Meta-analysis of the Effect of Treatment Strategies for Nephrosplenic Entrapment of the Large Colon.
Abstract: A variety of treatment strategies for nephrosplenic entrapment of the large colon are reported, with conflicting evidence in the published literature as to the preferred treatment option. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic meta-analytical assessment of the efficacy of different treatment strategies in horses with confirmed or suspected nephrosplenic entrapment. This study involves meta-analysis including nonrandomized studies. A comprehensive literature search was performed from January 1970 to January 2017. Inclusion criteria were retrospective studies involving horses with confirmed and suspected nephrosplenic entrapment. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, with the effect size calculated as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was P < .05. Out of 84 peer reviewed publications that met the search criteria, 19 relevant studies were identified. Using an OR as the effect size, the meta-analysis noted that the choice of medical or surgical therapy had no statistically significant effect on survival (P = .134). Patients treated via the rolling technique were no more likely to resolve with medical management than those treated via jogging (P = .187). Patients treated with phenylephrine were no more likely to exhibit medical resolution than patients that did not receive phenylephrine, either when all medical treatment methods were considered (P = .290), or when rolling under general anesthesia was used (P = .331). Treatment strategy, including medical versus surgical therapy, does not affect the likelihood of resolution of nephrosplenic entrapment. However, the lack of randomized trials means the results should be treated with caution and case selection remains important..
Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2020-06-20 PubMed ID: 32797791DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103169Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Meta-Analysis
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research looks into various treatment methods for a condition known as nephrosplenic entrapment (a common cause of colic in horses) and assesses their efficacy through a procedure called ‘meta-analysis of non-randomized studies’. The study doesn’t find any particular treatment strategy more effective than the others, though it does caution that the results should be applied with discretion due to the lack of randomized trials.
Research Methodology
- The researchers conducted a comprehensive review of literature from 1970 to 2017 on nephrosplenic entrapment.
- The inclusion criteria for these studies were that they needed to be retrospective studies involving horses with confirmed and suspected cases of nephrosplenic entrapment.
- A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. The effect size was determined using an odds ratio (OR) and the confidence intervals were set at 95%.
- The study defined statistical significance as P < .05.
- Out of 84 peer-reviewed publications, 19 relevant studies were included in the analysis.
Findings
- The meta-analysis revealed that the type of therapy, medical or surgical, did not significantly impact survival outcomes.
- Horses treated with the rolling technique were not more likely to recover with the help of medical management than those treated via jogging.
- Patients treated with phenylephrine (a decongestant used to relieve stuffy nose and sinus congestion) were not more likely to show medical improvement than patients who did not receive the treatment. This was consistent whether all medical treatment methods were considered or when rolling under general anesthesia was used.
Conclusions
- The choice of treatment strategy, whether medical or surgical, does not appear to impact the chances of resolving nephrosplenic entrapment.
- Despite these results, the researchers advise us to approach this conclusion with caution due to a lack of randomized trials, underscoring that appropriate case selection is still vital.
Cite This Article
APA
Gillen A, Kottwitz J, Munsterman A.
(2020).
Meta-analysis of the Effect of Treatment Strategies for Nephrosplenic Entrapment of the Large Colon.
J Equine Vet Sci, 92, 103169.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2020.103169 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Science, Philip Leverhulme Equine Hospital, University of Liverpool, Neston, Cheshire, UK. Electronic address: alexandra.gillen@liverpool.ac.uk.
- Department of Veterinary Pharmacology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
- Department of Veterinary Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Colic / veterinary
- Colon
- Horse Diseases
- Horses
- Phenylephrine
- Retrospective Studies
Citations
This article has been cited 1 times.- Normandeau J. Non-surgical correction of nephrosplenic entrapment and colitis in a Quarter Horse. Can Vet J 2022 Dec;63(12):1255-1257.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists