Analyze Diet
Animal biotechnology2024; 35(1); 2390935; doi: 10.1080/10495398.2024.2390935

Molecular identification of haemoparasites in animals using blood lysate PCR: a quick and inexpensive alternative to purified whole genomic DNA.

Abstract: Haemoparasitic diseases constitute a significant constraint to economic livestock farming. Diagnostic techniques that are inexpensive, rapid, reliable, and precise are crucial for the management of diseases. In this context, PCR assays are very valuable yet expensive since the samples must be processed before being included in the PCR reaction. Accordingly, the goal of the current study was to lower the PCR costs without jeopardizing the assay's sensitivity and specificity. For that purpose, the alkaline solution was optimized for low cost and quick DNA extraction (blood lysate), and PCR reagents were modified for optimum reaction. In comparison to purified whole blood genomic DNA, the currently developed and optimized blood lysate method was found to be 95.5% less expensive, as well as being equally sensitive and specific for the molecular detection (PCR) of haemoparasites like , and rickettsiales in cattle, buffaloes, horses, and dogs. The assay was also demonstrated to be quick, less likely to cross-contaminate, and appropriate for use in laboratories with limited resources. Therefore, the currently developed and optimized blood lysate method could serve as a viable alternative to purified whole blood genomic DNA for molecular detection (PCR) of haemoparasites in animals particularly in resource-limited settings.
Publication Date: 2024-08-13 PubMed ID: 39136443PubMed Central: PMC12674356DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2024.2390935Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study developed and optimized a rapid, inexpensive PCR method using blood lysate instead of purified whole genomic DNA to detect haemoparasitic infections in animals.
  • The optimized method maintains high sensitivity and specificity while drastically reducing the cost and processing time, making it suitable for resource-limited laboratories.

Background

  • Haemoparasitic diseases are a major economic burden on livestock farming globally due to their impact on animal health and productivity.
  • Accurate, rapid, and affordable diagnostic methods are essential for effective management and control of these infections.
  • PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) techniques are highly valuable for detecting haemoparasites at the molecular level but traditionally require purified genomic DNA from blood samples.
  • DNA purification steps tend to be time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly, limiting PCR use in many field or resource-poor settings.

Goals of the Study

  • To develop a quick and cost-effective method for DNA preparation directly from blood samples without full genomic DNA purification.
  • To optimize an alkaline lysis solution that effectively releases DNA into a blood lysate suitable for PCR.
  • To adjust PCR reagents and conditions to maintain sensitivity and specificity equivalent to those achieved with purified DNA templates.
  • To validate this new approach across a range of haemoparasite species and animal hosts important in veterinary practice.

Methods

  • Blood samples were collected from animals such as cattle, buffaloes, horses, and dogs potentially infected with haemoparasites.
  • An alkaline solution was optimized for lysing blood cells quickly and cost-effectively to release parasite DNA without the need for DNA purification kits.
  • PCR reagent concentrations and cycling parameters were modified to maximize amplification success using blood lysate as the template.
  • The assay’s performance was compared to standard PCR using purified whole genomic DNA as the template.
  • Parasites targeted in the assay included common haemoparasites and rickettsial pathogens relevant to livestock health.

Findings

  • The blood lysate PCR method reduced the cost by approximately 95.5% compared to conventional PCR requiring purified DNA.
  • The sensitivity (ability to detect true positives) and specificity (ability to avoid false positives) of PCR with blood lysate were comparable to those using purified genomic DNA.
  • The new method considerably decreased assay processing time, facilitating quicker diagnosis.
  • Due to the streamlined process, the assay lowered the risk of cross-contamination, an important consideration in diagnostic labs.
  • The method was versatile across multiple haemoparasite species and different animal hosts, indicating broad applicability.
  • Its simplicity and low resource requirements make it ideal for laboratories with limited infrastructure or funding.

Implications

  • This optimized blood lysate PCR method offers a practical alternative to the standard purified DNA PCR assays for haemoparasite diagnosis.
  • It enables faster, cheaper, and reliable detection of haemoparasites, which is especially vital in low-resource or field conditions.
  • By lowering barriers to molecular diagnostics, the method can improve surveillance, disease management, and control programs in veterinary settings.
  • Additional validation and adaptation could expand its use to other infectious diseases in veterinary and potentially human medicine.

