Occurrence of Malassezia spp. in horses and domestic ruminants.
Abstract: During a study on the occurrence of Malassezia spp. in 112 animals (50 horses, 25 goats, 25 sheep and 12 cows), Malassezia spp. were isolated from 60% of horses, 28% of sheep, 44% of goats and 58% of cows. In these animals, the occurrence of lipid-dependent species (42%) was much greater than the occurrence observed for M. pachydermatis (3%). Among the results obtained, we point out the first isolation of M. sympodialis, M. globosa and M. restricta from sheep, M. pachydermatis, M. furfur, M. sympodialis, M. obtusa, M. globosa and M. restricta from goats and M. furfur, M. slooffiae, M. obtusa, M. globosa and M. restricta from horses. To the authors' knowledge, this survey also states the first description of the presence of M. restricta in animals.
Publication Date: 2003-02-08 PubMed ID: 12572724DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.2002.00762.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research investigated the prevalence of various strains of the Malassezia species in domesticated animals including horses, goats, cows, and sheep. Results showed a greater incidence of lipid-dependent species compared to M. pachydermatis, with some species being isolated from these animals for the first time.
Research Methodology
- 112 animals were used in the study, comprising 50 horses, 25 goats, 25 sheep and 12 cows.
- These animals were tested for the presence of different Malassezia species, primarily lipid-dependent species and M. pachydermatis.
Results of the Study
- Malassezia species were isolated from a significant percentage of the animals tested, with the prevalence being highest in horses (60%) and cows (58%).
- In general, the occurrence of lipid-dependent species was much higher (42%), as compared to M. pachydermatis (3%).
- The study witnessed the first isolation of various Malassezia species from the different animals under consideration. A few examples include M. sympodialis, M. globosa, and M. restricta from sheep, and M. furfur, M. slooffiae, M. obtusa, M. globosa and M. restricta from horses.
Significance of Research Findings
- The study sheds new light on the occurrence of Malassezia species in animals. The high number of lipid-dependent species indicates the significant role of lipids in the biology of the Malassezia.
- The isolation of certain species from these animals for the first time improves the understanding of the distribution and range of different Malassezia species within the animal kingdom.
- Notably, this research is also the first to document the presence of M. restricta in animals, broadening the known range of this particular species.
- These findings may have critical implications for animal health and may direct future veterinary treatment strategies, especially given that the Malassezia genus is often associated with a variety of skin conditions.
Cite This Article
APA
Crespo MJ, Abarca ML, Cabañes FJ.
(2003).
Occurrence of Malassezia spp. in horses and domestic ruminants.
Mycoses, 45(8), 333-337.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0507.2002.00762.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Departament de Sanitat i d'Anatomia Animals (Microbiologie), Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Animals, Domestic
- Cattle
- Dermatomycoses / microbiology
- Horses / microbiology
- Lipid Metabolism
- Malassezia / classification
- Malassezia / isolation & purification
- Ruminants / microbiology
- Skin / microbiology
Citations
This article has been cited 7 times.- Hobi S, Cafarchia C, Romano V, Barrs VR. Malassezia: Zoonotic Implications, Parallels and Differences in Colonization and Disease in Humans and Animals. J Fungi (Basel) 2022 Jul 4;8(7).
- Aldrovandi AL, Osugui L, Acqua Coutinho SD. Is Malassezia nana the main species in horses' ear canal microbiome?. Braz J Microbiol 2016 Jul-Sep;47(3):770-4.
- Zia M, Mirhendi H, Toghyani M. Detection and identification of Malassezia species in domestic animals and aquatic birds by PCR-RFLP. Iran J Vet Res 2015 Winter;16(1):36-41.
- Cabañes FJ. Malassezia yeasts: how many species infect humans and animals?. PLoS Pathog 2014 Feb;10(2):e1003892.
- Cabañes FJ, Hernández JJ, Castellá G. Molecular analysis of Malassezia sympodialis-related strains from domestic animals. J Clin Microbiol 2005 Jan;43(1):277-83.
- Volk AV, Belyavin CE, Varjonen K, Cadiergues MC, Stevens KB, Bond R. Malassezia pachydermatis and M nana predominate amongst the cutaneous mycobiota of Sphynx cats. J Feline Med Surg 2010 Dec;12(12):917-22.
- Nardoni S, Mancianti F, Rum A, Corazza M. Isolation of Malassezia species from healthy cats and cats with otitis. J Feline Med Surg 2005 Jun;7(3):141-5.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists