Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary internal medicine2025; 39(3); e70064; doi: 10.1111/jvim.70064

Pain Assessment of Horses With Trigeminal-Mediated Headshaking (TMHS) at Rest Between Episodes.

Abstract: While there is agreement that horses experience pain during the actual headshaking attacks, there is still a lack of research about the time between the individual episodes in this species. Objective: To evaluate the signs of pain in horses with TMHS at rest in the absence of common triggering factors. Methods: Twenty TMHS horses (not head shaking at the time of pain assessment), 20 horses with colic, and 20 clinically healthy horses. Methods: Descriptive study assessing pain in TMHS horses during the absence of clinical signs using the Horse Grimace scale (HGS). To grade the pain shown with TMHS, horses with moderate gastrointestinal pain conditions and a healthy horses' group were also included. For evaluation, videos were taken on two consecutive days from both sides of the face (healthy, TMHS) or before analgesics were applied (colic). Eight photos per horse were extracted from the videos, randomized, and evaluated by three examiner groups, each comprising two persons: (a) last-year veterinary medicine students without previous use of the HGS, (b) experienced veterinarians without experience in using the HGS, and (c) experienced veterinarians who regularly apply the HGS. All examiners were blinded to the underlying condition. Results: Median HGS scores in the groups (healthy, gastrointestinal, TMHS) differed significantly from each other (p < 0.05). Healthy horses had median HGS scores below 2 (median 1.2, range: 0.1-2.4), whereas TMHS horses had higher median HGS scores (5.6, range 2.4-7.4), and colic horses had the highest HGS scores (6.6, range: 3.8-8.4). There was a statistically significant difference for all facial action units (FAU) when the different horse groups were compared (p < 0.05). Effect sizes were large for the healthy horses' group (ES-1.23) and for the colic horses (ES 0.86), and small to medium for the TMHS horses (ES 0.37). Conclusions: The results of this study show that pain occurs between individual TMHS attacks in severely affected horses and that the quality of life of these horses must be questioned and evaluated individually.
Publication Date: 2025-04-01 PubMed ID: 40168040PubMed Central: PMC11960477DOI: 10.1111/jvim.70064Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper is an investigative study into the occurrence and assessment of pain in horses with Trigeminal-Mediated Headshaking (TMHS) during their resting period in between episodes. The authors found that these horses experience significant pain even during their rest periods.

Methods of the Research

The researchers adopted a descriptive study design to evaluate the signs of pain in horses with TMHS at rest, i.e., during periods devoid of typical trigger factors. The investigation involved three sets of horses:

  • TWENTY horses diagnosed with TMHS but not presently manifesting active head shaking,
  • Twenty horses experiencing moderate gastrointestinal pain caused by colic, and
  • Twenty clinically healthy horses, representing a control group.

The Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) was employed to assess horses’ pain level. The HGS is a widely recognized pain evaluation tool designed around horses’ facial expressions.

The process involved recording videos of the horses on two consecutive days, or prior to administering analgesics in the cases of colic horses. Eight photographs were obtained from each video and ranked by three groups of examiners consisting of:

  • Veterinary medicine students in their final year,
  • Experienced veterinarians not familiar with the HGS, and
  • Experienced veterinarians regularly applying the HGS.

To maintain objectivity, all examiner groups were unaware of each horse’s condition.

Results of the Study

The study showed that there were considerable differences in pain levels among the three groups of horses. Healthy horses had the lowest median HGS scores, below 2. TMHS horses generally had a significantly high median HGS score of 5.6. Horses with colic had the highest median scores of 6.6.

These statistics demonstrate that every facial action unit (FAU) scored varied significantly among the different horse groups. The effect sizes were notably large for healthy horses and moderate for horses with colic, while the TMHS horses showed small to medium effect sizes.

Conclusion from the Research

The findings indicated that horses affected by TMHS do suffer some level of pain during their rest periods, between individual TMHS episodes. This insight is central to challenging previous understandings and provokes the need to reevaluate the quality of life of these horses on an individual basis. Each horse’s unique circumstances and pain level should be considered in order to optimize their care and wellbeing.

