Analyze Diet
Veterinary immunology and immunopathology2015; 164(3-4); 110-117; doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.01.009

Interaction between anthelmintic treatment and vaccine responses in ponies naturally infected with cyathostomins.

Abstract: Anthelmintics and vaccines are commonly given concurrently in routine equine management, but it is unknown to what extent an interaction between the two exists. Cyathostomins can modulate the local immune response by stimulating a type 2 helper T cell (Th2) response. In addition, anti-inflammatory effects of ivermectin have been found in rodent models. It is unknown whether these anti-inflammatory effects affect the acute phase response elicited by commonly used vaccines. This study evaluated how the acute phase inflammatory response, leukocyte expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and vaccine-specific titers induced by simultaneous injection of three vaccines (West Nile Virus, Equine Herpes Rhinopneumonitis, and Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin) were modulated by concurrent administration of ivermectin or pyrantel pamoate in ponies naturally infected with cyathostomins. Mixed-breed yearling ponies were blocked by gender and fecal strongyle egg count, then randomly assigned to three treatment groups: ivermectin (n=8), pyrantel pamoate (n=8), and control (n=7). All ponies received vaccinations intramuscularly on days 0 and 29, and anthelmintics were administered on the same days. Whole blood, serum and plasma samples were collected one, three and 14 days after each vaccination. Samples were analyzed for concentrations of acute phase reactants (haptoglobin, serum amyloid A, fibrinogen and iron), mRNA expression levels of cytokines (interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-4, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interferon (IFN)-γ) in leukocytes, and vaccine-specific antibody titers. A marked acute-phase response was noted following both vaccinations. In contrast, the pattern of change in cytokine expression was less pronounced and more variable. Statistical differences were observed between groups for haptoglobin, fibrinogen, IL-1β, IL-4, and IL-10, but differences were generally small and none of the vaccine titers were different between the groups. Taken together, the study found some signs of modulation of immunologic or inflammatory responses to the administered vaccines, when anthelmintics were administered concurrently, but these are unlikely to have practical implications for vaccination routines.
Publication Date: 2015-02-07 PubMed ID: 25704666DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.01.009Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores how the concurrent administration of de-worming drugs (anthelmintics) and vaccines in horses influences the immune response, specifically in horses infected with a type of parasitic worm (cyathostomins). The study did not find significant differences that would impact standard vaccination procedures.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers used mixed-breed yearling horses infected with cyathostomins that were grouped based on gender and the count of strongyle egg in their feces. The horses were divided into three groups: those treated with ivermectin, those treated with pyrantel pamoate, and a control group.
  • All of the horses received inoculations of three different vaccines – for West Nile Virus, Equine Herpes Rhinopneumonitis, and Keyhole Limpet Hemocyanin – on two separate occasions. On these same days, the horses also received their assigned worming medication.
  • Blood, serum, and plasma samples were collected from the horses at one, three and 14 days following each vaccination and were analyzed for signs of an inflammatory response, cytokine expression in white blood cells, and for vaccine-specific immune responses.

Results of the Study

  • It was observed that both vaccine injections triggered noticeable acute-phase responses, which is a rapid inflammatory reaction of the body to a trigger, such as a vaccine.
  • The change in cytokine expression, however, was less clear and more variable. Cytokines are important signaling molecules in immune responses.
  • Statistical differences among the groups were reported for certain acute phase reactants and cytokines, but the changes were generally small.
  • No significant differences were found in the immune response to the vaccines among the groups, suggesting that the anthelmintics did not substantially impact the response to the vaccines.

Final Remarks

  • Based on the evidence from this study, the researchers deduce that while there may be minor modulation of the immunological response when de-worming drugs are administered at the same time as vaccines, these interactions are unlikely to affect normal vaccination protocol.

Cite This Article

APA
Nielsen MK, Rubinson EF, Chambers TM, Horohov DW, Wagner B, Betancourt A, Reedy SE, Jacobsen S. (2015). Interaction between anthelmintic treatment and vaccine responses in ponies naturally infected with cyathostomins. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 164(3-4), 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2015.01.009

Publication

ISSN: 1873-2534
NlmUniqueID: 8002006
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 164
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 110-117
PII: S0165-2427(15)00031-8

Researcher Affiliations

Nielsen, M K
  • Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. Electronic address: martin.nielsen@uky.edu.
Rubinson, E F
  • Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Chambers, T M
  • Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Horohov, D W
  • Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Wagner, B
  • Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Betancourt, A
  • Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Reedy, S E
  • Maxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jacobsen, S
  • Department of Large Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anthelmintics / therapeutic use
  • Cytokines / analysis
  • Female
  • Horses
  • Immunoglobulin G / blood
  • Male
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / drug therapy
  • Strongyle Infections, Equine / immunology
  • Vaccination
  • Vaccines / immunology

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.