FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2011; 192(3); 455-460; doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.09.001

Pathogen associated molecular pattern motifs from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria induce different inflammatory mediator profiles in equine blood.

Abstract: Although the incidence of Gram-positive infection in horses is increasing, little is known about differences in inflammatory response between Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms in this species. Equine blood was stimulated with components of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms: lipopolysaccharide (LPS); lipoteichoic acid (LTA); peptidoglycan (PG); with combinations of LPS, LTA and PG; and with phosphate buffered saline (control). LPS, LTA and PG stimulated tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-6 production but only LTA and PG stimulated IL-1β production from whole blood. LPS was a more potent inducer of TNF than either LTA or PG and both LPS and LTA were more potent inducers of IL-6 than PG. Generally, combinations of pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) did not elicit greater inflammatory mediator responses when compared to LPS, LTA or PG alone, although there was some synergism between the effects of LPS and LTA. The repertoire of inflammatory mediators provoked by Gram-positive vs. Gram-negative motifs is thus distinctly different. As novel immunomodulatory therapies are developed for use in the horse, care should be exercised when applying treatments for endotoxemia to animals with Gram-positive infections given the different cytokine response profiles.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2011-10-04 PubMed ID: 21974971DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.09.001Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focuses on understanding the differences in inflammatory responses among horses upon exposure to components of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. It reveals that the type of bacteria influences the inflammatory mediator profiles in equine blood, which can inform more effective immunomodulatory treatments.

Purpose and Methodology

  • The primary objective of this study is to identify variations in inflammatory response in horses when exposed to components of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria.
  • Equine blood samples were stimulated with bacterial components like lipopolysaccharide (LPS), lipoteichoic acid (LTA), and peptidoglycan (PG) to observe and measure the subsequent inflammatory response.
  • The components were also combined to see whether these composites resulted in an exacerbated inflammatory response.

Findings

  • All three components caused the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin (IL)-6, but the production of IL-1β was stimulated only by LTA and PG.
  • In inducing TNF, LPS was found to be more potent than LTA or PG, and both LPS and LTA were more potent at generating IL-6 than PG.
  • In notable contrast to expectations, combining the components did not necessarily result in a stronger inflammatory response, albeit, there was a small level of synergism between the effects of LPS and LTA.

Interpretations and Implications

  • The study highlights differential inflammatory responses to various bacterial components, emphasising that Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria elicit distinct inflammatory mediator profiles in horses.
  • This research is critical for informing more tailored immunomodulatory therapies for horses since the kind of bacteria affects the resultant cytokine response profile.
  • The findings suggest that using the same treatments for endotoxemia in animals with Gram-positive infections could be ineffective, because of the different cytokine response.

Cite This Article

APA
Declue AE, Johnson PJ, Day JL, Amorim JR, Honaker AR. (2011). Pathogen associated molecular pattern motifs from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria induce different inflammatory mediator profiles in equine blood. Vet J, 192(3), 455-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.09.001

Publication

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)
ISSN: 1532-2971
NlmUniqueID: 9706281
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 192
Issue: 3
Pages: 455-460

Researcher Affiliations

Declue, A E
  • Comparative Internal Medicine Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 900 East Campus Drive, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. decluea@missouri.edu
Johnson, P J
    Day, J L
      Amorim, J R
        Honaker, A R

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Biomarkers
          • Cytokines / blood
          • Cytokines / genetics
          • Cytokines / metabolism
          • Gene Expression Regulation
          • Gram-Negative Bacteria / metabolism
          • Gram-Positive Bacteria / metabolism
          • Horses / blood
          • Inflammation / blood
          • Inflammation / metabolism
          • Inflammation / veterinary
          • Lipopolysaccharides / metabolism
          • Lipopolysaccharides / toxicity
          • Male

          Citations

          This article has been cited 15 times.
          1. Bauquier J, Tudor E, Bailey S. Effect of the p38 MAPK inhibitor doramapimod on the systemic inflammatory response to intravenous lipopolysaccharide in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Sep;34(5):2109-2116.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.15847pubmed: 32700419google scholar: lookup
          2. Martin LM, Johnson PJ, Amorim JR, DeClue AE. Effects of Orally Administered Resveratrol on TNF, IL-1β, Leukocyte Phagocytic Activity and Oxidative Burst Function in Horses: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study. Int J Mol Sci 2020 Feb 20;21(4).
            doi: 10.3390/ijms21041453pubmed: 32093379google scholar: lookup
          3. Dickson K, Lehmann C. Inflammatory Response to Different Toxins in Experimental Sepsis Models. Int J Mol Sci 2019 Sep 5;20(18).
            doi: 10.3390/ijms20184341pubmed: 31491842google scholar: lookup
          4. Sheats MK. A Comparative Review of Equine SIRS, Sepsis, and Neutrophils. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:69.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00069pubmed: 30931316google scholar: lookup
          5. Zhang Y, Igwe OJ. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated priming of toll-like receptor 4 enhances oxidant-induced prostaglandin E(2) biosynthesis in primary murine macrophages. Int Immunopharmacol 2018 Jan;54:226-237.
            doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.11.017pubmed: 29161659google scholar: lookup
          6. Hammamieh R, Muhie S, Borschel R, Gautam A, Miller SA, Chakraborty N, Jett M. Temporal Progression of Pneumonic Plague in Blood of Nonhuman Primate: A Transcriptomic Analysis. PLoS One 2016;11(3):e0151788.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151788pubmed: 27003632google scholar: lookup
          7. Vinther AM, Skovgaard K, Heegaard PM, Andersen PH. Dynamic expression of leukocyte innate immune genes in whole blood from horses with lipopolysaccharide-induced acute systemic inflammation. BMC Vet Res 2015 Jun 16;11:134.
            doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0450-5pubmed: 26076814google scholar: lookup
          8. Dinjaski N, Prieto MA. Smart polyhydroxyalkanoate nanobeads by protein based functionalization. Nanomedicine 2015 May;11(4):885-99.
            doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2015.01.018pubmed: 25720989google scholar: lookup
          9. Basto AP, Leitão A. Targeting TLR2 for vaccine development. J Immunol Res 2014;2014:619410.
            doi: 10.1155/2014/619410pubmed: 25057505google scholar: lookup
          10. Ye Q, Shao WX, Xu XJ, Yang YZ. The clinical application value of cytokines in treating infectious diseases. PLoS One 2014;9(6):e98745.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098745pubmed: 24887408google scholar: lookup
          11. Irvine KL, Hopkins LJ, Gangloff M, Bryant CE. The molecular basis for recognition of bacterial ligands at equine TLR2, TLR1 and TLR6. Vet Res 2013 Jul 4;44(1):50.
            doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-50pubmed: 23826682google scholar: lookup
          12. Miernikiewicz P, Owczarek B, Piotrowicz A, Boczkowska B, Rzewucka K, Figura G, Letarov A, Kulikov E, Kopciuch A, Switała-Jeleń K, Oślizło A, Hodyra K, Gubernator J, Dąbrowska K. Recombinant expression and purification of T4 phage Hoc, Soc, gp23, gp24 proteins in native conformations with stability studies. PLoS One 2012;7(7):e38902.
            doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038902pubmed: 22808021google scholar: lookup
          13. DeClue AE, Nickell J, Chang CH, Honaker A. Upregulation of proinflammatory cytokine production in response to bacterial pathogen-associated molecular patterns in dogs with diabetes mellitus undergoing insulin therapy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2012 May 1;6(3):496-502.
            doi: 10.1177/193229681200600303pubmed: 22768879google scholar: lookup
          14. Lewis DH, Chan DL, Pinheiro D, Armitage-Chan E, Garden OA. The immunopathology of sepsis: pathogen recognition, systemic inflammation, the compensatory anti-inflammatory response, and regulatory T cells. J Vet Intern Med 2012 May-Jun;26(3):457-82.
            doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00905.xpubmed: 22428780google scholar: lookup
          15. Aydın P, Bekmez H. Experimental Sepsis Models: Advantages and Limitations. Eurasian J Med 2023 Dec 29;55(1):120-124.
            doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.23364pubmed: 39109920google scholar: lookup
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,850 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.