FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Tissue Eng Regen Med / Persistence of fluorescent nanoparticle-labelled bone marrow...
Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine2019; 13(2); 191-202; doi: 10.1002/term.2781

Persistence of fluorescent nanoparticle-labelled bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and after intra-articular injection.

Abstract: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) improve the osteoarthritis condition, but the fate of MSCs after intra-articular injection is unclear. We used fluorescent nanoparticles (quantum dots [QDs]) to track equine MSCs (QD-labelled MSCs [QD-MSCs]) in vivo after intra-articular injection into normal and osteoarthritic joints. One week after injection of QD-MSCs, unlabelled MSCs, or vehicle, we determined the presence of QD-MSCs in synovium and articular cartilage histologically. In vitro, we evaluated the persistence of QDs in MSCs and whether QDs affected proliferation, immunophenotype, or differentiation. In joints injected with QD-MSCs, labelled cells were identified on the synovial membrane and significantly less often on articular cartilage, without differences between normal and osteoarthritic joints. Joints injected with QD-MSCs and MSCs had increased synovial total nucleated cell count and protein compared with vehicle-injected joints. In vitro, QDs persisted in nonproliferating cells for up to 8 weeks (length of the study), but QD fluorescence was essentially absent from proliferating cells within two passages (approximately 3 to 5 days). QD labelling did not affect MSC differentiation into chondrocytes, adipocytes, and osteocytes. QD-MSCs had slightly different immunophenotype from control cells, but whether this was due to an effect of the QDs or to drift during culture is unknown. QD-MSCs can be visualized in histological sections 1 week after intra-articular injection and are more frequently found in the synovial membrane versus cartilage in both normal and osteoarthritic joints. QDs do not alter MSC viability and differentiation potential in vitro. However, QDs are not optimal markers for long-term tracking of MSCs, especially under proliferative conditions.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2019-01-23 PubMed ID: 30536848PubMed Central: PMC6393194DOI: 10.1002/term.2781Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • N.I.H.
  • Extramural
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the behavior of equine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) labelled with fluorescent nanoparticles, or quantum dots (QDs), in vivo and in vitro after being injected into both healthy and osteoarthritic joints. It provides insights into the QDs’ impact on MSC proliferation, immunophenotype, and differentiation, concluding that while QDs are practical for short-term tracking of MSCs, they are not suitable for long-term tracking, particularly in proliferative conditions.

Methodology and Objectives

  • This research aimed to determine the properties and fate of equine mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) labeled with fluorescent nanoparticles (quantum dots) when injected into both normal and osteoarthritic joints.
  • Researchers aimed to study whether the QDs would affect the proliferation, immune characteristics, or the ability of MSCs to change into other forms, a process known as differentiation.

Processes

  • The researchers injected QD-labelled MSCs into normal and osteoarthritic joints and observed their positions in the synovium (the soft tissue that lines the non-cartilaginous surfaces within joints) and articular cartilage.
  • They also observed how QDs influenced the activity of MSCs in a controlled lab environment to evaluate their persistence.
  • Finally, they compared the effect on the synovial fluid when joints are injected with QDs, MSCs, or a vehicle.
  • In vitro, the persistence of QDs in MSCs was analyzed and the possible effects of QDs on proliferation, immunophenotype or differentiation were evaluated.

Findings

  • The MSCs labelled with QDs were identified in the synovial membrane considerably more frequently than the articular cartilage, regardless of whether or not the joint was osteoarthritic.
  • The presence of QD-MSCs and MSCs increased the total count of nucleated cells and protein in the synovial fluid when compared to joints injected with only the vehicle.
  • The QDs remained in non-dividing cells for the duration of the study (which lasted eight weeks), but were basically absent from dividing cells within two times of cell division (approximately 3 to 5 days).
  • The labelling of MSCs with QDs did not seem to alter the cells’ potential to differentiate into other types of cells or affect their viability.
  • The immunophenotype was slightly different in QD-MSCs compared to control cells, however the cause is unknown: it could be an effect of the QDs or possibly due to drift during the culturing process.

