FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Ecology and evolution2013; 3(9); 3073-3082; doi: 10.1002/ece3.694

Local density and group size interacts with age and sex to determine direction and rate of social dispersal in a polygynous mammal.

Abstract: Movement away from an area or social group in response to increasing density (density-dependent dispersal) is known for most species; why it evolves is fundamental to our understanding of ecology and evolution. However, we have yet to fully appreciate how individuals of varying conditions (e.g., age and sex) might differently consider effects of density (quorum) when deciding to disperse or not, and scale dependence in their sense of quorum. We tracked movements of all individuals of a naturalized population of feral horses (Equus ferus caballus; Sable Island National Park Reserve, Nova Scotia, Canada) during a period of rapid population growth (N increased from 375 to 484 horses from 2008 to 2010). Permanent dispersal from breeding groups (bands) was positively density dependent for all age and sex categories with respect to local density (horses/km(2), bounded by the 99th percentile of individual movements [8000 m]), but was negatively and positively density dependent for males and females, respectively, in relation to group (band) size. Dispersal was generally female biased, with the exception of foals which moved with their mothers (no sex effect), and for yearlings and subadults when band sizes were smaller than average, in which case males dispersed at higher rates than females. Dispersal distance was positively related to local density. We conclude that dispersal rate can be both positively and negatively density dependent for feral horses, contingent on the state of individuals and the scale at which quorum with respect to choosing to disperse or not is assessed. Scale effects and interactions of density-dependent and sex- and age-biased dispersal may have both ecological and evolutionary consequences through effects on resource and mate competition.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2013-08-01 PubMed ID: 24101995PubMed Central: PMC3790552DOI: 10.1002/ece3.694Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper investigates how density-induced movement or dispersal patterns among a population of feral horses are influenced by individual conditions such as age and sex. The study reveals that both males and females display density-dependent dispersal, but their responses differ according to their local group sizes.

Understanding the Research Paper

The research paper aims to understand how patterns of population dispersion among a species (in this case, feral horses) are influenced by variables such as the density of the local population, and individual characteristics like age and sex.

  • Objective: The key goal of the study is to comprehend why density-dependent dispersal evolves among species and how different individuals, based on their age and sex, consider the effects of density (quorum) when deciding whether to disperse or not.
  • Method: The researchers tracked the movements of all members of a feral horse population on the Sable Island National Park Reserve in Nova Scotia, Canada during a period of rapid population growth.

Findings of the Research Paper

The observations and conclusions of the study correspond to the relationship between dispersal, individual conditions, and local group sizes.

  • Density-dependent Dispersal: All members of the horse population, irrespective of their age or sex, showed a propensity to disperse from their breeding groups with increasing local density, but at different rates and in different ways.
  • Varied Responses due to Age and Sex: Dispersal was observed to be generally more common in female horses, with the exception of foals who moved with their mothers, and with yearlings and subadults from smaller bands, where males dispersed at higher rates.
  • Impact of Group Size: In terms of group size, male horses present a negative density-dependent dispersal rate, whereas female horses display a positive density-dependent relationship. This implies that males are more likely to leave as group size increases, while females are more inclined to stay or even join larger groups.
  • Dispersal Distance: The distance covered during dispersal was found to be positively related to local density, indicating that individuals were likely to move further away in areas with a higher density.

Concluding Thoughts

According to the study, dispersal rates can be both positively and negatively density-dependent among feral horses, depending on the state of individuals and the scale at which density is evaluated. These scale effects and the interaction of density-dependent dispersal with sex- and age-biased dispersal could have important ecological and evolutionary implications through their impact on resource competition and mate selection.