Conclusion

  • The study successfully demonstrated that PCR using an optimized blood lysate preparation is a sensitive, specific, quick, and cost-efficient alternative to purified DNA PCR for detecting haemoparasites.
  • This method is well-suited for resource-limited laboratories aiming to enhance diagnostic capacity for economically significant haemoparasitic diseases in animals.

Cite This Article

APA
Kumar B, Brahmbhatt NN, Thakre B, Maharana BR, Parmar VL, Kumar M. (2024). Molecular identification of haemoparasites in animals using blood lysate PCR: a quick and inexpensive alternative to purified whole genomic DNA. Anim Biotechnol, 35(1), 2390935. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2024.2390935

Publication

ISSN: 1532-2378
NlmUniqueID: 9011409
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 35
Issue: 1
Pages: 2390935
PII: 2390935

Researcher Affiliations

Kumar, Binod
  • Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh, India.
Brahmbhatt, Nilima N
  • Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh, India.
Thakre, Bhupendrakumar
  • Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh, India.
Maharana, Biswa Ranjan
  • Referral Veterinary Diagnostic and Extension Centre, LUVAS, Karnal, India.
Parmar, Vijay L
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Kamdhenu University, Junagadh, India.
Kumar, Manoj
  • Central Animal House, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Buffaloes
  • Cattle
  • Horses
  • Dogs
  • Babesia / isolation & purification
  • Babesia / genetics
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Trypanosoma / isolation & purification
  • Trypanosoma / genetics
  • DNA, Protozoan / genetics
  • Theileria / isolation & purification
  • Theileria / genetics
  • DNA / blood
  • DNA / isolation & purification
  • Cattle Diseases / diagnosis
  • Cattle Diseases / parasitology
  • Cattle Diseases / blood
  • Dog Diseases / blood

