Analyze Diet
Molecular and cellular probes2006; 21(2); 111-115; doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2006.08.008

Nucleotide alterations in the D3 domain of the large subunit of ribosomal DNA among 21 species of equine strongyle.

Abstract: The expansion segments or divergent (D) domains in the large subunit (LSU) of the ribosomal DNA have been suggested as genetic markers for taxonomic and/or phylogenetic studies of parasites. In the present study, we assessed the degree of sequence variation in the D3 domain and flanking core regions of the LSU for 21 species of equine strongyles (Strongylida: Strongylidae) and determined which positions in the secondary structure of the LSU were associated with the nucleotide alterations. No intraspecific sequence variation was detected in 17 species, for which multiple individual worms were available. Mutations in sequence among species were detected at 19 nucleotide positions, most of which were located in the D3 domain. Fifteen alterations were transitions, three were transversions and one represented a site of multiple mutations. In relation to the secondary structure element of D3, 26% of these mutations were located in unpaired regions (i.e., end of loops, or in bulges of helices) and thus did not appear to alter the pairing arrangement in the helices of the secondary structure. Many of the other mutations represented partial or complete compensatory base pair changes. The magnitude of interspecific nucleotide variation in the D3 domain (0-4%) was considerably less than that recorded for some other nematode groups (enoplids and thelastomatoids), indicating that this region alone is of limited value for taxonomic and phylogenetic studies for strongyles of equids but is interesting in relation to the evolution of ribosomal DNA.
Publication Date: 2006-09-16 PubMed ID: 17097265DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2006.08.008Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the nature of genetic variations found in a specific domain of a gene in different species of horse worms. It finds a moderate degree of variation, but less than in other types of worms, suggesting that this gene alone may not be sufficient to define species or evolutionary relationships among horse worms.

Understanding the Genetic Markers

  • The research revolved around the investigation of divergent (D) domains in the large subunit (LSU) of the ribosomal DNA of equine strongyles, or horse worms. The team chose this area because past studies have suggested that it might serve as a useful genetic marker for classifying parasites and understanding their evolutionary relationships.
  • The researchers looked at one specific portion of the LSU – the D3 domain – and examined neighbouring core regions. The study included 21 species of equine strongyles.
  • Through this inspection, the researchers aimed to identify which areas of the LSU secondary structure were experiencing changes in their nucleotide sequences.

Analysis of Nucleotide Alterations

  • For 17 species where multiple individual worms were available, no strays were found from the species’ typical sequence for that part of the LSU.
  • However, between different species, 19 positions on the D3 domain showed mutations. Most of these mutations were transitions, while three were transversions and one was a site of multiple mutations.
  • Slightly over a quarter of the mutations didn’t affect the helices’ pairing arrangement, as they were located in unpaired regions such as the ends of loops or the bulges of helices.
  • Frequently, the observed mutations resulted in complete or partial compensatory base pair changes.

Limitations of the D3 Domain as a Classifier

  • When it came to species classification and constructing evolutionary trees, the D3 domain showed relatively limited variation compared to some other worm groups. This implies that, while interesting for understanding the general mechanisms of evolution of genetic material, the D3 domain on its own might not provide enough information to render a detailed account of strongyle lineages or taxonomies.

Cite This Article

APA
Zhang L, Hu M, Chilton NB, Huby-Chilton F, Beveridge I, Gasser RB. (2006). Nucleotide alterations in the D3 domain of the large subunit of ribosomal DNA among 21 species of equine strongyle. Mol Cell Probes, 21(2), 111-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcp.2006.08.008

Publication

ISSN: 0890-8508
NlmUniqueID: 8709751
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 2
Pages: 111-115

Researcher Affiliations

Zhang, Luping
  • Department of Veterinary Science, The University of Melbourne, 250 Princes Highway, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia.
Hu, Min
    Chilton, Neil B
      Huby-Chilton, Florence
        Beveridge, Ian
          Gasser, Robin B

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Base Sequence
            • DNA, Ribosomal / chemistry
            • DNA, Ribosomal / genetics
            • Horse Diseases / parasitology
            • Horses
            • Molecular Sequence Data
            • Nucleic Acid Conformation
            • Phylogeny
            • Strongylida / classification
            • Strongylida / genetics
            • Strongylida Infections / genetics

            Citations

            This article has been cited 4 times.
            1. Meigouni M, Makki M, Haniloo A, Askari Z, Mobedi I, Naddaf SR, Boenke N, Stollner T, Aali A, Heidari Z, Mowlavi G. Herbivores Coprolites from Chehrabad Salt Mine of Zanjan, Iran (Sassanid Era, 224-651 AD) Reveals Eggs of Strongylidae and Anoplocephalidae Helminths. Iran J Parasitol 2020 Jan-Mar;15(1):109-114.
              pubmed: 32489382
            2. Saeed MA, Beveridge I, Abbas G, Beasley A, Bauquier J, Wilkes E, Jacobson C, Hughes KJ, El-Hage C, O'Handley R, Hurley J, Cudmore L, Carrigan P, Walter L, Tennent-Brown B, Nielsen MK, Jabbar A. Systematic review of gastrointestinal nematodes of horses from Australia. Parasit Vectors 2019 Apr 29;12(1):188.
              doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3445-4pubmed: 31036059google scholar: lookup
            3. Gao Y, Zhang Y, Yang X, Qiu JH, Duan H, Xu WW, Chang QC, Wang CR. Mitochondrial DNA Evidence Supports the Hypothesis that Triodontophorus Species Belong to Cyathostominae. Front Microbiol 2017;8:1444.
              doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01444pubmed: 28824575google scholar: lookup
            4. Jia H, Tang L, Fu Y, Xiong Y, Yan L, Shao C, Li K, Zhang D, Hu D. The first mitogenome of Petrovinema skrjabini from Equus ferus przewalskii: a phylogenetic analysis within the Strongylidae family. Parasit Vectors 2025 Jul 11;18(1):278.
              doi: 10.1186/s13071-025-06851-7pubmed: 40646541google scholar: lookup