Cite This Article

APA
Franzen V, Reisbeck D, Leibl Y, Schoster A, May A. (2025). Pain Assessment of Horses With Trigeminal-Mediated Headshaking (TMHS) at Rest Between Episodes. J Vet Intern Med, 39(3), e70064. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.70064

Publication

ISSN: 1939-1676
NlmUniqueID: 8708660
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 39
Issue: 3
Pages: e70064

Researcher Affiliations

Franzen, Vanessa
  • Equine Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Reisbeck, Daniela
  • Equine Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Leibl, Yvonne
  • Equine Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Schoster, Angelika
  • Equine Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.
May, Anna
  • Equine Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / physiopathology
  • Pain Measurement / veterinary
  • Male
  • Female
  • Colic / veterinary
  • Pain / veterinary
  • Pain / diagnosis
  • Behavior, Animal

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have nothing to report. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 37 references
  1. Newton SA, Knottenbelt DC, Eldridge PR. Headshaking in Horses: Possible Aetiopathogenesis Suggested by the Results of Diagnostic Tests and Several Treatment Regimes Used in 20 Cases. Equine Veterinary Journal 32, no. 3 (2000): 208–216.
    pubmed: 10836475
  2. Aleman M, Williams DC, Brosnan RJ. Sensory Nerve Conduction and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials of the Trigeminal Nerve in Horses With Idiopathic Headshaking. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 27, no. 6 (2013): 1571–1580.
    pubmed: 24107198
  3. Pickles K, Madigan J, Aleman M. Idiopathic Headshaking: Is It Still Idiopathic?. Veterinary Journal 201 (2014): 21–30.
    pubmed: 24821361
  4. Aleman M, Rhodes D, Williams DC, Guedes A, Madigan JE. Sensory Evoked Potentials of the Trigeminal Nerve for the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Headshaking in a Horse. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 28 (2014): 250–253.
    pmc: PMC4895556pubmed: 24428325
  5. Sheldon S, Aleman M, Costa L, Santoyo AC, Howey Q, Madigan J. Alterations in Metabolic Status and Headshaking Behavior Following Intravenous Administration of Hypertonic Solutions in Horses With Trigeminal‐Mediated Headshaking. Animals 8, no. 7 (2018): 102.
    pmc: PMC6071069pubmed: 29941850
  6. Maarbjerg S, Di Stefano G, Bendtsen L, Cruccu G. Trigeminal Neuralgia – Diagnosis and Treatment. Cephalalgia 37, no. 7 (2017): 648–657.
    pubmed: 28076964
  7. Roberts V. Trigeminal‐Mediated Headshaking in Horses: Prevalence, Impact, and Management Strategies. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports 10 (2019): 1–8.
    pmc: PMC6330979pubmed: 30666296
  8. Gambeta E, Chichorro JG, Zamponi GW. Trigeminal Neuralgia: An Overview From Pathophysiology to Pharmacological Treatments. Molecular Pain 16 (2020): 1744806920901890.
    doi: 10.1177/1744806920901890pmc: PMC6985973pubmed: 31908187google scholar: lookup
  9. Lane G, Mair TS. Observations on Headshaking in the Horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 19, no. 4 (1987): 331–336.
    pubmed: 3622462
  10. Mills D, Cook S, Taylor K, Jones B. Analysis of the Variations in Clinical Signs Shown by 254 Cases of Equine Headshaking. Veterinary Record 150, no. 8 (2002): 236–240.
    pubmed: 11916024
  11. Dyson S, Berger J, Ellis AD, Mullard J. Development of an Ethogram for a Pain Scoring System in Ridden Horses and Its Application to Determine the Presence of Musculoskeletal Pain. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 23 (2018): 47–57.
  12. Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D, Stucke D, Canali E, Leach MC. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a Pain Assessment Tool in Horses Undergoing Routine Castration. PLoS One 9, no. 3 (2014): e92281.
    pmc: PMC3960217pubmed: 24647606
  13. Gleerup KB, Forkman B, Lindegaard C, Andersen PH. An equine pain face. Veterinary Anaesthaesia and Analgesia 42, no. 1 (2015): 103–114.
    pmc: PMC4312484pubmed: 25082060
  14. Moore SA. Managing Neuropathic Pain in Dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 3 (2016): 12.
    pmc: PMC4762016pubmed: 26942185
  15. Epstein M, Rodan I, Griffenhagen G. AAHA/AAFP Pain Management Guidelines for Dogs and Cats. Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association 51 (2015): 67–84.
    pubmed: 25764070
  16. Mathews K, Kronen PW, Lascelles D. Guidelines for Recognition, Assessment and Treatment of Pain. Journal of Small Animal Practice 55 (2014): E10–E68.
    pubmed: 24841489
