Analyze Diet
PloS one2020; 15(8); e0237765; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237765

Is similarity in Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) associated with the incidence of retained fetal membranes in draft mares? A cross-sectional study.

Abstract: The failure of the maternal immune system to recognize fetal antigens and vice versa due to MHC similarity between the foal and its dam might result in the lack of placental separation during parturition in mares. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of MHC similarity between a mare and a foal on the incidence of retained fetal membranes (RFM) in post-partum mares. DNA was sampled from 43 draft mares and their foals. Mares which failed to expel fetal membranes within three hours after foal expulsion were considered the RFM group (n = 14) and mares that expelled fetal membranes during the above period were the control group (n = 29). Nine MHC microsatellites of MHC I and MHC II were amplified for all mares and foals. MHC compatibility and MHC genetic similarity between mares and their foals was determined based on MHC microsatellites. The inbreeding coefficient was also calculated for all horses. The incidence of RFM in the studied population was 33%. Compatibility in MHC I and MHC II did not increase the risk of RFM in the studied population of draft mares (P>0.05). Differences in MHC similarity at the genetic level were not observed between mare-foal pairs in RFM and control group (P>0.05). We suspect that RFM in draft mares may not be associated with MHC similarity between a foal and its dam. Despite the above, draft horses could be genetically predisposed to the disease.
Publication Date: 2020-08-17 PubMed ID: 32804960PubMed Central: PMC7430710DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237765Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research investigates whether the similarity in the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) between a foal and a mare is related to the occurrence of retained fetal membranes (RFM) in draft mares after giving birth.

Objective and Methodology of the Study

  • The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the MHC’s similarities between a mare and a foal on the incidence of retained fetal membranes (RFM) in post-delivery draft mares. The hypothesis was that if both the mare and foal have similar MHC, it may affect the placental separation during foal birth.
  • The research involved collecting DNA samples from 43 draft mares and their respective offspring.
  • The study divided the mares into two groups: RFM group (mares that retained fetal membranes beyond three hours after giving birth) and a control group (mares that expelled the fetal membranes within the same time).

Research Process and Findings

  • Nine MHC microsatellites of MHC I and MHC II were amplified for all sampled mares and foals, to assess the MHC compatibility and MHC genetic similarity between each mare-foal pair.
  • The analysis also considered the inbreeding coefficient for all sampled horses.
  • Through this investigation, it was found that 33% of the studied mare population suffered from RFM.
  • The results showed no correlation between MHC compatibility (MHC I and MHC II) and the risk of RFM. Even in genetic terms, no evidentiary differences in MHC similarity were observed between mare-foal pairs in both the RFM group and the control group.

Conclusions from the Study

  • The findings suggest that RFM in draft mares might not be associated with MHC compatibility between a mare and her foal, contrary to the initial hypothesis.
  • The study hints at draft horses potentially being genetically predisposed to retain fetal membranes after parturition. However, further validated studies are required to confirm this conjecture.

Cite This Article

APA
Jaworska J, Tobolski D, Janowski T. (2020). Is similarity in Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) associated with the incidence of retained fetal membranes in draft mares? A cross-sectional study. PLoS One, 15(8), e0237765. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237765

Publication

ISSN: 1932-6203
NlmUniqueID: 101285081
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 8
Pages: e0237765

Researcher Affiliations

Jaworska, Joanna
  • Department of Animal Reproduction with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Tobolski, Dawid
  • Department of Internal Diseases with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Janowski, Tomasz
  • Department of Animal Reproduction with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Genotyping Techniques
  • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
  • Horse Diseases / immunology
  • Horses / genetics
  • Horses / immunology
  • Inbreeding
  • Incidence
  • Major Histocompatibility Complex / genetics
  • Major Histocompatibility Complex / immunology
  • Microsatellite Repeats / genetics
  • Microsatellite Repeats / immunology
  • Placenta, Retained / epidemiology
  • Placenta, Retained / immunology
  • Placenta, Retained / veterinary
  • Postpartum Period
  • Pregnancy

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Allen WR, Wilsher S. A Review of implantation and early placentation in the mare.. Placenta 2009;30(12):1005–15.
  2. Canisso IF, Rodriguez JS, Sanz MG, da Silva MAC. A clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of retained fetal membranes with an emphasis placed on the critically ill mare.. J Equine Vet Sci 2013;33(7):570–9.
  3. Warnakulasooriya DN, Marth CD, McLeod JA, Hanlon DW, Krekeler N. Treatment of retained fetal membranes in the mare—a practitioner survey.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5.
    pmc: PMC6018472pubmed: 29971242
  4. Sevinga M, Barkema HW, Stryhn H, Hesselink JW. Retained placenta in Friesian mares: incidence, and potential risk factors with special emphasis on gestational length.. Theriogenology 2004;61(5):851–9.
    doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00260-7pubmed: 14757471google scholar: lookup
  5. Chavan AR, Griffith OW, Wagner GP. The inflammation paradox in the evolution of mammalian pregnancy: turning a foe into a friend.. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2017;47:24–32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2017.08.004pubmed: 28850905google scholar: lookup
  6. Marcellin L, Schmitz T, Messaoudene M, Chader D, Parizot C, Jacques S. Immune modifications in fetal membranes overlying the cervix precede parturition in humans.. J Immunol 2017;198(3):1345–56.
    doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601482pubmed: 28031337google scholar: lookup
  7. Frascoli M, Coniglio L, Witt R, Jeanty C, Fleck-Derderian S, Myers DE. Alloreactive fetal T cells promote uterine contractility in preterm labor via IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha.. Sci Transl Med 2018;10(438).
    pmc: PMC6449052pubmed: 29695455
  8. Janeway CA Jr, Travers P, Walport M, Shlomchik MJ. The major histocompatibility complex and its functions.. Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease 5th edition: Garland Science 2001.
  9. Alsughayyir J, Motallebzadeh R, Pettigrew GJ. Are donor lymphocytes a barrier to transplantation tolerance?. Curr Opin Organ Tran 2018;23(1):90–6.
    pubmed: 29210728
  10. Zachary AA, Leffell MS. HLA mismatching strategies for solid organ transplantation—a balancing act.. Front Immunol 2016;7.
    pmc: PMC5141243pubmed: 28003816
  11. Mahdi BM. A glow of HLA typing in organ transplantation.. Clin Transl Med 2013;2(1):6.
    doi: 10.1186/2001-1326-2-6pmc: PMC3598844pubmed: 23432791google scholar: lookup
  12. Benedictus L, Thomas AJ, Jorritsma R, Davies CJ, Koets AP. Two-way calf to dam major histocompatibility class i compatibility increases risk for retained placenta in cattle.. Am J Reprod Immunol 2012;67(3):224–30.
  13. Sevinga M, Vrijenhoek T, Hesselink JW, Barkema HW, Groen AF. Effect of inbreeding on the incidence of retained placenta in Friesian horses.. J Anim Sci 2004;8(4):982–6.
    pubmed: 15080317
  14. Fareed M, Afzal M. Genetics of consanguinity and inbreeding in health and disease.. Ann Hum Biol 2017;44(2):99–107.
    doi: 10.1080/03014460.2016.1265148pubmed: 27892699google scholar: lookup
  15. Rapacz-Leonard A, Leonard M, Chmielewska-Krzesinska M, Pazdzior-Czapula K, Janowski T. Major histocompatibility complex class I in the horse (Equus caballus) placenta during pregnancy and parturition.. Placenta 2018;74:36–46.
  16. Tseng CT, Miller D, Cassano J, Bailey E, Antczak DF. Identification of equine major histocompatibility complex haplotypes using polymorphic microsatellites.. Anim Genet 2010;41:150–3.
    pmc: PMC3289534pubmed: 21070289
  17. Holmes CM, Nathaniel V, Miller D, Wagner B, Svansson V, Antczak DF. MHC haplotype diversity in Icelandic horses determined by polymorphic microsatellites.. Genes Immun 2019; 20, 660–670.18.
    doi: 10.1038/s41435-019-0075-ypubmed: 31068686google scholar: lookup
  18. Raymond M, Rousset F. GENEPOP (version-1.2)—Population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism.. J Hered 1995;86(3):248–9.
  19. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.. Mol Ecol 1998;7(5):639–55.
  20. Oliehoek PA, Windig JJ, van Arendonk JAM, Bijma P. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.. Genetics 2006;173(1):483–96.
    doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.049940pmc: PMC1461426pubmed: 16510792google scholar: lookup
  21. Queller DC, Goodnight KF. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers.. Evolution 1989;43(2):258–75.
  22. Kraemer P, Gerlach G. Demerelate: calculating interindividual relatedness for kinship analysis based on codominant diploid genetic markers using R.. Mol Ecol Res 2017;17(6):1371–7.
    pubmed: 28281323
  23. Sargolzaei M, Iwaisaki H, Colleau JJ. CFC: A tool for monitoring genetic diversity.. Proc 8th World Congr Genet Appl Livest Prod, CD-ROM Communication 2006(27–28):13–8.
  24. Berglund AK, Schnabel LV. Allogeneic major histocompatibility complex-mismatched equine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells are targeted for death by cytotoxic anti-major histocompatibility complex antibodies.. Equine Vet J 2017;49(4):539–44.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12647pmc: PMC5425313pubmed: 27862236google scholar: lookup
  25. Ranera B, Antczak D, Miller D, Doroshenkova T, Ryan A, McIlwraith CW. Donor‐derived equine mesenchymal stem cells suppress proliferation of mismatched lymphocytes.. Equine Vet J 2016;48(2):253–60.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12414pubmed: 25582202google scholar: lookup
  26. Pezzanite LM, Fortier LA, Antczak DF, Cassano JM, Brosnahan MM, Miller D. Equine allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells elicit antibody responses in vivo.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2015;6:54.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0053-xpmc: PMC4414005pubmed: 25889095google scholar: lookup
  27. Fritz KL, Kaese HJ, Valberg SJ, Hendrickson JA, Rendahl AK, Bellone RR. Genetic risk factors for insidious equine recurrent uveitis in Appaloosa horses.. Anim Genet 2014;45(3):392–9.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12129pubmed: 24467435google scholar: lookup
  28. Andersson LS, Swinbune JE, Meadows JRS, Brostrom H, Eriksson S, Fikse WF. The same ELA class II risk factors confer equine insect bite hypersensitivity in two distinct populations.. Immunogenetics 2012;64(3):201–8.
    doi: 10.1007/s00251-011-0573-1pmc: PMC3276761pubmed: 21947540google scholar: lookup
  29. Lazary S, Antczak DF, Bailey E, Bell TK, Bernoco D, Byrns G. Joint Report of the Fifth International Workshop on lymphocyte alloantigens of the horse, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 31October–1 November 1987.. Anim Genet 1988;19:447–456.
  30. Brinkmeyer-Langford CL, Cai JJ, Gill CA, Skow LC. Microsatellite variation in the equine MHC.. Anim Genet 2013;44(3):267–75.
    doi: 10.1111/age.12003pubmed: 23051181google scholar: lookup
  31. Miller D, Tallmadge RL, Binns M, Zhu B, Mohamoud YA, Ahmed A. Polymorphism at expressed DQ and DR loci in five common equine MHC haplotypes.. Immunogenetics 2017;69(3):145–56.
    doi: 10.1007/s00251-016-0964-4pmc: PMC5316504pubmed: 27889800google scholar: lookup
  32. Sadeghi R, Moradi-Shahrbabak M, Ashtiani SRM, Miller DC, Antczak DF. MHC haplotype diversity in Persian Arabian horses determined using polymorphic microsatellites.. Immunogenetics 2018;70(5):305–15.
    doi: 10.1007/s00251-017-1039-xpubmed: 29170799google scholar: lookup
  33. Grunig G, Triplett L, Canady LK, Allen WR, Antczak DF. The maternal leukocyte response to the endometrial cups in horses is correlated with the developmental stages of the invasive trophoblast cells.. Placenta 1995;16(6):539–59.
    doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(05)80005-0pubmed: 8570575google scholar: lookup
  34. Noronha LE, Antczak DF. Maternal Immune Responses to Trophoblast: The Contribution of the Horse to Pregnancy Immunology.. Am J Reprod Immunol 2010;64(4):231–44.
  35. Schurink A, Shrestha M, Eriksson S, Bosse M, Bovenhuis H, Oldenbroek JK. Genetic diversity within and relationships among Dutch horse populations.. Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 2018.
  36. Piatek H, Jagusiak W. Inbred w stadninie koni zimnokrwistych „Nowe Jankowice”.. Roczniki Naukowe Zootechniki Suplement 2003;17(2).
  37. Benedictus L, Koets AP, Kuijpers FHJ, Joosten I, van Eldik P, Heuven HCM. Heritable and non-heritable genetic effects on retained placenta in Meuse-Rhine-Yssel cattle.. Anim Reprod Sci 2013;137(1–2):1–7.
  38. Endler M, Cnattingius S, Granfors M, Wikstrom AK. The inherited risk of retained placenta: a population based cohort study.. BJOG 2018;125(6):737–44.
    doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14828pubmed: 28731581google scholar: lookup
  39. Cox ST, Stephens HAF, Fernando R, Karasu A, Harber M, Howie AJ. Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A allele mismatching, antibodies, and rejection in renal transplantation.. Hum Immunol 2011;72(10):827–34.
    doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2011.05.004pubmed: 21664940google scholar: lookup
  40. Sato-Otsubo A, Nannya Y, Kashiwase K, Onizuka M, Azuma F, Akatsuka Y. Genome-wide surveillance of mismatched alleles for graft-versus-host disease in stem cell transplantation.. Blood 2015;126(25):2752–63.
    doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-630707pubmed: 26432889google scholar: lookup
  41. Trowsdale J, Betz AG. Mother's little helpers: mechanisms of maternal-fetal tolerance.. Nature Immunol 2006;7(3):241–6.
    pubmed: 16482172
  42. van Nieuwenhoven ALV, Heineman MJ, Faas MM. The immunology of successful pregnancy.. Hum Reprod Update 2003;9(4):347–57.
    doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmg026pubmed: 12926528google scholar: lookup
  43. Donaldson WL, Zhang CH, Oriol JG, Antczak DF. Invasive equine trophoblast expresses conventional class-i major histocompatibility complex antigens.. Development 1990;110(1):63–71.
    pubmed: 2081471
  44. Nelli RK, De Koster J, Roberts JN, de Souza J, Lock AL, Raphael W. Impact of uterine macrophage phenotype on placental retention in dairy cows.. Theriogenology 2019;127:145–52.
  45. Osman I, Young A, Ledingham MA, Thomson AJ, Jordan F, Greer IA. Leukocyte density and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in human fetal membranes, decidua, cervix and myometrium before and during labour at term.. Mol Hum Reprod 2003;9(1):41–5.
    doi: 10.1093/molehr/gag001pubmed: 12529419google scholar: lookup
  46. Renthal NE, Koriand’r CW, Montalbano AP, Chen C-C, Gao L, Mendelson CR. Molecular regulation of parturition: a myometrial perspective.. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2015;5(11):a023069.
    doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a023069pmc: PMC4632865pubmed: 26337112google scholar: lookup
  47. Rinaldi SF, Makieva S, Saunders PT, Rossi AG, Norman JE. Immune cell and transcriptomic analysis of the human decidua in term and preterm parturition.. Mol Hum Reprod 2017;23(10):708–24.
    doi: 10.1093/molehr/gax038pmc: PMC5909855pubmed: 28962035google scholar: lookup
  48. Streyl D, Kenngott R, Herbach N, Wanke R, Blum H, Sinowatz F. Gene expression profiling of bovine peripartal placentomes: detection of molecular pathways potentially involved in the release of foetal membranes.. Reproduction 2012(1):85–105.
    doi: 10.1530/REP-11-0204pubmed: 22031715google scholar: lookup
  49. Ntokkou ISA, Iniotaki AG, Knotou EN, Darema MN, Apostolaki MD, Kostakis AG. Long‐term follow up for anti‐HLA donor specific antibodies postrenal transplantation: high immunogenicity of HLA class II graft molecules.. Transplant Int 2011; 24(11), 1084–1093.
    pubmed: 21848902
  50. Lim WH, Chapman JR, Coates PT, Lewis JR, Russ GR, Watson N. HLA-DQ mismatches and rejection in kidney transplant recipients.. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11:875–83.
    doi: 10.2215/CJN.11641115pmc: PMC4858494pubmed: 27034399google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.