Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1991; 23(4); 243-246; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1991.tb03710.x

Laminitis in the pony: conservative treatment vs dorsal hoof wall resection.

Abstract: The clinical and radiographic findings in 21 ponies with laminitis and its treatment and results are described. All ponies received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. All were fed hay and no concentrates. They were box rested for varying periods depending on clinical improvement. Dorsal hoof wall resection was performed in 11 ponies and all regained complete soundness. To shorten the period of non-activity, working ponies were shod and the hoof wall defect was packed with technovit or a combination of glue with cotton cuttings. Ten were treated conservatively; two recovered completely, four remained lame and four were killed because of recurrent laminitis.
Publication Date: 1991-07-01 PubMed ID: 1915221DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1991.tb03710.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the treatment and results of laminitis, an inflammation of the soft tissue structures that attach the coffin bone of the foot to the hoof wall, in 21 ponies, specifically comparing conservative treatment methods to dorsal hoof wall resection.

Objective and Methodology

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of conservative treatment versus dorsal hoof wall resection to manage laminitis in ponies.
  • Two types of treatments were used: conservative treatment (10 ponies) and dorsal hoof wall resection (11 ponies).
  • All ponies received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and they were fed hay without any concentrates.
  • Ponies were rested in boxes for varying periods, depending on the level of their clinical improvement.

Dorsal Hoof Wall Resection

  • For 11 ponies, dorsal hoof wall resection was performed, a surgical procedure that removed a portion of the hoof wall in order to relieve pressure on the damaged laminal tissue.
  • Post-surgery, these ponies were still allowed to work. To pave the path for a quicker recovery and to shorten the period of non-activity, the ponies were shod and the hoof wall defect was filled with technovit, or a combination of glue with cotton cuttings.
  • All the ponies who underwent this surgery regained complete soundness, demonstrating that dorsal hoof wall resection was an effective treatment approach for laminitis.

Conservative Treatment

  • The other 10 ponies were treated conservatively. This approach involved using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, dietary modifications, and reducing load on the foot by resting.
  • Out of these 10, only two recovered completely, while four remained lame. Furthermore, four ponies had to be euthanized due to recurrent laminitis.
  • This indicates that the conservative treatment method was less effective compared to dorsal hoof wall resection.

Conclusion

  • The study concluded that dorsal hoof wall resection is a more effective treatment for laminitis in ponies compared to conservative methods, as seen by higher rates of full recovery.
  • However, in any research, the method, sample size, individual conditions of the subjects, etc., could affect the results. Hence, while this study presents important insights into the treatment of laminitis, larger-scale investigations might be needed to draw definitive conclusions.

Cite This Article

APA
Peremans K, Verschooten F, De Moor A, Desmet P. (1991). Laminitis in the pony: conservative treatment vs dorsal hoof wall resection. Equine Vet J, 23(4), 243-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1991.tb03710.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 23
Issue: 4
Pages: 243-246

Researcher Affiliations

Peremans, K
  • Kliniek voor Heelkunde van de Huisdieren, Faculteit Diergeneeskunde Casinoplein, Ghent, Belgium.
Verschooten, F
    De Moor, A
      Desmet, P

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / therapeutic use
        • Female
        • Foot Diseases / drug therapy
        • Foot Diseases / surgery
        • Foot Diseases / therapy
        • Foot Diseases / veterinary
        • Hoof and Claw / surgery
        • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
        • Horse Diseases / surgery
        • Horse Diseases / therapy
        • Horses
        • Lameness, Animal / drug therapy
        • Lameness, Animal / surgery
        • Lameness, Animal / therapy
        • Male
        • Recurrence

        Citations

        This article has been cited 0 times.