Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2025; 156; 105754; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105754

Measuring emotional contagion in Horse-Human interactions: A systematic scoping review of methods and outcomes.

Abstract: Emotional contagion between horses and humans is a key aspect of their interaction, influencing welfare, training, and therapy, yet current methods for measuring this phenomenon lack standardization and consistency. Objective: The aim of this study was to verify what methods are used to assess emotional contagion in horse-human interactions, and what outcomes have been reported. Methods: A systematic search of Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Science Direct was conducted up to March 2024. Peer-reviewed studies assessing emotional transfer through behavioral and/or physiological measures were included; studies outside this scope were excluded. From n=486 records screened, n=104 met inclusion criteria. Behavioral indicators included body language, facial expressions, and vocalizations. Physiological indicators included heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), and cortisol concentrations. Results: Behavioral measures, particularly body language (73.1 %), were most frequently applied. Heart rate (49 %) and HRV (30.8 %) dominated physiological assessments, while cortisol was less often used. Studies combining behavioral and physiological methods, especially body language with heart rate or variability, provided more robust insights into emotional contagion. However, methodological inconsistencies and lack of standardized frameworks limited comparability across studies. Conclusions: Combining behavioral and physiological measures offers a more comprehensive assessment of emotional contagion in horse-human interactions. To advance this field, standardized frameworks, interdisciplinary collaboration, and integration of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and wearable devices are needed. These improvements could enhance reliability, enable real-time monitoring, and support evidence-based practices that benefit both horse welfare and human-horse interactions.
Publication Date: 2025-12-16 PubMed ID: 41412357DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105754Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Scoping Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study systematically reviewed how emotional contagion between horses and humans is measured, examining the methods used and the outcomes reported in existing research.
  • The goal was to identify common behavioral and physiological indicators and to assess the strengths and limitations of these approaches.

Introduction to Emotional Contagion in Horse-Human Interactions

  • Emotional contagion refers to the phenomenon where emotions are transferred from one individual to another, impacting behavior and physiological states.
  • In the context of horses and humans, emotional contagion is crucial because it influences:
    • Animal welfare
    • Training effectiveness
    • Therapeutic outcomes for humans
  • Despite its importance, there is currently no standardized or consistent method to measure emotional contagion between horses and humans.

Research Objectives

  • To systematically identify the methods used to assess emotional contagion in horse-human interactions.
  • To summarize the behavioral and physiological outcomes reported in the literature.

Methods

  • The researchers conducted a systematic literature search in multiple databases: Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Science Direct.
  • The search was conducted up to March 2024.
  • Inclusion criteria:
    • Peer-reviewed studies that assessed emotional transfer between horses and humans.
    • Studies that used behavioral and/or physiological measures.
  • Exclusion criteria:
    • Studies outside the emotional contagion scope.
  • From 486 screened records, 104 studies met criteria and were included for analysis.

Behavioral Measures

  • Behavioral indicators were the most commonly used methods to assess emotional contagion.
  • Key behavioral measures included:
    • Body language (used in 73.1% of studies) – such as posture, movement, and proximity.
    • Facial expressions – which can convey emotional states like relaxation or stress.
    • Vocalizations – sounds made by horses or humans related to emotional states (e.g., neighs, whinnies, or human tone).

Physiological Measures

  • Physiological indicators provided objective measures of emotional states.
  • Mostly used physiological measures were:
    • Heart rate (49% of studies) – increased or decreased rates can reflect emotional arousal.
    • Heart rate variability (HRV) (30.8%) – variability in heart beats indicating autonomic nervous system balance.
    • Cortisol concentration – a hormonal marker of stress, less frequently used.

Combined Behavioral and Physiological Approaches

  • Studies combining both types of measures tended to yield more comprehensive insights.
  • The most robust findings came from pairing body language with heart rate or HRV readings.
  • This multimodal assessment helps cross-validate emotional contagion indicators, increasing reliability.

Limitations and Challenges

  • There were significant methodological inconsistencies across studies, such as differing protocols, sample sizes, and analysis techniques.
  • Lack of standardized frameworks limits the ability to compare results across different studies reliably.
  • Variability in how emotions are defined and operationalized adds complexity to measuring emotional contagion.

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • A combined approach using both behavioral and physiological measures is recommended for a more thorough assessment of emotional contagion in horse-human interactions.
  • For future advancements, the study highlights the need for:
    • Development of standardized measurement frameworks to enable comparable and consistent results.
    • Interdisciplinary collaboration involving ethologists, physiologists, psychologists, and technology experts.
    • Integration of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence for data analysis and wearable devices that allow real-time monitoring.
  • Such improvements would enhance the reliability of measurements and support practices that improve welfare and interaction quality between horses and humans.

Implications

  • Better measurement tools can inform evidence-based training and therapeutic protocols.
  • Improved understanding of emotional contagion can strengthen bonds and communication between horses and humans.
  • Enhanced welfare strategies can be developed, leading to healthier, more positive horse-human relationships.

Cite This Article

APA
Tripon MA, Manolăchescu D, Papuc I, Daradics Z, Crecan CM. (2025). Measuring emotional contagion in Horse-Human interactions: A systematic scoping review of methods and outcomes. J Equine Vet Sci, 156, 105754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105754

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 156
Pages: 105754
PII: S0737-0806(25)00412-5

Researcher Affiliations

Tripon, Mirela Alexandra
  • Department of Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Mănăștur St. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Manolăchescu, Dan
  • Department of Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Mănăștur St. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Electronic address: dan.manolachescu@usamvcluj.ro.
Papuc, Ionel
  • Department of Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Mănăștur St. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Daradics, Zsofia
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Mănăștur St. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Crecan, Cristian Mihăiță
  • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Mănăștur St. 3-5, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses / psychology
  • Horses / physiology
  • Humans
  • Emotions
  • Animals
  • Heart Rate
  • Behavior, Animal
  • Human-Animal Interaction

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.