Analyze Diet
Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025; 23(3); qzaf025; doi: 10.1093/gpbjnl/qzaf025

LCORL and STC2 Variants Increase Body Size and Growth Rate in Cattle and Other Animals.

Abstract: Natural variants can significantly improve growth traits in livestock and serve as safe targets for gene editing, thus being applied in animal molecular design breeding. However, such safe and large-effect mutations are severely lacking. Using ancestral recombination graphs, we investigated recent selection signatures in beef cattle breeds, pinpointing sweep-driving variants in the LCORL and STC2 loci with notable effects on body size and growth rate. The ACT-to-A frameshift mutation in LCORL occurs mainly in central-European cattle, and stimulates growth. Remarkably, convergent truncating mutations were also found in commercial breeds of sheep, goats, pigs, horses, dogs, rabbits, and chickens. In the STC2 gene, we identified a missense mutation (A60P) located within the conserved region across vertebrates. We validated the two natural mutations in gene-edited mouse models, where both variants in homozygous carriers significantly increase the average weight by 11%. Our findings provide insights into a seemingly recurring gene target of body size enhancing truncating mutations across domesticated species, and offer valuable targets for gene editing-based breeding in animals.
Publication Date: 2025-03-17 PubMed ID: 40094447PubMed Central: PMC12448305DOI: 10.1093/gpbjnl/qzaf025Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study identifies natural genetic variants in LCORL and STC2 genes that significantly increase body size and growth rate in cattle and several other domesticated animals.
  • The researchers validated these growth-enhancing mutations using gene-edited mice, highlighting their potential for improving livestock breeding through precise genetic methods.

Background

  • Growth traits like body size and growth rate are important for livestock productivity.
  • Natural genetic variants that robustly enhance these traits are rare but valuable as safe targets for gene editing.
  • Animal molecular design breeding uses such genomic information to accelerate improvement in traits without introducing foreign DNA.

Research Approach

  • The researchers used ancestral recombination graphs, a method to detect recent selection signatures in genomes across populations, focusing on beef cattle breeds.
  • They aimed to uncover specific genetic mutations under strong recent positive selection that drive desirable growth traits.

Key Findings in Cattle

  • Two loci, LCORL and STC2, were identified with variants under strong selection associated with body size and growth rate.
  • In the LCORL gene, an ACT-to-A frameshift mutation was found primarily in central-European cattle. This mutation presumably disrupts the normal protein but results in enhanced growth phenotypes.
  • For the STC2 gene, a missense mutation (amino acid substitution A60P) was identified within a conserved region across vertebrates, indicating its functional importance.

Cross-Species Convergence

  • The LCORL gene exhibited convergent truncating mutations (mutations leading to protein truncation) in commercial breeds across many domesticated species including sheep, goats, pigs, horses, dogs, rabbits, and chickens.
  • This convergence suggests a common, evolutionarily favored mechanism where disrupting or truncating LCORL enhances body size or growth rate in various animals.

Functional Validation Using Gene-Edited Mice

  • The team created gene-edited mouse models carrying the natural cattle variants in LCORL and STC2 genes.
  • Homozygous carriers of either variant exhibited an approximately 11% increase in average body weight compared to controls.
  • This provided direct experimental evidence that these specific mutations causally enhance growth.

Significance of the Study

  • Identifies novel, naturally occurring mutations with large beneficial effects on livestock growth that can be safely utilized in breeding programs.
  • Highlights a recurring target gene (LCORL) where truncating mutations increase body size across a broad range of domesticated animals, pointing to common genetic mechanisms.
  • The findings open opportunities for precise gene editing to improve economically important growth traits in animal agriculture without introducing exogenous genes.
  • Contributes to fundamental understanding of vertebrate growth regulation and evolutionary adaptation during domestication.

Implications for Animal Breeding

  • Offers clear gene editing targets (LCORL and STC2 variants) to enhance cattle growth rates and body size safely and effectively.
  • Because similar mutations appear beneficial in multiple species, these targets may be translated across species in molecular breeding efforts.
  • Improved growth traits can increase meat production efficiency, contributing to better resource utilization and economic gains.

