distinct habitat zones (west, central, and east), each with different resource availability. It was found that horses were adapting their habitats as their density increased. When the population was relatively low, their preferred habitat was the west. However, as the population increased, they generalized and began to include the central and east habitats.

Resource Selection Function

  • The researchers observed how horses selected for certain vegetation associations across the island and within specific habitat zones. When population density was low, they were able to choose their prefered, most productive forage, the grasslands. With increased density and resources, they began to select for lower-quality vegetation in higher quantities.

Conclusions Drawn

  • The main conclusions drawn from this study bolster the relevance of density-dependent habitat selection to interpret resource selection functions. The researchers found that when population sizes are low, density can be a leading indicator of habitat quality. However, this correlation may not hold with high population size.
  • Furthermore, the generalization of habitat and resource preferences as density increases underlines the trade-off between achieving maximum fitness and optimal resource utilization. This correlation is visible across multiple spatial extents and grains of resolution.

Cite This Article

APA
van Beest FM, Uzal A, Vander Wal E, Laforge MP, Contasti AL, Colville D, McLoughlin PD. (2013). Increasing density leads to generalization in both coarse-grained habitat selection and fine-grained resource selection in a large mammal. J Anim Ecol, 83(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12115

Publication

ISSN: 1365-2656
NlmUniqueID: 0376574
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 83
Issue: 1
Pages: 147-156

Researcher Affiliations

van Beest, Floris M
  • Department of Animal and Poultry Science, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E2, Canada.
Uzal, Antonio
    Vander Wal, Eric
      Laforge, Michel P
        Contasti, Adrienne L
          Colville, David
            McLoughlin, Philip D

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Demography
              • Ecosystem
              • Female
              • Horses / physiology
              • Islands
              • Male
              • Nova Scotia
              • Population Density
              • Population Growth

