Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2021; 104; 103697; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103697

Investigating Equestrians’ Perceptions of Horse Happiness: An Exploratory Study.

Abstract: Happiness is a subjective feeling and associated with positive affective states that can indicate good welfare. It is becoming increasingly agreed that equestrians' ability to recognize indicators of positive emotions has the potential to enhance overall horse wellbeing, but research in this area is limited. Therefore, this study investigated equestrians' perceptions of horse happiness. A survey comprising 25 questions was distributed through equestrian-related social media (internationally) and yielded 332 valid responses. Frequency analysis was conducted within each factor category (e.g., rider type). Pearson chi-squared and Fisher's exact test determined if differences occurred between the tested factor categories (significance level: P < .05). The majority of respondents believed that they were able to recognize when their horses were happy (94%, n = 332; P < .0001) whilst 92.8% (n = 332; P < .0001) believed that their horses could be described as happy. The majority of participants who indicated that they were able to recognize when their horses were happy also believed that their horses were: happy when they interacted with them (98.3%, n = 295; P < .001); when they rode them (83%, n = 270; P < .0001); when they worked them (i.e., unmounted work) (82.7%, n = 312; P < .0001). The largest respondent proportion believed that horses who were very "forward"/energetic every time they were being ridden could be best described as "rather happy" (36.4%, n = 332). Owners more frequently believed that horses were "rather happy" if they did not react to loud noises/scary objects (30.9%, n = 285; P < .013). These results suggest that some equestrians may have overconfidence in interpreting equine affective states. Furthermore, some respondents may have incorrectly perceived behaviors potentially indicating negative emotions as indicators of happiness.
Publication Date: 2021-06-25 PubMed ID: 34416986DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103697Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper explores how horse riders perceive their horses’ happiness and the potential impact this understanding has on overall horse welfare. It questions the accuracy of these perceptions.

Research Methodology

  • The researchers conducted a study using a survey with 25 questions related to horse happiness. Its distribution happened via various equestrian-related social media platforms to achieve a broad, international reach.
  • The survey received 332 valid responses, allowing researchers to analyze the equestrians’ understanding and perceptions towards their horse’s positive emotions.
  • The researchers used frequency analysis for each factor category (like rider type) and adopted Pearson chi-squared and Fisher’s exact test to determine if differences occurred between the tested factor categories.

Key Findings

  • The study found that a vast majority, about 94% of respondents, believed they could identify when their horses were happy. Additionally, 92.8% thought their horses could be described as happy.
  • Most participants, when they believed their horses were happy, associated this happiness with various activities. These included interacting with their horse (98.3%), riding the horse (83%), and working them unmounted (82.7%).
  • A significant respondent ratio, 36.4%, believed “forward”/energetic horses during riding sessions could be described as “rather happy”. Similarly, horses that did not react to loud noises or scary objects were considered “rather happy” (30.9%).

Interpretations

  • The research suggests that some equestrians might be overconfident in interpreting their horses’ emotional states, possibly overestimating their animals’ happiness.
  • There were instances where behaviors potentially indicating negative emotions in horses were misinterpreted as signs of happiness by the respondents. This finding indicates a gap in accurately understanding equine emotional states among some equestrians.
  • Overall, the research points to a need for improving equestrian education about recognizing and accurately interpreting equine affective states to enhance horse welfare.

Cite This Article

APA
Bornmann T, Randle H, Williams J. (2021). Investigating Equestrians’ Perceptions of Horse Happiness: An Exploratory Study. J Equine Vet Sci, 104, 103697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103697

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 104
Pages: 103697
PII: S0737-0806(21)00327-0

Researcher Affiliations

Bornmann, Tanja
  • Academic Equitation, North Glengarry, Canada. Electronic address: info@academicequitation.com.
Randle, Hayley
  • School of Animal and Veterinary Science, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, Australia.
Williams, Jane
  • Department of Equine Science, Hartpury University, Gloucester, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Emotions
  • Happiness
  • Horses
  • Perception
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Carroll SL, Sykes BW, Mills PC. Moving toward Fear-Free Husbandry and Veterinary Care for Horses. Animals (Basel) 2022 Oct 24;12(21).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12212907pubmed: 36359031google scholar: lookup
  2. Górski K, Kondracki S, Kępka-Borkowska K. The Complexity of Communication in Mammals: From Social and Emotional Mechanisms to Human Influence and Multimodal Applications. Animals (Basel) 2026 Jan 15;16(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani16020265pubmed: 41594455google scholar: lookup
  3. Loftus L, Newman A, Leach M, Asher L. Exploring the induction and measurement of positive affective state in equines through a personality-centred lens. Sci Rep 2025 May 27;15(1):18550.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98034-8pubmed: 40425817google scholar: lookup
  4. Hall-Bromley A, Dixon L. Education and Licensing of Horse Owners: Addressing Poor Horse Welfare in the UK. Animals (Basel) 2025 Apr 3;15(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15071037pubmed: 40218430google scholar: lookup
  5. Ross M, Proudfoot K, Merkies K, Lundgren C, Ritter C. A wicked problem: Systemic issues surrounding Canadian equestrian dressage and dressage horse welfare. Anim Welf 2025;34:e11.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2025.2pubmed: 39935780google scholar: lookup
  6. Fiedler JM, Ayre ML, Rosanowski S, Slater JD. Horses are worthy of care: Horse sector participants' attitudes towards animal sentience, welfare, and well-being. Anim Welf 2025;34:e6.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2024.69pubmed: 39935777google scholar: lookup
  7. Luke KL, Rawluk A, McAdie T, Smith BP, Warren-Smith AK. How equestrians conceptualise horse welfare: Does it facilitate or hinder change?. Anim Welf 2023;32:e59.
    doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.79pubmed: 38487466google scholar: lookup
  8. Seery R, Wells D. An Exploratory Study into the Backgrounds and Perspectives of Equine-Assisted Service Practitioners. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jan 22;14(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14020347pubmed: 38275806google scholar: lookup
  9. Spence KL, Rosanowski SM, Slater J, Cardwell JM. 'I want to be the sort of owner that he wants me to be': Rationales for biosecurity implementation among British horse owners. Equine Vet J 2025 Jan;57(1):183-192.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.14047pubmed: 38177092google scholar: lookup