Conclusion

  • This research advances the application of genomics and gene editing in livestock by revealing natural high-impact mutations modulating growth.
  • It underscores the potential of leveraging evolutionary-selected variants for molecular design breeding, improving animal production sustainably and predictably.

Cite This Article

APA
Bai F, Cai Y, Qiu M, Liang C, Pan L, Liu Y, Feng Y, Cao X, Yang Q, Ren G, Jiao S, Gao S, Lu M, Wang X, Heller R, Lenstra JA, Jiang Y. (2025). LCORL and STC2 Variants Increase Body Size and Growth Rate in Cattle and Other Animals. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 23(3), qzaf025. https://doi.org/10.1093/gpbjnl/qzaf025

Publication

ISSN: 2210-3244
NlmUniqueID: 101197608
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 23
Issue: 3
PII: qzaf025

Researcher Affiliations

Bai, Fengting
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Cai, Yudong
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Qiu, Min
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Liang, Chen
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Pan, Linqian
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Liu, Yayi
  • College of Veterinary Medicine, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Feng, Yanshuai
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Cao, Xuesha
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Yang, Qimeng
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Ren, Gang
  • College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Jiao, Shaohua
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Gao, Siqi
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Lu, Meixuan
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Wang, Xihong
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Heller, Rasmus
  • Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lenstra, Johannes A
  • Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CM, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jiang, Yu
  • Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Shaanxi Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Cattle / growth & development
  • Cattle / genetics
  • Body Size / genetics
  • Mice
  • Mutation, Missense
  • Breeding
  • Frameshift Mutation
  • Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins / genetics