              Citations

              This article has been cited 27 times.
              1. Smith BJ, MacNulty DR, Stahler DR, Smith DW, Avgar T. Density-dependent habitat selection alters drivers of population distribution in northern Yellowstone elk. Ecol Lett 2023 Feb;26(2):245-256.
                doi: 10.1111/ele.14155pubmed: 36573288google scholar: lookup
              2. Šigutová H, Šigut M, Dolný A, Harabiš F. Individual variability in habitat selection by aquatic insects is driven by taxonomy rather than specialisation. Sci Rep 2022 Dec 1;12(1):20735.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25363-3pubmed: 36456650google scholar: lookup
              3. Broekman MJE, Hilbers JP, Huijbregts MAJ, Mueller T, Ali AH, Andrén H, Altmann J, Aronsson M, Attias N, Bartlam-Brooks HLA, van Beest FM, Belant JL, Beyer DE, Bidner L, Blaum N, Boone RB, Boyce MS, Brown MB, Cagnacci F, Černe R, Chamaillé-Jammes S, Dejid N, Dekker J, L J Desbiez A, Díaz-Muñoz SL, Fennessy J, Fichtel C, Fischer C, Fisher JT, Fischhoff I, Ford AT, Fryxell JM, Gehr B, Goheen JR, Hauptfleisch M, Hewison AJM, Hering R, Heurich M, Isbell LA, Janssen R, Jeltsch F, Kaczensky P, Kappeler PM, Krofel M, LaPoint S, Latham ADM, Linnell JDC, Markham AC, Mattisson J, Medici EP, de Miranda Mourão G, Van Moorter B, Morato RG, Morellet N, Mysterud A, Mwiu S, Odden J, Olson KA, Ornicāns A, Pagon N, Panzacchi M, Persson J, Petroelje T, Rolandsen CM, Roshier D, Rubenstein DI, Saïd S, Salemgareyev AR, Sawyer H, Schmidt NM, Selva N, Sergiel A, Stabach J, Stacy-Dawes J, Stewart FEC, Stiegler J, Strand O, Sundaresan S, Svoboda NJ, Ullmann W, Voigt U, Wall J, Wikelski M, Wilmers CC, Zięba F, Zwijacz-Kozica T, Schipper AM, Tucker MA. Evaluating expert-based habitat suitability information of terrestrial mammals with GPS-tracking data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 2022 Aug;31(8):1526-1541.
                doi: 10.1111/geb.13523pubmed: 36247232google scholar: lookup
              4. Regan CE, Pemberton JM, Pilkington JG, Smiseth PT. Having a better home range does not reduce the cost of reproduction in Soay sheep. J Evol Biol 2022 Oct;35(10):1352-1362.
                doi: 10.1111/jeb.14083pubmed: 36063153google scholar: lookup
              5. Aliperti JR, Jenderseck K, Van Vuren DH. Habitat selection in a fluctuating ground squirrel population: Density-dependence and fitness consequences. Ecol Evol 2022 Aug;12(8):e9241.
                doi: 10.1002/ece3.9241pubmed: 36052297google scholar: lookup
              6. Northrup JM, Vander Wal E, Bonar M, Fieberg J, Laforge MP, Leclerc M, Prokopenko CM, Gerber BD. Conceptual and methodological advances in habitat-selection modeling: guidelines for ecology and evolution. Ecol Appl 2022 Jan;32(1):e02470.
                doi: 10.1002/eap.2470pubmed: 34626518google scholar: lookup
              7. Scharf I, Reshef MH, Avidov B, Ovadia O. Evidence for competition and cannibalism in wormlions. Sci Rep 2021 Jun 17;11(1):12733.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92154-7pubmed: 34140585google scholar: lookup
              8. Schmidt NM, van Beest FM, Dupuch A, Hansen LH, Desforges JP, Morris DW. Long-term patterns in winter habitat selection, breeding and predation in a density-fluctuating, high Arctic lemming population. Oecologia 2021 Apr;195(4):927-935.
                doi: 10.1007/s00442-021-04882-2pubmed: 33609167google scholar: lookup
              9. Avgar T, Betini GS, Fryxell JM. Habitat selection patterns are density dependent under the ideal free distribution. J Anim Ecol 2020 Dec;89(12):2777-2787.
                doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13352pubmed: 32961607google scholar: lookup
              10. Ordiz A, Uzal A, Milleret C, Sanz-Pérez A, Zimmermann B, Wikenros C, Wabakken P, Kindberg J, Swenson JE, Sand H. Wolf habitat selection when sympatric or allopatric with brown bears in Scandinavia. Sci Rep 2020 Jun 18;10(1):9941.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66626-1pubmed: 32555291google scholar: lookup
              11. Jenkins E, Backwell AL, Bellaw J, Colpitts J, Liboiron A, McRuer D, Medill S, Parker S, Shury T, Smith M, Tschritter C, Wagner B, Poissant J, McLoughlin P. Not playing by the rules: Unusual patterns in the epidemiology of parasites in a natural population of feral horses (Equus caballus) on Sable Island, Canada. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2020 Apr;11:183-190.
                doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2020.02.002pubmed: 32095427google scholar: lookup
              12. Jones KA, Ratcliffe N, Votier SC, Newton J, Forcada J, Dickens J, Stowasser G, Staniland IJ. Intra-specific Niche Partitioning in Antarctic Fur Seals, Arctocephalus gazella. Sci Rep 2020 Feb 24;10(1):3238.
                doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59992-3pubmed: 32094418google scholar: lookup
              13. O'Neil ST, Beyer DE Jr, Bump JK. Territorial landscapes: incorporating density-dependence into wolf habitat selection studies. R Soc Open Sci 2019 Nov;6(11):190282.
                doi: 10.1098/rsos.190282pubmed: 31827818google scholar: lookup
              14. Manning JA, McLoughlin PD. Environmental and demographic drivers of male mating success vary across sequential reproductive episodes in a polygynous breeder. Ecol Evol 2019 May;9(9):5106-5117.
                doi: 10.1002/ece3.5066pubmed: 31110665google scholar: lookup
              15. Devries JH, Clark RG, Armstrong LM. Dynamics of habitat selection in birds: adaptive response to nest predation depends on multiple factors. Oecologia 2018 May;187(1):305-318.
                doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4134-2pubmed: 29627956google scholar: lookup
              16. Debeffe L, Poissant J, McLoughlin PD. Individual quality and age but not environmental or social conditions modulate costs of reproduction in a capital breeder. Ecol Evol 2017 Aug;7(15):5580-5591.
                doi: 10.1002/ece3.3082pubmed: 28811876google scholar: lookup
              17. Huntsman BM, Falke JA, Savereide JW, Bennett KE. The role of density-dependent and -independent processes in spawning habitat selection by salmon in an Arctic riverscape. PLoS One 2017;12(5):e0177467.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177467pubmed: 28531202google scholar: lookup
              18. Bao H, Fryxell JM, Liu H, Dou H, Ma Y, Jiang G. Effects of interspecific interaction-linked habitat factors on moose resource selection and environmental stress. Sci Rep 2017 Jan 27;7:41514.
                doi: 10.1038/srep41514pubmed: 28128311google scholar: lookup
              19. Leclerc M, Vander Wal E, Zedrosser A, Swenson JE, Kindberg J, Pelletier F. Quantifying consistent individual differences in habitat selection. Oecologia 2016 Mar;180(3):697-705.
                doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3500-6pubmed: 26597548google scholar: lookup
              20. Naundrup PJ, Svenning JC. A Geographic Assessment of the Global Scope for Rewilding with Wild-Living Horses (Equus ferus). PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0132359.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132359pubmed: 26177104google scholar: lookup
              21. Tardy O, Massé A, Pelletier F, Fortin D. Resampling method for applying density-dependent habitat selection theory to wildlife surveys. PLoS One 2015;10(6):e0128238.
                doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128238pubmed: 26042998google scholar: lookup
              22. Richard E, Simpson SE, Medill SA, McLoughlin PD. Interacting effects of age, density, and weather on survival and current reproduction for a large mammal. Ecol Evol 2014 Oct;4(19):3851-60.
                doi: 10.1002/ece3.1250pubmed: 25614799google scholar: lookup
              23. van Beest FM, McLoughlin PD, Vander Wal E, Brook RK. Density-dependent habitat selection and partitioning between two sympatric ungulates. Oecologia 2014 Aug;175(4):1155-65.
                doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2978-7pubmed: 24913777google scholar: lookup
              24. Marjamäki PH, Contasti AL, Coulson TN, McLoughlin PD. Local density and group size interacts with age and sex to determine direction and rate of social dispersal in a polygynous mammal. Ecol Evol 2013 Sep;3(9):3073-82.
                doi: 10.1002/ece3.694pubmed: 24101995google scholar: lookup
              25. Webber Q, Prokopenko C, Kingdon K, Turner J, Vander Wal E. Effects of the social environment on movement-integrated habitat selection. Mov Ecol 2024 Sep 5;12(1):61.
                doi: 10.1186/s40462-024-00502-9pubmed: 39238061google scholar: lookup
              26. Webber QMR, Laforge MP, Bonar M, Vander Wal E. The adaptive value of density-dependent habitat specialization and social network centrality. Nat Commun 2024 May 24;15(1):4423.
                doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48657-8pubmed: 38789438google scholar: lookup
              27. Doherty JF, Milotic M, Filion A, Eriksson A. Host specificity and the reproductive strategies of parasites. Parasitology 2022 Apr;149(4):534-541.
                doi: 10.1017/S0031182021002122pubmed: 35331349google scholar: lookup