Cite This Article

APA
Marjamäki PH, Contasti AL, Coulson TN, McLoughlin PD. (2013). Local density and group size interacts with age and sex to determine direction and rate of social dispersal in a polygynous mammal. Ecol Evol, 3(9), 3073-3082. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.694

Publication

Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
NlmUniqueID: 101566408
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 3
Issue: 9
Pages: 3073-3082

Researcher Affiliations

Marjamäki, Paula H
  • Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 7PY, UK.
Contasti, Adrienne L
    Coulson, Tim N
      McLoughlin, Philip D

        References

        This article includes 56 references
        1. Amarasekare P. Spatial variation and density-dependent dispersal in competitive coexistence.. Proc Biol Sci 2004 Jul 22;271(1547):1497-506.
          pmc: PMC1691754pubmed: 15306322doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2696google scholar: lookup
        2. Amarasekare P. The role of density-dependent dispersal in source-sink dynamics.. J Theor Biol 2004 Jan 21;226(2):159-68.
          pubmed: 14643185doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.08.007google scholar: lookup
        3. Asa CS. Male reproductive success in free-ranging feral horses. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1999;47:89–93.
        4. Baker MB, Rao S. Incremental costs and benefits shape natal dispersal: theory and example with Hemilepistus reaumuri. Ecology 2004;85:1039–1051.
        5. van Beest FM, Uzal A, Vander Wal E, Laforge MP, Contasti AL, Colville D, McLoughlin PD. Increasing density leads to generalization in both coarse-grained habitat selection and fine-grained resource selection in a large mammal.. J Anim Ecol 2014 Jan;83(1):147-56.
          doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12115pubmed: 23931034google scholar: lookup
        6. Bélisle M. Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 2005;86:1988–1995.
        7. Berger J. Wild horses of the Great Basin: social competition and population size. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1986. p. 330.
        8. Berger J. Reproductive fates of dispersers in a harem-dwelling ungulate: the wild horse. In: Chepko-Sade DB, Haplin ZT, editors. Mammalian dispersal patterns: the effect of social structure on population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987. pp. 41–54.
        9. Bonenfant C, Gaillard J-M, Klein F, Maillard D. Variation in harem size of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). J. Zool. (London) 2004;264:77–85.
        10. Bonte D, Van Dyck H, Bullock JM, Coulon A, Delgado M, Gibbs M, Lehouck V, Matthysen E, Mustin K, Saastamoinen M, Schtickzelle N, Stevens VM, Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M, Barton K, Benton TG, Chaput-Bardy A, Clobert J, Dytham C, Hovestadt T, Meier CM, Palmer SC, Turlure C, Travis JM. Costs of dispersal.. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2012 May;87(2):290-312.
          pubmed: 21929715doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00201.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        11. Bowler DE, Benton TG. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics.. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2005 May;80(2):205-25.
          pubmed: 15921049doi: 10.1017/s1464793104006645google scholar: lookup
        12. Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FK. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol. Model. 2002;157:281–300.
        13. Brown JS. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1988;22:37–47.
        14. Chave J. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: what have we learned in 20 years?. Ecol Lett 2013 May;16 Suppl 1:4-16.
          pubmed: 23351093doi: 10.1111/ele.12048google scholar: lookup
        15. Clobert J, Le Galliard JF, Cote J, Meylan S, Massot M. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations.. Ecol Lett 2009 Mar;12(3):197-209.
          pubmed: 19170731doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01267.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        16. Clutton-Brock TH, Lukas D. The evolution of social philopatry and dispersal in female mammals.. Mol Ecol 2012 Feb;21(3):472-92.