Conflict of Interest Statement

Yu Jiang, Yudong Cai, Fengting Bai, Min Qiu, Chen Liang, and Yanshuai Feng are inventors on two patent applications related to this work submitted on 27 December 2024 by Northwest A&F University (Patent Application Nos. 202411951967.8 and 202411951964.4). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 69 references
  1. Ajmone-Marsan P, Garcia JF, Lenstra JA. On the origin of cattle: how aurochs became cattle and colonized the world.. Evol Anthropol 2010;19:148–57.
  2. Bouwman AC, Daetwyler HD, Chamberlain AJ, Ponce CH, Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for cattle stature identifies common genes that regulate body size in mammals.. Nat Genet 2018;50:362–7.
    pubmed: 29459679
  3. Plassais J, Kim J, Davis BW, Karyadi DM, Hogan AN, Harris AC. Whole genome sequencing of canids reveals genomic regions under selection and variants influencing morphology.. Nat Commun 2019;10:1489.
    pmc: PMC6445083pubmed: 30940804
  4. Hongo H, Pearson J, Öksüz B, Ilgezdi G. The process of ungulate domestication at Çayönü, Southeastern Turkey: a multidisciplinary approach focusing on sp. and .. Anthropozoologica 2009;44:63–78.
  5. Vigne JD, Peters J, Helmer D. First Steps of Animal Domestication.. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2005.
  6. Beja-Pereira A, Caramelli D, Lalueza-Fox C, Vernesi C, Ferrand N, Casoli A. The origin of European cattle: evidence from modern and ancient DNA.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:8113–8.
    pmc: PMC1472438pubmed: 16690747
  7. Scheu A, Powell A, Bollongino R, Vigne JD, Tresset A, Çakırlar C. The genetic prehistory of domesticated cattle from their origin to the spread across Europe.. BMC Genetics 2015;16:54.
    pmc: PMC4445560pubmed: 26018295
  8. Pryce JE, Hayes BJ, Bolormaa S, Goddard ME. Polymorphic regions affecting human height also control stature in cattle.. Genetics 2011;187:981–4.
    pmc: PMC3048786pubmed: 21212230
  9. Liu Y, Duan X, Chen S, He H, Liu X. NCAPG is differentially expressed during longissimus muscle development and is associated with growth traits in Chinese Qinchuan beef cattle.. Genet Mol Biol 2015;38:450–6.
    pmc: PMC4763315pubmed: 26692155
  10. An B, Xia J, Chang T, Wang X, Xu L, Zhang L. Genome-wide association study reveals candidate genes associated with body measurement traits in Chinese Wagyu beef cattle.. Anim Genet 2019;50:386–90.
    pubmed: 31179577
  11. Smith JL, Wilson ML, Nilson SM, Rowan TN, Oldeschulte DL, Schnabel RD. Genome-wide association and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits in U.S. Gelbvieh cattle.. BMC Genomics 2019;20:926.
    pmc: PMC6892214pubmed: 31801456
  12. Zhang F, Wang Y, Mukiibi R, Chen L, Vinsky M, Plastow G. Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in beef cattle revealed by genome wide association studies of imputed whole genome sequence variants: I: feed efficiency and component traits.. BMC Genomics 2020;21:36.
    pmc: PMC6956504pubmed: 31931702
  13. Smith JL, Wilson ML, Nilson SM, Rowan TN, Schnabel RD, Decker JE. Genome-wide association and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits in U.S. Red Angus cattle.. BMC Genomics 2022;23:517.
    pmc: PMC9287884pubmed: 35842584
  14. Gualdrón Duarte JL, Yuan C, Gori AS, Moreira GCM, Takeda H, Coppieters W. Sequenced-based GWAS for linear classification traits in Belgian Blue beef cattle reveals new coding variants in genes regulating body size in mammals.. Genet Sel Evol 2023;55:83.
    pmc: PMC10683324pubmed: 38017417
  15. Majeres LE, Dilger AC, Shike DW, McCann JC, Beever JE. Defining a haplotype encompassing the locus associated with increased lean growth in beef cattle.. Genes (Basel) 2024;15:576.
    pmc: PMC11121065pubmed: 38790206
  16. Ferrell CL. Factors influencing fetal growth and birth weight in cattle.. Beef Research Program Progress Report 1993;4:104–7.
  17. Schoeman SJ. Characterization of beef cattle breeds by virtue of their performances in the National Beef Cattle Performance and Progeny Testing Scheme.. S Afr J Anim Sci 1996;26:15–9.
  18. Speidel L, Forest M, Shi S, Myers SR. A method for genome-wide genealogy estimation for thousands of samples.. Nat Genet 2019;51:1321–9.
    pmc: PMC7610517pubmed: 31477933
  19. Stern AJ, Wilton PR, Nielsen R. An approximate full-likelihood method for inferring selection and allele frequency trajectories from DNA sequence data.. PLoS Genet 2019;15:e1008384.
    pmc: PMC6760815pubmed: 31518343