  17. Owens JG, Kamerling SG, Stanton SR, Keowen ML. Effects of Ketoprofen and Phenylbutazone on Chronic Hoof Pain and Lameness in the Horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 27, no. 4 (1995): 296–300.
    pubmed: 8536666
  18. Dalla Costa E, Bracci D, Dai F, Lebelt D, Minero M. Do Different Emotional States Affect the Horse Grimace Scale Score? A Pilot Study. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 54 (2017): 114–117.
  19. Evangelista MC, Monteiro BP, Steagall PV. Measurement Properties of Grimace Scales for Pain Assessment in Nonhuman Mammals: A Systematic Review. Pain 163, no. 6 (2022): 697–714.
    pubmed: 34510132
  20. Rosenzweig S, Lawson AL, Archer DC, Ireland JL. Comparison of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS), the Composite Pain Scale (CPS) and the Equine Utrecht University Scale for Composite Pain Assessment (EQUUS‐COMPASS SCALE) for Assessment of Colic Patients. Veterinary Journal 206 (2021): 356–364.
  21. Ahmadinejad SM. Vocalization in Horses in Response to Different Events. Veterinary Journal 108 (2015): 83–89.
  22. Maarbjerg S, Gozalov A, Olesen J, Bendtsen L. Concomitant Persistent Pain in Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia — Evidence for Different Subtypes. Headache 54 (2014): 1173–1183.
    pubmed: 24842632
  23. Rasmussen P. Facial Pain. I. A Prospective Survey of 1052 Patients With a View of: Definition, Delimitation, Classification, General Data, Genetic Factors, and Previous Diseases. Acta Neurochirurgia (Wien) 107 (1990a): 112–120.
    pubmed: 2077847
  24. Benoliel R, Zadik Y, Eliav E, Sharav Y. Peripheral Painful Traumatic Trigeminal Neuropathy: Clinical Features in 91 Cases and Proposal of Novel Diagnostic Criteria. Journal of Orofacial Pain 21 (2012): 49–58.
    pubmed: 22292140
  25. Miller JP, Acar F, Burchiel KJ. Classification of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Clinical, Therapeutic, and Prognostic Implications in a Series of 144 Patients Undergoing Microvascular Decompression. Journal of Neurosurgery 111 (2009): 1231–1234.
    pubmed: 19392593
  26. Sellon DC, Sanz M, Kopper JJ, Mattei D. Pain Severity Scores for Common Equine Disorders as Provided by Horse Owners and Equine Veterinarians. Equine Veterinary Journal 54, no. 6 (2022): 1094–1102.
    pubmed: 35034381
  27. Dzikiti TB, Hellebrekers LJ, van Dijk P. Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Isoflurane Concentration, Physiological Parameters, Metabolic Parameters and Stress‐Related Hormones in Horses Undergoing Surgery. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. A, Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 50, no. 4 (2003): 190–195.
  28. McCarthy RN, Jeffcot LB, Clarke IJ. Preliminary Studies on the Use of Plasma Beta‐Endorphin in Horses, as an Indicator of Stress and Pain. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 13 (1993): 216–219.
  29. Erber R, Wulf M, Becker-Birck M. Physiological and Behavioral Responses of Young Horses to Hot Iron Branding and Microchip Implantation. Veterinary Journal 191, no. 2 (2012): 171–175.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.08.008pubmed: 21917490google scholar: lookup
  30. Gleerup KB, Lindegaard C. Recognition and Quantification of Pain in Horses: A Tutorial Review. Equine Veterinary Education 28, no. 1 (2016): 47–57.
  31. Wagner AE. Effects of Stress on Pain in Horses and Incorporating Pain Scales for Equine Practice. Veterinary Clinics of North America. Equine Practice 26, no. 3 (2010): 481–492.
    pubmed: 21056295
  32. Frank D. Recognizing Behavioral Signs of Pain and Disease: A Guide for Practitioners. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice 44, no. 3 (2014): 507–524.
    pubmed: 24766697
  33. Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M. The Revised International Association for the Study of Pain Definition of Pain: Concepts, Challenges, and Compromises. Pain 161, no. 9 (2020): 1976–1982.
    pmc: PMC7680716pubmed: 32694387
  34. Coneglian MM, Duarte Borges T, Weber SH, Godoi Bertagnon H, Michelotto PV. Use of the Horse Grimace Scale to Identify and Quantify Pain due to Dental Disorders in Horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 225 (2020): 104970.
  35. Van Loon JP, van Dierendonck MC. Objective Pain Assessment in Horses (2014‐2018). Veterinary Journal 242 (2018): 1–7.
    pubmed: 30503538
  36. Taylor PM, Pascoe PJ, Mama KR. Diagnosing and Treating Pain in the Horse: Where Are We Today?. Veterinary Clinics Equine 18 (2002): 1–19.
    pubmed: 12064173
  37. Dai F, Leach M, MacRae AM, Minero M, Dalla Costa E. Does Thirty‐Minute Standardized Training Improve the Inter‐Observer Reliability of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS)? A Case Study. Animals 10 (2020): 1–7.
    pmc: PMC7277819pubmed: 32365927