FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Trauma Nurs / Motorcycle and Equestrian Trauma: An ACS TQIP Comparative St...
Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses2025; 32(1); 15-22; doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000828

Motorcycle and Equestrian Trauma: An ACS TQIP Comparative Study.

Abstract: Motorcycle and equestrian accidents can share similar trauma mechanisms and can result in serious injuries. Objective: This study aims to analyze variations in injuries and safety standards through types, severity, and outcomes of traumatic injuries in both motorcycle and equestrian riders. Methods: Using the 2020 ACS TQIP database, we split patients into two groups based on their primary injury. We chose codes V28 and V80.0 to identify non-collision fall or throw injuries for motorcycle and equestrian accidents respectively. A total of 17,730 motorcycle and 5,461 equestrian patients were identified. Results: Motorcyclists were more likely to experience external/superficial injuries (41.34% vs. 29.08%, p < .001) and chest trauma (5.15% vs. 3.18%, p < .001), while equestrian trauma resulted in more injuries to the abdomen and pelvic content (24.07% vs. 15.75%, p < .001), extremities and pelvic girdle (9.85% vs. 4.98%, p < .001), and head/neck (15.57% vs. 12.16%, p < .001) comparatively. Motorcyclists also had a higher average length of inpatient stay (6.06 (8.03) vs. 4.32 (4.23) days, p < .001). Helmet use was more common among motorcyclists than horseback riders (57.79% vs. 24.24%, p < .001). The average injury severity score between the two groups was not significantly different. Conclusions: These data show the different injuries observed between both activities and the need for increased safety equipment, especially in the case of hip and pelvic injuries among equestrians. The low rate of helmet, especially among equestrian riders, is concerning despite broad education regarding their benefits.
Copyright © 2025 Society of Trauma Nurses.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-01-27 PubMed ID: 39879267DOI: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000828Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Comparative Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Overview

  • This study compares injury patterns, severity, and safety equipment use between motorcycle and equestrian trauma using data from the 2020 ACS TQIP database.
  • It identifies differences in injury types and outcomes, highlighting areas for improved safety measures, especially helmet use among equestrian riders.

Study Purpose and Background

  • Motorcycle and equestrian accidents often involve similar trauma mechanisms such as falls or throws.
  • Despite this, injury types, severity, and safety practices may differ due to factors like protective equipment and riding dynamics.
  • The study aims to analyze and compare variations in traumatic injuries and safety standards between these two groups.

Data Source and Methods

  • Data was obtained from the 2020 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS TQIP) database.
  • Patients were divided into two groups based on injury coding:
    • Motorcycles: code V28 – non-collision fall or throw injuries associated with motorcycle accidents.
    • Equestrian: code V80.0 – non-collision fall or throw injuries associated with horse riding accidents.
  • Total patients analyzed:
    • 17,730 motorcyclists
    • 5,461 equestrian riders

Key Findings on Injury Patterns

  • Motorcycle Riders:
    • More likely to sustain external/superficial injuries (41.34% vs. 29.08%)
    • Higher incidence of chest trauma (5.15% vs. 3.18%)
  • Equestrian Riders:
    • Higher frequency of abdominal and pelvic content injuries (24.07% vs. 15.75%)
    • More extremity and pelvic girdle injuries (9.85% vs. 4.98%)
    • Greater head and neck injuries (15.57% vs. 12.16%)

Severity, Hospital Stay, and Safety Equipment Usage

  • Average Injury Severity Score:
    • No statistically significant difference between motorcyclists and equestrians.
  • Length of Inpatient Stay:
    • Longer for motorcyclists (average 6.06 days) compared to equestrians (4.32 days).
  • Helmet Use:
    • More prevalent in motorcyclists (57.79%) than equestrian riders (24.24%).
    • Indicates a potential area for safety improvements, especially among equestrians.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Distinct injury profiles exist between motorcyclists and equestrian riders; for instance, equestrians suffer more pelvic and extremity injuries.
  • The similar injury severity scores suggest both activities carry substantial injury risks despite different injury patterns.
  • Motorcyclists’ greater use of helmets correlates with injury types but shows room for improvement in protecting other injury sites.
  • Low helmet use among equestrian riders highlights the need for enhanced education and safety enforcement in this community.
  • Recommendations include increasing protective equipment use—particularly for hips and pelvis in equestrians—to reduce injury severity and improve outcomes.