  20. Sollis E, Mosaku A, Abid A, Buniello A, Cerezo M, Gil L. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog: knowledgebase and deposition resource.. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;51:D977–85.
  21. Yengo L, Vedantam S, Marouli E, Sidorenko J, Bartell E, Sakaue S. A saturated map of common genetic variants associated with human height.. Nature 2022;610:704–12.
    pmc: PMC9605867pubmed: 36224396
  22. Conway E, Jerman E, Healy E, Ito S, Holoch D, Oliviero G. A family of vertebrate-specific polycombs encoded by the genes balance PRC2 subtype activities.. Mol Cell 2018;70:408–21.e8.
    pubmed: 29628311
  23. O’Carroll D, Erhardt S, Pagani M, Barton SC, Surani MA, Jenuwein T. The -group gene is required for early mouse development.. Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:4330–6.
    pmc: PMC87093pubmed: 11390661
  24. Boyer LA, Plath K, Zeitlinger J, Brambrink T, Medeiros LA, Lee TI. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells.. Nature 2006;441:349–53.
    pubmed: 16625203
  25. Ngan CY, Wong CH, Tjong H, Wang W, Goldfeder RL, Choi C. Chromatin interaction analyses elucidate the roles of PRC2-bound silencers in mouse development.. Nat Genet 2020;52:264–72.
    pmc: PMC7869692pubmed: 32094912
  26. Rubin CJ, Megens HJ, Barrio AM, Maqbool K, Sayyab S, Schwochow D. Strong signatures of selection in the domestic pig genome.. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:19529–36.
    pmc: PMC3511700pubmed: 23151514
  27. Carneiro M, Rubin CJ, Di Palma F, Albert FW, Alföldi J, Barrio AM. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication.. Science 2014;345:1074–9.
    pmc: PMC5421586pubmed: 25170157
  28. Rice ES, Alberdi A, Alfieri J, Athrey G, Balacco JR, Bardou P. A pangenome graph reference of 30 chicken genomes allows genotyping of large and complex structural variants.. BMC Biol 2023;21:267.
    pmc: PMC10664547pubmed: 37993882
  29. Wang J, Liu J, Lei Q, Liu Z, Han H, Zhang S. Elucidation of the genetic determination of body weight and size in Chinese local chicken breeds by large-scale genomic analyses.. BMC Genomics 2024;25:296.
    pmc: PMC10956266pubmed: 38509464
  30. Saif R, Henkel J, Jagannathan V, Drogemuller C, Flury C, Leeb T. The locus is under selection in large-sized Pakistani goat breeds.. Genes (Basel) 2020;11:168.
    pmc: PMC7074466pubmed: 32033434
  31. Reich P, Möller S, Stock KF, Nolte W, von Depka Prondzinski M, Reents R. Genomic analyses of withers height and linear conformation traits in German Warmblood horses using imputed sequence-level genotypes. Genet Sel Evol 2024;56:45.
    pmc: PMC11177368pubmed: 38872118
  32. Jepsen MR, Kloverpris S, Mikkelsen JH, Pedersen JH, Fuchtbauer EM, Laursen LS. Stanniocalcin-2 inhibits mammalian growth by proteolytic inhibition of the insulin-like growth factor axis. J Biol Chem 2015;290:3430–9.
    pmc: PMC4319012pubmed: 25533459
  33. Marouli E, Graff M, Medina-Gomez C, Lo KS, Wood AR, Kjaer TR. Rare and low-frequency coding variants alter human adult height. Nature 2017;542:186–90.
    pmc: PMC5302847pubmed: 28146470
  34. Kern C, Wang Y, Xu X, Pan Z, Halstead M, Chanthavixay G. Functional annotations of three domestic animal genomes provide vital resources for comparative and agricultural research. Nat Commun 2021;12:1821.
    pmc: PMC7988148pubmed: 33758196
  35. Nielsen R, Vaughn AH, Deng Y. Inference and applications of ancestral recombination graphs. Nat Rev Genet 2025;26:47–58.
    pmc: PMC12036574pubmed: 39349760
  36. Hejase HA, Dukler N, Siepel A. From summary statistics to gene trees: methods for inferring positive selection. Trends Genet 2020;36:243–58.
    pmc: PMC7177178pubmed: 31954511
  37. Sanchez MP, Tribout T, Kadri NK, Chitneedi PK, Maak S, Hoze C. Sequence-based GWAS meta-analyses for beef production traits. Genet Sel Evol 2023;55:70.
    pmc: PMC10568825pubmed: 37828440
  38. Wyler SC, Gahlot S, Bideyan L, Yip C, Dushime J, Chen B. LCoRL regulates growth and metabolism. Endocrinology 2024;165:bqae146.
  39. Kraft K, Yost KE, Murphy SE, Magg A, Long Y, Corces MR. Polycomb-mediated genome architecture enables long-range spreading of H3K27 methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022;119:e2201883119.
    pmc: PMC9295753pubmed: 35617427
  40. LeRoith D, Holly JMP, Forbes BE. Insulin-like growth factors: ligands, binding proteins, and receptors. Mol Metab 2021;52:101245.
    pmc: PMC8513159pubmed: 33962049
  41. Zhou Z, Li M, Cheng H, Fan W, Yuan Z, Gao Q. An intercross population study reveals genes associated with body size and plumage color in ducks. Nat Commun 2018;9:2648.
    pmc: PMC6050300pubmed: 30018292
