Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2019; 51(5); 575-580; doi: 10.1111/evj.13087

Misoprostol is superior to combined omeprazole-sucralfate for the treatment of equine gastric glandular disease.

Abstract: Previous studies have demonstrated a poor response to healing of gastric glandular lesions with oral omeprazole and other medications. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of two novel treatments (misoprostol [M] and combined omeprazole-sucralfate [OS]) in horses for gastric glandular disease. Methods: Prospective, clinical study. Methods: Sixty-three sports horses with grade >1/4 glandular disease were identified by gastroscopy. Horses received either 5 μg/kg of misoprostol per os BID 1 h prior to feeding or a combination of 4 mg/kg enteric coated omeprazole per os SID and 12 mg/kg sucralfate per os BID where drugs were given 1 h prior to feeding and sucralfate given 60 min after omeprazole; allocation was dependent upon centre. Gastroscopy was repeated at 28-35 days. Evaluators of the gastroscopy images were blinded to the treatments the horses received and images were reviewed independently. Results: The most common presenting sign in both treatment groups was poor performance (Overall - 65.1%; M - 60.5% and OS - 75%). Overall healing (P<0.001; OR = 11 [2.8-45]) and improvement (P = 0.006; OR = 11 [1.9-59]) of lesions were associated with resolution of clinical signs. Misoprostol was shown to be superior to combined omeprazole-sucralfate both for healing (M - 72% [95% CI 43-67] and OS - 20% [95% CI 7-41]; P<0.001) and improvement (M - 98% [95% CI 90-100] and OS - 65% [95% CI 43-83]; P<0.001). Conclusions: Relatively small, clinical study, reliance on client questionnaire data, clients not blinded to the treatments the horse received, diet could have affected drug pharmacodynamics although mimics clinical practice and no validated scoring system available for glandular lesions. Conclusions: These results suggest that gastric glandular disease does indeed result in clinical signs. In this population of horses, misoprostol was superior to omeprazole and sucralfate and warrants further evaluation in a large scale, multi-centre trial.
Publication Date: 2019-03-21 PubMed ID: 30809869DOI: 10.1111/evj.13087Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Veterinary
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article reveals that Misoprostol is better than a combination of omeprazole-sucralfate in treating gastric glandular diseases in horses. The study claims that faster healing and improvement of glandular lesions were reported in horses subjected to Misoprostol.

Objectives and Methods

  • The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of Misoprostol and a combination of omeprazole and sucralfate in treating gastric glandular diseases in horses.
  • The experiment was carried out on sixty-three sports horses identified with gastric glandular diseases.
  • The animals were either treated with Misoprostol or a combination of omeprazole-sucralfate.
  • Following the implementation of treatments, a repeated gastroscopy was performed after 28-35 days.

Results

  • It was observed that the common signal in both treatment groups was poor performance – 65.1% in overall terms, 60.5% in the Misoprostol group, and 75% in the omeprazole-sucralfate group.
  • The healing and improvement of lesions were significantly associated with the resolution of clinical signs.
  • Misoprostol was found to be superior to the combination of omeprazole-sucralfate in terms of healing rated at 72% vs 20% and improvement rated at 98% vs 65%.

Conclusion

  • The research concludes that gastric glandular disease does result in clinical signs in horses.
  • In the sample population of horses, Misoprostol yielded more promising results than the combined usage of omeprazole and sucralfate.
  • The study suggests the need for a larger-scale, multi-centre trial to further evaluate Misoprostol in treating the said disease in horses.
  • The study had its limitations including its relatively small size, reliance on client-provided data, and the potential influence of diet on drug pharmacodynamics.

Cite This Article

APA
Varley G, Bowen IM, Habershon-Butcher JL, Nicholls V, Hallowell GD. (2019). Misoprostol is superior to combined omeprazole-sucralfate for the treatment of equine gastric glandular disease. Equine Vet J, 51(5), 575-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13087

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 51
Issue: 5
Pages: 575-580

Researcher Affiliations

Varley, G
  • Gibbs Marsh Equine, Dorset, UK.
Bowen, I M
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.
Habershon-Butcher, J L
  • British Horseracing Authority Ltd, London, UK.
Nicholls, V
  • School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, UK.
Hallowell, G D
  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Ulcer Agents / administration & dosage
  • Anti-Ulcer Agents / therapeutic use
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Gastric Mucosa / pathology
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horses
  • Male
  • Misoprostol / therapeutic use
  • Odds Ratio
  • Omeprazole / administration & dosage
  • Omeprazole / therapeutic use
  • Stomach Diseases / drug therapy
  • Stomach Diseases / pathology
  • Stomach Diseases / veterinary
  • Sucralfate / administration & dosage
  • Sucralfate / therapeutic use

Grant Funding

  • School of Veterinary Medicine and Science
  • University of Nottingham

Citations

This article has been cited 9 times.
  1. Vokes J, Lovett A, Sykes B. Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome: An Update on Current Knowledge. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 5;13(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13071261pubmed: 37048517google scholar: lookup
  2. Pratt SL, Bowen M, Hallowell GH, Shipman E, Bailey J, Redpath A. Does lesion type or severity predict outcome of therapy for horses with equine glandular gastric disease? - A retrospective study. Vet Med Sci 2023 Jan;9(1):150-157.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.1034pubmed: 36495212google scholar: lookup
  3. Pratt S, Bowen I, Hallowell G, Shipman E, Redpath A. Assessment of agreement using the equine glandular gastric disease grading system in 84 cases. Vet Med Sci 2022 Jul;8(4):1472-1477.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.807pubmed: 35412651google scholar: lookup
  4. Gough S, Hallowell G, Rendle D. Evaluation of the treatment of equine glandular gastric disease with either long-acting-injectable or oral omeprazole. Vet Med Sci 2022 Mar;8(2):561-567.
    doi: 10.1002/vms3.728pubmed: 35167731google scholar: lookup
  5. Banse HE, Andrews FM. Equine glandular gastric disease: prevalence, impact and management strategies. Vet Med (Auckl) 2019;10:69-76.
    doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S174427pubmed: 31406687google scholar: lookup
  6. Zhou K, Dong Z, Zhou X, Zhai B, Li B, Zhang J, Cheng F. The Prevalence of Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in 395 Horses in Jiangyin City, China, Jiangsu Province. Animals (Basel) 2024 Dec 17;14(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14243636pubmed: 39765539google scholar: lookup
  7. Busechian S, Orvieto S, Nocera I, Rueca F. Presence of Gastric Ulcers in Horses Used for Historical Races in Italy. Animals (Basel) 2024 Apr 22;14(8).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14081247pubmed: 38672395google scholar: lookup
  8. Paul LJ, Ericsson AC, Andrews FM, McAdams Z, Keowen ML, St Blanc MP, Banse HE. Field study examining the mucosal microbiome in equine glandular gastric disease. PLoS One 2023;18(12):e0295697.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295697pubmed: 38060520google scholar: lookup
  9. Martin EM, Schirmer JM, Jones SL, Davis JL. Pharmacokinetics and ex vivo anti-inflammatory effects of oral misoprostol in horses. Equine Vet J 2019 May;51(3):415-421.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13024pubmed: 30256450google scholar: lookup