FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Parasites & vectors2020; 13(1); 462; doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04318-5

Investigations on the occurrence of tapeworm infections in German horse populations with comparison of different antibody detection methods based on saliva and serum samples.

Abstract: Effective and sustainable worm control in horses would benefit from detailed information about the current regional occurrence of tapeworms. Different diagnostic methods are currently available to detect Anoplocephala spp. infections in horses. However, the format as well as the sensitivity and specificity of the methods vary considerably. Methods: A coprological, serological and questionnaire study was conducted to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of tapeworm infections on 48 horse farms in the region of Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany. In total, faecal samples of 484 horses were analysed using the double centrifugation/combined sedimentation-flotation and mini-FLOTAC. Serum (n = 481) and saliva (n = 365) samples were analysed by ELISAs to determine antibody levels against Anoplocephala spp. 12/13 kDa excretory/secretory (E/S) antigens. Results: Cestode eggs were detected in 0.6% of faecal samples (farm prevalence 6.3%) without differences between the two methods. In contrast, antibodies against Anoplocephala spp. were detected in 16.2% (farm prevalence 52.1%) and in 29.5% (farm prevalence 75.7%) of the serum and saliva samples, respectively. Both ELISA based methods for detection of tapeworms reported a greater number of infected animals requiring treatment than were positively identified by coproscopy. Logistic regression analysis identified permanent pasture access, large pastures and regular pasture changes and high strongyle egg counts as risk factors for positive serum antibody responses to Anoplocephala spp. while last treatment with praziquantel was protective. Other protective factors were the presence of foals and high numbers of horses on the farm. Daily removal of faeces from the pasture and horse age did not have a significant effect. Conclusions: The findings of the present serological investigation indicate that tapeworm prevalence in Berlin/Brandenburg horse farms is much higher than would be anticipated by using conventional/coproscopic analyses. Moreover, the majority of tapeworm-positive horses had not received a cestocidal drug at their last treatment. Considering the already known low sensitivity of the coproscopic detection, the equine veterinary diagnostics can be enhanced by the use of antibody detection methods such as the saliva-based ELISA.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-09-10 PubMed ID: 32912340PubMed Central: PMC7488081DOI: 10.1186/s13071-020-04318-5Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research sought to understand tapeworm infections in horses in the region of Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, and also compared different methods of tapeworm detection. The study utilized serological, coprological, and a questionnaire approach on 48 horse farms. The findings indicate that the prevalence of tapeworms is higher than anticipated using traditional detection methods and suggest that enhanced diagnostic methods, like saliva-based ELISA, could improve equine veterinary diagnostics.

Overview of Methods Used

  • The researchers conducted a comprehensive study using coprological, serological, and questionnaire methods across 48 horse farms in Berlin and Brandenburg.
  • For the coprological study, they analyzed fecal samples from 484 horses using double centrifugation/combined sedimentation-flotation and mini-FLOTAC methods. This provided the team with information on existing tapeworm egg presence in feces.
  • The serological study involved analyzing serum (n = 481) and saliva (n = 365) samples to determine the antibody levels against Anoplocephala spp. 12/13 kDa E/S antigens.
  • A questionnaire was also utilized to gather more data about horses’ living conditions and access to pastures. This data allowed researchers to relate the occurrence of tapeworms to specific risk factors.

Key Findings

  • Compared to the 0.6% occurrence detected through fecal analysis, serological studies showed a significantly higher rate of infection. Antibodies indicative of tapeworm infections were found in 16.2% of serum samples and 29.5% of saliva samples.
  • An interesting discrepancy became clear: ELISA methods, which look for the presence of antibodies, reported a considerably higher number of infected animals than the traditional coproscopy method.
  • Through logistic regression analysis, key risk factors such as permanent pasture access, large pastures, regular pastoral changes, and high strongyle egg counts were noted. On the other hand, factors like recent treatment with praziquantel (a drug used against parasites), foals’ presence, and high numbers of horses on the same farm were found to be protective.

Conclusions and Implications

  • The research concluded that the traditional coproscopic method underestimates tapeworm prevalence in horse-populations in Berlin/Brandenburg.
  • More horses had tapeworm infections than the existing treatment numbers suggested, indicating a gap in the current parasitic control approach.
  • The higher tapeworm incidence detected with the saliva-based ELISAmethod suggests that this diagnostic technique can offer an enhanced understanding of equine tapeworm occurrence.