  42. Posbergh C, Huson H. All sheeps and sizes: a genetic investigation of mature body size across sheep breeds reveals a polygenic nature. Anim Genet 2021;52:99–107.
    pmc: PMC7821113pubmed: 33089531
  43. Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 2021;10:giab008.
  44. Browning BL, Tian X, Zhou Y, Browning SR. Fast two-stage phasing of large-scale sequence data. Am J Hum Genet 2021;108:1880–90.
    pmc: PMC8551421pubmed: 34478634
  45. Manichaikul A, Mychaleckyj JC, Rich SS, Daly K, Sale M, Chen WM. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2010;26:2867–73.
    pmc: PMC3025716pubmed: 20926424
  46. Wu DD, Ding XD, Wang S, Wojcik JM, Zhang Y, Tokarska M. Pervasive introgression facilitated domestication and adaptation in the species complex.. Nat Ecol Evol 2018;2:1139–45.
    pubmed: 29784979
  47. Fu W, Wang R, Nanaei HA, Wang J, Hu D, Jiang Y. RGD v2.0: a major update of the ruminant functional and evolutionary genomics database.. Nucleic Acids Res 2021;50:D1091–9.
  48. Dutheil JY, Gaillard S, Stukenbrock EH. MafFilter: a highly flexible and extensible multiple genome alignment files processor.. BMC Genomics 2014;15:53.
    pmc: PMC3904536pubmed: 24447531
  49. Keightley PD, Jackson BC. Inferring the probability of the derived . the ancestral allelic state at a polymorphic site.. Genetics 2018;209:897–906.
    pmc: PMC6028244pubmed: 29769282
  50. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA. The variant call format and VCFtools.. Bioinformatics 2011;27:2156–8.
    pmc: PMC3137218pubmed: 21653522
  51. Baumdicker F, Bisschop G, Goldstein D, Gower G, Ragsdale AP, Tsambos G. Efficient ancestry and mutation simulation with msprime 1.0.. Genetics 2021;220:iyab229.
  52. Hinrichs AS, Karolchik D, Baertsch R, Barber GP, Bejerano G, Clawson H. The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006.. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D590–8.
    pmc: PMC1347506pubmed: 16381938
  53. Verdugo MP, Mullin VE, Scheu A, Mattiangeli V, Daly KG, Maisano Delser P. Ancient cattle genomics, origins, and rapid turnover in the Fertile Crescent.. Science 2019;365:173–6.
    pubmed: 31296769
  54. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads.. EMBnet J 2011;17:10–2.
  55. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform.. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1754–60.
    pmc: PMC2705234pubmed: 19451168
  56. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078–9.
    pmc: PMC2723002pubmed: 19505943
  57. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.. Genome Res 2010;20:1297–303.
    pmc: PMC2928508pubmed: 20644199
  58. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor.. Bioinformatics 2018;34:i884–90.
    pmc: PMC6129281pubmed: 30423086
  59. McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GRS, Thormann A. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor.. Genome Biol 2016;17:122.
    pmc: PMC4893825pubmed: 27268795
  60. Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data.. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:e164.
    pmc: PMC2938201pubmed: 20601685
  61. Martin FJ, Amode MR, Aneja A, Austine-Orimoloye O, Azov Andrey G, Barnes I. Ensembl 2023. Nucleic Acids Res 2022;51:D933–41.
  62. Gautier M, Vitalis R. rehh: an R package to detect footprints of selection in genome-wide SNP data from haplotype structure. Bioinformatics 2012;28:1176–7.
    pubmed: 22402612
  63. Bailey TL, Johnson J, Grant CE, Noble WS. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:W39–49.
    pmc: PMC4489269pubmed: 25953851
  64. Rauluseviciute I, Riudavets-Puig R, Blanc-Mathieu R, Castro-Mondragon JA, Ferenc K, Kumar V. JASPAR 2024: 20th anniversary of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 2023;52:D174–82.
  65. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol 2019;37:907–15.
    pmc: PMC7605509pubmed: 31375807
  66. Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform 2013;14:178–92.
    pmc: PMC3603213pubmed: 22517427
  67. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 2021;38:3022–7.
    pmc: PMC8233496pubmed: 33892491
  68. Stemmer M, Thumberger T, del Sol Keyer M, Wittbrodt J, Mateo JL. CCTop: an intuitive, flexible and reliable CRISPR/Cas9 target prediction tool. PLoS One 2015;10:e0124633.
    pmc: PMC4409221pubmed: 25909470
  69. Chen T, Chen X, Zhang S, Zhu J, Tang B, Wang A. The Genome Sequence Archive Family: toward explosive data growth and diverse data types. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2021;19:578–83.
    pmc: PMC9039563pubmed: 34400360

