Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2023; 122; 104229; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104229

Investigation of the Systemic Antibody Response and Antigen Detection Following Intranasal Administration of Two Commercial Equine Herpesvirus-1 Vaccines to Adult Horses.

Abstract: EHV-1 vaccines are often administered intranasally during emergency situation such as outbreaks of equine herpesvirus myeloencephalopathy. However, there is currently no data available on the efficacy of such protocols, nor the diagnostic challenge when recently vaccinated horses become clinically infected and nasal secretions are collected to support a diagnosis of EHV-1 infection. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if two commercially available EHV-1 vaccines, a killed-adjuvanted (Calvenza) and a modified-live (Rhinomune) EHV-1 vaccine, could induce a measurable systemic antibody response postintranasal administration. A second objective was to determine the detection time of EHV-1 in nasal secretions by qPCR following the intranasal administration of the respective EHV-1 vaccines. Thirty healthy adult horses, with no recent EHV-1 vaccine administration, were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Rhinomune group, Calvenza group, and unvaccinated control group. Total Ig and isotype-specific IgG4/7 against EHV-1 measured pre- and 30-days post-vaccination were not different amongst the three study groups. Vaccine-derived EHV-1 was only detected in the two EHV-1 vaccine groups with 9/10 horses in the Rhinomune group and 8/10 horses in the Calvenza group testing qPCR-positive for EHV-1 for 1 to 3 days. There was no significant difference in number of horses testing qPCR-positive for EHV-1 and absolute quantitation of EHV-1 in nasal secretions by qPCR between the two vaccine groups. The intranasal administration of two commercial EHV-1 vaccines did not elicit a systemic immune response. Further, vaccine derived EHV-1 could be detected in the majority of the intranasally vaccinated horses, potentially impacting diagnostic interpretation of EHV-1 during outbreak situations.
Publication Date: 2023-01-17 PubMed ID: 36657628DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104229Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Veterinary
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the effectiveness of two commercially available equine herpesvirus-1 (EHV-1) vaccines when administered intranasally. Specifically, it examines whether these vaccines can trigger an immune response and the detection time of EHV-1 in nasal secretions following vaccination.

Study Rationale

  • The primary focus of this study is to understand the efficacy of two commercial EHV-1 vaccines, Calvenza and Rhinomune, when delivered intranasally. This is because intranasal vaccine administration is often used during equine herpesvirus myeloencephalopathy outbreak emergencies, despite a lack of clarity regarding its effectiveness and the resultant diagnostic challenges.

Study Design

  • Thirty healthy adult horses without a recent EHV-1 vaccination history were divided into three groups: Rhinomune, Calvenza, and an unvaccinated control group.
  • The goals were twofold: first, whether the vaccines could spur a detectable systemic antibody response post-administration, and secondly, to understand the timeframe for detecting EHV-1 in nasal secretions following the vaccine administration.

Findings

  • Across all groups, there were no marked differences, pre- and post-vaccination, in total Ig and isotype-specific IgG4/7 against EHV-1, indicating that neither vaccine stimulated a systemic immune response.
  • Vaccine-derived EHV-1 was detected only in the vaccinated groups, with 90% and 80% of horses in the Rhinomune and Calvenza groups, respectively, testing qPCR-positive for EHV-1 one to three days post-administration.
  • There was no major difference between the two vaccine groups in terms of the count of horses testing qPCR-positive for EHV-1 and the absolute measurement of EHV-1 in the nasal secretions.

Conclusion

  • The study concludes that neither of the two vaccines prompted a systemic immune response when administered intranasally, suggesting that their effectiveness may be limited in this delivery mode.
  • Furthermore, traces of the vaccine-derived EHV-1 could be detected in the majority of vaccinated horses, revealing potential implications for the interpretation of EHV-1 diagnostics during outbreaks.

Cite This Article

APA
Spann K, Barnum S, Pusterla N. (2023). Investigation of the Systemic Antibody Response and Antigen Detection Following Intranasal Administration of Two Commercial Equine Herpesvirus-1 Vaccines to Adult Horses. J Equine Vet Sci, 122, 104229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2023.104229

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 122
Pages: 104229
PII: S0737-0806(23)00020-5

Researcher Affiliations

Spann, Kennedy
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA.
Barnum, Samantha
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA.
Pusterla, Nicola
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA. Electronic address: npusterla@ucdavis.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Herpesvirus 1, Equid
  • Administration, Intranasal / veterinary
  • Antibody Formation
  • Herpesvirus Vaccines
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Vaccines
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.