Cite This Article

APA
Jürgenschellert L, Krücken J, Austin CJ, Lightbody KL, Bousquet E, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. (2020). Investigations on the occurrence of tapeworm infections in German horse populations with comparison of different antibody detection methods based on saliva and serum samples. Parasit Vectors, 13(1), 462. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04318-5

Publication

Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
NlmUniqueID: 101462774
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 1
Pages: 462

Researcher Affiliations

Jürgenschellert, Laura
  • Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 7-13, Berlin, 14163, Germany.
Krücken, Jürgen
  • Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 7-13, Berlin, 14163, Germany.
Austin, Corrine J
  • Austin Davis Biologics Ltd, Unit 1 Denfield Lodge, Lower Street, Great Addington, Northants, NN14 4BL, UK.
Lightbody, Kirsty L
  • Austin Davis Biologics Ltd, Unit 1 Denfield Lodge, Lower Street, Great Addington, Northants, NN14 4BL, UK.
Bousquet, Eric
  • Virbac, 13e rue LID BP 27, Carros cedex, 06511, France.
von Samson-Himmelstjerna, Georg
  • Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Robert-von-Ostertag-Str. 7-13, Berlin, 14163, Germany. samson.georg@fu-berlin.de.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Helminth / blood
  • Cestoda / immunology
  • Cestoda / isolation & purification
  • Cestode Infections / blood
  • Cestode Infections / diagnosis
  • Cestode Infections / parasitology
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / veterinary
  • Feces / parasitology
  • Germany
  • Horse Diseases / blood
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / parasitology
  • Horses
  • Parasite Egg Count
  • Saliva / chemistry
  • Saliva / immunology
  • Seasons
  • Serum / chemistry
  • Serum / parasitology

Grant Funding

  • Not applicable / Virbac

Conflict of Interest Statement

CJA and KLL report an affiliation to Austin Davis Biologics, a commercial company with a financial interest in the discussed content. Austin Davis Biologics supported the study by providing the saliva collection kits and performing both serum and saliva ELISAs. EB reports an affiliation to the pharmaceutical company Virbac, Carros, France, which is sponsoring clinical trials. GvSH, JK and LJ declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 39 references
  1. Kornaś S, Cabaret J, Skalska M, Nowosad B. Horse infection with intestinal helminths in relation to age, sex, access to grass and farm system.. Vet Parasitol 2010;174:285–291.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.007pubmed: 20933334google scholar: lookup
  2. Denegri GM. Review of oribatid mites as intermediate hosts of tapeworms of the Anoplocephalidae.. Exp Appl Acarol 1993;17:567–580.
    doi: 10.1007/BF00053486google scholar: lookup
  3. Bohórquez GA, Luzón M, Martín-Hernández R, Meana A. New multiplex PCR method for the simultaneous diagnosis of the three known species of equine tapeworm.. Vet Parasitol 2015;207:56–63.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.11.002pubmed: 25498328google scholar: lookup
  4. Proudman CJ, French NP, Trees AJ. Tapeworm infection is a significant risk factor for spasmodic colic and ileal impaction colic in the horse.. Equine Vet J 1998;30:194–199.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1998.tb04487.xpubmed: 9622319google scholar: lookup
  5. Bain SA, Kelly JD. Prevalence and pathogenicity of Anoplocephala perfoliata in a horse population in South Auckland.. N Z Vet J 1977;25:27–28.
    doi: 10.1080/00480169.1977.34343pubmed: 275676google scholar: lookup
  6. Beelitz P, Gothe R. Bandwurmbefall bei Schlachtpferden in Oberbayern: Befallshäufigkeit und -stärke sowie Korrelation zwischen Befall mit Adultwürmern und Einachweis im Enddarmkot.. Pferdeheilkunde 2001;17:423–428.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20010501google scholar: lookup
  7. Kiedrowski C. Helminthologische Untersuchungen an Pferden vor und nach der Schlachtung.. PhD thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 1959.
  8. Cirak V, Hermosila C, Bauer C. Study on the gastrointestinal parasite fauna of ponies in northern Germany.. Appl Parasitol 1996;37:239–244.
    pubmed: 9060170
  9. Rehbein S, Visser M, Winter R. Prevalence, intensity and seasonality of gastrointestinal parasites in abattoir horses in Germany.. Parasitol Res 2013;112:407–413.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-3150-0pubmed: 23052780google scholar: lookup
  10. Hinney B, Wirtherle NC, Kyule M, Miethe N, Zessin K-H, Clausen P-H. Prevalence of helminths in horses in the state of Brandenburg Germany.. Parasitol Res 2011;108:1083.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2362-zpubmed: 21472400google scholar: lookup
  11. Behrens T. Bandwürmer (Anoplocephaliden) beim Pferd: Prävalenz in Norddeutschland sowie Eignung eines serologischen Nachweisverfahrens (ELISA) zur Diagnostik.. PhD thesis, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany; 2001.
  12. Nilsson O, Ljungstrom BL, Hoglund J, Lundquist H, Uggla A. Anoplocephala perfoliata in horses in Sweden: prevalence, infection levels and intestinal lesions.. Acta Vet Scand 1995;36:319–328.
    pmc: PMC8095443pubmed: 7502948
  13. Gasser RB, Williamson RM, Beveridge I. Anoplocephala perfoliata of horses - significant scope for further research, improved diagnosis and control.. Parasitology 2005;131:1–13.
    doi: 10.1017/S0031182004007127pubmed: 16038391google scholar: lookup
  14. Fogarty U, del Piero F, Purnell RE, Mosurski KR. Incidence of Anoplocephala perfoliata in horses examined at an Irish abattoir.. Vet Rec 1994;134:515–518.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.134.20.515pubmed: 8085308google scholar: lookup
  15. Abbott JB, Barrett EJ. The problem of diagnosing tapeworm infections in horses.. Equine Vet J 2008;40:5–6.
    doi: 10.2746/042516408X262352pubmed: 18083653google scholar: lookup
  16. Traversa D, Fichi G, Campigli M, Rondolotti A, Iorio R, Proudman CJ. A comparison of coprological, serological and molecular methods for the diagnosis of horse infection with Anoplocephala perfoliata (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea). Vet Parasitol 2008;152:271–277.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.12.032pubmed: 18280660google scholar: lookup
  17. Proudman CJ, Edwards GB. Validation of a centrifugation/flotation technique for the diagnosis of equine cestodiasis.. Vet Rec 1992;131:71–72.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.131.4.71pubmed: 1529504google scholar: lookup
  18. Rehbein S, Lindner T, Visser M, Winter R. Evaluation of a double centrifugation technique for the detection of Anoplocephala eggs in horse faeces.. J Helminthol 2011;85:409–414.
    doi: 10.1017/S0022149X10000751pubmed: 21138608google scholar: lookup
  19. Tomczuk K, Kostro K, Szczepaniak KO, Grzybek M, Studzińska M, Demkowska-Kutrzepa M. Comparison of the sensitivity of coprological methods in detecting Anoplocephala perfoliata invasions.. Parasitol Res 2014;113:2401–2406.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3919-4pmc: PMC4031382pubmed: 24777342google scholar: lookup
