Analyze Diet
Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS2021; 26(4); 530-539; doi: 10.1080/10888705.2021.2008249

Monitoring Blinks And Eyelid Twitches In Horses To Assess Stress During The Samples Collection Process.

Abstract: To assess stress in horses, a method of monitoring eye blinks (full and half) and eyelid twitches while collecting saliva and blood samples before and after annual intensive police training was carried out. This noninvasive monitoring method was used to determine whether blood collection, which is considered invasive, is more stressful for horses than saliva collection. We discovered no significant difference in stress related manifestations between saliva sampling and blood collection in our study. In both cases, sampling (blood and saliva) reduced the number of full and half eye blinks. Based on our hypothesis, we expected a statistically significant changes in the number of eye blinks and eyelid twitches as the number of potential stressors increased (in our case, we considered police training and sampling). Saliva cortisol levels, on the other hand, revealed that police training for horses was not stressful. The method of measuring eye blinks and eyelid twitches appears to be an appropriate alternative method for monitoring stress factors in horses.
Publication Date: 2021-12-13 PubMed ID: 34894896DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2021.2008249Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper is about assessing stress in horses via monitoring eye blinks and eyelid twitches during saliva and blood sample collection and after police training, and determining if these are viable methods of evaluating stress in horses.

Methodology

  • The research was conducted to understand the stress levels in horses through the process of finding and monitoring eye blinks (full and half), and eyelid twitches.
  • This method was utilized while collecting blood and saliva samples from horses before and after they underwent annual intensive police training.
  • The focus of the research was to evaluate whether the collection of blood, typically perceived as a more invasive sampling technique, is more stressful for the horses than saliva collection.

Findings

  • Researchers found no significant difference in stress-related manifestations between the saliva sampling and blood collection processes in horses.
  • It was observed that in both sampling cases (blood and saliva), the number of full and half eye blinks reduced. This reduction may suggest that the sampling act itself could induce some level of stress in horses.

Hypothesis

  • Based on the hypotheses set at the beginning of the research, an increase in potential stressors was expected to bring statistically significant changes in the number of eye blinks and eyelid twitches.
  • The potential stressors in this case were identified as, police training and the various sampling processes.

Cortisol Levels

  • Despite the intensive training they received, saliva cortisol levels indicated that the police training seemed not to significantly stress the horses.

Conclusion

  • The researchers concluded that the method applied in the study, measuring the number of eye blinks and eyelid twitches, appears to be adequate in determining stress levels in horses.
  • This method may offer a less-invasive, alternative approach for monitoring stress factors in horses and thereby maximizing their well-being.

Cite This Article

APA
Lelláková M, Pavľak A, Lešková L, Florián M, Skurková L, Mesarčová L, Kottferová L, Takáčová D, Kottferová J. (2021). Monitoring Blinks And Eyelid Twitches In Horses To Assess Stress During The Samples Collection Process. J Appl Anim Welf Sci, 26(4), 530-539. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2021.2008249

Publication

ISSN: 1532-7604
NlmUniqueID: 9804404
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 26
Issue: 4
Pages: 530-539

Researcher Affiliations

Lelláková, Monika
  • Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, The Slovak Republic.
Pavľak, Alexander
  • Department of Nutrition and Animal Breeding, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, The Slovak Republic.
Lešková, Lenka
  • Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, The Slovak Republic.
Florián, Martin
  • Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, The Slovak Republic.
Skurková, Lenka
  • Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, The Slovak Republic.
Mesarčová, Lýdia
  • Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, The Slovak Republic.
Kottferová, Lucia
  • University Veterinary Hospital, Clinic of Birds, Exotic and Free-living Animals, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, The Slovak Republic.
Takáčová, Daniela
  • Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, The Slovak Republic.
Kottferová, Jana
  • Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Košice, The Slovak Republic.