Nictitating membrane resection in the horse: a comparison of long-term outcomes using local vs. general anaesthesia.
- Journal Article
- Anesthesia
- Clinical Examination
- Clinical Findings
- Clinical Pathology
- Clinical Signs
- Clinical Study
- Clinical Symptoms
- Disease Treatment
- Equine Health
- Horses
- Local Anaesthesia
- Neoplasm
- Post-Operative Period
- Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Surgery
- Veterinary Care
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Practice
- Veterinary Procedure
- Veterinary Research
Summary
The study evaluates if the type of anesthesia, local or general, impacts the recurrence of eye cancer in horses after the surgical removal of their nictitating membrane (a transparent or translucent third eyelid found in certain animals). It concludes that the anesthesia method has no significant effect on cancer recurrence and that the procedure has no harmful long-term effects on the horses’ eye health.
Study Goals and Methodology
The primary aims of the study included:
- Assessing long-term complications associated with the resection of the nictitating membrane in horses.
- Evaluating the rate of recurrence in horses after surgery, based on whether local or general anesthesia was used.
- Determining the impact of anesthesia choice on disease recurrence post-surgery.
To achieve these goals, the researchers reviewed the records of 26 horses that underwent the resection procedure due to primary neoplasia (new and abnormal growth of tissue) between 1999 and 2009. They recorded details like examination findings, the surgical process, anesthesia type, pathological findings, and any additional treatments given. They also contacted the horses’ owners to gather information on post-operative outcomes. The data was then analyzed using Fisher’s exact test.
Findings of the Study
The study concluded that:
- The common long-term side effect of nictitating membrane resection was a mild ocular discharge.
- Squamous cell carcinoma, a type of skin cancer, was the most frequently diagnosed disease in the histopathological results.
- On a rare occasion (2 out of the 26 horses studied), there was a recurrence of neoplasia.
- No noteworthy difference was found in neoplasia’s recurrence rate between horses receiving general anesthesia versus local anesthesia.
Conclusion and Implications
The study asserts that there are no significant differences in the recurrence rates of neoplasia in horses whether the surgery was performed under local or general anesthesia. Furthermore, the removal of the nictitating membrane in horses does not associate with any harmful ocular side effects in the long run. The findings suggest that this surgical procedure can effectively treat primary neoplasia of the nictitating membrane in certain cases. It can help veterinarians choose the appropriate anesthesia for operations and provide info about potential long-term outcomes.
Cite This Article
Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA. alabelle@illinois.edu
MeSH Terms
- Anesthesia, General / adverse effects
- Anesthesia, General / veterinary
- Anesthesia, Local / adverse effects
- Anesthesia, Local / veterinary
- Anesthetics, General / administration & dosage
- Anesthetics, General / adverse effects
- Anesthetics, General / pharmacology
- Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage
- Anesthetics, Local / adverse effects
- Anesthetics, Local / pharmacology
- Animals
- Eyelid Neoplasms / surgery
- Eyelid Neoplasms / veterinary
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Horse Diseases / surgery
- Horses
- Male
- Nictitating Membrane / surgery
- Treatment Outcome