  20. Slocombe JOD. A modified critical test for the efficacy of pyrantel pamoate for Anoplocephala perfoliata in equids.. Can J Vet Res 2004;68:112–117.
    pmc: PMC1142154pubmed: 15188955
  21. Williamson RM, Beveridge I, Gasser RB. Coprological methods for the diagnosis of Anoplocephala perfoliata infection of the horse.. Aust Vet J 1998;76:618–621.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1998.tb10242.xpubmed: 9791714google scholar: lookup
  22. Kjaer LN, Lungholt MM, Nielsen MK, Olsen SN, Maddox-Hyttel C. Interpretation of serum antibody response to Anoplocephala perfoliata in relation to parasite burden and faecal egg count.. Equine Vet J 2007;39:529–533.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407X217876pubmed: 18065311google scholar: lookup
  23. Proudman CJ, Trees AJ. Correlation of antigen specific IgG and IgG(T) responses with Anoplocephala perfoliata infection intensity in the horse.. Parasite Immunol 1996;18:499–506.
    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3024.1996.d01-18.xpubmed: 9226687google scholar: lookup
  24. Hoglund J, Ljungstrom BL, Nilsson O, Uggla A. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies to Anoplocephala perfoliata in horse sera.. Vet Parasitol 1995;59:97–106.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(94)00755-2pubmed: 7483241google scholar: lookup
  25. Proudman CJ, Trees AJ. Use of excretory/secretory antigens for the serodiagnosis of Anoplocephala perfoliata cestodosis.. Vet Parasitol 1996;61:239–247.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(95)00837-3pubmed: 8720562google scholar: lookup
  26. Kania SA, Reinemeyer CR. Anoplocephala perfoliata coproantigen detection: a preliminary study.. Vet Parasitol 2005;127:115–119.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.10.003pubmed: 15631904google scholar: lookup
  27. Skotarek SL, Colwell DD, Goater CP. Evaluation of diagnostic techniques for Anoplocephala perfoliata in horses from Alberta. Canada.. Vet Parasitol 2010;172:249–255.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.05.005pubmed: 20605685google scholar: lookup
  28. Lightbody KL, Davis PJ, Austin CJ. Validation of a novel saliva-based ELISA test for diagnosing tapeworm burden in horses.. Vet Clin Pathol 2016;45:335–346.
    doi: 10.1111/vcp.12364pubmed: 27218436google scholar: lookup
  29. Drogemuller M, Beelitz P, Pfister K, Schnieder T, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Amplification of ribosomal DNA of Anoplocephalidae: Anoplocephala perfoliata diagnosis by PCR as a possible alternative to coprological methods.. Vet Parasitol 2004;124:205–215.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.07.012pubmed: 15381301google scholar: lookup
  30. Bohorquez A, Meana A, Luzon M. Differential diagnosis of equine cestodosis based on E/S and somatic Anoplocephala perfoliata and Anoplocephala magna antigens.. Vet Parasitol 2012;190:87–94.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.06.001pubmed: 22763349google scholar: lookup
  31. Barda BD, Rinaldi L, Ianniello D, Zepherine H, Salvo F, Sadutshang T. Mini-FLOTAC, an innovative direct diagnostic technique for intestinal parasitic infections: experience from the field.. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2013;7:e2344.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002344pmc: PMC3731229pubmed: 23936577google scholar: lookup
  32. Noel ML, Scare JA, Bellaw JL, Nielsen MK. Accuracy and precision of mini-FLOTAC and McMaster techniques for determining equine strongyle egg counts.. J Equine Vet Sci 2017;48(182–7):e1.
  33. Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: Open source epidemiologic statistics for public health.. 2013.
  34. Bühl A, Zöfel P. SPSS 11: Einführung in die moderne Datenanalyse unter Windows.. München: Pearson Studium; 2002.
  35. Hedderich J, Sachs L. Angewandte Statistik. Methodensammlung mit R.. 14th ed. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer; 2012.
  36. Lightbody KL, Matthews JB, Kemp-Symonds JG, Lambert PA, Austin CJ. Use of a saliva-based diagnostic test to identify tapeworm infection in horses in the UK.. Equine Vet J 2018;50:213–219.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12742pubmed: 28805265google scholar: lookup
  37. Wilson WD, Mihalyi JE, Hussey S, Lunn DP. Passive transfer of maternal immunoglobulin isotype antibodies against tetanus and influenza and their effect on the response of foals to vaccination.. Equine Vet J 2001;33:644–650.
    doi: 10.2746/042516401776249435pubmed: 11770984google scholar: lookup
  38. Lyons ET, Drudge JH, Tolliver SC, Swerczek TW, Collins SS. Determination of the efficacy of pyrantel pamoate at the therapeutic dose rate against the tapeworm Anoplocephala perfoliata in equids using a modification of the critical test method.. Vet Parasitol 1989;31:13–18.
    doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(89)90004-6pubmed: 2728327google scholar: lookup
  39. Wirtherle NC. Untersuchungen zur Verbreitung von Anthelminthikaresistenzen bei Pferden in Niedersachsen.. PhD thesis, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany; 2003.