Cite This Article

APA
Ross DE, Ghodasara SK, Roskam JS, Gaccione AG, DiFazio LT, Bilaniuk JW, Nemeth ZH. (2025). Motorcycle and Equestrian Trauma: An ACS TQIP Comparative Study. J Trauma Nurs, 32(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000828

Publication

Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses
ISSN: 1078-7496
NlmUniqueID: 9512997
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 32
Issue: 1
Pages: 15-22

Researcher Affiliations

Ross, Daniel E
  • Department of Surgery, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, New Jersey.
Ghodasara, Satyam K
    Roskam, Justin S
      Gaccione, Amanda G
        DiFazio, Louis T
          Bilaniuk, Jaroslaw W
            Nemeth, Zoltan H

              MeSH Terms

              • Humans
              • Motorcycles / statistics & numerical data
              • Male
              • Female
              • Adult
              • Accidents, Traffic / statistics & numerical data
              • Wounds and Injuries / epidemiology
              • Injury Severity Score
              • Middle Aged
              • Horses
              • Animals

              Conflict of Interest Statement

              The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

              References

              This article includes 37 references
              1. Analysis NHTSA. Motorcycle helmet use in 2021 – Overall results. .
              2. Asa N, Newton A, Sullivan L, Shi J, Wheeler K, Smith GA, Yang J. Horseback riding-related injuries treated in emergency departments: Risk factors and prevention strategies. Journal of Safety Research 71, 251–257.
                doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.004google scholar: lookup
              3. Bahloul M, Dlela M, Bouchaala K, Kallel H, Ben Hamida C, Chelly H, Bouaziz M. Post-traumatic pulmonary embolism: Incidence, physiopathology, risk factors of early occurrence, and impact outcome. A narrative review. American Journal of Cardiovascular Disease 10(4), 432–443.
              4. Balakrishnan A, Abbadi R, Oakland K, Jamdar S, Harper SJ, Jamieson NV, Huguet EL, Jah A, Praseedom RK. Outcomes following liver trauma in equestrian accidents. Journal of Trauma management & Outcomes 8(1), 13.
                doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-8-13google scholar: lookup
              5. Bilaniuk JW, Adams JM, DiFazio LT, Siegel BK, Allegra JR, Lujan JJ, Durling-Grover R, Pawar J, Rolandelli RH, Nemeth ZH. Equestrian trauma: Injury patterns vary among age groups. The American Surgeon 80(4), 396–402.
                doi: 10.1177/000313481408000424google scholar: lookup
              6. Burns ST, Gugala Z, Jimenez CJ, Mileski WJ, Lindsey RW. Epidemiology and patterns of musculoskeletal motorcycle injuries in the USA. F1000Research 4, 114.
                doi: 10.12688/f1000research.4995.1google scholar: lookup
              7. Castana O, Dagdelenis J, Rempelos G, Paneris P, Anagiotos G, Diplas D, Alexakis D. Traumatic injuries with deep abrasion: “A burn”. Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters 22(1), 44–47.
              8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC. Horseback-riding-associated traumatic brain injuries – Oklahoma, 1992-1994. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 45(10), 209–211.
                doi: 10.1001/jama.1996.03530380014009google scholar: lookup
              9. de Rome L, Ivers R, Fitzharris M, Du W, Haworth N, Heritier S, Richardson D. Motorcycle protective clothing: Protection from injury or just the weather?. Accident Analysis & Prevention 43(6), 1893–1900.
                doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.027google scholar: lookup
              10. Dischinger PC, Ryb GE, Ho SM, Braver ER. Injury patterns and severity among hospitalized motorcyclists: A comparison of younger and older riders. Annual Proceedings Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine 50, 237–249.
              11. American Horse Council. Economic impact of the United States horse industry. .
              12. Francis AO, McCabe F, McCabe P, O’Daly BJ, Leonard M. Pelvic and acetabular trauma in amateur equestrian enthusiasts – A retrospective review. The Surgeon 20(3), 164–168.
                doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.04.001google scholar: lookup
              13. Havlik HS. Equestrian sport-related injuries: A review of current literature. Current Sports Medicine Reports 9(5), 299–302.
                doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181f32056google scholar: lookup
              14. Hoffmann MF, Bernstorff M, Kreitz N, Roetman B, Schildhauer TA, Wenning KE. Horse-related injury patterns: A single center report. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 18(1), 83.
                doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03549-3google scholar: lookup
              15. Kraus JF, Peek-Asa C, Cryer HG. Incidence, severity, and patterns of intrathoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in motorcycle crashes. The Journal of Trauma 52(3), 548–553.
                doi: 10.1097/00005373-200203000-00022google scholar: lookup
              16. Krishnan S, Karg P E, Boninger M L, Brienza D M. Association between presence of pneumonia and pressure ulcer formation following traumatic spinal cord injury. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 40(4), 415–422.
                doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1180099google scholar: lookup
              17. Link M S. Commotio cordis: Ventricular fibrillation triggered by chest impact-induced abnormalities in repolarization. Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 5(2), 425–432.
                doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.962712google scholar: lookup
              18. Liu H T, Liang C C, Rau C S, Hsu S Y, Hsieh C H. Alcohol-related hospitalizations of adult motorcycle riders. World Journal of Emergency Surgery 10(1), 2.
                doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-10-2google scholar: lookup
              19. Ma X, Dong Z, Wang Y, Gu P, Fang J, Gao S. Risk factors analysis of thoracic trauma complicated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and observation of curative effect of lung-protective ventilation. Frontiers in Surgery 8, 826682.
                doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.826682google scholar: lookup
              20. Mastellar S L. Equestrian injury statistics. .
              21. Mauffrey C, Hak D J, Martin M P. Compartment syndrome: A guide to diagnosis and management. .
              22. Mayberry J C, Pearson T E, Wiger K J, Diggs B S, Mullins R J. Equestrian injury prevention efforts need more attention to novice riders. The Journal of Trauma 62(3), 735–739.
                doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e318031b5d4google scholar: lookup
              23. Morris C C. Motorcycle Trends in the United States. .
              24. . Motorcycle helmet use laws. .
              25. . Motorcycles. .
              26. . Motorcycles registered in the United States, 2002–2023. .
              27. Nakao S, Katayama Y, Hirayama A, Hirose T, Ishida K, Umemura Y, Tachino J, Kiguchi T, Matsuyama T, Kiyohara K. Characteristics and outcomes of pediatric blunt renal trauma: A nationwide cohort study in japan. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 48(3), 2047–2057.
                doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01795-wgoogle scholar: lookup
              28. Nielsen S Jr, O’Connor D, Kaul S, Sharma J, Napolitano M, Simonian G, Blatt M, Zielonka T, Nyirenda T, Cohn S. Early detection of deep venous thrombosis in trauma patients. Cureus 12(7), e9370.
                doi: 10.7759/cureus.9370google scholar: lookup
              29. Olsen C S, Thomas A M, Singleton M, Gaichas A M, Smith T J, Smith G A, Peng J, Bauer M J, Qu M, Yeager D. Motorcycle helmet effectiveness in reducing head, face and brain injuries by state and helmet law. Injury Epidemiology 3(1), 8.
                doi: 10.1186/s40621-016-0072-9google scholar: lookup
              30. Papachristos A, Edwards E, Dowrick A, Gosling C. A description of the severity of equestrian-related injuries (ERIs) using clinical parameters and patient-reported outcomes. Injury 45(9), 1484-1487.
              31. Peek-Asa C, Kraus J F. Alcohol use, driver, and crash characteristics among injured motorcycle drivers. The Journal of Trauma 41(6), 989–993.
                doi: 10.1097/00005373-199612000-00008google scholar: lookup
              32. Schwebach C, Vempati A. Alcohol withdrawal with delirium tremens. Journal of Education and Teaching in Emergency Medicine 8(3), S1–S33.
                doi: 10.21980/J8S35Ngoogle scholar: lookup
              33. Sorli J M. Equestrian injuries: A five year review of hospital admissions in british columbia, canada. Injury Prevention 6(1), 59–61.
                doi: 10.1136/ip.6.1.59google scholar: lookup
              34. Stanfill A G, Wynja K, Cao X, Prescott D, Shore S, Baughman B, Oddo A, Tsao J W. Helmet use in equestrian athletes: Opportunities for intervention. Concussion 6(1), CNC85.
                doi: 10.2217/cnc-2020-0019google scholar: lookup
              35. Thomas K E, Annest J L, Gilchrist J, Bixby-Hammett D M. Non-fatal horse related injuries treated in emergency departments in the United States, 2001-2003. British Journal of Sports medicine 40(7), 619–626.
                doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.025858google scholar: lookup
              36. Ueeck B A, Dierks E J, Homer L D, Potter B. Patterns of maxillofacial injuries related to interaction with horses. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 62(6), 693–696.
                doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.010google scholar: lookup
              37. Winkler E A, Yue J K, Burke J F, Chan A K, Dhall S S, Berger M S, Manley G T, Tarapore P E. Adult sports-related traumatic brain injury in United States trauma centers. Neurosurgical Focus 40(4), E4.
                doi: 10.3171/2016.1.FOCUS15613google scholar: lookup

              Citations

              This article has been cited 1 times.
              1. Duma LA, Begonia MT, Miller B, Jung C, Wood M, Duma BG, Rowson S. Equestrian STAR: Development of an Experimental Methodology for Assessing the Biomechanical Performance of Equestrian Helmets.. Ann Biomed Eng 2025 Sep;53(9):2309-2332.
                doi: 10.1007/s10439-025-03723-0pubmed: 40293632google scholar: lookup
              Subscribe to our newsletter
              Join 99,005 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.