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Albrecht E, Chitneedi PK, Dannenberger D, Kühn C, Maak S. Impact of Mutations in the NCAPG and MSTN Genes on Body Composition, Structural Properties of Skeletal Muscle, Its Fatty Acid Composition, and Meat Quality of Bulls from a Charolais × Holstein F(2) Cross.. Int J Mol Sci 2026 Jan 15;27(2).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms27020882pubmed: 41596529google scholar: lookup
  2. Lu Y, Li D, Ma R, Gao Y, Gao Z, Qian Y, Xi D, Deng W, Wu J. Omics Evidence Chains for Complex Traits in Beef Cattle: From Cross-Layer Colocalization to Genetic Evaluation and Application.. Biology (Basel) 2025 Dec 1;14(12).
    doi: 10.3390/biology14121725pubmed: 41463498google scholar: lookup
  3. Lewczuk D, Wypchło M, Hecold M, Buczkowska R, Korwin-Kossakowska A. Connections Between Gene Polymorphism and Fetlock and Hock Measurements in Polish Sport Horses.. Int J Mol Sci 2025 Oct 2;26(19).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms26199645pubmed: 41096909google scholar: lookup
  4. Arshad F, Jayaraman S, Talenti A, Owen R, Mohsin M, Mansoor S, Asif M, Prendergast J. A comprehensive water buffalo pangenome reveals extensive structural variation linked to population-specific signatures of selection.. Gigascience 2025 Jan 6;14.
    doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaf099pubmed: 40884803google scholar: lookup
  5. Hassanine NNAM, Saleh AA, Essa MOA, Adam SY, Mohai Ud Din R, Rehman SU, Ali R, Husien HM, Wang M. Candidate Genes, Markers, Signatures of Selection, and Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) and Their Association with Economic Traits in Livestock: Genomic Insights and Selection.. Int J Mol Sci 2025 Aug 8;26(16).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms26167688pubmed: 40869008google scholar: lookup
  6. Bovo S, Carneiro M, Ribani A, Bolner M, Taurisano V, Schiavo G, Schiavitto M, Bertolini F, Fontanesi L. Signatures of selection detected from whole-genome sequencing indicate that the small body size in dwarf rabbit breeds is caused by polygenic effects with a few major loci.. Anim Genet 2025 Aug;56(4):e70025.
    doi: 10.1111/age.70025pubmed: 40607659google scholar: lookup
  7. Buckley RM, Bilgen N, Harris AC, Savolainen P, Tepeli C, Erdoğan M, Serres Armero A, Dreger DL, van Steenbeek FG, Hytönen MK, Parker HG, Hale J, Lohi H, Çınar Kul B, Boyko AR, Ostrander EA. Analysis of canine gene constraint identifies new variants for orofacial clefts and stature.. Genome Res 2025 May 2;35(5):1080-1093.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.280092.124pubmed: 40127928google scholar: lookup