Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics1985; 8(2); 194-201; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1985.tb00944.x

Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in the horse following intravenous and intramuscular administration.

Abstract: The pharmacokinetics of amikacin sulfate (AK) were studied in the horse after intravenous (i.v.) and intramuscular (i.m.) administration. Serum (Cs), synovial (Csf) and peritoneal (Cpf) fluid concentrations of the drug were measured. Doses of 4.4, 6.6 and 11.0 mg/kg were given. The concentrations at 15 min following i.v. injection were 30.3 +/- 0.3, 61.2 +/- 6.9 and 122.8 +/- 7.4 micrograms/ml, respectively, for the 4.4, 6.6 and 11.0 mg/kg doses. Mean peak Cs values after the intramuscular injections occurred at 1.0 h post-injection and were 13.3 +/- 1.6, 23.0 +/- 0.6 and 29.8 +/- 3.2 micrograms/ml, respectively. The t 1/2 of amikacin was 1.44, 1.57 and 1.14 h for the 4.4, 6.6 and 11.0 mg/kg doses, respectively. In this study, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of amikacin sulfate were determined for six pathogens. Based on the MIC and the pharmacokinetic parameters, it would appear that the usual therapeutic dose of amikacin would be between 4.4 and 6.6 mg/kg twice daily and, for the more serious life-threatening infections, dosing three times a day.
Publication Date: 1985-06-01 PubMed ID: 4020950DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1985.tb00944.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article focuses on the study of how amikacin sulfate, an antibiotic, behaves in the body of a horse when given by intravenous and intramuscular injections. The investigation is carried out across different injection doses and frequencies, and the drug’s concentrations in several bodily fluids are measured. The results indicate the most effective dose and frequency for therapeutic use.

Method of Research

  • The research team conducted a study on the pharmacokinetics of amikacin sulfate (often used as an antibiotic) in horses. Pharmacokinetics studies how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body.
  • The drug was administered in two ways: intravenous (i.v.) and intramuscular (i.m.) injections.
  • Different doses were given including 4.4, 6.6, and 11.0 mg/kg to understand the dose-dependent behavior of the drug.
  • The drug’s concentrations in different biological fluids namely serum (Cs), synovial fluid (Csf), and peritoneal fluid (Cpf) were measured.

Key Findings

  • The concentration of the drug at 15 mins following the i.v. injection was directly proportional to the dose. The higher the dose, the greater the concentration.
  • The peak concentration values in the serum post intramuscular injections were observed at about 1 hour after the injection. The concentration value was again directly proportional to the injected dose.
  • The half-life (t 1/2) of amikacin varied slightly across different doses with recorded times at 1.44, 1.57, and 1.14 hours for 4.4, 6.6, and 11.0 mg/kg doses respectively.
  • The study also determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of amikacin sulfate for six different pathogens. The MIC is the lowest concentration of a drug that prevents the visible growth of a bacterium.

Theoretical Implications

  • Beyond understanding the behavior of amikacin sulfate in horses’ bodies, this study helped determine optimal dosing schedules to maximize therapeutic effects.
  • By measuring the MIC and studying the pharmacokinetic parameters, the researchers were able to provide a suggested therapeutic dose. The regular treatment of amikacin should fall between 4.4 and 6.6 mg/kg given twice daily.
  • In case of serious, life-threatening infections, the dose could be increased and administered three times a day to combat the severity of the infection effectively.

Cite This Article

APA
Orsini JA, Soma LR, Rourke JE, Park M. (1985). Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in the horse following intravenous and intramuscular administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 8(2), 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1985.tb00944.x

Publication

ISSN: 0140-7783
NlmUniqueID: 7910920
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 8
Issue: 2
Pages: 194-201

Researcher Affiliations

Orsini, J A
    Soma, L R
      Rourke, J E
        Park, M

          MeSH Terms

          • Amikacin / administration & dosage
          • Amikacin / metabolism
          • Animals
          • Body Fluids / metabolism
          • Female
          • Horses / metabolism
          • Injections, Intramuscular / veterinary
          • Injections, Intravenous / veterinary
          • Kanamycin / analogs & derivatives
          • Kinetics
          • Male
          • Synovial Fluid / metabolism

          Citations

          This article has been cited 8 times.
          1. Pezzanite L, Chow L, Hendrickson D, Gustafson DL, Russell Moore A, Stoneback J, Griffenhagen GM, Piquini G, Phillips J, Lunghofer P, Dow S, Goodrich LR. Evaluation of Intra-Articular Amikacin Administration in an Equine Non-inflammatory Joint Model to Identify Effective Bactericidal Concentrations While Minimizing Cytotoxicity. Front Vet Sci 2021;8:676774.
            doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.676774pubmed: 34095281google scholar: lookup
          2. Pezzanite L, Chow L, Piquini G, Griffenhagen G, Ramirez D, Dow S, Goodrich L. Use of in vitro assays to identify antibiotics that are cytotoxic to normal equine chondrocytes and synovial cells. Equine Vet J 2021 May;53(3):579-589.
            doi: 10.1111/evj.13314pubmed: 32544273google scholar: lookup
          3. Endo Y, Tsuchiya T, Omura T, Nakai K, Korosue K, Ishimaru M, Ishikawa Y, Hobo S. Effects of pre-shipping marbofloxacin administration on fever and blood properties in healthy Thoroughbreds transported a long distance. J Vet Med Sci 2015 Jan;77(1):75-9.
            doi: 10.1292/jvms.14-0336pubmed: 25720808google scholar: lookup
          4. Wang Q, Kachelmeier A, Steyger PS. Competitive antagonism of fluorescent gentamicin uptake in the cochlea. Hear Res 2010 Sep 1;268(1-2):250-9.
            doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.06.008pubmed: 20561573google scholar: lookup
          5. Haritova A, Lashev L. Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in lactating sheep. Vet Res Commun 2004 Jul;28(5):429-35.
          6. Butt TD, Bailey JV, Dowling PM, Fretz PB. Comparison of 2 techniques for regional antibiotic delivery to the equine forelimb: intraosseous perfusion vs. intravenous perfusion. Can Vet J 2001 Aug;42(8):617-22.
            pubmed: 11519271
          7. Saini SP, Srivastava AK. The disposition kinetics, urinary excretion and dosage regimen of amikacin in cross-bred bovine calves. Vet Res Commun 1998 Jan;22(1):59-65.
            doi: 10.1023/a:1005987212046pubmed: 9541990google scholar: lookup
          8. Orsini JA, Park MI, Spencer PA. Tissue and serum concentrations of amikacin after intramuscular and intrauterine administration to mares in estrus. Can Vet J 1996 Mar;37(3):157-60.
            pubmed: 8681283