Conflict of Interest Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

This article includes 32 references
  1. Solano-Gallego L, Sainz Á, Roura X. A review of canine babesiosis: the European perspective.. 2016;9(1):336.
    pmc: PMC4902949pubmed: 27289223
  2. Momčilović S, Cantacessi C, Arsić-Arsenijević V. Rapid diagnosis of parasitic diseases: current scenario and future needs.. 2019;25(3):290–309.
    pubmed: 29730224
  3. Thakre BJ, Kumar B, Vagh A. Comparative studies on detection of infection by clinical, parasitological and molecular techniques in buffaloes ().. 2023;93(6):641–652.
  4. Kumar B, Maharana BR, Thakre B. 18S rRNA gene-based piroplasmid PCR: an assay for rapid and precise molecular screening of and species in animals.. 2022;67(4):1697–1707.
    pmc: PMC9523193pubmed: 36178614
  5. Yang S, Rothman RE. PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings.. 2004;4(6):337–348.
    pmc: PMC7106425pubmed: 15172342
  6. Nishimura N, Nakayama T, Tonoike H. Direct polymerase chain reaction from whole blood without DNA isolation.. 2000;37(Pt 5):674–680.
    pubmed: 11026521
  7. Bu Y, Huang H, Zhou G. Direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from human whole blood and filter-paper-dried blood by using a PCR buffer with a higher pH.. 2008;375(2):370–372.
    pubmed: 18249179
  8. Green MR, Sambrook J. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual.. In . CSHL Press, New York, 2012:1890.
  9. Nordvåg B-Y, Riise HMF, Husby G. [2] Direct use of blood in PCR.. 1995;25:26–15.
  10. Kricke S, Mhaldien L, Fernandes R. Chimerism analysis in the pediatric setting: direct PCR from bone marrow, whole blood, and cell fractions.. 2018;20(3):381–388.
    pubmed: 29474984
  11. Geiger K, Leiherer A, Brandtner EM. Direct blood PCR: TaqMan-probe based detection of the venous thromboembolism associated mutations factor V Leiden and prothrombin c.20210G > A without DNA extraction.. 2019;488:221–225.
    pubmed: 30439355
  12. Govindarajan N, Lemalu A, Patel J. Forensic casework methodology for direct PCR amplification of blood swabs.. 2019;42:125–134.
    pubmed: 31306933
  13. Nogueira TLS, Oliveira TP, Braz EBV. Mitochondrial DNA direct PCR sequencing of blood FTA paper.. 2015;5:e611–e613.
  14. Hailemariam Z, Krücken J, Baumann M. Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in cattle from Southwestern Ethiopia.. 2017;12(11):e0188248.
    pmc: PMC5695778pubmed: 29155863
  15. Alyethodi RR, Singh U, Kumar S. Designing, optimization, and validation of whole blood direct T-ARMS PCR for precise and rapid genotyping of complex vertebral malformation in cattle.. 2021;21(1):36.
    pmc: PMC8141239pubmed: 34022869
  16. Martin B, Linacre A. Direct PCR: a review of use and limitations.. 2020;60(4):303–310.
    pubmed: 32650932
  17. Singh I, Swarup V, Shakya S. Single-step blood direct PCR: A robust and rapid method to diagnose triplet repeat disorders.. 2017;379:49–54.
    pubmed: 28716278
  18. Ganguly A, Bisla RS, Ganguly I. Direct blood PCR detection of and its effect on haematological and biochemical profile in crossbred cattle of eastern Haryana.. 2017;51:141–145.
  19. Roth JM, de Bes L, Sawa P. Plasmodium detection and differentiation by direct-on-blood PCR nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay: development, validation, and evaluation.. 2018;20(1):78–86.
    pubmed: 29056574
  20. Chen KY, Xu JX, Wang MM. Single probe PCR melting curve analysis MTHFR C677T SNP sites.. 2021;619:114102.
    pubmed: 33450284
  21. Bilgic HB, Karagenç T, Shiels B. Evaluation of cytochrome b as a sensitive target for PCR based detection of carrier animals.. 2010;174(3–4):341–347.
    pubmed: 20880635
  22. Kamau J, de Vos AJ, Playford M. Emergence of new types of in Australian cattle and possible cause of theileriosis outbreaks.. 2011;4(1):22.
    pmc: PMC3050848pubmed: 21338493
  23. Kumar B, Maharana BR, Brahmbhatt NN. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay based on RoTat1.2 gene for detection of in domesticated animals.. 2021;120(5):1873–1882.
    pubmed: 33712930
  24. Murphy GL, Ewing SA, Whitworth LC. A molecular and serologic survey of , and in dogs and ticks from Oklahoma.. 1998;79(4):325–339.
    pubmed: 9831955
  25. Wang LX, He L, Fang R. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for detection of infection targeting the p33 gene.. 2010;171(1-2):159–162.
    pubmed: 20334978
  26. Uilenberg G. International collaborative research: significance of tick-borne hemoparasitic diseases to world animal health.. 1995;57(1–3):19–41.
    pubmed: 7597784
  27. Azhahianambi P, Ghosh S, Ashok Kumar C. Cost effectiveness of colony lysis and colony PCR methods for screening of recombinant colonies–a comparative study.. 2008;46(10):731–735.
    pubmed: 19024172
  28. Jamal MAHM, Sharma SP, Chung HJ. Ultra-high efficient colony PCR for high throughput screening of bacterial genes.. 2017;57(3):365–369.
    pmc: PMC5574782pubmed: 28904423
  29. Yamazaki-Matsune W, Taguchi M, Seto K. Development of a multiplex PCR assay for identification of subsp. hyointestinalis, and .. 2007;56(Pt 11):1467–1473.
    pubmed: 17965346
  30. Takano A, Toyomane K, Konnai S. Tick surveillance for relapsing fever spirochete in Hokkaido, Japan.. 2014;9(8):e104532.
    pmc: PMC4128717pubmed: 25111141
  31. Masatani T, Hayashi K, Andoh M. Detection and molecular characterization of and species in hard ticks collected from Kagoshima, the southern region in Japan.. 2017;8(4):581–587.
    pubmed: 28501503
  32. Yamazaki Y, Thongchankaew-Seo U, Nagao K. Development and evaluation of a point-of-care test with a combination of EZ-Fast DNA extraction and real-time PCR and LAMP detection: evaluation using blood samples containing the bovine leukaemia DNA.. 2020;71(6):560–566.
    pubmed: 32852051

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.