Conclusion

  • Results indicate that QD-labelled MSCs can be visualized in tissue samples a week after being injected into a joint and are typically found more frequently in the synovial membrane than in the cartilage, regardless of whether or not the joint is osteoarthritic.
  • While QDs do not influence the viability and differentiation potential of MSCs, they are not an ideal tool for long-term tracking of MSCs due to their tendency to not persist in cells that are actively dividing.

Cite This Article

APA
Grady ST, Britton L, Hinrichs K, Nixon AJ, Watts AE. (2019). Persistence of fluorescent nanoparticle-labelled bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro and after intra-articular injection. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 13(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2781

Publication

Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine
ISSN: 1932-7005
NlmUniqueID: 101308490
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 2
Pages: 191-202

Researcher Affiliations

Grady, Sicilia T
  • Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Britton, Lorraine
  • Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Hinrichs, Katrin
  • Department of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Nixon, Alan J
  • Clinical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Watts, Ashlee E
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Allografts
  • Animals
  • Bone Marrow Cells / metabolism
  • Bone Marrow Cells / pathology
  • Horse Diseases / metabolism
  • Horse Diseases / pathology
  • Horse Diseases / therapy
  • Horses
  • Joints / metabolism
  • Joints / pathology
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / metabolism
  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells / pathology
  • Osteoarthritis / metabolism
  • Osteoarthritis / pathology
  • Osteoarthritis / therapy
  • Quantum Dots / chemistry

Grant Funding

  • T32 RR007059 / NCRR NIH HHS
  • F32 AR057299 / NIAMS NIH HHS

References

This article includes 31 references
  1. Assoni A, Coatti G, Valadares MC, Beccari M, Gomes J, Pelatti M, Mitne-Neto M, Carvalho VM, Zatz M. Different Donors Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Secretomes Reveal Heterogeneous Profile of Relevance for Therapeutic Use.. Stem Cells Dev 2017 Feb 1;26(3):206-214.
    pubmed: 27762666doi: 10.1089/scd.2016.0218google scholar: lookup
  2. Broeckx S, Suls M, Beerts C, Vandenberghe A, Seys B, Wuertz-Kozak K, Duchateau L, Spaas JH. Allogenic mesenchymal stem cells as a treatment for equine degenerative joint disease: a pilot study.. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2014;9(6):497-503.
    pubmed: 25175766doi: 10.2174/1574888x09666140826110601google scholar: lookup
  3. Burk J, Berner D, Brehm W, Hillmann A, Horstmeier C, Josten C, Paebst F, Rossi G, Schubert S, Ahrberg AB. Long-Term Cell Tracking Following Local Injection of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in the Equine Model of Induced Tendon Disease.. Cell Transplant 2016 Dec 13;25(12):2199-2211.
    pubmed: 27392888doi: 10.3727/096368916X692104google scholar: lookup
  4. Carrade DD, Owens SD, Galuppo LD, Vidal MA, Ferraro GL, Librach F, Buerchler S, Friedman MS, Walker NJ, Borjesson DL. Clinicopathologic findings following intra-articular injection of autologous and allogeneic placentally derived equine mesenchymal stem cells in horses.. Cytotherapy 2011 Apr;13(4):419-30.
    pubmed: 21105841doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.536213google scholar: lookup
  5. Collins MC, Gunst PR, Cascio WE, Kypson AP, Muller-Borer BJ. Labeling and imaging mesenchymal stem cells with quantum dots.. Methods Mol Biol 2012;906:199-210.
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-953-2_15pubmed: 22791434google scholar: lookup
  6. De Schauwer C, Piepers S, Van de Walle GR, Demeyere K, Hoogewijs MK, Govaere JL, Braeckmans K, Van Soom A, Meyer E. In search for cross-reactivity to immunophenotype equine mesenchymal stromal cells by multicolor flow cytometry.. Cytometry A 2012 Apr;81(4):312-23.
    doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22026pubmed: 22411893google scholar: lookup
  7. Dudhia J, Becerra P, Valdés MA, Neves F, Hartman NG, Smith RK. In Vivo Imaging and Tracking of Technetium-99m Labeled Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Equine Tendinopathy.. J Vis Exp 2015 Dec 9;(106):e52748.
    pmc: PMC4692789pubmed: 26709915doi: 10.3791/52748google scholar: lookup
  8. Ferris DJ, Frisbie DD, Kisiday JD, McIlwraith CW, Hague BA, Major MD, Schneider RK, Zubrod CJ, Kawcak CE, Goodrich LR. Clinical outcome after intra-articular administration of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells in 33 horses with stifle injury.. Vet Surg 2014 Mar;43(3):255-65.
    pubmed: 24433318doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12100.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  9. Frisbie DD, Cross MW, McIlwraith CW. A comparative study of articular cartilage thickness in the stifle of animal species used in human pre-clinical studies compared to articular cartilage thickness in the human knee.. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006;19(3):142-6.
    pubmed: 16971996
  10. Geburek F, Mundle K, Conrad S, Hellige M, Walliser U, van Schie HT, van Weeren R, Skutella T, Stadler PM. Tracking of autologous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells with in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and histology after intralesional treatment of artificial equine tendon lesions--a pilot study.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2016 Feb 1;7:21.
    pmc: PMC4736260pubmed: 26830812doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0281-8google scholar: lookup
  11. Hatakeyama A, Uchida S, Utsunomiya H, Tsukamoto M, Nakashima H, Nakamura E, Pascual-Garrido C, Sekiya I, Sakai A. Isolation and Characterization of Synovial Mesenchymal Stem Cell Derived from Hip Joints: A Comparative Analysis with a Matched Control Knee Group.. Stem Cells Int 2017;2017:9312329.
    pmc: PMC5237455pubmed: 28115945doi: 10.1155/2017/9312329google scholar: lookup
  12. Mak J, Jablonski CL, Leonard CA, Dunn JF, Raharjo E, Matyas JR, Biernaskie J, Krawetz RJ. Intra-articular injection of synovial mesenchymal stem cells improves cartilage repair in a mouse injury model.. Sci Rep 2016 Mar 17;6:23076.
    pmc: PMC4794799pubmed: 26983696doi: 10.1038/srep23076google scholar: lookup
  13. Mitchell A, Rivas KA, Smith R 3rd, Watts AE. Cryopreservation of equine mesenchymal stem cells in 95% autologous serum and 5% DMSO does not alter post-thaw growth or morphology in vitro compared to fetal bovine serum or allogeneic serum at 20 or 95% and DMSO at 10 or 5.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2015 Nov 26;6:231.
    doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0230-ypmc: PMC4661990pubmed: 26611913google scholar: lookup
  14. Muller-Borer BJ, Collins MC, Gunst PR, Cascio WE, Kypson AP. Quantum dot labeling of mesenchymal stem cells.. J Nanobiotechnology 2007 Nov 7;5:9.
    doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-5-9pmc: PMC2186355pubmed: 17988386google scholar: lookup
  15. Ohyabu Y, Kaul Z, Yoshioka T, Inoue K, Sakai S, Mishima H, Uemura T, Kaul SC, Wadhwa R. Stable and nondisruptive in vitro/in vivo labeling of mesenchymal stem cells by internalizing quantum dots.. Hum Gene Ther 2009 Mar;20(3):217-24.
    doi: 10.1089/hum.2008.100pubmed: 19257853google scholar: lookup
  16. Pigott JH, Ishihara A, Wellman ML, Russell DS, Bertone AL. Investigation of the immune response to autologous, allogeneic, and xenogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after intra-articular injection in horses.. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2013 Nov 15;156(1-2):99-106.
    pubmed: 24094688doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2013.09.003google scholar: lookup
  17. Ranjbarvaziri S, Kiani S, Akhlaghi A, Vosough A, Baharvand H, Aghdami N. Quantum dot labeling using positive charged peptides in human hematopoetic and mesenchymal stem cells.. Biomaterials 2011 Aug;32(22):5195-205.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.004pubmed: 21549422google scholar: lookup
  18. Rosen AB, Kelly DJ, Schuldt AJ, Lu J, Potapova IA, Doronin SV, Robichaud KJ, Robinson RB, Rosen MR, Brink PR, Gaudette GR, Cohen IS. Finding fluorescent needles in the cardiac haystack: tracking human mesenchymal stem cells labeled with quantum dots for quantitative in vivo three-dimensional fluorescence analysis.. Stem Cells 2007 Aug;25(8):2128-38.
    doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0722pubmed: 17495112google scholar: lookup
  19. Sacchetti B, Funari A, Remoli C, Giannicola G, Kogler G, Liedtke S, Cossu G, Serafini M, Sampaolesi M, Tagliafico E, Tenedini E, Saggio I, Robey PG, Riminucci M, Bianco P. No Identical "Mesenchymal Stem Cells" at Different Times and Sites: Human Committed Progenitors of Distinct Origin and Differentiation Potential Are Incorporated as Adventitial Cells in Microvessels.. Stem Cell Reports 2016 Jun 14;6(6):897-913.
    pmc: PMC4912436pubmed: 27304917doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.05.011google scholar: lookup
  20. Schnabel LV, Pezzanite LM, Antczak DF, Felippe MJ, Fortier LA. Equine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells are heterogeneous in MHC class II expression and capable of inciting an immune response in vitro.. Stem Cell Res Ther 2014 Jan 24;5(1):13.
    doi: 10.1186/scrt402pmc: PMC4055004pubmed: 24461709google scholar: lookup
  21. Seleverstov O, Zabirnyk O, Zscharnack M, Bulavina L, Nowicki M, Heinrich JM, Yezhelyev M, Emmrich F, O'Regan R, Bader A. Quantum dots for human mesenchymal stem cells labeling. A size-dependent autophagy activation.. Nano Lett 2006 Dec;6(12):2826-32.
    pubmed: 17163713doi: 10.1021/nl0619711google scholar: lookup
  22. Smith RK, Werling NJ, Dakin SG, Alam R, Goodship AE, Dudhia J. Beneficial effects of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in naturally occurring tendinopathy.. PLoS One 2013;8(9):e75697.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075697pmc: PMC3783421pubmed: 24086616google scholar: lookup
  23. Spriet M, Buerchler S, Trela JM, Hembrooke TA, Padgett KA, Rick MC, Vidal MA, Galuppo LD. Scintigraphic tracking of mesenchymal stem cells after intravenous regional limb perfusion and subcutaneous administration in the standing horse.. Vet Surg 2015 Apr;44(3):273-80.
    pubmed: 25307554doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12289.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  24. Szepesi Á, Matula Z, Szigeti A, Várady G, Szalma J, Szabó G, Uher F, Sarkadi B, Német K. In Vitro Characterization of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Isolated from Different Tissues with a Potential to Promote Complex Bone Regeneration.. Stem Cells Int 2016;2016:3595941.
    pmc: PMC5143785pubmed: 27999599doi: 10.1155/2016/3595941google scholar: lookup
  25. Tautzenberger A, Lorenz S, Kreja L, Zeller A, Musyanovych A, Schrezenmeier H, Landfester K, Mailänder V, Ignatius A. Effect of functionalised fluorescence-labelled nanoparticles on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation.. Biomaterials 2010 Mar;31(8):2064-71.
    doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.099pubmed: 20004969google scholar: lookup
  26. Taylor SE, Smith RK, Clegg PD. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in equine musculoskeletal disease: scientific fact or clinical fiction?. Equine Vet J 2007 Mar;39(2):172-80.
    pubmed: 17378447doi: 10.2746/042516407x180868google scholar: lookup
  27. Tsuji K, Ojima M, Otabe K, Horie M, Koga H, Sekiya I, Muneta T. Effects of Different Cell-Detaching Methods on the Viability and Cell Surface Antigen Expression of Synovial Mesenchymal Stem Cells.. Cell Transplant 2017 Jun 9;26(6):1089-1102.
    pmc: PMC5657749pubmed: 28139195doi: 10.3727/096368917X694831google scholar: lookup
  28. Wakitani S, Imoto K, Yamamoto T, Saito M, Murata N, Yoneda M. Human autologous culture expanded bone marrow mesenchymal cell transplantation for repair of cartilage defects in osteoarthritic knees.. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002 Mar;10(3):199-206.
    pubmed: 11869080doi: 10.1053/joca.2001.0504google scholar: lookup
  29. Wang Y, Xu C, Ow H. Commercial nanoparticles for stem cell labeling and tracking.. Theranostics 2013;3(8):544-60.
    doi: 10.7150/thno.5634pmc: PMC3741604pubmed: 23946821google scholar: lookup
  30. Wang ZG, Liu SL, Hu YJ, Tian ZQ, Hu B, Zhang ZL, Pang DW. Dissecting the Factors Affecting the Fluorescence Stability of Quantum Dots in Live Cells.. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016 Apr 6;8(13):8401-8.
    pubmed: 26998815doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b01742google scholar: lookup
  31. Wood JA, Chung DJ, Park SA, Zwingenberger AL, Reilly CM, Ly I, Walker NJ, Vernau W, Hayashi K, Wisner ER, Cannon MS, Kass PH, Cherry SR, Borjesson DL, Russell P, Murphy CJ. Periocular and intra-articular injection of canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: an in vivo imaging and migration study.. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2012 Jun;28(3):307-17.
    pmc: PMC3361184pubmed: 22175793doi: 10.1089/jop.2011.0166google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Copp G, Robb KP, Viswanathan S. Culture-expanded mesenchymal stromal cell therapy: does it work in knee osteoarthritis? A pathway to clinical success.. Cell Mol Immunol 2023 Jun;20(6):626-650.
    doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-01020-1pubmed: 37095295google scholar: lookup
  2. Nativel F, Smith A, Boulestreau J, Lépine C, Baron J, Marquis M, Vignes C, Le Guennec Y, Veziers J, Lesoeur J, Loll F, Halgand B, Renard D, Abadie J, Legoff B, Blanchard F, Gauthier O, Vinatier C, Rieux AD, Guicheux J, Le Visage C. Micromolding-based encapsulation of mesenchymal stromal cells in alginate for intraarticular injection in osteoarthritis.. Mater Today Bio 2023 Apr;19:100581.
    doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100581pubmed: 36896417google scholar: lookup
  3. Watson-Levings RS, Palmer GD, Levings PP, Dacanay EA, Evans CH, Ghivizzani SC. Gene Therapy in Orthopaedics: Progress and Challenges in Pre-Clinical Development and Translation.. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:901317.
    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.901317pubmed: 35837555google scholar: lookup
  4. Soleymani-Goloujeh M, Hosseini S, Baghaban Eslaminejad M. Advanced Nanotechnology Approaches as Emerging Tools in Cellular-Based Technologies.. Adv Exp Med Biol 2023;1409:127-144.
    doi: 10.1007/5584_2022_725pubmed: 35816248google scholar: lookup
  5. Aldrich ED, Cui X, Murphy CA, Lim KS, Hooper GJ, McIlwraith CW, Woodfield TBF. Allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells for cartilage regeneration: A review of in vitro evaluation, clinical experience, and translational opportunities.. Stem Cells Transl Med 2021 Nov;10(11):1500-1515.
    doi: 10.1002/sctm.20-0552pubmed: 34387402google scholar: lookup
  6. Li X, Dai B, Guo J, Zheng L, Guo Q, Peng J, Xu J, Qin L. Nanoparticle-Cartilage Interaction: Pathology-Based Intra-articular Drug Delivery for Osteoarthritis Therapy.. Nanomicro Lett 2021 Jun 23;13(1):149.
    doi: 10.1007/s40820-021-00670-ypubmed: 34160733google scholar: lookup
  7. Magri C, Schramme M, Febre M, Cauvin E, Labadie F, Saulnier N, François I, Lechartier A, Aebischer D, Moncelet AS, Maddens S. Comparison of efficacy and safety of single versus repeated intra-articular injection of allogeneic neonatal mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of osteoarthritis of the metacarpophalangeal/metatarsophalangeal joint in horses: A clinical pilot study.. PLoS One 2019;14(8):e0221317.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221317pubmed: 31465445google scholar: lookup
  8. Sasaki A, Mizuno M, Mochizuki M, Sekiya I. Mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration in dogs.. World J Stem Cells 2019 May 26;11(5):254-269.
    doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v11.i5.254pubmed: 31171954google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.