          pubmed: 21883582doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05232.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        17. Clutton-Brock TH, Rose KE, Guinness FE. Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer.. Proc Biol Sci 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1509-16.
          pmc: PMC1688709pubmed: 9364790doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0209google scholar: lookup
        18. Contasti AL, Tissier EJ, Johnstone JF, McLoughlin PD. Explaining spatial heterogeneity in population dynamics and genetics from spatial variation in resources for a large herbivore.. PLoS One 2012;7(10):e47858.
          pmc: PMC3485331pubmed: 23118900doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047858google scholar: lookup
        19. Contasti AL, van Beest FM, Vander Wal E, McLoughlin PD. Identifying hidden sinks in growing populations from individual fates and movements: the feral horses of Sable Island. J. Wildl. Manage. 2013 (in press).
        20. Cote J, Clobert J. Risky dispersal: avoiding kin competition despite uncertainty.. Ecology 2010 May;91(5):1485-93.
          pubmed: 20503880doi: 10.1890/09-0387.1google scholar: lookup
        21. Coulson T, Albon S, Guinness F, Pemberton J, Clutton-Brock T. Population substructure, local density, and calf winter survival in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Ecology 1997;78:852–863.
        22. Crawley MJ. The R book. The Atrium, U.K: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2007. p. 950.
        23. Dobson FS. Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Anim. Behav. 1982;30:1183–1192.
        24. Fellous S, Duncan A, Coulon A, Kaltz O. Quorum sensing and density-dependent dispersal in an aquatic model system.. PLoS One 2012;7(11):e48436.
          pmc: PMC3492347pubmed: 23144882doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048436google scholar: lookup
        25. Gaillard JM, Festa-Bianchet M, Yoccoz NG. Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival.. Trends Ecol Evol 1998 Feb 1;13(2):58-63.
          pubmed: 21238201doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01237-8google scholar: lookup
        26. Greenwood PJ. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav. 1980;28:1140–1162.
        27. Hanski I, Mononen T. Eco-evolutionary dynamics of dispersal in spatially heterogeneous environments.. Ecol Lett 2011 Oct;14(10):1025-34.
          pmc: PMC3187866pubmed: 21794053doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01671.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        28. Kaseda Y, Khalil M. Harem size reproductive success of stallions in Misaki feral horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996;47:163–173.
        29. Kaseda Y, Ogawa H, Khalil AM. Causes of natal dispersal and emigration and their effects on harem formation in Misaki feral horses.. Equine Vet J 1997 Jul;29(4):262-6.
          pubmed: 15338905doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03121.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        30. Kim SY, Torres R, Drummond H. Simultaneous positive and negative density-dependent dispersal in a colonial bird species.. Ecology 2009 Jan;90(1):230-9.
          pubmed: 19294928doi: 10.1890/08-0133.1google scholar: lookup
        31. Kokko H, Monaghan P. Predicting the direction of sexual selection. Ecol. Lett. 2001;4:159–165.
        32. Larsen KW, Boutin S. Movements, survival, and settlement of red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) offspring. Ecology 1994;75:214–223.
        33. Linklater WL. Adaptive explanation in socio-ecology: lessons from the Equidae.. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2000 Feb;75(1):1-20.
          pubmed: 10740891doi: 10.1017/s0006323199005411google scholar: lookup
        34. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ. Social dispersal but with philopatry reveals incest avoidance in a polygynous ungulate. Anim. Behav. 2009;77:1085–1093.
        35. Linklater WL, Cameron EZ, Minot EO, Stafford KJ. Stallion harassment and the mating system of horses.. Anim Behav 1999 Aug;58(2):295-306.
          pubmed: 10458881doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1155google scholar: lookup
        36. Loe LE, Mysterud A, Veiberg V, Langvatn R. Negative density-dependent emigration of males in an increasing red deer population.. Proc Biol Sci 2009 Jul 22;276(1667):2581-7.
          pmc: PMC2686653pubmed: 19364736doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0224google scholar: lookup
        37. Lucas ZL, McLoughlin PD, Coltman DW, Barber C. Multiscale analysis reveals restricted gene flow and a linear gradient in heterozygosity for an island population of feral horses. Can. J. Zool. 2009;87:1–7.
        38. Matthysen E. Density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals. Ecography 2005;28:403–416.
        39. Matthysen E. Multicausality of dispersal: a review. In: Clobert JM, Baguette M, Benton TG, Bullock JM, editors. Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. pp. 3–18.
        40. Monard AM, Duncan P, Boy V. The proximate mechanisms of natal dispersal in female horses. Behaviour 1996;133:1095–1124.
        41. Morris DW. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection.. Oecologia 2003 Jun;136(1):1-13.
          pubmed: 12690550doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1241-4google scholar: lookup
        42. Morris DW, MacEachern JT. Active density-dependent habitat selection in a controlled population of small mammals.. Ecology 2010 Nov;91(11):3131-7.
          pubmed: 21141174doi: 10.1890/10-0479.1google scholar: lookup
        43. Nowicki P, Vrabec V. Evidence for positive density-dependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations.. Oecologia 2011 Nov;167(3):657-65.
          pmc: PMC3193995pubmed: 21625981doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2025-xgoogle scholar: lookup
        44. Pérez-González J, Carranza J. Female-biased dispersal under conditions of low male mating competition in a polygynous mammal.. Mol Ecol 2009 Nov;18(22):4617-30.
          pubmed: 19840261doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04386.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        45. R Core Development Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012. Available via http://www.R-project.org.
        46. Røed KH, Holand Ø, Smith ME, Gjøstein H, Kumpula J, Nieminen M. Reproductive success in reindeer males in a herd with varying sex ratio.. Mol Ecol 2002 Jul;11(7):1239-43.
          pubmed: 12074731doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01509.xgoogle scholar: lookup
        47. Rosenzweig ML. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 1981;62:327–335.
        48. Rosenzweig ML. Habitat selection and population interactions – the search for mechanism. Am. Nat. 1991;137:S5–S28.
        49. Roy J, Yannic G, Côté SD, Bernatchez L. Negative density-dependent dispersal in the American black bear (Ursus americanus) revealed by noninvasive sampling and genotyping.. Ecol Evol 2012 Mar;2(3):525-37.
          pmc: PMC3399142pubmed: 22822432doi: 10.1002/ece3.207google scholar: lookup
        50. Rutberg AT, Keiper RR. Proximate causes of natal dispersal in feral ponies - some sex-differences. Anim. Behav. 1993;46:969–975.
        51. Schoener TW. The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics.. Science 2011 Jan 28;331(6016):426-9.
          pubmed: 21273479doi: 10.1126/science.1193954google scholar: lookup
        52. Scorolli AL, Lopez Cazorla AC. Demography of feral horses (Equus caballus): a long-term study in Tornquist Park, Argentina. Wildl. Res. 2010;37:207–214.
        53. Travis J, Murrell D, Dytham C. The evolution of density-dependent dispersal. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1999;266:1837–1842.
        54. Travis JMJ, Mustin K, Bartoń KA, Benton TG, Clobert J, Delgado MM. Modelling dispersal: an eco-evolutionary framework incorporating emigration, movement, settlement behaviour and the multiple costs involved. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2012;3:628–641.
        55. Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B, editor. Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine; 1972. pp. 136–179.
        56. VanderWaal KL, Mosser A, Packer C. Optimal group size, dispersal decisions and postdispersal relationships in female African lions. Anim. Behav. 2009;77:949–954.

        Citations

        This article has been cited 14 times.
        1. Medill SA, Janz DM, McLoughlin PD. Hair Cortisol Concentrations in Feral Horses and the Influence of Physiological and Social Factors. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 27;13(13).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13132133pubmed: 37443930google scholar: lookup
        2. Colpitts J, McLoughlin PD, Poissant J. Runs of homozygosity in Sable Island feral horses reveal the genomic consequences of inbreeding and divergence from domestic breeds. BMC Genomics 2022 Jul 12;23(1):501.
          doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08729-9pubmed: 35820826google scholar: lookup
        3. Manning JA, McLoughlin PD. Environmental and demographic drivers of male mating success vary across sequential reproductive episodes in a polygynous breeder. Ecol Evol 2019 May;9(9):5106-5117.
          doi: 10.1002/ece3.5066pubmed: 31110665google scholar: lookup
        4. Marjamäki PH, Dugdale HL, Dawson DA, McDonald RA, Delahay R, Burke T, Wilson AJ. Individual variation and the source-sink group dynamics of extra-group paternity in a social mammal. Behav Ecol 2019 Mar-Apr;30(2):301-312.
          doi: 10.1093/beheco/ary164pubmed: 30971858google scholar: lookup
        5. Burger D, Meuwly C, Thomas S, Sieme H, Oberthür M, Wedekind C, Meinecke-Tillmann S. Cycle-specific female preferences for visual and non-visual cues in the horse (Equus caballus). PLoS One 2018;13(2):e0191845.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191845pubmed: 29466358google scholar: lookup
        6. Debeffe L, Poissant J, McLoughlin PD. Individual quality and age but not environmental or social conditions modulate costs of reproduction in a capital breeder. Ecol Evol 2017 Aug;7(15):5580-5591.
          doi: 10.1002/ece3.3082pubmed: 28811876google scholar: lookup
        7. Ringhofer M, Inoue S, Mendonça RS, Pereira C, Matsuzawa T, Hirata S, Yamamoto S. Comparison of the social systems of primates and feral horses: data from a newly established horse research site on Serra D'Arga, northern Portugal. Primates 2017 Oct;58(4):479-484.
          doi: 10.1007/s10329-017-0614-ypubmed: 28585062google scholar: lookup
        8. Selonen V, Wistbacka R. Role of breeding and natal movements in lifetime dispersal of a forest-dwelling rodent. Ecol Evol 2017 Apr;7(7):2204-2213.
          doi: 10.1002/ece3.2814pubmed: 28405284google scholar: lookup
        9. Weiß BM, Kulik L, Ruiz-Lambides AV, Widdig A. Individual dispersal decisions affect fitness via maternal rank effects in male rhesus macaques. Sci Rep 2016 Aug 31;6:32212.
          doi: 10.1038/srep32212pubmed: 27576465google scholar: lookup
        10. Dahirel M, Vardakis M, Ansart A, Madec L. Density-dependence across dispersal stages in a hermaphrodite land snail: insights from discrete choice models. Oecologia 2016 Aug;181(4):1117-28.
          doi: 10.1007/s00442-016-3636-zpubmed: 27139427google scholar: lookup
        11. Debeffe L, Focardi S, Bonenfant C, Hewison AJ, Morellet N, Vanpé C, Heurich M, Kjellander P, Linnell JD, Mysterud A, Pellerin M, Sustr P, Urbano F, Cagnacci F. A one night stand? Reproductive excursions of female roe deer as a breeding dispersal tactic. Oecologia 2014 Oct;176(2):431-43.
          doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3021-8pubmed: 25027183google scholar: lookup
        12. Ahn S, Redman EM, Gavriliuc S, Bellaw J, Gilleard JS, McLoughlin PD, Poissant J. Mixed strongyle parasite infections vary across host age and space in a population of feral horses. Parasitology 2024 Oct;151(12):1299-1316.
          doi: 10.1017/S0031182024001185pubmed: 39663810google scholar: lookup
        13. Corley M, Garcia de la Chica A, van der Heide G, Rotundo M, Caccone A, Fernandez-Duque E. Inbreeding avoidance, competition and natal dispersal in a pair-living, genetically monogamous mammal, Azara's owl monkey (Aotus azarae). R Soc Open Sci 2024 Aug;11(8):240379.
          doi: 10.1098/rsos.240379pubmed: 39113772google scholar: lookup
        14. Jreidini N, Green DM. Study methodology impacts density-dependent dispersal observations: a systematic review. Mov Ecol 2024 May 21;12(1):39.
          doi: 10.1186/s40462-024-00478-6pubmed: 38773669google scholar: lookup
        Subscribe to our newsletter
        Join 99,780 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.