Citations

This article has been cited 12 times.
  1. Klass LG, Krücken J, Mbedi S, Sparmann S, Schenk T, Andreotti S, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Characterizing mixed strongyle infections in foals and broodmares using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I deep amplicon sequencing. Parasit Vectors 2026 Jan 3;19(1):65.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-025-07192-1pubmed: 41484633google scholar: lookup
  2. Abbas G, Nielsen MK, E-Hage C, Ghafar A, Beveridge I, Bauquier J, Beasley A, Wilkes EJA, Carrigan P, Cudmore L, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, Jabbar A. Recent advances in intestinal helminth parasites of horses in the Asia-Pacific region: Current trends, challenges and future directions. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2025 Dec;29:100622.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2025.100622pubmed: 41135277google scholar: lookup
  3. Kukurić T, Erdeljan M, Matthews JB, Lightbody KL, Austin CJ, Peczak N, Uzelac A, Klun I, Simin S. A Prevalence Study on Anoplocephala spp. in Serbian Horses: Navigating Diagnostic Challenges and Understanding Infection Risks. Animals (Basel) 2025 Jul 16;15(14).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15142094pubmed: 40723557google scholar: lookup
  4. Matthews JB, Peczak N, Lightbody KL. The Use of Innovative Diagnostics to Inform Sustainable Control of Equine Helminth Infections. Pathogens 2023 Oct 11;12(10).
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens12101233pubmed: 37887749google scholar: lookup
  5. Burcáková L, Königová A, Kuzmina TA, Austin CJ, Matthews JB, Lightbody KL, Peczak NA, Syrota Y, Várady M. Equine tapeworm (Anoplocephala spp.) infection: evaluation of saliva- and serum-based antibody detection methods and risk factor analysis in Slovak horse populations. Parasitol Res 2023 Dec;122(12):3037-3052.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-023-07994-1pubmed: 37803152google scholar: lookup
  6. Osterman-Lind E, Holmberg M, Grandi G. Selective Anthelmintic Treatment in Horses in Sweden Based on Coprological Analyses: Ten-Year Results. Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 28;13(17).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13172741pubmed: 37685005google scholar: lookup
  7. Stummer M, Frisch V, Glitz F, Hinney B, Spergser J, Krücken J, Diekmann I, Dimmel K, Riedel C, Cavalleri JV, Rümenapf T, Joachim A, Lyrakis M, Auer A. Presence of Equine and Bovine Coronaviruses, Endoparasites, and Bacteria in Fecal Samples of Horses with Colic. Pathogens 2023 Aug 15;12(8).
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens12081043pubmed: 37624003google scholar: lookup
  8. Boelow H, Krücken J, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Epidemiological study on factors influencing the occurrence of helminth eggs in horses in Germany based on sent-in diagnostic samples. Parasitol Res 2023 Mar;122(3):749-767.
    doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07765-4pubmed: 36627515google scholar: lookup
  9. Hu D, Tang Y, Wang C, Qi Y, Ente M, Li X, Zhang D, Li K, Chu H. The Role of Intestinal Microbial Metabolites in the Immunity of Equine Animals Infected With Horse Botflies. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:832062.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.832062pubmed: 35812868google scholar: lookup
  10. Jürgenschellert L, Krücken J, Bousquet E, Bartz J, Heyer N, Nielsen MK, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Occurrence of Strongylid Nematode Parasites on Horse Farms in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, With High Seroprevalence of Strongylus vulgaris Infection. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:892920.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.892920pubmed: 35754549google scholar: lookup
  11. Boelow H, Krücken J, Thomas E, Mirams G, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G. Comparison of FECPAK(G2), a modified Mini-FLOTAC technique and combined sedimentation and flotation for the coproscopic examination of helminth eggs in horses. Parasit Vectors 2022 May 12;15(1):166.
    doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05266-ypubmed: 35549990google scholar: lookup
  12. Gehlen H, Wulke N, Ertelt A, Nielsen MK, Morelli S, Traversa D, Merle R, Wilson D, Samson-Himmelstjerna GV. Comparative Analysis of Intestinal Helminth Infections in Colic and Non-Colic Control Equine Patients. Animals (Basel) 2020 Oct 19;10(10).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10101916pubmed: 33086590google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.