Intraoperator, intraobserver and interoperator variability of echocardiographic measurements in healthy foals.
Abstract: The repeatability of various echocardiographic measurements is unknown. Objective: To determine the intraoperator, intraobserver and interoperator variability of echocardiographic measures in healthy foals. Methods: Echocardiographic examinations were carried out on 6 healthy foals by 3 experienced echocardiographers. Intraoperator variability was determined by having a single echocardiographer obtain and measure images from 6 foals scanned on 3 consecutive days. Interoperator and intraobserver variability were determined by having 3 echocardiographers each obtain images from an additional 6 sedated foals. Within-day interoperator variability was determined by having each echocardiographer measure their own images. Intraobserver variability was determined by having a single echocardiographer measure images obtained by all 3 echocardiographers. The coefficient of variation (CV) and standard error were calculated for each measure. Results: The variability for most measurements was either very low (CV 25%) in all 3 categories. Measurements of the left ventricular ejection time (LVET) and velocity time integral from the right parasternal long axis view of right outflow tract in the fourth intercostal space showed moderate intraoperator variability. Measurements of the LVET, RVID in diastole and left atrial appendage (LAA) showed moderate interoperator variability and measurements of the RVID in diastole and acceleration time from the short axis view of the right outflow tract in the right third intercostal space showed moderate interobserver variability. Conclusions: The intraoperator, intraobserver and interoperatorvariabilities for most echocardiographic measurements in foals are low. Conclusions: Most standard transthoracic echocardiographic measurements in foals have a low enough variability to warrant their use in serial clinical evaluations or experimental studies. Repeated measurements of RVID, EPSS, LVET and LAA should be interpreted with caution.
Publication Date: 2012-05-19 PubMed ID: 22594030DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00503.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
- Cardiovascular Health
- Clinical Examination
- Clinical Pathology
- Clinical Study
- Comparative Study
- Diagnostic Technique
- Echocardiography
- Equine Diseases
- Equine Health
- Foals
- Heart
- Horses
- In Vivo
- Observational Study
- Physiology
- Reproducibility of Results
- Standardbred Horses
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Procedure
- Veterinary Research
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research study investigated the variability in echocardiographic measurements on healthy foals, taken by multiple operators and observers. Variabilities were generally low, leading to a conclusion that such measurements can be reliably used in serial clinical evaluations or experimental studies. However, caution is advised for certain measurements like Right Ventricular Internal Diameter (RVID), E-point to septal separation (EPSS), Left Ventricular Ejection Time (LVET), and Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) as they showed higher variability.
Methodology
- The study used echocardiographic examinations conducted on six healthy foals. The measurements were obtained by three distinct, experienced echocardiographers.
- Intraoperator variability was determined by having a single echocardiographer conduct and measure images from the same six foals scanned on three subsequent days.
- Interoperator and intraobserver variabilities were determined by having three different echocardiographers each obtain images from an additional set of six sedated foals.
- Within a day, the interoperator variability was determined by having each echocardiographer measure their own images while the intraobserver variability was ascertained by having a single echocardiographer measure all images obtained by the three echocardiographers.
- The coefficient of variation (CV) and standard error were computed for each measure to estimate the variability.
Results
- Most measurements exhibited either very low (CV < 5%) or low (CV = 5-15%) variability.
- However, measurements of Right Ventricular Internal Diameter (RVID) in systole and E-point to septal separation (EPSS) displayed moderate (CV 15-25%) to high variability (CV > 25%) across all three categories of variability.
- Measures for Left Ventricular Ejection Time (LVET) and velocity time integral from the right parasternal long axis view of right outflow tract in the fourth intercostal space showed moderate intraoperator variability.
- The measurements for the LVET, RVID in diastole, and Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) revealed moderate interoperator variability.
- The measurements for the RVID in diastole and acceleration time from the short axis view of the right outflow tract in the right third intercostal space showed moderate interobserver variability.
Conclusions
- The study concludes that most echocardiographic measurements in foals show low levels of intraoperator, intraobserver, and interoperator variabilities. This means these measurements can be relied upon for consistency.
- Such measurements are sufficiently reliable to be used in sequential clinical evaluations or experimental research involving foals.
- However, the research advises caution when interpreting repeated measurements of RVID, EPSS, LVET, and LAA, because these demonstrated higher levels of variability.
Cite This Article
APA
Slack J, Durandot MM, Belcher CN, Collins N, Palmer L, Ousey J, Birks EK, Marr CM.
(2012).
Intraoperator, intraobserver and interoperator variability of echocardiographic measurements in healthy foals.
Equine Vet J Suppl(41), 69-75.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00503.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania, USA. slackj@vet.upenn.edu
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Echocardiography / veterinary
- Female
- Heart / anatomy & histology
- Horses / anatomy & histology
- Male
- Observer Variation
- Reproducibility of Results
Citations
This article has been cited 8 times.- Vuille-Dit-Bille J, Weingand N, Jud Schefer R, Stirn M, Adamik KN, Rathmann JMK, Sigrist NE. Comparison of Jugular vs. Saphenous Blood Samples, Intrarater and In-Between Device Reliability of Clinically Used ROTEM S Parameters in Dogs. Animals (Basel) 2022 Aug 17;12(16).
- Moshesh M, Peddada SD, Cooper T, Baird D. Intraobserver variability in fibroid size measurements: estimated effects on assessing fibroid growth. J Ultrasound Med 2014 Jul;33(7):1217-24.
- Boutibou A, Chetboul V, Magnin M, Bureau M, Baillon C, Chai N. Feasibility of Baseline cardIac investiGation in awake elepHants (Elephas mAximus) using tRansThoracic echocardiography: The BIG HEART study. PLoS One 2026;21(2):e0333463.
- Mendoza FJ, Buzon-Cuevas A, Aguilera-Aguilera R, Gonzalez-De Cara CA, De Las Heras A, Perez-Ecija A. Hemodynamic Response to Lipopolysaccharide Infusion and Effect of Meloxicam Administration on Cardiac Function in Donkeys. Animals (Basel) 2024 Dec 18;14(24).
- Dufourni A, Buschmann E, Vernemmen I, Van Steenkiste G, van Loon G, Decloedt A. Effect of physiological and pharmacological stress on heart rate, blood pressure, and echocardiographic measurements in healthy Warmblood horses. J Vet Intern Med 2024 Jan-Feb;38(1):398-410.
- Siddharth K, Kumar T, Zabihullah M. Interobserver Variability in Semen Analysis: Findings From a Quality Control Initiative. Cureus 2023 Oct;15(10):e46388.
- Ghilardi S, Pradelli D, Rizzi R, Polli M, Bagardi M, Santilli RA, Brambilla PG, Bussadori CM. A study of the inter- and intra-operator variability on selected echocardiographic measurements in dogs. Vet Res Commun 2023 Dec;47(4):2323-2331.
- Yu X, Yao X, Wu B, Zhou H, Xia S, Su W, Wu Y, Zheng X. Using deep learning method to identify left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022 Apr;38(4):759-769.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists