Analyze Diet
Pakistan journal of biological sciences : PJBS2007; 10(9); 1519-1524; doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.1519.1524

Isolation and characterization of Campylobacter spp. from domestic animals and poultry in south of Iran.

Abstract: A total of 455 domestic animals (cow, horse and camel) and poultry from south of Iran were surveyed for fecal carriage of Campylobacter spp. Out of all collected fecal samples, the highest isolation rate of Campylobacter was recorded among poultry (35%), followed by horse (27%) and cow (21%) while, lowest isolation rate was recorded among camel. Of the 85 Campylobacter strains isolated, 76 were classified as catalase positive Campylobacter. Out of them, high frequency of occurrence was belonged to Campy. jejuni. Furthermore, catalase positive Campylobacter spp. were isolated from all the sources of investigation, other than camel. The results obtained from biotyping of the isolates indicated Camp. lari biotype I followed by Camp. jejuni and Camp. coli biotypes I existed in high frequency; while Camp. jejuni biotype II and untypable Campylobacter existed in low frequency. Overall, domestic animals and poultry other than camels are vehicle of Campylobacter in the area of investigation therefore, the people who living in this area may be infected via feces of domestic animals and poultry.
Publication Date: 2007-05-01 PubMed ID: 19069968DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.1519.1524Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research examined fecal samples from domestic animals and poultry in Southern Iran to identify the presence of different types of Campylobacter spp., with results indicating a significant presence especially among poultry.

Research Process

  • The research involved collecting and analyzing fecal samples from 455 domestic animals and poultry including cows, horses, camels, and various types of poultry in the southern part of Iran.
  • The purpose was to identify and categorize the presence of different bacteria strains of the species Campylobacter spp.

Findings

  • Among all samples, the highest rate of Campylobacter presence was found in poultry at 35%, followed by horses at 27% and cows at 21%.
  • Campylobacter was least found in samples from camels.
  • Out of 85 isolated strains of Campylobacter, 76 were classified as being catalase positive, indicating an ability to thrive in an oxygen-rich environment.
  • The most regularly occurring catalase positive Campylobacter was Campylobacter jejuni, with this strain found in all sources investigated except for camels.
  • Biotypes, or groups of organisms that share common physical and genetic characteristics, were also identified among the identified Campylobacter.
  • The most frequent biotypes found were Campylobacter lari biotype I, followed by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.
  • Less frequently found biotypes were Campylobacter jejuni biotype II and untypable Campylobacter.

Conclusion and Implications

  • The researchers concluded that, except for camels, domestic animals and poultry in the study area serve as carriers for Campylobacter.
  • This may pose a health risk to humans living in the area, as they may get infected through contact with feces from domestic animals or poultry. This implies a need for stronger public health efforts to manage and limit potential transmission of the bacterial strain to humans.

Cite This Article

APA
Baserisalehi M, Bahador N, Kapadnis BP. (2007). Isolation and characterization of Campylobacter spp. from domestic animals and poultry in south of Iran. Pak J Biol Sci, 10(9), 1519-1524. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.1519.1524

Publication

ISSN: 1028-8880
NlmUniqueID: 101247723
Country: Pakistan
Language: English
Volume: 10
Issue: 9
Pages: 1519-1524

Researcher Affiliations

Baserisalehi, M
  • Department of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Kazeroun Branch, Kazeroun, Iran.
Bahador, N
    Kapadnis, B P

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Bacterial Typing Techniques
      • Camelus / microbiology
      • Campylobacter / classification
      • Campylobacter / isolation & purification
      • Campylobacter Infections / epidemiology
      • Campylobacter Infections / veterinary
      • Cattle / microbiology
      • Diet
      • Feces / microbiology
      • Horses / microbiology
      • Humans
      • Iran / epidemiology
      • Poultry / microbiology

      Citations

      This article has been cited 9 times.
      1. Ansarifar E, Riahi SM, Tasara T, Sadighara P, Zeinali T. Campylobacter prevalence from food, animals, human and environmental samples in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Microbiol 2023 May 10;23(1):126.
        doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02879-wpubmed: 37165317google scholar: lookup
      2. Knipper AD, Göhlich S, Stingl K, Ghoreishi N, Fischer-Tenhagen C, Bandick N, Tenhagen BA, Crease T. Longitudinal Study for the Detection and Quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Dairy Cows during Milking and in the Dairy Farm Environment. Foods 2023 Apr 13;12(8).
        doi: 10.3390/foods12081639pubmed: 37107434google scholar: lookup
      3. Knipper AD, Ghoreishi N, Crease T. Prevalence and concentration of Campylobacter in faeces of dairy cows: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022;17(10):e0276018.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276018pubmed: 36240215google scholar: lookup
      4. Paruch L, Paruch AM. Molecular Identification of Infectious Enteropathogens in Faeces of Healthy Horses. Microbiol Insights 2022;15:11786361221089005.
        doi: 10.1177/11786361221089005pubmed: 35431557google scholar: lookup
      5. Mohammadpour R, Champour M, Tuteja F, Mostafavi E. Zoonotic implications of camel diseases in Iran. Vet Med Sci 2020 Aug;6(3):359-381.
        doi: 10.1002/vms3.239pubmed: 32160657google scholar: lookup
      6. Torkan S, Vazirian B, Khamesipour F, Dida GO. Prevalence of thermotolerant Campylobacter species in dogs and cats in Iran. Vet Med Sci 2018 Nov;4(4):296-303.
        doi: 10.1002/vms3.117pubmed: 30168285google scholar: lookup
      7. Manyi-Loh CE, Mamphweli SN, Meyer EL, Makaka G, Simon M, Okoh AI. An Overview of the Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Cattle Manure. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016 Aug 25;13(9).
        doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090843pubmed: 27571092google scholar: lookup
      8. Mshelia GD, Amin JD, Egwu GO, Woldehiwet Z, Murray RD. The prevalence of bovine venereal campylobacteriosis in cattle herds in the Lake Chad basin of Nigeria. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012 Oct;44(7):1487-9.
        doi: 10.1007/s11250-012-0092-6pubmed: 22318768google scholar: lookup
      9. Kabir A, Lamichhane B, Habib T, Adams A, El-Sheikh Ali H, Slovis NM, Troedsson MHT, Helmy YA. Antimicrobial Resistance in Equines: A Growing Threat to Horse Health and Beyond-A Comprehensive Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024 Jul 29;13(8).
        doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13080713pubmed: 39200013google scholar: lookup